US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considering all evidence we do actually have (such as victim testimonies) points to Trump having nothing to do with Epstein's dirty work, I think at this point its most likely some sort of blackmail/threat situation. Trump and his team very well likely wanted to at least release something, but either all the evidence was destroyed, or there are threats being made from greater forces. Or it really is true that it is so society-shattering as to who is involved that it led second thoughts as to revealing it (although imo this is kinda bullshit).
This is my opinion as well. The only scenario that makes sense is that the Epstein thing was going to be another point for Trump but everything that could have been there got destroyed. The response from Trump only makes sense from a "we can't admit our profound government incompetence so we can only show you what was left" point of view, so they're trying to sweep it under the rug.
 
So you have 10,000 videos, a lot of which likely have people engaging in lewd acts with children.

Why don't you get the spreadsheet you ABSOLUTELY HAVE of the names of the people in those videos, which you ABSOLUTELY FUCKING HAVE, and release that?

It's not a list. Fine. I understand. I'll take "Epstein Video Subjects 1.csv" instead as a consolation prize.

Do it on a Friday so we can get some really good kill cam shots and suicide notes in by Monday, please.
They could you know, find any frame where there's not CSAM material of the "10,000" videos and snapshot an offenders face or what ever too. I think Pam Bondi is literally fucking retarded and her mouth runs a mile per minute writing checks she can't cash.

If what she's said is infact bullshit, this is entirely on Trump and co not tard wrangling her.
 
Very sane takes for someone who defends Stalin. I guess even broken clocks can be on point.
You thought I was defending Stalin? No, my point was that the mismanagement of the nations agriculture which caused the holodomor wasn't uncommon for Russia in the early 20th century, and that I wouldn't surprised if a similar event happened if the whites won. Stalin was still a full on dumbass in that regard.
 
Last edited:
You thought I was defending Stalin? No, my point was that the mismanagement of the nations agriculture which caused the holodomor wasn't uncommon for Russia in the early 20th century, and that I wouldn't surprised if a similar event happened if the whites won. Stalin was still a full on dumbass.
Fair point, Russia was a shithole even today and most bigger commie countries are notoriously mishandled or just won't work due to the geography and other factors like butter spread too thin.
 
You're an actual fucking retard if you don't think the DNC was doing the same shit.
And who controls all branches of the Federal government at this moment?

Screaming "But they do it toooooooo!" doesn't work. President Trump isn't in control of what the Democrats do. He IS, however, accountable for what he, and his appointees, do.

A lot of bad decisions have been made since the binder debacle. Given every opportunity to make better decisions, President Trump and his appointees have chosen not to. Now we all get to live with the consequences.
 
And who controls all branches of the Federal government at this moment?

Screaming "But they do it toooooooo!" doesn't work. President Trump isn't in control of the the Democrats do. He IS, however, accountable for what he, and his appointees, do.

A lot of bad decisions have been made since the binder debacle. Given every opportunity to make better decisions, President Trump and his appointees have chose not to. Now we all get to live with the consequences.
That wasn't his point, fatpacks is a DNC shill and all the weeb was doing is pointing out that his (side) is of the same leviathan.
 
And who controls all branches of the Federal government at this moment?

Screaming "But they do it toooooooo!" doesn't work. President Trump isn't in control of the the Democrats do. He IS, however, accountable for what he, and his appointees, do.

A lot of bad decisions have been made since the binder debacle. Given every opportunity to make better decisions, President Trump and his appointees have chose not to. Now we all get to live with the consequences.
Sounds like the government is the underlying issue coupled with Trump's ego.
 
Sounds like Democracy might not be America's best system outcome. If we were still artistocratic republic of states and had our pcokets filled with blood and gold beaten from those faggy Natives and if my South side maintained the slave economy the union raped and collapsed, we'd be faring way better.

Reminder that Alex Haley, author of Roots went on record to admit "I was just trying to create a myth for my people."
Slavery was morally bad, sure, but do you want moral grayness with a dogshit economy instead?
 
And who controls all branches of the Federal government at this moment?

Screaming "But they do it toooooooo!" doesn't work. President Trump isn't in control of what the Democrats do. He IS, however, accountable for what he, and his appointees, do.

A lot of bad decisions have been made since the binder debacle. Given every opportunity to make better decisions, President Trump and his appointees have chose not to. Now we all get to live with the consequences.
What fatpacks was saying implicates that only the GOP is gonna known for covering for pedophiles, this is completely false. It's why my statement was something to the effect of "they do it too." because they do and that's what they'll be known for as well.
 
Late to the party here, but this gave me the big thinky and I needed to respond.

If Iran does some type of nuclear test then they WILL no longer be a target of Israel or the US unless they're pushed to an extreme degree.

Full disclosure: my biases (beyond America-first policy), trend against Israel and toward autistic hyperfixation on Persianate language and culture. I'm actually reluctantly agreeing with the US/Israeli rationale.

If this were 2005, Iran would be in a much better position to retaliate if it were Bush dropping the bombs and not Trump. Sadly, this is the end result of 20+ years of increasingly severe sanctions coupled with Ali Khameini and the IRGC squandering what little remains of Iran's resource wealth and international prestige on funding proxy wars against the Saudis. I don't doubt that Iran will try, some way or some how, to acquire nuclear weapons. But certainly not for the foreseeable future (i.e. the next 20 years).

Smuggling nuclear shit ain't a fool's game like hiding bricks of coke in the back of a COSCO shipping container full of actual B2B orders. The impact of regulatory scrutiny combined with digital tracking systems linking back to national or even international databases cannot be understated. You know why the USA actually 420k of bunker buster bombs in Iran after literal decades of scaremongering by Israel that previously amounted to nothing? It's because, this time, the boy who cried wolf was right and could present tangible proof of material movement and enrichment beyond civilian needs.

TMI here, but this is a core reason for why I'm reluctantly accepting the bombing: the world of (civilian) international logistics is highly digitised, tariff schedules are programmed into standardised computer systems (i.e. the USA's Automated Commercial Environment). The customs clearance process, to distill it down to the simplest "how," is basically "I read this invoice, I read this packing list. I key in values into computer system. I talk to customer, get clarification on all the shit I need before I plug in all the values and hit "send." Then I wait X amount of time, I get 1 of two messages: oi you're in the clear *or* oi ya fooked up somewhere, fix it or I'll tell on you! Slow down there bucko, I think we need the FDA, no wait USDA, no wait Fish & Wildlife! No wait, my mistake, you didn't fook up m8. I apologise. Now get yer shit outta there before you rack up more storage fees."

This is all to say that the process is digitised to a point of discerning origin, destination, seller, buyer, extremely granular commodity codes, total value, the list goes on and on. That granular commodity code is the lynchpin of the system because repair parts for lithography machines is categorised something like "machinery -> manufacturing -> semiconductors -> lithography -> optical etching instrument" Or some variation thereof, I'm still trying to wrap my head around the way HTS works but I digress. The reason why I brought all of that up is that the logistics process for nuclear is way more regulated and involves far more interaction with supervisory and governing agencies from. Beyond the level of intense scrutiny average civilian business-to-business transactions already face. I don't know the specifics, but intuition leads me to believe that Iran tripped a digitised bell somewhere along the process, in a way that Israel could ostensibly prove several ways to sunshine, and this was the inscrutable proof that the USA needed to actually get off its ass and whack Iran with the big stick... 420,000 times in the most targeted manner possible.

I'm still grappling with this rationalisation because it makes a creepy amount of sense and the ramifications on an international geopolitical level are... well, it's enough to give me pause for thought.

It's like with north korea, the US tried to intimidate them and so they got a nuclear program going and started doing nuclear testing (under the control of China).

Whoa there. You call yourself a socialist, yet you slander Juche and Mao Tse-tung Thought with your fallacious accusations?

a) To be clear, Kim il-sung started the war in the first place. Nevertheless, the USA slaughtered the North in the Korean War. No exaggeration or hyperbole. There is almost nothing in the North that wasn't flattened to the ground in carpet bombings. Korean monuments, temples, historical sites, cultural landmarks, all that shit was completely flattened. It's literally impossible for the USA to truly intimidate North Korea because they already endured some of the worst punishment the USA could throw at it. South Korean historiography in the postwar period glosses over this detail because the USA's actively bankrolling the South Korean security apparatus.

b) The armistice agreement laid the framework for no nuclear arms on the peninsula, with the implied obligation on the USA to not park its nukes in South Korea and point them at the North. The USA reneged on this, North Korea objected, and the USA said "tough tits faggot. I'm gonna point the nuclear death gun at your face from across the street until 1991, and there ain't nothing you can do about it. Bear in mind: the Korean War is Kim Il-sung's fault, the North was gonna engulf the South, and the solution was to... completely fucking destroy the North to a point where China's scared and they step in because their ass is at risk too? And point nukes at it within proverbial walking distance during a time where they were recovering from the aftermath of total war? There's rubbing your nose in it, and then there's smashing your face into the concrete over and over again until the muscle tissue is gone and all that's left is bone.

c) China never wanted North Korea to have nukes. It's one of the few things the USA and China can agree on. China benefits from North Korea being an impoverished buffer state with the Kims being their client regime to hold the line. If North Korea got nukes, even with Chinese approval, that would immediately invite US attention and potential intervention. That's why Kim Jong-il's missile tests in the 2000s had China joining in on the sanctions. Yeah, yeah: China helps North Korea officially and unofficially anyway and actively evades sanctions until flare-up points like in 2018 where they had to dial it back. Point is: Kim regime has a chip on their shoulder about being China's bitch, and nukes don't just make the USA quiver in their boots.

Pakistan did this preemptively and also because of their own buildup against India.

1752510254121.webp
 
A lot of bad decisions have been made since the binder debacle. Given every opportunity to make better decisions, President Trump and his appointees have chose not to. Now we all get to live with the consequences.
But what materially changes with the non-release of the nontent nothingburger of the client list? Nothing. We've had six years to draw the worst conclusions about the Epstein case, which I did once he died in prison.

The people who say "Bondi didn't release the list, Trump's on it!" are the same people who said "If they don't release it, Trump must be on it" before the election but then voted for him. They still voted for someone for whom they were open to being deeply associated with Epstein.

And even then, the Epstein issue wasn't a primary point of the campaign. It wasn't even secondary. It was tertiary at best. Epstein lived on mostly as a meme. Anyone saying "I elected him based on Epstein and this whole thing is a failure to make good on promises" is exaggerating to the point of lying.

The whole rigamarole about it now is weird. It's disappointing, but nothing ultimately has changed. People are taking a mistake in messaging by appointees and blowing it up to something bigger than it is. Anyone unwilling to Trust the Plan anymore isn't going to make it and probably was never going to make it, simple as. Let me know when ICE starts blackbagging brown people from overseas and dumps them into rural America with $5,000 and a candy bar in their pocket and I'll start dooming.
 
I am way more interested in Ghislaine Maxwell supposedly having a client list and offering to publish it. Could be bullshit and Maxwell trying to get attention, but that sounds more potentially productive (or at least interesting) than speculating for days about the same old report.

Well she has nothing to lose at this point (besides her life but she’s gonna die in prison anyway) so I hope she does have some juicy deets to spill.
 
The Gulag system was pretty shitty, it wasn't all that bad in regards to the number of people that were ever in it though; it's all time high of like over 2 million was in 1942 or 1943 so obviously most of those people were German POWs. Another system that was pretty shitty was the internal exile system since it was also a means of trying to make places like Central Asia and Siberia more Russian both in numbers and culturally. Overall the worst thing you could actually point to as being a bad thing during the Stalin era would be the Holodomor but even then, a famine happening isn't gonna be all that uncommon for a place like Russia in the early 20th century and it likely would've been way worse had Russia been controlled by the whites.
“holodomor” never happened tho.

Don’t get me wrong, there WAS a famine in the 1930’ies. It wasn’t caused, but was partly exacerbated by political decisions. That it was some kind of special punishment for Ukrainians or only happened in Ukraine is absolute, ahistorical nonsense. The famine affected other parts of the USSR, including Siberia just as bad as it did Ukraine.

As for gulags, it’s true that the numbers were never as high as anti communists later made them out to be.

And fuck, gulags are a great idea. Imagine if we had them in America, and sent the administrative class there for reeducation through work. “You spent the last decade in the State Department, creating LGBTQ friendly HR materials? That’s great… But for the foreseeable future, you’re going to do actually useful stuff. Like breaking rocks into smaller rocks and pebbles and use those pebbles to build a road!”
I mean, here's the agenda 47 platform, you can clearly see where Epstein is on there:
View attachment 7641621

Hmm yes. So he just talked about releasing them and promised to get to the bottom of it, but he didn’t DOUBLE PINKY PROMISE to release them, I got ya!

(Btw… How about them promises “not cutting SE and Medicaid” and of “restoring peace in Europe and the Middle East lmao! Guess that was before bombing Iran and BBB making cuts in SS and Medicaid!)
The Epstein stuff was never a major promise of Trump's presidential campaign.
Goddamn man, this is embarrassing.

Some of y’all remind me of, and sound just like Democrats last year when they pretended that Biden totally wasn’t senile and in fact was sharp as a tack.

“Nooooo stalker child! When Trump said he’ll get to the bottom of it and release the Epstein files, he didn’t ACTUALLY mean he’ll get to the bottom and release them!”

And yesterday Trump suggested that it was all just a “Democrat psyop”. Looool.

Honest question: How in the fuck can you defend this shit and still look yourself in the mirror the next day? Not talking about “Welp, at least he’s not Kamala” but actually defend it?
 
Honest question: How in the fuck can you defend this shit and still look yourself in the mirror the next day? Not talking about “Welp, at least he’s not Kamala” but actually defend it?
I didn't vote for Trump because I wanted the Epstein files. I voted for Trump because fuck the Democrats. It's very simple. You're the UK-born Canadian rambling about Epstein.
 
Back