Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.2%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.1%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 68 10.1%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    670
Alright law type people.....question to yall please....

Aaron has mentioned in both HROs about the unauthorized access. Will this be addressed at the hearing? Seems like it would be and Nick would have to respond that it is not true and Aaron could respond with the criminal complaint/evidence information. Or maybe even add it to the MENDES(or whatever it is) system and make them exhibits.
 
Alright law type people.....question to yall please....

Aaron has mentioned in both HROs about the unauthorized access. Will this be addressed at the hearing? Seems like it would be and Nick would have to respond that it is not true and Aaron could respond with the criminal complaint/evidence information. Or maybe even add it to the MENDES(or whatever it is) system and make them exhibits.
It's all up in the air. HROs are civil actions, not criminal. However, a violation of an HRO can result in criminal charges, not just contempt. The burden of proof is “preponderance of the evidence,” meaning the petitioner must show it's more likely than not that harassment occurred.

Can Aaron successfully argue that it’s likely Nick Rekieta illegally accessed his email account? Probably. Under the HRO standard, he doesn’t need to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. If he can present circumstantial evidence suggesting access or attempts to access, such as unusual logins or references to private emails, the court might find that sufficient. Nick would not be required to prove a negative, but he would need to raise reasonable doubt or offer a plausible alternative explanation.

If the CFAA allegations are entirely false, is it also plausible that Nick and Melton fabricated or exaggerated them to cause emotional distress? Yes. The court can consider a pattern of targeted behavior, including false accusations, doxing, or humiliation, as harassment under Minnesota law.

The HRO against Melton appears stronger. He's fucked with Aaron for years, digging up or fabricating documents intended to cause distress, making sexualized comments about Aaron’s child, and broadcasting intimate photos of Aaron and his private correspondence to an online audience. Even if no actual hacking occurred, the intent to humiliate or emotionally harm Aaron is central to HRO claims.

Aaron may also benefit from a kind of home court advantage. Minnesota’s privacy and anti-harassment statutes could support his argument that the respondents’ actions go beyond criticism and constitute targeted digital harassment. Claims of chilling free speech will likely fall flat if the speech involves illegally obtaining / fabricated confidential data, sexual remarks about children, or repeated personal attacks designed to provoke a breakdown.

I only ask that Aaron hasn't half-assed this. He needs to sit down and carefully record, timestamp and lay out everything. These cites for @elb and @Third World Aristocrat might pass the smell test for ex parte TRO, but if he wants the HRO to stick, he needs direct sources / mirrors. Timestamps from original content (or from CogCity lmao)
Aaron is their bread and butter, both Nick and Melton aren't fucking around.
 
Last edited:
Its all up in the air. HROs are civil action, not criminal (until a respondent breaches it, then it becomes contempt). The burden of proof is “preponderance of the evidence".

Can Aaron successfully argue that it was likely that Nick Rekieta illegally accessed his email account? I'd say yes. Nick would have to come up with compelling evidence to the contrary.

I think the HRO against Melton is the far stronger of the two. He's been fucking with Aaron for years, inventing documents to upset him, making sexual comments about his child, broadcasting photos of him in bed to a room of people. Even if the hacking stories are false, the intent was to cause considerable distress, its still a valid form of action against him.
There's no point in only HROing Melton then having him use Rekieta as some sort of faggot proxy to continue harassing Aaron. This way it looks like any and all bases are covered, a surprisingly sensible approach to take.
 
And these faggots thought doing this stream was a good idea for the future of their boss Pedolton?
I mean, the cope and overall laughs they provide for US here is great! Keep it up!
lol, lmao even.

Toast these guys cuckpope junkie, this is your ingroup now!
🥃:really:
Nick clearly being associated with Melton who's blatantly stalking and harassing Aaron and his family might wind up losing the HRO dismissal
 
Nick's locals being a white trash sex party and sycophantic echo chamber combo was really eye opening and seemed to greatly accelerate his downfall. It make me wonder how bad his discord was. There were always rumors it was "degenerate" but seemed at the time to just be standard anime coomerism.

The DISCORD was edgy anime coomer discourse with N-words, F-slurs, and slapfight drama. The porn was contained to one channel (mostly), but there were vore, gore, and other things posted in other channels that got people put in time-out and had to be swept. People took these hijinks too seriously, but I think the drama was intensified by the presence of more 'normal' people in the server. There used to be a lovely cooking chat there.

From what I've gathered, TUGSIMP is the anti-Himedall.

Which is to say, like Himedall, she's apparently female and British, but... unlike Himedall... is just really stupid.

Probably a chav or Welsh. I always wanted a nemesis.

1752265807257.webp

I wonder if Melton's iraqi child molester employee Moody doing this is too indirect to be "indirect contact"

Apparently testimony from Keanu that Aaron told her to talk about Kayla on the STMS episodes that she hosted while he was on holiday was enough. If we get proof MAPton gave instructions to Moody...

Do they think this is a smart move? It just makes the whole thing look like coordinated harassment. Also, can Aaron find out who's actually paying the lawyer's bill? I'm betting that it's Rekieta paying Paedo's share. Which would look to me like hard evidence of collusion and coordination in harassment.

I believe that Nick and Melton are counting on the court being lazy and not plumbing the depths of internet lore on the animus between them.

I do wonder, however, if there is a potential conflict of interest if White represents both of them, and they have to option to shift blame toward the other one... This could be an ethical conundrum where White will underserve both his clients....
 
There is absolutely no way Aaron will win this. He is an openly racist, openly womanizing public figure.
He had a news worthy event happen in his life and it was reported to those that may care. Along with visits to locations Aaron advertises on his show. None of this is illegal or even pushing a boundary.
It’s like Kim Kardashian saying Vogue is STALKING HER! They talk about her kids negatively and wait for her outside restaurants she’s at. Where is her HRO?
Reddit's that way faggot.
 
Probably a chav or Welsh. I always wanted a nemesis.
Worse, she's a middle aged Brummie.
I scoped her out for another phonebooking ala GriftyIRL, but she's less retarded about giving every life detail, just generic stories about clubbing in the 90's. UK data laws are more annoying to work with when trying to discover census data, etc so I gave up (for now).
 
Nick clearly being associated with Melton who's blatantly stalking and harassing Aaron and his family might wind up losing the HRO dismissal
Nick fighting the HRO by himself I would put at roughly even odds. Nick is obviously been fucking with Aaron for the past year, but Aaron has been clearly trying to use his previous connection to the Rekietas to try and generate interest for this STMS.

But Melton? That guy has been a disgusting pest for years, and has said things even Nick is smart enough not to say. Assuming the court isn't being retarded that day (not a given, as Minnesota can't even get Nick to pay a traffic ticket), Melton should get smacked down hard with HRO.

Nick being co-defendants with Melton is only going to make Nick look guilty of harassment when they play the clip of Melton talking about cup holders and Nick shipping the cuck fridge across state lines.

Once the HRO hearing happens, Nitrous Nick and PedoMelt are going to rip each other's throats out.
 
I do wonder, however, if there is a potential conflict of interest if White represents both of them, and they have to option to shift blame toward the other one... This could be an ethical conundrum where White will underserve both his clients
I wondered the same question, one of them could make an off-hand comment that compromises the defence of the other. Nick is known for speaking over his counsel.
 
I believe that Nick and Melton are counting on the court being lazy and not plumbing the depths of internet lore on the animus between them.
That's why Nick and Kayla watched STMS constantly and made everything they could into a police report

If Aaron's smart he'll do the same because it worked

The court doesn't know STMS/NLO lore but that also means the concept of an entire show dedicated to making fun of Aaron would be foreign and abhorrent to them.
 
Last edited:
Back