Jason Thor Hall / PirateSoftware / Maldavius Figtree / DarkSphere Creations / Maldavius / Thorwich / Witness X / @PotatoSec - Incompetent Furry Programmer, Blizzard Nepo Baby, Lies about almost every thing in his life, Industry Shill, Carried by his father, Hate boner against Ross Scott of Accursed Farms, False Flagger

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Which will happen first?

  • Jason Hall finishes developing his game

    Votes: 33 0.8%
  • YandereDev finishes developing his game

    Votes: 412 9.7%
  • Grummz finishes developing his game

    Votes: 117 2.7%
  • Chris Roberts finishes developing his game

    Votes: 143 3.3%
  • Cold fusion

    Votes: 1,638 38.4%
  • The inevitable heat death of the universe

    Votes: 1,926 45.1%

  • Total voters
    4,269
I have a small prediction that he is going to stage gayops to say someone crossed the line and try to revalidate himself.
and another post I also said
"I bet he is going to cut down the content for "the end of heartbound" to animus due to "all of the hate and deaththreats I got made it too hard to finish"
Which kind of happened with the ARG that was never coming out getting cancelled because we know he would have actually posted it anyways despite any amount of hate if he had done it because he thinks anything he makes is gold.

So we all know that the swatting attempt is fake and he's just trying to point blame away even more but something that I have been thinking about extensively today is that mald might be getting close to a genuine sperg out. We're going to see him soon just completely break down and lose his shit with the rate it's going and his proven inability to be wrong. I have a feeling that every time he reads this thread and we call him out for doubling down it just fuels the next doubling. This guy should really take up gambling and see what happens lmao.
 
Got curious about social blade stuff.

Twitch: Lost 32000 followers.
View attachment 7602425

Youtube: Lost a little over 98k followers.
View attachment 7602427

That's at least half a day's worth of signups on the SKG legislature.
6gRCnAr.gif
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.
 
Sorry if I'm late to this.
Firstly, congrats on the signatures! It was insane watching the petition practically skyrocket to a million in just 3 days and I really hope the petition is the start of better consumer practices in games.
That said, I would like to ask, just out of curiosity, what's the difference between this and some generic Change.org petition?
Is the EU government forced to look into it if it reaches the signature goal? Can they just glance at it and throw it away regardless of the signatures?
I know this is probably a stupid question but I'm just curious as to how this thing works.
 
That said, I would like to ask, just out of curiosity, what's the difference between this and some generic Change.org petition?
Is the EU government forced to look into it if it reaches the signature goal?

You answered your first question by asking the second; yes the ECI is bound by law to address the petition with industry, advocates, and neutral parties (the EU Commission).

From there they can dismiss it (very rare) or there will be some policy change (either minute or so large it affects the global industry, much like how Apple was compelled to adopt USB-C as a standard charging port for all its new hardware, which coincidentally was also brought about by an ECI).
 
Sorry if I'm late to this.
Firstly, congrats on the signatures! It was insane watching the petition practically skyrocket to a million in just 3 days and I really hope the petition is the start of better consumer practices in games.
That said, I would like to ask, just out of curiosity, what's the difference between this and some generic Change.org petition?
Is the EU government forced to look into it if it reaches the signature goal? Can they just glance at it and throw it away regardless of the signatures?
I know this is probably a stupid question but I'm just curious as to how this thing works.

You answered your first question by asking the second; yes the ECI is bound by law to address the petition with industry, advocates, and neutral parties (the EU Commission).

From there they can dismiss it (very rare) or there will be some policy change (either minute or so large it affects the global industry, much like how Apple was compelled to adopt USB-C as a standard charging port for all its new hardware, which coincidentally was also brought about by an ECI).
Beat me to it.

EU initiative has real legal weight and they are required to address and acknowledge it. What they do from there comes down to the legal process. There is still the chance we get nothing from this.

Change.org is not associated with the government, they're a non profit.

US did have something similar during the Obama years, but it got shutdown and was only associated with the White House, not Congress. We had one petition for building a Death Star and they actually responded with cost estimates for it. https://petitions.obamawhitehouse.a...nding-and-begin-construction-death-star-2016/
 
There is still the chance we get nothing from this.
At the very least we're going to get a real answer from these fucks.
"do we own shit we buy or not?"
even a nothing answer will show us what the future of games will hold.
a future of man made creations, with self imposed expiration dates.

even if this goes nowhere.
people fucking showed up.
not only because it was the right thing to do, but to spite a little bitch who did nothing.
 
Last edited:
"Video Games Europe" has made a response on SKG.
Basically the obvious "nuh-uh" that Ross had already predicted publishers would say.
Here's who they are, practically every publisher
yeah cool, tell that to the lawmakers with a chip on their shoulder against your faggoty practices.
they are afraid, CHEER ON LADS, FUCK THESE NIGGERS.
 
not sure if anyone mentioned this, but he once said that the local PD know of him, and know that people might try to "swat" him, and yet in the clip of him talking about getting swatted, he says "now the police know who i am"(pretty sure)

"THEY TRIED TO KILL ME ON TUESDAY!"

""I hope the government listens to you. and that they give you what you want. Instead of what you actually asked for. which probably isnt gonna happen"
He really cant stop playing victim.
 

Attachments

  • Life as a Streamer.mp4
    10 MB
US did have something similar during the Obama years, but it got shutdown and was only associated with the White House, not Congress. We had one petition for building a Death Star and they actually responded with cost estimates for it.
Couldn't help but notice something on that petition...
thunk.webp
 
Even if they blow it off we still got all the normalfags to collectively shit on Mald for being the nigger he is. That's still something at least
I mean consumer rights are important and all, but getting that mean cock sucker to blow his brains out is a much more satisfying reward. Yes Mald if you're reading this, I hope you kill yourself.
 
Yes Mald if you're reading this, I hope you kill yourself.
Nah, there's more fun down the suffering path. I want to see him continue to double and triple down on this spergout. I want to see him cancel Heartbound because the EU regulations are obviously too onerous for him to work around with his games, so they all gotta go. I want to see him try to be cool gamedev streamer when he's taken a hardline position that functionally forbids him from making games, and the endless salt that he'll be spewing because of it.

Its the least we deserve. The milk must flow.

Even if it did make sense, the law could be written to tackle that.
Don't even have to go that far, the idea of license clauses that isolate the software provider from the software users are extremely well proven in the court of law. If you release something freely that has an obvious and benign use, the law looks extremely leniently on you if someone uses it maliciously, especially if its being done so entirely outside of your own control, with no financial incentive. As long as they're not running the software instances, which is the entire point here, they're genuinely golden.

Existing law actually has plenty of protections for the publishers doing exactly what we want them to do, and its not even theoretically. Lots of games already drop free server software, from full corporate studios and publishers. Guarantee you that their lawyers aren't just sleeping on the job.
 
Back