Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 15.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 52 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 71 16.3%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 144 33.1%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 101 23.2%

  • Total voters
    435
"For reasons I don't understand" sounds like every parent whose child has gone no contact with them. Often when a family member decides to no longer speak to another family member they give them a reason, because as much fun as we make about Russ' pathological need to explain, that's largely human nature when it comes to letting others down.

But if you go to any thread where people who have been cut off the one thing they always say is "I don't understand why they said X" or "I wasn't told why."

These people will never understand why, because they don't want to understand. They want to play the victim. Frankly, it disgusts me.
 
Entire books of legal theory have been written about this. Everything on "when does a mandatory reporter know child abuse is happening" to "when does someone know they are being sued."
I get that there's a specific legal definition of "knowledge" that's been discussed and interpreted to death and the discussion and interpretation discussed and interpreted to death ten or more layers deep, but it does seem the SCOTUS was uninterested in having this semantic argument AGAIN, and it seems the least interesting thing to appeal on with all the other manifest injustices in this case and impossibilities like Null needing a time machine.

I have a vested interest in this case, so if the SCOTUS petition makes me snore, I can only imagine how little it held the interest of the clerks.
 
The court will attempt to garnish his wages but fail when they realize they have no idea where he even lives.

Will they send the FBI after him? Greer's outlaw arc would be kino, but they will probably find him at some brothel.

Second, specific to our enemies, most of them are trannies, and trannydom is entering a death spiral. With the return RETVRN of the God-Emperor, more people are feeling empowered to point out trannies and niggers are trannies and niggers.

I am hopeful that the trans-mania is dying a death akin to #MeToo, but as the tranny movement was exponentially worse than #MeToo, what new horror will replace it?

...with blackjack and hookers... In fact, forget the blackjack!

No Greer's allowed.

The bigger number is more relevant to future retards. Whether or not Greer pays anything is irrelevant to the goal

Yes, the entire point is to keep him as the debtor gimp to parade before the enemies at the gate to warn them of the fate of the last attacker.

IIRC he kept pressuring her to talk Stephanie into meeting him IRL after it had been made clear Stephanie had no desire to do so.

Does she have Moebius syndrome as well? Just curious.
 
Does she have Moebius syndrome as well? Just curious.
No, she's completely normal and actually decently attractive.

Screenshot_20220707-193947_Brave.webp
Screenshot_20220707-194004_Brave.webp
IMG_0746.webp
Screenshot_20220707-194019_Brave.webp
 
1752590528671.webp
Sir, once again, this is a copyright case.
1752590580756.webp1752590599992.webp
Greer are you fucking colorblind as well as retarded, what is with the font color changes?!
1752590932753.webp

Greer trying to turn around Hardin's "empty head, pure of heart" phrase back at him. Par serve, 15 - Love !
1752590806852.webp

1752590853815.webp

"Noooo stalker child, it will be YOUuuuu that owes MEeeee attorney's fees! Enjoy Prison!"
 
Last edited:
Is this one of those situations where Greee was supposed to give 21 days notice or some shit before he filed this?
Part of his motion seeks relief under Rule 11 which:
  1. Requires it to be a separate motion

    and

  2. Requires it to be presented to the offending party 21 days in advance
 
This fucking faggot didn't even bother to attach the supposed emails he received as evidence this time.

He seems to think that opposing counsel in a lawsuit should not scrutinize him because he is a pro-se litigant, likely because the judge is supposed to show a pro-se litigant a bit more mercy?
I know that we already know he thinks that way but it's still amazing seeing it in writing.
Screenshot 2025-07-15 at 11.55.20 pm.webp

Also, I can't believe he is demanding attorney's fees when he's still due to pay sanctions to Moon.
 
1752590739418.webp

wat

Anyway,
1752590788221.webp

Still insisting that any negative emails he (allegedly) receives are from Kiwi Farms trolls, while offering zero proof that the emails didn't come from literally any old weirdos online, or from sockpuppets that he himself created. Love it.

Pretty rich to see him accusing Hardin of being the vexatious one, too. Hopefully when Hardin replies, he remembers to succinctly point out that his client is the Defendant and is entitled to an aggressive defense.

1752590996308.webp
See above, re: aggressive defense. Also, we don't actually need to defend the allegations at this stage. We can't even complete discovery thanks to Dipshitforlips "prolonging the case" with his fuckery, so we're not at trial yet.

IPF appears again!
1752591121098.webp
1752591144722.webp


Oh shit, animal mimicry rears its ugly head -- "empty head pure heart" from our boy!
1752591256517.webp

And the requested gibs:
1752591336032.webp

Just enough to cover the sanctions he has been repeatedly ordered to pay for months, plus a little extra for whoring.
 
Back