At this point, when a man begins a sentence with "white women," we all know some insane moid degeneracy is sure to follow. The worst one by far, imo, is "white women fuck dogs," because it's just blatant projection in addition to the usual misogyny cloaked in "acceptable" racism.
It's undeniable at this point that almost all zoosadists are men, and when women do molest animals, it's nearly always to make porn content which is consumed, again, by men. But when a man posts photos of himself with his shitbull, you never see comments suggesting that he adopted the dog to molest it. The majority of shitbulls are owned and bred by nonwhite men, but nobody suggests they're doing it for sexual reasons (even though it's far more likely, based on their
breeding methods). Mikayla Raines' husband is
on film making sexual jokes about her foxes, but the responses are all "white women fuck canids" and not "why is her husband sexualizing the foxes, and why are her male OnlyFans subscribers paying to see it?" They can cherry pick examples of female animal abusers all day long, but the fact remains that when a list of zoosadists is posted, it's 99% male names, and the occasional female name is highly likely to be a troon.
It would be tit for tat to say that all men who make zoosadism jokes about white women are zoosadists, but I'm not even going to say that. I am saying that the reason the "joke" gets repeated so much is because it lets men pretend that they aren't the majority of animal abusers and the sole reason why animal abuse gets filmed.