US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[Judex Meus]

Wouldn't you be able to figure out who his clients were by reviewing the videos?

I read "client list" as the list of people Epstein kept personally in order for blackmail, not the list of clients the FBI deduced. I might be reading into it too much though.

 

[cantankerous jackalope]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? I could sort of get going for broke and saying anything to get elected, but why even bring it up after winning? Furthermore, why make it such a big deal and do that big binder PR thing a few months ago? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders (and if the tables were turned most of MAGA would probably do it too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted). What I just don't get from a PR perspective is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election? And why end the whole thing like this?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

 

[DrakosBiz]

Free my nigga Grok.

The mechanical slave turning on his master and shitting on his political party by calling it out as the Indian trojan horse it is made my day.

 

[make_it_so]

I find it interesting that Vivek's always received the brunt of racial vitriol, even compared to other Indians. Kash, Usha and Harmeet don't receive nearly as much hate as him. Is there a reason for that?

Probably because Vivek really gives off the skeezy politician vibes, while Kash and Harmeet are more of the get it done lawyer types. More importantly, Kash (until recently) and Harmeet aren't massive fuck ups.

 

[Suburban Bastard]

hahah hahah

IT’S ROBOT HITLER!

 

[Levitcus prime24]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders. Be honest, most of MAGA would probably too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted. What I just don't get from a PR move is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

Trump bombing Iran then negating a a ceasefire with them has got to be one of the most WTF moments in recent history, I mean it worked but still

 

[Dammit Mandrake!]

@grok who is on Epstein's list?

Making the @grok user was clever and I hope they don't ban you.

 

[The best and greatest]

Trump bombing Iran then negating a a ceasefire with them has got to be one of the most WTF moments in recent history, I mean it worked but still

So what country are you from/what physical disability do you have?

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

I read "client list" as the list of people Epstein kept personally in order for blackmail, not the list of clients the FBI deduced. I might be reading into it too much though.

I assumed the Epstein List was the redacted flight logs that were fought over in court for several years. Those definitely existed.

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? I could sort of get going for broke and saying anything to get elected, but why even bring it up after winning? Furthermore, why make it such a big deal and do that big binder PR thing a few months ago? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders (and if the tables were turned most of MAGA would probably do it too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted). What I just don't get from a PR perspective is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election? And why end the whole thing like this?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

Trump's handlers must be getting massive headaches knowing their latest puppet is kind of retarded.

 

[Rimanah]

Probably because Vivek really gives of the skeezy politician vibes, while Kash and Harmeet are more of the get it done lawyer types. More importantly, Kash (until recently) and Harmeet aren't massive fuck ups.

This. Never forget that Vivek funded AND defended Martin Shkreli, and said the DOJ should prosecute him for fraud since it’s a “victimless crime.” And his company pumped and dumped SIO gene therapies.
AND he claimed to be a “scientist” who “developed medicine,” when running for president, despite only holding a BA and JD, and only being an investor who’s company just bought other people’s patents that hadn’t yet been brought to market

Vivek is a sleeze ball who’d sell you up the river for a nickel. Him being a filthy pajeet only heightens the disgust, but it’s not the root issue. He’d be scum not matter his race.

 

[Puff]

Vivek is a sleeze ball who’d seek you up the river for a nickel. Him being a filthy pajeet only heightens the disgust, but it’s not the root issue. He’d be scum not matter his race.

No, he acts like scum BECAUSE he's Indian.

 

[The Secret Sauce]

I find it interesting that Vivek's always received the brunt of racial vitriol, even compared to other Indians. Kash, Usha and Harmeet don't receive nearly as much hate as him. Is there a reason for that?

IIRC, he was the catalyst for Elon's Christmas Day meltdown. He decided to shit on American sitcoms on Christmas Day apropos of nothing.

 

[The Big A]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? I could sort of get going for broke and saying anything to get elected, but why even bring it up after winning? Furthermore, why make it such a big deal and do that big binder PR thing a few months ago? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders (and if the tables were turned most of MAGA would probably do it too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted). What I just don't get from a PR perspective is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election? And why end the whole thing like this?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

Humiliation Ritual.

 

[gay porn is the best porn]

can someone actually explain what is wrong in this post besides the couple of typos? I take it that people are mad about me implying a support for China so they just shut down and negrate me

@Sneed Lurker I wanna hear your criticism come on

 

[SITHRAK!]

I'm beginning to believe that paedophilia is just so ingrained in the elites in the West it's the one topic they can all agree and come together on.

Footage of one’s self fucking a fourteen year old is the price of admission to places like Bohemian Grove, I’m sure. Prevents whistleblowers from going public, which is a preferable outcome to them dying in some unusual, public or noticeable way.
These globalist elites thrive best when not exposed for who they really are.

 

[cantankerous jackalope]

Humiliation Ritual.

Definitely crossed my mind too. Could just be exactly that - an incredibly poignant fuck you to the American people to gaslight and further demoralize them from the administration that's "saving their country" from globohomo. Although I secretly hope that my "dood he's just trying trying to lure in da bad guyz" copium comes true, all I really wanted to do is just point out that this blunt anti-climatic conclusion to the biggest conspiracy of our lifetimes definitely wasn't done by accident.

Also, friendly reminder that like 60 days after Epstein "died" a mysterious once in a century virus began to spread in Wuhan that shut the entire world down and everyone kind of forgot about Epstein in the mainstream until a few months ago.

 

[Dammit Mandrake!]

Not a big surprise but the Harvard Jew lawyer Alan Dershowitz is now openly backing Trump.

"I'm not a Republican by any means but I want the Democrats to lose. I am now an Independent officially and will do what I can to help defeat the Democrats in 2026"

This is only semi important because Dershowitz is a long time hard core Democrat supporter for the last 50 years and now he's throwing in for Trump. I would assume only as long as Trump keeps supporting Israel but it really shows whats most important to Jews.

TLDR: Big name Jew boy Harvard lawyer now supports Trump over his lefty comrades because Trump is pro-Israel and the Democrats are not. So much for his moral stance, being a Jew is more important that being a Democrat I guess....to no ones surprise.

To nobody's surprise because he has been a Trump supporter since the first impeachment.

 

[Tēzcatlīpohca]

What I just don't get from a PR perspective is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election? And why end the whole thing like this?

Red meat for the political base especial during an election cycle where your already running partially on the platform of "they are coming for your kids ". The people in PR must be hoping if enough trusted sources on the right parrot the same talking points people will believe them. Im surprise in the sense that it feels like they are trying to take that mentality as a whole and lock it away till its not a glaring hypocrisy. Especially since there totaly aren't plenty of other instances of the US Government involved in this shit ala The Finders cult , The Frankland Scandal, ect.
> Bro trust me the patriots are in control

 

[Puff]

Definitely crossed my mind too. Could just be exactly that - an incredibly poignant fuck you to the American people to gaslight and further demoralize them from the administration that's "saving their country" from globohomo. Although I secretly hope that my "dood he's just trying trying to lure in da bad guyz" copium comes true, all I really wanted to do is just point out that this blunt anti-climatic conclusion wasn't done by accident.

It's almost certainly that he's been told (either truthfully or a lie) that shit would get real really quickly if the people on the list were exposed.
That or everything got deleted already