I still overall support Trump,
I don't because we're talking about people who are
definitely still operating or otherwise participating in
child sex slavery rings that he's protecting by having his administration cover for them.
No, I draw the line at people who commit, enable, and/or cover for, CSA. I've said prior that what his admin has done here is leagues above what the UK government allowed to take place with the rape gangs, as at least on some level it's believable they weren't active participants in it.
Supporting someone,
anyone who does that is morally bankrupt. Do I regret voting for him over Kamala? No. I don't have to, because at the time, it wasn't known that he was
going to run cover for the world's most well-connected and powerful child rapists.
It's genuinely sickening to see so many people have this stance. This is a test of the most basic principle we have as a society, this isn't some 'does banning online porn lead to the government demanding ID before you log into Twitter?' dilemma. It's one of very, very few legitimate A/B tests of whether or not you actually
do hate people who commit or enable CSA. For so many to fail this because of political partisanship is a grim indictment of the people who make up our body politic.