Disaster Canada’s euthanasia regime is already killing the disabled. It’s about to get worse - Even the UN has described Canada’s assisted suicide program as ‘state-sponsored eugenics’ and called upon the government to curtail plans to expand euthanasia access.

Article Archive

backstories: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/killin...cheme-could-be-rolled-out-to-children.140100/ and https://kiwifarms.st/threads/disturbing-experts-troubled-by-canadas-euthanasia-laws.126985/ and https://kiwifarms.st/threads/canada-is-a-failed-state.105929/post-21329230

(LifeSiteNews) — In Canada, we kill the disabled. Over 90 percent of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome in the womb are aborted; pre-born children diagnosed with other disabilities usually meet the same fate. But for decades, our Nazi-style lethal ableism was limited to those not yet born.

With the expansion of euthanasia eligibility to those suffering solely from disability or mental illness scheduled to come into effect in 2027, that is slated to change. Disability groups have been nearly unanimous in their condemnation of this plan, which has been delayed twice by the Liberal government due to pushback from across Canadian society – but not cancelled entirely.

Even the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, examining Canada’s compliance with the U.N. Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities earlier this year, concluded that Canada was embarking on “state-sponsored eugenics” and called on the Canadian government to scrap these plans and roll back the expanding euthanasia regime. The disability rights group Inclusion Canada, as well as several others, had written to the body to sound the alarm about Canada’s euthanasia policies.

Canadians with physical disabilities have been attempting to get the government’s attention for years, with stories of those who seeking euthanasia because they cannot get the support or care they need periodically dominating international headlines. (This ugly reality is best encapsulated in a famous cartoon showing stairs leading to a healthcare provider, with the only wheelchair ramp leading to “euthanasia.”) These stories have not yet been heeded by the government.

A story recently posted to X by Samantha Smith, a victim advocate and survivor of the grooming and rape gangs in the U.K., highlights Canada’s grim slippery slope. It is worth reading in full:
A family member of mine is a nurse in Canada. They performed several assisted dying procedures at the care home they worked at, before refusing to continue. In one case, the family of a mentally disabled man decided they wanted him to be euthanised. He didn’t want to die. But my family member was legally forced to end his life. They held his hand while he told them “I’m hungry” and “I’m thirsty.”

That poor man didn’t understand what was happening to him as he was pumped full of medication that would end his life, and my family member wept for the soul that was being lost unnecessarily. He wasn’t terminally ill. He wasn’t particularly old. He wasn’t dying. He didn’t want to die. But he didn’t have a choice. Because his life was deemed dispensable by his family, and the Government gave them the power to end his life regardless of his needs or wishes.

And when my family member told their workplace that they couldn’t continue performing these procedures – that their conscience wouldn’t allow it – they were told that it was their “legal duty” as a nurse. They still refused. But not everyone will have the moral fibre or bravery of my family member.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and this is exactly what the Assisted Dying Bill opens the door to. It starts with “choice” and “dignity.” But suicide isn’t only done “when the patient wants it.” And the countries where it is already legalised have shown us the grim reality. In the Netherlands, 40% of euthanasia deaths occur without patient consent. In Canada, it has been offered to Paralympians who only asked for a mobility aid. If it can happen there; it will happen here. People will be killed against their will.

When asked for public corroboration, Smith stated: “No, my family member will not ‘go public.’ Yes, I trust his testimony. No, he is not a horrible, awful person. Yes, this is really happening. The black letter law vs. the grim reality are two very different things. Just because the law was supposed to protect against coercion or non-consenting procedures … doesn’t mean it is.”

I wish I didn’t believe her, but I do. I believe her because euthanasia providers have ended the lives of people like Alan Nichols, who was taken to the hospital by family members after a psychiatric episode and euthanized days later. I believe her because leaked documents show that Ontario’s euthanasia providers have tracked 428 cases of possible criminal violations without a single case being referred to law enforcement. I believe her because Canada’s medical establishment already embraces lethal ableism, and our government does too.

Canada is already killing those with disability or mental illness; thus far, euthanasia practitioners are forced to come up with other reasons for doing so (the written reason for Alan Nichols’ lethal injection was “hearing loss”). But once eligibility requirements are expanded in 2027, the floodgates will open. There is still time to stop this expansion, and we must doing everything we can to do so. The lives of people with disabilities depend on it.
 
Last edited:
I assumed it was that someone with something like power of attorney could make that decision for you.
That still usually only comes into play when you're unable to make and communicate medical decisions for yourself. I feel like there might be some information missing here.
 
There is absolutely no government I would trust with the power to decide when someone should die. If someone with a terminal illness wants to off themselves, fine, get a gun, line it up with your brain and pull the trigger. I won't condemn that decision, but the state being trusted with the power of life and death? (Moreso than it already is, I mean.) lol, no.
 
If you did an honest survey I think you'd find whites make up 80% of MAID.
99% of MAID users are white
I want the real stats, not guesses. I wouldn't be surprised if the government doesn't even collect that, but it could be inferred from analyzing the names if those were obtained.

I'll settle for Canadian street interviews showing jeets and other browns laughing at the idea of using MAID services.
 
How about YOU take care of the bag of organs and after five years of cleaning shit, struggling to feed and wasting most of your time on a lost cause you tell me your opinions on euthanasia?

It's the same with kids that have autism or any other mental disease, it will eat away at anyone. If it's doomed to be a potato that you have to take care of forever then what's the fucking point?
Yeah, its one of those things where the line is blurry. You have a person that will ruin the lives of everyone around them and be a constant drain on resources, time and willpower. Even if they don't do it on purpose, does it really make a difference?

Of course its obviously sad, but when you have a husk of a person that's turning eveyrone around them into husks as well, what are you supposed to do? Sacrifice everyone in their immediate periphery for what?

Thankfuly I don't have family like that but I do have friends that have family members that are mentally disabled, and I can tell they said family members, but I can also tell how said family members are just a drain on their soul.

I'm trying my best to not sound cruel because I do genuinely feel sorry for these people and if we could cure them or uplift them to a level where they could be independant that would be great, but when they will literally never be independant and always be a ward/drain on someone else while being unable to contribute...

Sometimes when nature deals you a shitty hand, you just have to fold.

Like, Idunno, god forbid, if I ever end up being a vegetable or even a potato or something I wouldn't want my family to suffer mentally and economically just for my sake. Especially having seen what that does to people.
 
Ok so I'm a little confused here. Was this man mentally or just physically disabled? Could he mentally make decisions for himself, or not? How did he "not know" what was going on? Either he doesn't have the mental capacity to make decisions on his own (Alzheimer's or retarded), or they just didn't tell him anything and pumped him full of drugs. If it's the latter that's not "assisted suicide", that's just murdering the elderly. How the fuck is "assisted suicide" without consent, therefore making it not suicide legal??
Is the story even real? "Yeah I heard from my mother's cousin's boyfriend that they killed this old guy in the hospital. He was just trying to watch Columbo reruns and the doctor chopped his head off with an axe." Conveniently, there's no legal way to dig through medical records to find out if it happened.

MAID is becoming the chud version of 'schewl shewtings, m8'.... highly annoying.
 
I want the real stats, not guesses. I wouldn't be surprised if the government doesn't even collect that, but it could be inferred from analyzing the names if those were obtained.

I'll settle for Canadian street interviews showing jeets and other browns laughing at the idea of using MAID services.
  • A total of 9,619 people of the 15,343 who received MAID responded to this question, the vast majority of whom (95.8%) identified as Caucasian (White). The second most commonly reported racial, ethnic or cultural identity was East Asian (1.8%). A small number (around 139) identified as First Nations, Métis, or both.
 
Even the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, examining Canada’s compliance with the U.N. Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities earlier this year, concluded that Canada was embarking on “state-sponsored eugenics” and called on the Canadian government to scrap these plans and roll back the expanding euthanasia regime. The disability rights group Inclusion Canada, as well as several others, had written to the body to sound the alarm about Canada’s euthanasia policies.
Why contain it? Let the bodies pile up in the schools and in the churches. In the end they'll beg the USA to save them.

(Yeah yeah, rainbows, but I couldn't resist.)
 
I don't have an issue with sensible eugenics. My only real issue is who exactly is dictating what is considered "good" or "bad".
Thats pretty much my stance.

Is eugenics a valid science?
Yes, we practice it in animals and crops all the time.

Would I trust the government with a eugenics plan?
Not in a million fucking years and even then I still wouldn't.

I don't like abortion but at the end of the day when you have a child that will never develop beyond a infant and will be a constant burden on the family and once the family dies out becomes a ward of the state in the horrible care we've seen the state provide, I can't fault a family for making the tough decision out of mercy. But it should be to the family though, not some faceless bureaucrat

edit: I'm waiting for the gay gene to finally be "discovered" only for a anti-homosexual charity group setup abortions for those who have it. Then to watch the "its a clump of cells" people tie themselves into knots explaining how gay babies shouldn't be aborted because life is precious.
 
So the State (with help from higher taxation, Tech and the Market) has been prolonging and protecting marginally functional lives that in the past families and communities would have gotten rid of in one way or another because their survival depended on it. Now that the family and the community have been nearly destroyed and/or rendered impotent by the State and the Market, and the Market is making it unaffordable for the State to be the guardian of last resort, I guess we’ve come full circle. Now the State is removing the undesirables for its survival with help from the Market (and its Tech!). With or without family input, as the case may be. And with a fine “individual rights” and “consent” white wash.

A grotesque and thoroughly modern predicament. That’s not going to be resolved anytime soon.
 
Euthanasia is always a slippery slope. The Nazis didn't start by herding Jews and political prisoners onto trains and gassing them in camps - They started by saying "Aww, look at these poor families, having to take care of these useless eaters. Look how grateful these families were after sending their tards to the glue factory!" The only reason Canada is doing this is to grease the skids for judicial murder. This is absolutely what they're going to do, and I predict we're going to see the mask-off version of this within ten years.
 
Alan Nichols' story has been mentioned on the Farms a few times before:

Alan Nichols, a 61-year-old British Columbian was hospitalised in 2019 over concerns he might be suicidal.

Despite asking his brother, Gary, to 'bust him out' as soon as possible, within a month he'd submitted a MAiD request.

He listed only one health condition — hearing loss — but it was enough and he was euthanised. His family and a nurse practitioner made an official complaint, saying he had clearly not met the MAiD criteria because he lacked the capacity to understand the process and wasn't suffering unbearably.

'Alan was basically put to death,' said brother Gary. Rod McNeill, 71, went to an Ontario hospital after a fall. A month later, he had been euthanised.

According to his daughter, Erin, the doctors responsible didn't even retrieve his medical records and killed him, albeit with his consent, for end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease — a condition that a post mortem showed he didn't have.
‘Disturbing’: Experts troubled by Canada’s euthanasia laws
By MARIA CHENG yesterday

TORONTO (AP) — Alan Nichols had a history of depression and other medical issues, but none were life-threatening. When the 61-year-old Canadian was hospitalized in June 2019 over fears he might be suicidal, he asked his brother to “bust him out” as soon as possible.

Within a month, Nichols submitted a request to be euthanized and he was killed, despite concerns raised by his family and a nurse practitioner.

His application for euthanasia listed only one health condition as the reason for his request to die: hearing loss.

Nichols’ family reported the case to police and health authorities, arguing that he lacked the capacity to understand the process and was not suffering unbearably — among the requirements for euthanasia. They say he was not taking needed medication, wasn’t using the cochlear implant that helped him hear, and that hospital staffers improperly helped him request euthanasia.

“Alan was basically put to death,” his brother Gary Nichols said.

Disability experts say the story is not unique in Canada, which arguably has the world’s most permissive euthanasia rules — allowing people with serious disabilities to choose to be killed in the absence of any other medical issue.
This man was actually hospitalized for his own protection, due to suicidal depression. When someone is committed for a suicide watch, that is enabled by the State- without that legal ability, the hospital would have to let you go. So the State confined this man for a psychiatric evaluation out of concern he would kill himself. Then, a short time later, the State murdered him under the justification that he asked to be murdered.
 
You have a person that will ruin the lives of everyone around them and be a constant drain on resources, time and willpower. Even if they don't do it on purpose, does it really make a difference?
Suicidal empathy dictates that the lives of everyone else is worthless compared to a single tard. Healthy children's lives should be annihilated to tend to a single autistic child. One negro should take precedence over 29 whites. It's a simple concept of harm maximization.
 
  • A total of 9,619 people of the 15,343 who received MAID responded to this question, the vast majority of whom (95.8%) identified as Caucasian (White). The second most commonly reported racial, ethnic or cultural identity was East Asian (1.8%). A small number (around 139) identified as First Nations, Métis, or both.
Well, that’s one way to do white genocide.
 
Simple, pay low IQ demographics to be voluntarily sterilized in exchange for money.

That way nobody is required to die.

Preventing low IQ people and criminals from having children would be a good thing.
We do it with animals, no reason why we can't do it for humans considering having a population of low IQ humans is worse than animals.
oh man, if only you knew.

Back in the olden days, and we're talking as late as the 80s, several provincial governments in Canada forcibly sterilized Low IQ/mentally disabled people, and also Indian (feather not dot) women. There was a whole fucking scandal about it, people got mad, especially human rights groups.

But I guess we shouldn't be surprised about what's going on now. Hell, Tommy Douglas, the head of the NDP back in the day, was a hardcore eugenicist.
 
Back