- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 2:
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Without Cree's livestream there wouldn't be a lawsuit, and therefore there wouldn't be a victory. One cannot make gold out of shit, afterall. So, cheer up, and celebrate instead of glooming.Look I'm glad Stabby got crushed yet again by the Justice system but I don't like that the furry's and the Owl Fucker are crowing like they had something to do with it.
I went through the effort of cutting down this 3 and a half hour livestream into only 30 minutes. If you wanted to watch it, but don't like the side tangents, then enjoy:Part 1:
Part 2:
Fine I will watch people enjoying Acerthorn's loss againI went through the effort of cutting down this 3 and a half hour livestream into only 30 minutes. If you wanted to watch it, but don't like the side tangents, then enjoy:
C'mon judge, that was uncalled for.
I'd argue being a youtuber is the most reject, but I suppose the judge is old fashioned and doesn't think it's a real job.
I get what the court is trying to do here, and in a normal case with normal participants it would probably work. However Stabby has made it abundantly clear in his filings he's not a normal participant he's the most belligerent assburger I've seen in a while and he's not going to compromise or give up anything willingly.Also contains one of the mostparagraphs I've seen in a court order recently.
The funny thing is he'd probably be better off getting a loan from the mob to be rid of Stabby rather than deal with him any more.loan to pay if off
But the whole point of this line of discussion is the court did tell him to upload them to the location the clerk provided so they could be reviewed and not disappear during the case.
I missed seeing this in the earlier post of this document, or maybe the court just added it:
View attachment 7615085
Conference on the 15th for this motion. Should be open to the public, but as usual don't record the court, unless you're Stabby who rules don't apply to.
Here it is on the Judge's calendar.
View attachment 7615104
Should be the "Public" hearing link here, I think.
David, I wish the court responded much faster to your bullshit. If we could just speed up the process and banish you to a remote island to have you fend for yourself now instead of in 30 years, that would be great
To take it a step further. Let's say I license a song for use in my video. Then someone does a commentary video on my video allegedly in violation of copyright. Can that third party who I licensed the song from now go after the alleged infringer as well?This shouldn’t trigger any kind of violation but copyright law is a murky mess.