Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 61 23.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 79 30.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 29 11.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 83 32.4%

  • Total voters
    256
all you had to do was ignore it
If Nick was capable of such a feat this thread would only be 100 pages, but fortunately for us he's got that dawg* in him.

*The dawg in question makes him never shut the fuck up and always choose the worst possible option in any given situation.
 
For some reason, that passed me by. I knew the judge was pissed because she was resetting the bail arrangements, but I hadn't noticed that she'd refused to accept the agreed on sentence.

Given that, if I'm Aaron I'm demanding a jury trial. Lets get the whole story out in front of a goddam jury and see what THEY make of the behaviour of Mr and Mrs Balldo and how damaged they are by the sending of a titty pic to a single person.

And I assume that would also allow Aaron to replace Judge Piggly-Wiggly and get somebody more reasonable and less hysterical on the case?
Ding
Ding
Ding

Discovery!!!!
Get those bodycams too.
Get all his/her/them DMs, texts, emails since the month b4 you left polycule until now.

SUbpoena google for specific-unique google search terms [i.e. terms NOT so generic that it comes back with sooo many searches that google is unable to produce a result cuz everybody searched for "Karen Read Trial" versus "hos long to die in the cold" searched on 1.28.22 and 1.29.22] during a specific short time period: the date, time, and IP address will show who searched what, in what location.

Crowdfund this evil fuck's lolsuits.

Or NOT do any of above.
Not my life.
I go scream into the closet, again.
ALL scenarios entertain.
 
Last edited:
I don't really think there is any doubt Nick was reading Aaron's emails. Aaron was also seemingly able to state in the HRO exact time periods.

Nick confirms he had access, but now wants to try and claim didn't use it. The browser history blows that away.

It matters not. It's all logged on Google's Servers. Every email, every login, every page accessed.

It wasn't just emails. There is a video out there of Aaron saying that the screenshots (incomplete page snips) Melton posted of his business proposal were legit, that he took the screen grabs and compared it to his proposal and the font and words and everything matched up with his pdf. That's beyond just reading email, that's in the realm of business interference or trade secrets, obtained via email or google docs.
 
Is Nick actually required to have some kind of job as part of his release conditions?
I think he does. Regardless, he can claim that doing his CLEs and being a househusband (lol) requires his time.

Side note: If we're going to have blue nanny states with feminazi judges, then why not go one step further and demand that Nick and Aaron Stay Off The Internet? (Yeah, I know. First Amendment, but we have the good of society to think of - lol.)

I endorse the creation of a Diddleverse subforum.
Wouldn't one of the requirements be that there is significant interest in doing so? I don't think there is. Last night, Keanu had nine - yes, nine - people watching her show 20 minutes in.

@John Andrews Stan seems to be the only person with the deep lore on the Dabbleverse, but I'd never inflict that thread (writing an OP or moderating) on anyone. Imholte's thread is already riddled with pink triangles despite the modding efforts to limit the retarded spergery.

The only problem I see with that is it presents the appearance that dabbleverse fans are welcome rather than being a containment zone.
They seem pretty happy over on Reddit's SteelToeBoringShow. Somehow they never get reported for doxxing or publicly organizing brigading campaigns - clearly against Reddit's TOS. I invite anyone to visit and lose a few brain cells when reading the comments. (Btw, Nick mentioned on Saturday that he's there, reading everything.)

Speaking of related communities, EDB is currently on Peter's (LawyerYouKnow) channel to discuss Read, Kohlberger, etc. Apparently, she's still willing to play in the LawTube sandbox. Behold these happy, healthy, competent streamers with 12K live viewers.
1751893799491.webp
 
Well, they both do involve a lot of skeletons, showers, and gas.


Is Nick actually required to have some kind of job as part of his release conditions? I think we all assume as much, but does the state care as long as there's income coming in somehow and the kids are fed?

I think he does. Regardless, he can claim that doing his CLEs and being a househusband (lol) requires his time.
Almost certainly he is required to have some kind of occupation. The PO can be flexible on what counts as an occupation and they will generally do this for wealthier people whom don't need to work. Of course, Nick is flat ass broke, so it doesn't apply.

They can allow you to stay in education, training, volunteering, charity work, etc.

The idea is it's about structure, accountability and rehabilitation. Someone with a schedule can be monitored and a schedule makes it less tempting to go on cocaine binges.
 
I kinda like the dabbleverse, even though it’s so very, very, gay. I don’t actually watch any of them, I just find the idea of a whole network of podcasts obsessing over stuttering John amusing.
The gayness comes not in the idea, but in the execution. Making fun of bad streams and podcasts is one thing, but turning into a cargo cult to Aaron Imholte?
 
This is being way over thought.

Nick admitted access and posted screens. Case closed.

Feds aren’t interested because why the fuck would they be? It’s a couple of Minnesota retards slap fighting, there are bigger fish.
Potentially. If it was only two Minnesotan retards and as you say admitted access and posted screenshot, case closed.

Supposedly Nick was sharing it far and wide and creating witness trails nationally. Timeline wise, by October the Feds will either charge or refer it back to the state prosecutor. Minnesota has a statute to cover it at a base level.

Nothing ever happens in the timeline people want, is more likely the best wording.
 
Feds aren’t interested because why the fuck would they be? It’s a couple of Minnesota retards slap fighting, there are bigger fish.
It's not beyond the realm of possibilities that Nick would start harboring illegal immigrants so he can feel like the god of his own gross little piglet sex cult. then maybe ICE and the FBI might pay attention. "OFFICER THESE 30 MEXICANS ARE MY NANNYS. GET OFF MY PROPERTY."
 
And the only way possible is if someone snitches, or something is discovered that could only have come from Aaron's personal Google account.
Didn’t they show off that application presentation Aaron made for some radio job? I could have sworn that it came up sometime ITT. If he has an affidavit from the station saying they didn’t leak it and he swears he didn’t leak it to MAPton then I would assume that’s pretty good proof Crackets has/had access to his drive or email?
 
Nick admitted access
as you say admitted access

Link? AFAICS the only thing even close was one time on Saturday and one time a few months back where he consistently only acknowledged the fact that the mere passive ability to access the account sat there lying dormant, by virtue of Aaron having foisted unwanted accessibility onto him by having logged in and not having logged out. This was still coupled with an explicit denial of having ever actually "used" that passive accessibility by actively clicking on Aaron's account so as to view anything at all, as opposed to just continuing to use Nick's own "default" account as normal. Or to put it another way, his usual wannabe-lawyer pilpul acknowledges only the non-crime of "access" as a noun but denies the crime that it would have been to "access" as a verb. Where is the clip of him admitting to the latter?


Nick... posted screens
as you say... posted screenshot

Even assuming for the sake of argument that those screenshots were not the obvious parody shoops that would perfectly explain the wholly unnecessary redaction of the google account logo in the upper right and would perfectly explain the browser history itself being too good to be true (speed-reading straight from KF page to KF page to cuck fetish porn in mere minutes - really, Aaron?), where's the clip or tweet of Nick having even so much as insinuated having personally screencapped them, as opposed to having been sent them by some random dabblenigger for the lulz?


It wasn't just emails. There is a video out there of Aaron saying that the screenshots (incomplete page snips) Melton posted of his business proposal were legit, that he took the screen grabs and compared it to his proposal and the font and words and everything matched up with his pdf. That's beyond just reading email, that's in the realm of business interference or trade secrets, obtained via email or google docs.

Great, and even though MAPton has since responded to Aaron's claim by proving that several of those "incomplete page snips" actually were not from that document, for the sake of argument let's assume that MAPton's statements elsewhere about having the document anyway weren't "just jokes" and assume that at least one or two of the "incomplete page snips" even were from the document.

Even then, where is the clip or tweet where anyone states that Nick's google access was the source in the first place, as opposed to any given random Leighton employee who thought Aaron enough of a joke to respond to his a-logs' emails by sending what Aaron claimed were only "physical copies" that could have simply been scanned with high enough DPI to look digital in an "incomplete page snip," or as opposed to April simply having sent to MAPton (or to MAPton through Nick) something that she had already obtained within her authorized scope of employment at Steel Toe Media Inc. at some point long before she was terminated? The latter is already the Balldoguard's "official story" that any prosecutor would be in the unenviable position of needing to disprove in April's perpetual silence:

  • Melton reaffirms that he still has the Leighton Broadcasting proposal, and it was April who sent him the file.
Timestamp: https://youtu.be/uQ1_Fjp8K9c?t=16304

Got it from April. Didn't hack. Still have it. April had it. Got it from April, hello? Not clamming up. Still have it. ... Got it from April, Never hacked.

Being that Aaron has already indicated that the involvement of the feds is not for purposes of a CFAA prosecution by DOJ and is instead to temporarily make use of their expertise to obtain more evidence for use in eventual prosecution by Stearns County if they move forward or by Kandiyohi County as a backup plan if Stearns takes a pass, it's that much less likely that a grand jury subpoena will be used to smash through any NDA that April likely signed and force her to say whether MAPton is lying in the above clip. Meanwhile any state-level LEOs' request to interview her will surely be met with her flipping them a middle finger sporting a new "Fifth Amendment" tattoo, and state prosecutors would have to commit to charges in the first place before acquiring the ability to compel her testimony at evidentiary hearings or trial, so unfortunately MAPton's "official story" still stands for the foreseeable future.

One very funny way to break this stalemate could be if whatever HRO lawyer Aaron retains (if any) actually has the balls to subpoena April's testimony at the July 15th hearing about this sourcing question that the HRO petition's unauthorized access allegations and Nick's denials of them have made squarely relevant to what Judge Pearson has to decide that day, but I'm guessing Aaron wouldn't want to poke that bear when there's only so much that direct examination and objections on cross could do to limit whatever other shit she might try to talk about that day. Just add that one to the growing list of this bungled HRO case's tragically wasted opportunities.
 
Last edited:
I feel like Nick’s main strategy both in court and in life is to throw so much bullshit in hopes that whoever is watching/ listening that they don’t catch him being a retard.

Aaron’s best bet is to just lay out a timeline with events and then do what anyone in a self-defense scenario should do cry and piss their pants and say they were afraid and that’s why they blasted the bad man with a 12ga 18 times. In this case defending his HRO.
 
it's that much less likely that a grand jury subpoena will be used to smash through any NDA that April likely signed and force her to say whether MAPton is lying in the above clip
NDA does not prohibit talking about a crime.
If April accessed Aaron's emails and forwarded it, then she committed the crime as well.

If predicted that they would try shifting the blame onto April months ago and they already did small attempts at it by insinuating that April might have known the passwords as far back as November? of 2024.

She is the perfect fall guy, she already admitted to doing the exact thing with Aaron's mobile phone records for the revenge porn case, which she should also no longer have had a right to access due to the divorce proceedings going on. Perfect patsy.
 
NDA does not prohibit talking about a crime.

Of course, which is great in theory, but in practice getting her to circumvent it would take compulsory process, which in a pre-indictment posture would only be available through A) a grand jury subpoena that won't be happening because the feds (according to Aaron) are only providing investigative resources for potential state prosecution and Minnesota doesn't require grand juries other than for capital offenses, or B) Aaron using the HRO hearing's brief window of opportunity for a civil subpoena. In a post-indictment posture there are more opportunities to subpoena her, but that presupposes that prosecutors would commit to charges without knowing in advance what she has to say, which is tantamount to a sanctionable fishing expedition unless the investigation already found enough to not even need her in the first place.

Barring those possibilities, all that state-level LEOs could do is politely request an interview and be unpolitely told to fuck off, since any NDA's exception allowing disclosure of a crime doesn't change the fact that, at least in Minnesota, there is no free-standing obligation to report a crime. Not only would she keep her yap shut to protect herself from any criminal exposure, moreover everything we know about her is enough to expect her slavish adherence to whatever "legal advice" she elicits from a certain unlicensed crackhead with a conflict of interest.

If April accessed Aaron's emails and forwarded it, then she committed the crime as well.

If that's how she got it, but MAPton only said that she sent it, without saying (or necessarily even knowing) how she got it. The possibility that she obtained it from the company's google drive while an employee or potentially even was emailed versions of it by Aaron for her input on the drafting process is still out there, and arguably a likely enough possibility that MAPton's naming her as the source, without more, shouldn't be enough for probable cause to get a warrant to explore how it made its way to her.
 
Back