Law Woke Justice at Its Most Horrifying — the Ahmaud Arbery Case - Retrospective on the original jogger case.

Woke Justice at Its Most Horrifying — the Ahmaud Arbery Case​

The McMichaels, accused of murdering Arbery, were unlucky enough to have entered the portal of woke justice when BLM was in its ascendancy.


Arbery.jpg
Raw video: Ahmaud Arbery shooting in Georgia (WSB-TV/Youtube)

by Jack Cashill
February 15, 2025, 10:30 PM

“Ahmaud Arbery was murdered,” said Judge Timothy Walmsley with the solemnity befitting the Chatham County Superior Court in Brunswick, Georgia.

“A resident of Glynn County, a graduate of Brunswick High, a son, a brother, a young man with dreams was gunned down in this community,” Walmsley continued. “As we understand it, he left his home apparently to go for a run and he ended up running for his life.”

Although both men were veterans with unblemished records, each was charged with felony murder and denied bond.

So saying, Walmsley summed up what the jury was allowed to know about Arbery, 25, at the time of his February 2020 death in the coastal community of Satilla Shores, Georgia. Either out of fear or ambition or some combination of the two, Walmsley had grossly misrepresented the reality of Arbery’s troubled life and death to justify the draconian sentences he was about to hand down to the men who “murdered” him — Greg McMichael, then 64, his son Travis, 34, and their neighbor Roddie Bryan, 50 .

Unknown to the jurors, America was entering its 10th year in the era of woke justice, an all but unremarked break from the leftist past. Historically, to highlight racial injustice, real or imagined, leftists had made a practice of romanticizing the guilty — Sacco and Vanzetti, Leonard Peltier, Mumia Abu-Jamal etc. — and proclaiming their innocence.

The 2012 arrest of George Zimmerman for the shooting death of Trayvon Martin signaled a dark turn in American history. With the tacit support of Barack Obama’s Department of Justice, activists now felt free to frame innocent citizens and proclaim their guilt. Mob-dictated and media-driven, woke justice would indict the not guilty, almost all of them white, in case after case for the next decade and more.

The year 2020 would see a major escalation in the woke reign of judicial terror. Appropriately perhaps, the troubles for Travis McMichael, a Coast Guard veteran turned escort boat pilot, began on January 1 of that fateful year.

“I need a police officer. I need to report a stolen pistol,” he told the 911 dispatcher late that morning. Living with his parents after breaking up with his son’s mother, Travis had left the door of his truck unlocked for less than an hour in the driveway of his family’s humble suburban home.

As was admitted in court, the neighborhood was “on edge.” Other residents of Satilla Shores had been calling 911 to report break-ins and suspicious behavior. Among the callers was Travis’s father Greg McMichael, a U.S. Navy veteran and retired chief investigator for the Glynn County district attorney’s office.

“We got a lot of break-ins in this area out here, automobile break-ins,” he calmly told a supervisor. He and Travis had discovered a “shady looking fellow” living under a nearby bridge. “We just wanted to make someone aware there was someone living under there,” he told the dispatcher.

On February 11, 2020, at 7:27 p.m., a nervous Travis called 911 for a second time. “We’ve got a string of burglaries in the neighborhood, and I just caught a guy running into a house being built,” he said. The house, in question, was just two doors down from his own.

When asked what the man looked like, Travis described him as “a black male, red shirt, white shorts.” Upon seeing Travis in his truck, the man reached into his pocket, “acting like he was armed.” With the police on the way, Travis wanted them to be “mindful of that.”

The parallels to the 2012 Zimmerman case in neighboring Florida are stunning. A neighborhood watch captain in a crime-ridden community, Zimmerman called the dispatcher from his truck upon seeing Martin lurking in the shadows. Martin, too, feigned having a gun. Zimmerman also identified Martin as black only after being asked to describe him. In each case, that identification would be used to suggest racist intent.

As Travis sat in his truck across from the house awaiting the police, he was startled to see the man use a flashlight to navigate through the house. Travis, now joined by other neighbors, stayed on the line. “About four of us over here now,” he told the dispatcher. By the time police showed up, the man was gone.

Unknown to the jurors, other relevant people had called 911 to report on Arbery’s troubled behavior. These included Arbery’s own mother who confessed to being frightened of her own son. Much like Trayvon Martin, Arbery was caught in a downward emotional spiral that, in this case, turned a “young man with dreams” into a pathological thief and chronic troublemaker.

In December 2018, Arbery was diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder. He claimed to have had hallucinations that instructed him to hurt people. In March 2019, he told his probation officer he wasn’t taking the prescribed meds because they upset his stomach. No one appeared to have followed up. In the final months of his life, Arbery engaged in reckless, obsessive shoplifting and, when caught, proved capable of resisting forcefully.

The jury heard none of this. In his pretrial rulings, Walmsley barred any testimony about Arbery’s “bad acts,” observing that the “character of the victim is neither relevant nor admissible in a murder trial.” Citing medical privacy, he ruled out Arbery’s mental health records as well. True to form, Walmsley did allow photos of the Confederate flag emblem on Travis’s truck.

At the outset of his sentencing lecture, Judge Walmsley chose to engage in some “theatrics.” For one minute, he said nothing. He wanted the court to absorb just for a moment the angst of Arbery’s last five minutes. Upon reflection, said a somber Walmsley, “My thoughts kept coming back to the terror that must have been in the mind of the young man running through Satilla Shores.”

Based on the audio and video evidence and Arbery’s history, if anything ran through Arbery’s mind it was rage. Much like Trayvon Martin, anger appears to have driven him — anger at anyone representing authority, from his mother to the store clerks who restrained him to the frustrated Satilla Shores neighbors trying to protect their community. Just as the reckless Martin attacked Zimmerman, Arbery even more recklessly, suicidally even, would attack Travis McMichael.

At 1:08 p.m. on the fateful Sunday, February 23, 2020, Satilla Shores neighbor Matthew Albenze called 911 to alert the police to “a black guy, white t-shirt” rummaging through a house under construction. Albenze added, “And he’s been caught on camera a bunch at night. It’s kind of an ongoing thing.” Albenze was correct. Security camera videos captured Arbery entering the unfinished house five times between October 2019 and February 2020, including on that very day.

Working in his driveway, Greg saw this same black guy run by. He called out to Travis and said, “The guy is running down the street; let’s go.” The two climbed into Travis’s F-150, Travis behind the wheel, Greg initially in the passenger seat wedged in against his grandson’s car seat.

When the McMichaels pulled up parallel to the jogging Arbery, Greg yelled out to him, “Hey, buddy, we just want to talk to you. The police are on the way.” This was one of several attempts the McMichaels made to reason with him during this five-minute sequence.

For his part, Arbery just stared at the McMichaels blankly and then ran in the opposite direction. Upon learning of Arbery’s Schizoaffective Disorder, that look made sense to the father and son.

Without being asked, neighbor Roddie Bryan joined in the pursuit in his own truck. At one point, Arbery reached out and tried to open Bryan’s door, leaving a mark on the vehicle. Having moved to the truck bed to ease his recently replaced hip, Greg saw the encounter from a distance.

Travis stopped the vehicle to give Greg his cell phone to call 911. Now, Arbery was running toward their truck. Bryan, following behind Arbery, recorded the critical sequence on his cell phone while driving.

The viewer first sees Arbery from a distance running, his pace almost casual. Alarmed by Arbery’s earlier behavior, Travis had dismounted from the truck and was standing by the open left front door with a shotgun at his side. A boarding officer during his time in the Coast Guard, Travis was well trained in its use.

Greg, standing in the truck bed, holds the phone up against his ear with one hand, his revolver in the other hand. ”I’m out here at Satilla Shores,” Greg told the dispatcher. “There’s a black male running down the street.” When asked where at Satilla Shore, Greg replied: “I don’t know what street we’re on,” then shouted at Arbery, “Stop! … Watch that. Stop, damn it! Stop!” He then dropped the phone.

Approaching the truck from the rear, Arbery had seen Travis on the left side and headed around the right. For reasons unknown, Arbery chose not to escape into an unfenced green space on his right. Instead, he abruptly turned left at the front of the truck, headed towards Travis at full speed, and grabbed the barrel of his shotgun.

Caught off guard, Travis found himself engaged in a life and death struggle for the gun. One shot went off in front of the truck, and a second was fired after the men moved out of frame.

When the two moved back into view, both were still holding on to the barrel of the gun. At this point, Arbery let go of the gun with one hand to punch Travis in the head, the fifth or so time he struck him. Now, the third shot was fired. All three shots had hit Arbery, the last shot fatally.

As with the Zimmerman case, local authorities ruled the homicide justifiable, citing in this case Georgia’s citizen arrest law. In both cases, under mounting pressure from national media and various race hustlers, the state attorney general’s office — Republican in each case — took control of the case away from the locals.

On May 7, 2020, within 36 hours of taking over the case, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation swooped down on the McMichaels’ home. With some 20 heavily armed officers backing him, and several news crews capturing his every move, GBI Agent Richard Dial arrested Greg and Travis and led them away in handcuffs while Travis’s 3-year-old son looked on in horror.

Although both men were veterans with unblemished records, each was charged with felony murder and denied bond. The one advantage George Zimmerman had is that Black Lives Matter did not exist until the day after his July 2013 acquittal. When the McMichaels entered the portal of woke justice, BLM was in its ascendancy. The timing could not have been worse. The McMichaels faced their preliminary hearing on June 4, 2020, nine days and $2 billion worth of damage after George Floyd’s death. By this time, even GOP worthies were taking the knee.

At the hearing the McMichaels learned that on his fourth interview with the authorities, Roddie Bryan, likely hoping to avoid punishment, remembered that Travis had said “fucking nigger” over the dying Arbery. Testifying for the State, the GBI’s Dial repeated those words in the televised hearing. Now, all hope was truly lost for the McMichaels.

In the show trial that began in November 2021, just months after Derek Chauvin’s trial ended in Minneapolis, prosecutors chose not to enter Travis’s alleged racial slur into evidence. They knew the McMichaels could prove Travis did not say it. The 911 dispatcher was still on the line when Travis allegedly used the slur. Prosecutors settled on “asshole” instead. In a curious parallel, the media insisted George Zimmerman had called Trayvon Martin a “coon.” Prosecutors in that case settled on “thug.”

Before handing down the sentence, the pious Walmsley offered the court a bromide so counter to common sense it is worthy of disbarment. “Assuming the worst in others we show our worst character,” said the judge. “Assuming the best in others is always the best action.”

If Walmsley even half-believed what he said, how did he possibly justify sentencing the McMichaels, father and son, to life without parole. Bryan got life as well. His cooperation earned him a “with parole,” woke justice at its most merciless.

J’accuse!

 
The complete (purposeful?) failure of local law enforcement is the real villain of the story.

Arbery was out on parole, was serial reoffending and not taking his schizo meds. Lazy fucking parole officer ignores it. Arbery commits a series of petty crimes in the same neighborhood. Local law enforcement doesn't feel like driving out to the boonies, tells the neighborhood to fend for themselves. Arbery gets caught trespassing for the 5000th time, chase ensues, shit hits fan, Arbery is dead, neighborhood people get thrown under the bus.

If law enforcement did their fucking job, none of this happens. I mean, Arbery would still end up dead eventually, but by overdose or getting shot by one of his fellow crime enjoyers instead of being sainted by media & NGO scum.
 
I remember when this happened, retards were asserting to me that this meant white rednecks would start forming lynching crews and hanging blacks while shouting the south will rise again. Instead we just got years of uppity negroes demanding increasing levels of gibsmedat and racism. Can we try the other way now?
 
This whole pretrial thing where lawyers and judges get to strike and remove potentially relevant evidence from the record and withhold it from the jury, what exactly is the reason all that exists again? This stuff has always done more harm than good in my eyes. Would it be so bad if this whole aspect of the legal process was erased?
On the contrary the prosecution got five years of phone records on all three men and played selective games on what the jury got to see. To the jury, this literally was an innocent black man minding his own business and three evil white supremacists just lived out their fantasy of killing a nigger.

This whole case was beyond disgusting, the Charlottesville riot cases were literally the only thing I have seen in recent times play out worse and more openly corrupt.
 
And you don't actually give a shit about them. You did not develop enough of a sentimental bond to these random yahoos that you're actually emotionally distraught over their incarceration. You're just an outrage junkie upset that I'm ruining your dopamine fix by pointing out everyone involved got what they deserved: the consequence of their own actions.
Its called precedents retard, those of us who followed this clown show of a case know you now have to contend with the possibility of this verdict any time you have to confront a nigger chimping out. I don't give a fuck if everybody in this case deserved to die, the activists involved fucked all of us.

Shoot, shovel, shut up. That's unironically safer then the justice system now days because of the very fucking case we are talking about.
 
You do realize what that word means, right? There's a reason people distinguish between 'brandishing' a firearm and 'aiming' a firearm. Brandishing just means they have a weapon in their hand. They haven't raised it, they haven't aimed it at anyone and they haven't pulled the trigger, they merely have it on them without trying to conceal it. Possession of a firearm is not a crime, nor does it justify an assault.
That is absolutely not what that word means.

Anybody have definitive answers on these questions;

1. I keep hearing he had Timbs and/or jeans on, but pictures of his body and images of the video seem to corroborate running shoes and shorts.
2. Did he actually have a hammer on him during the struggle or was one found nearby later?
3. Beyond the unlikelihood, is there any evidence he 100% wasn't jogging, such as him taking a bus there?
 
2. Did he actually have a hammer on him during the struggle or was one found nearby later?
He was charging at him, hammer in hand.
3. Beyond the unlikelihood, is there any evidence he 100% wasn't jogging, such as him taking a bus there?
Imagine being a Black guy who lives in a Black neighborhood, and you're thinking of going out for a jog for exercise. Let's assume in this alternate scenario, that you are 100% innocent and this is not just an excuse to break into people's houses.
Would you
A: jog in your own neighborhood where your house is and you can immediately go home when you're done?
B: Travel across the city to a completely different, White neighborhood where people are suspicious of you because there's been a lot of burglaries there, and it'll take an hour to get back home when you're done?
Any reasonable person is going to pick option A. Arbery picked option B, which is a clear sign that this isn't an innocent workout at all and he just wanted some defenseless and wealthy targets to steal from.
 
That is absolutely not what that word means.

Anybody have definitive answers on these questions;

1. I keep hearing he had Timbs and/or jeans on, but pictures of his body and images of the video seem to corroborate running shoes and shorts.
2. Did he actually have a hammer on him during the struggle or was one found nearby later?
3. Beyond the unlikelihood, is there any evidence he 100% wasn't jogging, such as him taking a bus there?
Read the fucking thread and archived info before you necro a 4 month old topic.
 
Read the fucking thread and archived info before you necro a 4 month old topic.
I did read the thread. In it, several people claim he was jogging in Timbs and reference him having a hammer. Only a single person challenged the bit about Timbs, but this challenge was rebuffed, too. It's actually why I bumped this, to see if after 4 months, anything more conclusive can been offered. The topic itself isn't 4-months-old, either, but 5+ years. It's still relevant to shit, obviously.

People whining about how bad it is to "necro" threads are functionally retarded, I think. If I have questions about a topic and there's a recent discussion on that specific topic, I am going to bump the old one instead of creating a new one. Where is "archived info" at, if not existing threads? Quit being a bitch.

He was charging at him, hammer in hand.
I can't see that in the videos I can find. I'm trying to see if a hammer was recovered or reported missing, though. It's tough finding shit when our entire media landscape is captured by Marxist retards. I didn't watch the trial myself, though.
Imagine being a Black guy who lives in a Black neighborhood, and you're thinking of going out for a jog for exercise. Let's assume in this alternate scenario, that you are 100% innocent and this is not just an excuse to break into people's houses.
Would you
A: jog in your own neighborhood where your house is and you can immediately go home when you're done?
B: Travel across the city to a completely different, White neighborhood where people are suspicious of you because there's been a lot of burglaries there, and it'll take an hour to get back home when you're done?
Any reasonable person is going to pick option A. Arbery picked option B, which is a clear sign that this isn't an innocent workout at all and he just wanted some defenseless and wealthy targets to steal from.
This is the unlikelihood I already agree with, but I'm asking about actual evidence against him jogging. Like evidence against Trayvon just walking back with Skittles was him having B&E tools in his school locker and stolen women's jewelry. It lines up with him casing houses, something George's reporting of his behavior aligns with, too. I was curious if anything like that had come out.

Like where did this jogging bullshit come from to begin with? It's not like he was doing press tours after. Media just inventing it and running with it like Trayvon simply walking back from the store while black?

LOL, Wikipedia isn't even trying to look unbiased anymore:
On social media, far-right and neo-Nazi groups spread falsehoods about Arbery; their white-nationalist supporters attacked President Trump for his sympathetic comments regarding Arbery. According to an analyst from the Middle East Media Research Institute, such groups claimed Arbery was wielding a hammer and wearing Timberland boots when he was shot dead; Arbery was wearing running shoes and did not have a hammer. They also spread racist remarks about Arbery, and claimed that the McMichaels and Bryan were victims. Several far-right groups said the McMichaels' and Bryan's arrests reflected a bias against whites.[278] Some far-right members appropriated "jogger" as a euphemism for "nigger" to both mock the circumstance surrounding his death, and as a way to circumvent anti-hate speech policies.[279]
 
Last edited:
I can't see that in the videos I can find. I'm trying to see if a hammer was recovered or reported missing, though. It's tough finding shit when our entire media landscape is captured by Marxist retards. I didn't watch the trial myself, though.
As far as I know, no hammer was involved in the altercation. AA simply charged Travis McMichael and tried to wrest his shotgun away.

LOL, Wikipedia isn't even trying to look unbiased anymore:
This is typical of Wikipedia in $CURRENT_YEAR. There are now hundreds of articles that include language like this.
 
I thought one of the people who attacked aubrey was a pedophile.That's why no one talked about the case anymore

Well, nobody attacked Arbery, so you're wrong from the get go there. Further, none of the men involved were ever even accused of such a thing. Nobody talks about this case because it isn't as splashy and it all happened during the Race Riots of 2020 and got buried.
 
As far as I know, no hammer was involved in the altercation. AA simply charged Travis McMichael and tried to wrest his shotgun away.
This is where I'm at if nobody has receipts.
This is typical of Wikipedia in $CURRENT_YEAR. There are now hundreds of articles that include language like this.
Yep. It was one of the signals to me that total ideological capture has spread everywhere, infecting the sources I used to rely on.
I thought one of the people who attacked aubrey was a pedophile.That's why no one talked about the case anymore
Not to my knowledge, no. They were framed as good ol' boys out lynching themselves a black man for fun. But you might be thinking of one of the men Kyle Rittenhouse put air holes in? The first guy, Rosenbaum, had anally sodomized like 6 boys. But that's not really relevant to any leftist morons because Rittenhouse actually executed peaceful black men protesting injustice!

Rittenhouse's case overshadowed the Arbery trial in my opinion. The Arbery case actually has some nuance in the law and how citizens intersect with it, while Rittenhouse's does not. Zimmerman's case is more like the Arbery case. The similar issue with all three is how ourr nation is being convinced you must cede society to criminals. Given what happens when you don't, I can see why nobody wants to be the next Daniel Penny.
 
Like where did this jogging bullshit come from to begin with? It's not like he was doing press tours after. Media just inventing it and running with it like Trayvon simply walking back from the store while black?
That is exactly what the media did. The reason for it was they were trying get their capstone to start the summer of love by twisting the story into "three white supremacists get their hearts desire to murder a black man". George Floyd incident happened soon after which was more outrageous with the selective editing the media did so they used that instead.

Edit: Apologies for yelling at you for necroing this thread, a large number of links have been memoryholed and this thread wasn't archived as well as others. Its hard to even find the unedited footage of the incident.
 
I love the term "woke justice" because it allows right wing boomers to both ignore any and all judicial misconduct they commit while making fun of left wingers for the same thing. "Well actually it was justified for that cop to shoot that man 82 times in the back because he had a failure to appear warrant and resisted having his teeth kicked in by officer Bob."
 
"Well actually it was justified for that cop to shoot that man 82 times in the back because he had a failure to appear warrant and resisted having his teeth kicked in by officer Bob."
It makes you look so desperate and unhinged when you have to invent fantasy quotes by imaginary people who disagree with you - instead of finding an actual quote that you disagree with.
 
It makes you look so desperate and unhinged when you have to invent fantasy quotes by imaginary people who disagree with you - instead of finding an actual quote that you disagree with.
Florida which is criticized multiple times for the Zimmerman case in this article took a year to determine that they can not send a random beaner to jail for MURDER because a cop walked up to him to investigate the crime of sitting outside of a hotel eating a sandwich and talking on the phone. Minutes after the cop had a heart attack and died from the strain of tackling him to the ground after he turned away slightly. An obvious case of judicial misconduct that many retired right wing boomers in the state applauded.
 
Last edited:
It makes you look so desperate and unhinged when you say post this rambling diatrabe:
Florida which is criticized multiple times for the Zimmerman case in this article took a year to determine that they can not send a random beaner to jail for MURDER because a cop walked up to him to investigate the crime of sitting outside of a hotel eating a sandwich and talking on the phone. Minutes after the cop had a heart attack and died from the strain of tackling him to the ground after he turned away slightly. An obvious case of judicial misconduct that many retired right wing boomers in the state applauded.
as support for this made up quote:
"Well actually it was justified for that cop to shoot that man 82 times in the back because he had a failure to appear warrant and resisted having his teeth kicked in by officer Bob."
These don't have anything to do with each other!

First you invent an imaginary straw man, then when challenged, you start rambling about a totally different thing.
 
Why do we need to prove a negative? The jogging thing was something the MSM pulled out of their ass.
I'm not demanding proof, only curious. It's helpful to have strong evidence against the MSM narratives when trying to show folks they're being played. I try to remember that many of my friends believe shit like this because they're kindhearted people, not morons. And not long ago, people at least thought they could trust MSM.

It's kind of a tough sell to be like, "YOUR EMPATHY IS MISPLACED AND EVERY INSTITUTION YOU'VE TRUSTED TO SHAPE YOUR WORLDVIEW IS DELIBERATELY LYING ABOUT EVERYTHING!"

So if the dude actually was wearing Timbs, that'd be strong evidence to employ with the Socratic method. When people repeat it and it's complete horseshit, it makes it more difficult to convince people of reality. I just like to have accurate information and think KF should hold itself to high standards, too.
I love the term "woke justice" because it allows right wing boomers to both ignore any and all judicial misconduct they commit while making fun of left wingers for the same thing. "Well actually it was justified for that cop to shoot that man 82 times in the back because he had a failure to appear warrant and resisted having his teeth kicked in by officer Bob."
Can you point to any instances where police mag-dumped on a fleeing suspect who clearly posed no threat? I can think of a single instance and the cop was given 20 years or something.
Edit: Apologies for yelling at you for necroing this thread, a large number of links have been memoryholed and this thread wasn't archived as well as others. Its hard to even find the unedited footage of the incident.
No worries. Yeah, lack of clean, unedited video is another thing I'm having trouble with.
 
Last edited:
I'm not demanding proof, only curious. It's helpful to have strong evidence against the MSM narratives when trying to show folks they're being played. I try to remember that many of my friends believe shit like this because they're kindhearted people, not morons. And not long ago, people at least thought they could trust MSM.
The proof is that there's not a single shred of evidence supporting Arbery was in the area for a jog.

The facts: Arbery was far from home. He had a criminal record, including theft and violence. He was mentally ill. Arbery charged and punched the men accused of murdering him.

"Jogging" is an invention to explain why Arbery was on the street in an unfamiliar neighborhood. You don't need to prove he wasn't jogging; you should ask anyone who asserts he was out for a jog how they know that.
 
Back
Top Bottom