US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You have no idea how many millions of people this man has hypnotized and kept in the TDS state under the guise that he's allegedly a comedian.
I don't think people with TDS truly hate Trump, since I think they are in a media bubble without realizing it. Propagandists like Stephen Colbert keep them in a media bubble where thought terminating clichés, frequent and coordinated deceptive editing, and cherry picking strawmen present Trump and his supporters as the neoliberal conception of the devil. The tenacious thing is someone in the TDS bubble might not even realize it. They might wake up and read the paper while watching the morning news. Then on their morning commute, they listen to NPR News and read the "conservative" Wall Street Journal at work during lunch. To relax at night, they watch their favorite late night television shows like 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' and 'Last Week Tonight with John Oliver'. While this is certainly a great number of sources, all their sources are ideologically aligned against Trump even if they're not politically aligned otherwise. This creates a false sense of variety! Additionally, they exclusively consume traditional media! They don't realize the exceptional reputational and carrer risk associated with being remotely pro Trump in this legacy format, And how the new digital frontier unrestricted by this has allowed more diverse coverage to emerge.
Stephen, NPR, and PBS today, Maddow, Kimmel, and Oliver tomorrow. Only then will the Boomers move on from legacy media and Break the TDS curse when they are exposed to a variety of Trump's positions and pro-Trump perspectives that they may agree with.
 
That Coffeezilla video was informative. I see now why the WSJ were so confident about publishing. I hope Trump does sue, because it will force an answer. If he loses, then we know he was involved. If he wins, then an establishment paper ceases to exist.

It’s a win win for the people.
After a week of Doom and Gloom, it's great to be back to our regularly scheduled programming of Ungodly Amounts of Stupid. It's amazing how in just a few hours we've gotten here. I haven't stopped laughing since. It doesn't pass the smell test. It doesn't pass anyone's test. Everyone I've showed this too thought I made a fake meme even though WSJs name was attached. Nobody believes this shit and even if they do, it insinuates Trump and Epstein were gay lovers, not pedos.
 
After a week of Doom and Gloom, it's great to be back to our regularly scheduled programming of Ungodly Amounts of Stupid. It's amazing how in just a few hours we've gotten here. I haven't stopped laughing since. It doesn't pass the smell test. It doesn't pass anyone's test. Everyone I've showed this too thought I made a fake meme even though WSJs name was attached. Nobody believes this shit and even if they do, it insinuates Trump and Epstein were gay lovers, not pedos.
Yeah, I went from, it’s 100% bullshit to a ‘okay, maybe’. It’s obvious why the WSJ felt confident enough to publish it. A lot of things line up to where it’s at least plausible, to be later proven fake in court.

I don’t see the point in going all-in on “it’s real” or “it’s fake” when Trump has publicly stated that he intends to sue. We’re going to find out either way. Seems like a waste of energy. I’ve seen some of your other posts, and I think some of your points are worth considering, though.

And a non-relevant side note, but I used to study US history. If you’re interested in that kind of thing, you should read some of the correspondence of the founding fathers. Some of their witty lines sound gay as fuck with modern context. It’s hilarious.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I’m not so sure it’s fake now after looking at some of the “evidence” around the letter. I went from, it’s 100% bullshit to a ‘maybe’. It’s pretty obvious why the WSJ was confident enough to publish it. A lot of things line up where it’s at least plausible, to be later proven fake in court.
Holy shit, stop with the vagueposting. Either spill the "evidence" surrounding it or stop making snide insinuations.
 
I’m also not saying these articles are credible, necessarily, but they do have some threads you could tug on.
I genuinely thought Epstein was Israeli intelligence but after reading this it's pretty obvious that the claims stem from Ari Ben-Menashe who is a known liar.

This article goes into it: https://www.newsweek.com/one-man-many-tales-201744

After searching around and doing further research, I came away thinking that Epstein was not Israeli intelligence.
 
Nobody knows what regular everyday folks are like more than a terminally online Internet Nazi does. When I got my hair cut yesterday, the lady wouldn't stop talking about how Mossad runs our government via blackmailing an elite cabal of pedophiles. It's the talk of the town, really. Then she sighed and said America took the wrong side in WW2, Poland had it coming, and started singing the Horst-Wessel Lied.
So not only does the pedo squad have Pelosi, Stephen King and Andrew Cuomo on their side, they're now going for "everyone who disagrees with child rape is a Nazi" shtick borrowed from the same crowd. Should go swimmingly
 
Holy shit, stop with the vagueposting. Either spill the "evidence" surrounding it or stop making snide insinuations.
Coffeezilla made a chart tracking “circumstantial evidence” and goes through it line by line, but makes it clear that it doesn’t prove anything. That will be decided in court. It was a fair assessment of what the WSJ has. Like I said, I don’t 100% believe it (it’s too convenient), but it explains to me why they would be confident enough to publish in the first place.

I would post screenshots from the video, but it would be a lot, because you never get just one screen that has his presentation in a single frame. If you’re not interested in giving him clicks, just click on the video, pause it, then move the bar through the video. I don’t think that counts as a view, but I’m not sure.

 
Last edited:
Dear sex pervert man with illegal sex trade:

How are you today? I love being a rich and powerful man who has illegal sex with questionable partners who might be considered minors. As an evil man who lives illegal sex, I wanted to say thank you for your service and I really enjoy all the evil illegal sex. Also, do you like mechwarrior games?

Anyways, lovingly yours,
Trump “Evil Sex Man” Donald

PS:
Today I wrote in a diary about all the insane evil sex and crimes I did. Lmao! Kisses!
 
Coffeezilla made a chart tracking “corroborating evidence” and goes through it line by line, but makes it clear that it doesn’t prove anything. That will be decided in court. It was a fair assessment of what the WSJ has. Like I said, I don’t 100% believe it (it’s too convenient), but it explains to me why they would be confident enough to publish in the first place.

I would post screenshots from the video, but it would be a lot, because you never get just one screen that has his presentation in a single frame. If you’re not interested in giving him clicks, just click on the video, pause it, then move the bar through the video. I don’t think that counts as a view, but I’m not sure.

Zilla is well-known for having TDS, so if even he can only wishcast some circumstantial evidence that doesn't lead to any real conclusion, I'm gonna go with the burden of proof all falling on WSJ at this point.
 
Coffeezilla made a chart tracking “corroborating evidence” and goes through it line by line, but makes it clear that it doesn’t prove anything. That will be decided in court. It was a fair assessment of what the WSJ has. Like I said, I don’t 100% believe it (it’s too convenient), but it explains to me why they would be confident enough to publish in the first place.

I would post screenshots from the video, but it would be a lot, because you never get just one screen that has his presentation in a single frame. If you’re not interested in giving him clicks, just click on the video, pause it, then move the bar through the video. I don’t think that counts as a view, but I’m not sure.

Don't really know much about the guy, I did see a couple of his videos on random cryptos, however his presentation and persona seems a bit cringey and click baity, and his coverage on the argie milei meme coin was a thinly veiled click bait hit piece, TLDW(from memory):
>Milei(president of argentina) tweets about a meme coin saying "meme coin looks good" or something along that
>Meme coin gets ragpulled
>looks and is awful, but peanuts in the world of politics and the absurd levels of corruption in the past and most likely present government
>Coffeezilla does his thumbnail implying Milei's involvement is much deeper
>Turns out the big secret is that this group have done a couple of other rug pulls before, and Milei has no real involvement

Going off this I wouldn't be surprised if there's some heavy bias, and his reaching for straws, he should stick to retarded crypto scams, seems to be about his level of journalistic skill (the real investigative one).
Zilla is well-known for having TDS, so if even he can only wishcast some circumstantial evidence that doesn't lead to any real conclusion, I'm gonna go with the burden of proof all falling on WSJ at this point.
Ah, that makes sense.
 
So not only does the pedo squad have Pelosi, Stephen King and Andrew Cuomo on their side, they're now going for "everyone who disagrees with child rape is a Nazi" shtick borrowed from the same crowd. Should go swimmingly
why would i call a guy with a swastika pfp and a jew-obsessed posting history a nazi
it's a mistory
no rational explernation
 
You’re ranting about ‘nuance’ but you insist the only reason Trump could possibly be suppressing the files is because he’s in them.
I haven't heard another reasonable explanation. And I don't buy the whole "what if this is to prevent nuclear war" angle a lot of the retards here are trying to take.

Provide a more reasonable explanation if you want me to give him the benefit of the doubt.
 
Coffeezilla made a chart tracking “circumstantial evidence” and goes through it line by line, but makes it clear that it doesn’t prove anything. That will be decided in court. It was a fair assessment of what the WSJ has. Like I said, I don’t 100% believe it (it’s too convenient), but it explains to me why they would be confident enough to publish in the first place.

I would post screenshots from the video, but it would be a lot, because you never get just one screen that has his presentation in a single frame. If you’re not interested in giving him clicks, just click on the video, pause it, then move the bar through the video. I don’t think that counts as a view, but I’m not sure.

All the evidence linking Trump to Russia was fake. All of the sexual assault allegations were fake. Then, throughout his first term there were weekly fake reports from liars about things happening inside his administration. My favorite was the gorilla channel. This love letter is just fake, we don't need line-by-line autism. We already know how Trump writes, because he's shit up the entire internet daily for 15 years with his brain dumps.

I haven't heard another reasonable explanation.

You actually have, but to you, anything "reasonable" has to fit in with your theory that Mossad is controlling Trump, which is wholly lacking in evidence.
 
All the evidence linking Trump to Russia was fake. All of the sexual assault allegations were fake. Then, throughout his first term there were weekly fake reports from liars about things happening inside his administration. My favorite was the gorilla channel. This love letter is just fake, we don't need line-by-line autism. We already know how Trump writes, because he's shit up the entire internet daily for 15 years with his brain dumps.
You didn't jew sperg.
 
Back