Argue with a group of retards with too much time on their hands over whether masturbation to porn disqualifies you from having political opinions

[CatharticShitHead]

You're not making a real argument, you're just ranting with personal hate. Having a kink or being cringe online doesn't automatically discredit someone's political ideas. If that's your standard, most politicians wouldn't qualify

I made the argument. You're just choosing to ignore it, faggot. This is my issue with faggots like you who are edubrained politiposters. You keep asking for someone to make an argument, to explain themselves and blah blah blah but when you're supplied with a response that is meeting your criteria, you pull some shit out of your ass and act like no one's actually made a point against you.

It's not "personal hate", it's disgust. Card's weirdo behavior disgusts me, but it also entertains me to see someone like him exist. He deadass calls shlop shlop shlop, famous 4chan meme about dogs drinking water, a dogwhistle. Your hard on for defending him makes you look more fucking stupid than the people YOU seemingly hate like Useful Mistake.

Card didn't even tripcode in those NSFW posts, and even if he had, it still wouldn't invalidate his political views.

still didn't follow gooner opsec now did he?

 

[Wodanaz]

Digging up old NSFW posts from an anonymous imageboard to attack someone's current political work is still a weak move, regardless of how weird you think they are.

If Card's current ideas or behavior are harmful, then criticize those directly not a /soc/ post from 2023 that has zero relevance to his political views today.

People can change, but even if they don’t, context matters. Posting something anonymously in a space made for NSFW content isn’t the same as being a public hypocrite. He’s not out here telling everyone on his YouTube channel that he loves being humiliated in private

"Card is a weirdo now. he's a weirdo then, so it's valid to use his old NSFW posts to discredit his current political work, because it proves he's a hypocrite or can’t be trusted"

listen bro it's okay if you gave him money, just don't fall for the same mistake twice

 

[slungus22]

I made the argument. You're just choosing to ignore it, faggot. This is my issue with faggots like you who are edubrained politiposters. You keep asking for someone to make an argument, to explain themselves and blah blah blah but when you're supplied with a response that is meeting your criteria, you pull some shit out of your ass and act like no one's actually made a point against you.

It's not "personal hate", it's disgust. Card's weirdo behavior disgusts me, but it also entertains me to see someone like him exist. He deadass calls shlop shlop shlop, famous 4chan meme about dogs drinking water, a dogwhistle. Your hard on for defending him makes you look more fucking stupid than the people YOU seemingly hate like Useful Mistake.


still didn't follow gooner opsec now did he?

when you realize 'disgust' isnt the argument

 

[NoodleFucker3000]

Being a sodomite disqualifies you from having a respectable political opinion.

Absolutely this.

Also, so does being a massive hypocrite and a,fag who can't wash a cup or brush his hair or get a job.

 

[CatharticShitHead]

when you realize 'disgust' isnt the argument
View attachment 7646212

whatever you say Card Orbiter.

 

[Paul-Denton]

when you realize 'disgust' isnt the argument

You seem to have some form of naive ideal of how public perception of character affects public perception of ideals. Optics are very real even in the wacky political climate we find ourselves in, and bad optics have the power to negatively impact every serious opinion you have in the future. Ironically, your favorite up and coming pundit seems to agree with me on this

 

[Beavis’ Moms Boyfriend#6]

when you realize 'disgust' isnt the argument

Don’t hurt yourself carrying so much water. Remember to wear a back brace.

 

[slungus22]

You seem to have some form of naive ideal of how public perception of character affects public perception of ideals. Optics are very real even in the wacky political climate we find ourselves in, and bad optics have the power to negatively impact every serious opinion you have in the future. Ironically, your favorite up and coming pundit seems to agree with me on this
View attachment 7646246

no one's denying that optics matter, they obviously do. but there's a difference between bad optics that reflect actual hypocrisy and "bad optics" based on kink-shaming

having a 0consensual adult kink doesn't make someone unfit to speak on political issues. it only becomes "bad optics" if people insist on dragging private, irrelevant stuff into the spotlight

 

[Lowlife Adventures]

having a 0consensual adult kink doesn't make someone unfit to speak on political issues. it only becomes "bad optics" if people insist on dragging private, irrelevant stuff into the spotlight

Why are you interpreting laughing at a retard for doing retarded things as serious political critique?

 

[Lvkester Endorser]

Because he is a queer who wears his mother's underwear and jerks it to lolis, too.

 

[slungus22]

Why are you interpreting laughing at a retard for doing retarded things as serious political critique?

because taking hard arguments are fun and i like card as a person

 

[CatharticShitHead]

no one's denying that optics matter, they obviously do. but there's a difference between bad optics that reflect actual hypocrisy and "bad optics" based on kink-shaming

having a 0consensual adult kink doesn't make someone unfit to speak on political issues. it only becomes "bad optics" if people insist on dragging private, irrelevant stuff into the spotlight

a "consensual adult kink" does indeed make certain people unfit to speak on certain issues, retard. I wouldn't trust the local tranny chasing politician to understand why the average man doesn't want a bearded she/her in the bathroom with his daughter. Nor would I trust him to make responsible decisions regarding transgender political hot button topics like whether or not children should be allowed to transition.

Going back to the whole point about Card, I wouldn't trust Card's balding bone collecting ass with any issues regarding capitalism and its consequences. He's already proven to be a hypocrite a la the autistic spergout about self sufficiency, but owning 800 steam games. Hating Jason Thor Hall but showing off that his political mindset is a mishmash of "I'm okay with living in the pod and not owning shit" and "we should all be heckin anarchists and act away from the government by not having bank accounts!"

Where you seem to keep having a hangup is the kink posts so let me try to reiterate this in even a way a person like you can understand.

If person want not be laughed at, still with me? If person want not be laughed at, they not do things people can make fun of! It's not just the kink posts or whatever. It's a combination of all his documented sperg behaviors that make him and his positions able to be so easily disregarded as worthless wannabe pseudo intellectual nonsense. My whole argument is that his weirdo behavior, kink or not, is something that should be pointed at when discussing whether or not we should point and laugh at him. It's a valid contributing factor, the fact that you can't see this proves you're a dipshit moron.

 

[slungus22]

a "consensual adult kink" does indeed make certain people unfit to speak on certain issues, retard. I wouldn't trust the local tranny chasing politician to understand why the average man doesn't want a bearded she/her in the bathroom with his daughter. Nor would I trust him to make responsible decisions regarding transgender political hot button topics like whether or not children should be allowed to transition.

Going back to the whole point about Card, I wouldn't trust Card's balding bone collecting ass with any issues regarding capitalism and its consequences. He's already proven to be a hypocrite ala the autistic spergout about self sufficiency, but owning 800 steam games. Hating Jason Thor Hall but showing off that his political mindset is a mishmash of "I'm okay with living in the pod and not owning shit" and "we should all be heckin anarchists and act away from the government by not having bank accounts!"

Where you seem to keep having a hangup is the kink posts so let me try to reiterate this in even a way a person like you can understand.

If person want not be laughed at, still with me? If person want not be laughed at, they not do things people can make fun of! It's not just the kink posts or whatever. It's a combination of all his documented sperg behaviors that make him and his positions able to be so easily disregarded as worthless wannabe pseudo intellectual nonsense. My whole argument is that his weirdo behavior, kink or not, is something that should be pointed at when discussing whether or not we should point and laugh at him. It's a valid contributing factor, the fact that you can't see this proves you're a dipshit moron

if you don't trust someone on trans issues debate their arguments not their personal life or fetishes, same goes with card and capitalism

obsessing over private kinks or hobbies is a cheap character assassination. if his politics are weak, prove it with facts and logic instead of resorting to ridicule

public discourse shouldn't be about who's easiest to mock. critique ideas, not personal quirks or behaviors that dont actually impact those ideas

 

[Paul-Denton]

because taking hard arguments are fun and i like card as a person

I "like" lolcows too. Everyone here likes society's rejects in some form or capacity or you wouldn't spend your time here. That don't mean you gotta take a losing argument, not even a hard one. I hope Ralph lives to see 90 but do I listen to any word he says on politics? (this being said when was the last time ralph could form a thought long enough to be taken as a political opinion)

 

[slungus22]

I "like" lolcows too. Everyone here likes society's rejects in some form or capacity or you wouldn't spend your time here. That don't mean you gotta take a losing argument, not even a hard one. I hope Ralph lives to see 90 but do I listen to any word he says on politics? (this being said when was the last time ralph could form a thought long enough to be taken as a political opinion)

just because someone's a "reject" doesn't mean their political ideas are automatically wrong, also cardposting is not a "lolcow"

 

[Paul-Denton]

facts and logic

I now think all of this was bait. it's been funny dude

 

[slungus22]

View attachment 7646306
I now think all of this was bait. it's been funny dude

not the popular opinion = bait

rightoids... so dumb...

 

[Mutley]

no one's denying that optics matter, they obviously do. but there's a difference between bad optics that reflect actual hypocrisy and "bad optics" based on kink-shaming

Thats the thing about card, he has bad optics that actually reflect his hypocrisy

For example:
Claims he can easily make $1000.00 per day and has taught people how to do it (he even made a video explaining how), yet is grifting on GoFundMe to help him 'make ends meet.'
Claims you should not be a slave to capitalism and the institute of banks, and if de-banking hurts you, its self-inflicted because you should be self-sufficient, yet he is obviously not self-sufficient and is reliant on the institute of banks to make money via monetizing his channel, Patreon, and GoFundMe.

In reality, i dont believe his intent on coming to the farms had anything to do with understanding how the farms works. You can see that by his complete lack of interactions, either in this thread or the PirateSoftware thread. It was solely to try and grift his channel, either by people here subscribing or using 'KiwiFarms' as a form of 'clout chasing' to bring people to his channel.

 

[slungus22]

Claims he can easily make $1000.00 per day and has taught people how to do it (he even made a video explaining how), yet is grifting on GoFundMe to help him 'make ends meet.'

setting up a gofundme to make "make ends meet" doesn't automatically mean he's grifting. he was upfront that the gofundme was a joke and never claimed youtube bankrupted him, unlike ian danskin [1] [2]

Claims you should not be a slave to capitalism and the institute of banks, and if de-banking hurts you, its self-inflicted because you should be self-sufficient, yet he is obviously not self-sufficient and is reliant on the institute of banks to make money via monetizing his channel, Patreon, and GoFundMe.

relying on existing systems while advocating for self-sufficiency isn't automatically hypocrisy, it's hard to completely opt out of capitalism overnight, especially when those systems are deeply embedded in daily life.

 

[Paul-Denton]

relying on existing systems while advocating for self-sufficiency isn't automatically hypocrisy, it's hard to completely opt out of capitalism overnight, especially when those systems are deeply embedded in daily life.

This would be a fine point to make if the man you're guntguarding didn't take up multiple posts claiming that he would rather do 'everything' himself than 'curry favor'. People said the same thing and gave the same reasons, which were summarily rebuked by card. gofundme doesn't have to be a grift for it not to be doing everything by himself.