Disaster Canada’s euthanasia regime is already killing the disabled. It’s about to get worse - Even the UN has described Canada’s assisted suicide program as ‘state-sponsored eugenics’ and called upon the government to curtail plans to expand euthanasia access.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Article Archive

backstories: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/killin...cheme-could-be-rolled-out-to-children.140100/ and https://kiwifarms.st/threads/disturbing-experts-troubled-by-canadas-euthanasia-laws.126985/ and https://kiwifarms.st/threads/canada-is-a-failed-state.105929/post-21329230

(LifeSiteNews) — In Canada, we kill the disabled. Over 90 percent of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome in the womb are aborted; pre-born children diagnosed with other disabilities usually meet the same fate. But for decades, our Nazi-style lethal ableism was limited to those not yet born.

With the expansion of euthanasia eligibility to those suffering solely from disability or mental illness scheduled to come into effect in 2027, that is slated to change. Disability groups have been nearly unanimous in their condemnation of this plan, which has been delayed twice by the Liberal government due to pushback from across Canadian society – but not cancelled entirely.

Even the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, examining Canada’s compliance with the U.N. Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities earlier this year, concluded that Canada was embarking on “state-sponsored eugenics” and called on the Canadian government to scrap these plans and roll back the expanding euthanasia regime. The disability rights group Inclusion Canada, as well as several others, had written to the body to sound the alarm about Canada’s euthanasia policies.

Canadians with physical disabilities have been attempting to get the government’s attention for years, with stories of those who seeking euthanasia because they cannot get the support or care they need periodically dominating international headlines. (This ugly reality is best encapsulated in a famous cartoon showing stairs leading to a healthcare provider, with the only wheelchair ramp leading to “euthanasia.”) These stories have not yet been heeded by the government.

A story recently posted to X by Samantha Smith, a victim advocate and survivor of the grooming and rape gangs in the U.K., highlights Canada’s grim slippery slope. It is worth reading in full:
A family member of mine is a nurse in Canada. They performed several assisted dying procedures at the care home they worked at, before refusing to continue. In one case, the family of a mentally disabled man decided they wanted him to be euthanised. He didn’t want to die. But my family member was legally forced to end his life. They held his hand while he told them “I’m hungry” and “I’m thirsty.”

That poor man didn’t understand what was happening to him as he was pumped full of medication that would end his life, and my family member wept for the soul that was being lost unnecessarily. He wasn’t terminally ill. He wasn’t particularly old. He wasn’t dying. He didn’t want to die. But he didn’t have a choice. Because his life was deemed dispensable by his family, and the Government gave them the power to end his life regardless of his needs or wishes.

And when my family member told their workplace that they couldn’t continue performing these procedures – that their conscience wouldn’t allow it – they were told that it was their “legal duty” as a nurse. They still refused. But not everyone will have the moral fibre or bravery of my family member.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and this is exactly what the Assisted Dying Bill opens the door to. It starts with “choice” and “dignity.” But suicide isn’t only done “when the patient wants it.” And the countries where it is already legalised have shown us the grim reality. In the Netherlands, 40% of euthanasia deaths occur without patient consent. In Canada, it has been offered to Paralympians who only asked for a mobility aid. If it can happen there; it will happen here. People will be killed against their will.

When asked for public corroboration, Smith stated: “No, my family member will not ‘go public.’ Yes, I trust his testimony. No, he is not a horrible, awful person. Yes, this is really happening. The black letter law vs. the grim reality are two very different things. Just because the law was supposed to protect against coercion or non-consenting procedures … doesn’t mean it is.”

I wish I didn’t believe her, but I do. I believe her because euthanasia providers have ended the lives of people like Alan Nichols, who was taken to the hospital by family members after a psychiatric episode and euthanized days later. I believe her because leaked documents show that Ontario’s euthanasia providers have tracked 428 cases of possible criminal violations without a single case being referred to law enforcement. I believe her because Canada’s medical establishment already embraces lethal ableism, and our government does too.

Canada is already killing those with disability or mental illness; thus far, euthanasia practitioners are forced to come up with other reasons for doing so (the written reason for Alan Nichols’ lethal injection was “hearing loss”). But once eligibility requirements are expanded in 2027, the floodgates will open. There is still time to stop this expansion, and we must doing everything we can to do so. The lives of people with disabilities depend on it.
 
Last edited:
Despite being a christian, I've always held a sympathetic and complex understanding of suicides. But what is going on in Canada, transparently killing off whites who, despite being of the nation and paying into it, are highly wounded or fucked in the head. If you did an honest survey I think you'd find whites make up 80% of MAID.

Great replacement in action. Bothers me a lot as I have family in that country. One of them already has kids with a Chinese bitch who ran off to china. She only came back because China sucks even more than canada.
 
See this is why they're pushing for infinite brown importation: Look at India. Look at the Caribbean. These people aren't the beneficiaries of the Enlightenment, no matter how fervently you're told they are. They're not "just like us, but brown". They don't value human life. So you see a lot of Caribbean and Indian types moving in to low-level health care. At some juncture something's going to click for the white doctors and nurses: "Hey, I'm just out here murdering people." That...off switch, that morality circuitry is either diminished or doesn't exist in the brains of the people they're importing.
 
I know I should be upset about this, but I guess I kinda see the argument behind eugenics.
Down’s kids get singled out because a) there’s an easily physiognomic element and b) the Nazis targeted them specifically, but you’re looking at less than 10% of people with Down’s never developing past the point where they can at least live in a group home in .1% of the population (making .0001% a total burden). Contrast with autism where up to 30% are extremely low functioning from a demographic that’s around 3% of the population (making .09% of the population). Frankly, autism is the bigger drain.

But it’s all barbarism, the human genome has hit too many bottlenecks already to assume eugenics can improve anything.
 
I've been saying this from the start.
We're living in the prequel to Soylent Green.
Soon, when the numbers of suicided people gets big enough, they will start turning them into tax funded food rations that you will get every month.

You can laugh at this comment but get ready for this to happen within the next 20 years.
 
I don't have an issue with sensible eugenics. My only real issue is who exactly is dictating what is considered "good" or "bad". I always believed in a "reactive" form of eugenics where we just sterilize people who are currently a problem or become a problem to society, and not pre-emptively do it. Yes some of you say that kinda defeats the point, but I don't really trust governmental powers dictating who does or doesn't have children, assuming said human being isn't already retarded, or a net drain on society. My line of thinking is more so snipping the balls off of the violent criminals in prison who are set to be released soon, rapists, and so on.

That poor man didn’t understand what was happening to him as he was pumped full of medication that would end his life, and my family member wept for the soul that was being lost unnecessarily. He wasn’t terminally ill. He wasn’t particularly old. He wasn’t dying. He didn’t want to die. But he didn’t have a choice. Because his life was deemed dispensable by his family, and the Government gave them the power to end his life regardless of his needs or wishes.

Ok so I'm a little confused here. Was this man mentally or just physically disabled? Could he mentally make decisions for himself, or not? How did he "not know" what was going on? Either he doesn't have the mental capacity to make decisions on his own (Alzheimer's or retarded), or they just didn't tell him anything and pumped him full of drugs. If it's the latter that's not "assisted suicide", that's just murdering the elderly. How the fuck is "assisted suicide" without consent, therefore making it not suicide legal??
 
f it's the latter that's not "assisted suicide", that's just murdering the elderly. How the fuck is "assisted suicide" without consent, therefore making it not suicide legal??
The family voted for the liberals so they're allowed to spray a little proverbial glyphosate on their autistic spud.
 
Ok so I'm a little confused here. Was this man mentally or just physically disabled? Could he mentally make decisions for himself, or not? How did he "not know" what was going on? Either he doesn't have the mental capacity to make decisions on his own (Alzheimer's or retarded), or they just didn't tell him anything and pumped him full of drugs. If it's the latter that's not "assisted suicide", that's just murdering the elderly. How the fuck is "assisted suicide" without consent, therefore making it not suicide legal??
I assumed it was that someone with something like power of attorney could make that decision for you.
 
In Canada, we kill the disabled. Over 90 percent of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome in the womb are aborted; pre-born children diagnosed with other disabilities usually meet the same fate. But for decades, our Nazi-style lethal ableism was limited to those not yet born.
Dealing with tards and people with extreme disabilities is a nightmare and wouldn't wish that on anybody. Whenever a news story pops up about a monstrous family that kind of let their veggie kid die, I can't help but not blame them. reminds me of those twins with microencephalia, legit nothing going on inside, and then there was the poor kid brother who basically lost his life and parents. He probably felt some measure of relief when the twin tings finally expired.
I think I read another article by this news outlet before, they seems to be planed on the retarded side of Christianity. I remember they were claiming that now medical euthanasia was the xth leading cause of death in Canada, and cited the Canadian gov healthcare for it, but I checked it myself, and since the UN doesn't have a code for medical euthanasia yet, neither does Canada, so I couldn't find where all these euthanasia cases were at, and the top xth positions were distinct diseases that couldn't be conflated with euthanasia.

I do believe its not a good thing solely cause this is Canadian government and they are most likely trying to do evil, but I don't trust this sensationalist outlet with accurate reporting in it.
 
Anyone who is citing the extreme cases in this thread to justify it are falling for the psy-op. That’s what they want you to believe. That’s how they got the law passed in the first place a decade ago. As Canada continues to circle the drain, as the cost of living rises and more and more people end up on the fringes of society. They’ll soon expand it to include depressed people and who the fuck wouldn’t be depressed looking at the future? They want to remove all the undesirables in this country and replace them with cheap foreigners who are happy with living off the scraps because it’s still better than the shit hole they came from.
 
Back