UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Back in the late 90s my mate sprayed "NIGGER BALLS" onto the bonnet of his car. Big yellow letters.

We're still friends all these years later. You gotta keep good folks like that in your life.
What motivated that particular styling choice? I thought the late 90s car modding scene was more cold-cathode under lighting, Burberry re-upholstering, big wings and zorsts and attempting to recreate scenes from NFS: Underground in a maccys car park

From what I gleamed @Geoff Capes Vapes Apes doesn't like the browns and blacks and @lamppost believes in treating people as individuals and not as part of their racial group, naive? maybe but that's neither here nor there. IN response Geoff decides to a remarkable impression of a black or brown that he so despises leading to two sub 60 IQ mongs having a sperg out at eachother.

The biggest crime here is that the spergout wasn't even funny, just annoying.
Fuck if I know, I'd been to the pub.
 
Some news tibits from GB News:


Prevent anti-terror officers deemed Sir David Amess killer a 'great person'


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/MUxNF


Ofwat to be abolished after rising bills and Thames Water scandal as regulator 'loses public trust'


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/VZLPy


UK on the brink of stagflation as Bank of England put in 'extremely tough spot' amid rising unemployment:


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/tFFf6


Pension proposal could slap boomers with 10% levy on retirement savings to help 'future generations':




Rachel Reeves under fire as pension system overhaul slammed as 'barrier for growth':


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/HYcls


BBC admits it is 'actively exploring' changes to the TV licence fee as pressure mounts to scrap it:


Archive: https://archive.ph/L64U8


Rachel Riley left 'in genuine fear' after Channel 4 Countdown star received string of death threats from contestant:


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/hFSRc
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Morethanabitfoolish
Some news tibits from GB News:


Prevent anti-terror officers deemed Sir David Amess killer a 'great person'


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/MUxNF


Ofwat to be abolished after rising bills and Thames Water scandal as regulator 'loses public trust'


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/VZLPy


UK on the brink of stagflation as Bank of England put in 'extremely tough spot' amid rising unemployment:


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/tFFf6


Pension proposal could slap boomers with 10% levy on retirement savings to help 'future generations':




Rachel Reeves under fire as pension system overhaul slammed as 'barrier for growth':


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/HYcls


BBC admits it is 'actively exploring' changes to the TV licence fee as pressure mounts to scrap it:


Archive: https://archive.ph/L64U8


Rachel Riley left 'in genuine fear' after Channel 4 Countdown star received string of death threats from contestant:


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/hFSRc
Sorry but if you pay for a TV license, you're a mong
 
Inclusive education is an abomination.
I think it depends what it is. A child in a wheelchair with cerebral palsy but above normal intelligence shouldn’t be shoved in a special school. Neither should things that are mildly disabling physically but allow the child to keep up mentally. Mild hearing or visual issues that don’t need specialist kit etc should and can be dealt with in mainstream without harming the class.
Screaming Autists, behavioural issues and violent / disruptive children DO affect the class and need separate provision.
 
I think it depends what it is. A child in a wheelchair with cerebral palsy but above normal intelligence shouldn’t be shoved in a special school. Neither should things that are mildly disabling physically but allow the child to keep up mentally. Mild hearing or visual issues that don’t need specialist kit etc should and can be dealt with in mainstream without harming the class.
Screaming Autists, behavioural issues and violent / disruptive children DO affect the class and need separate provision.
That's exactly who I'm referring to, maybe it wasn't clear. And the groups of children you just mentioned are currently terrorising schools because of regressive new policies to keep them in school to the detriment of everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Otterly
That's exactly who I'm referring to, maybe it wasn't clear. And the groups of children you just mentioned are currently terrorising schools because of regressive new policies to keep them in school to the detriment of everyone else.
And the school responds by sitting your well behaved daughter next to them ‘to calm them down.)
(Until you go down there and rip them a new one…)
 
An interesting breaking story from Wales about former MP Wayne David, who is retiring 'due to health concerns' rather than 'anything political'.


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/oypbh

The wording of this makes me think 'well, why say 'political reasons' in the first place.'

Adding some extra context:

Wayne's son, Hefin, is the Senedd Member for Caerphilly and is a known cyber-bully who has threatened people and blocked people who dare oppose what he says. He's relied a lot on 'Daddy' to get by and also for 'Daddy's friends' to keep him out of trouble/the courts.

Hefin also publicly backed a Caerphilly Council Member who posed with a gun on Ogmore Beach near Bridgend saying 'fighting off English invaders'. This Council Member was arrested, charged and then removed from his position.

Caerphilly Council is also known to be deeply corrupt - the story of three Council Workers who were sacked but paid their salaries even when accusations of wrongdoings hit the media:


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/be0aq


Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/7Oh3Z

There are strong rumours that Wayne and Hefin David knew about the problems but did nothing - the Council is still cash-strapped and had to close both Blackwood Miners Institute (where the Manic Street Preachers played their first ever concert in 1986) and the Llancaiach Fawr Manor House.
 
1752772850882.webp
100% of 16-17 year old muslims will vote because their vote is chosen by the imam's at a mosque. That's just the way it is and how they choose their votes. That's not racism or conspiracy, just a fact.
Even if 100% of white 16-17 year olds vote, they're still out numbered by muslims.

However, the worst part about the changes is this:

Migrants, legal, illegal, irregular or otherwise, are given bank cards with their benefits loaded onto them. This makes sense because doing cash-in-hand would be a logistical nightmare. It does mean that you can come here and within 24 hours be voting.

This will be interesting and I believe Labour are being lied to when they think the yewf will vote for them, they won't.

Contrast that in 2024 :

The muslim vote holds a significant sway and in those areas where labour were contested the strongest, it wasn't the greens or reform but 'independents' who are majority muslim.

Once the order is given that muslims shall vote for X party, that party will gain power.

You will be stuck with labour until 2029, giving the muslims another 4 years for their demographic majority to reach voting age, then things get interesting.
Not surprisingly, if that data is anything to go by, Labour is moving to farcify UK elections:
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/20...-kills-voter-id-law-slashes-voting-age-to-16/
1752870883890.webp
Under international and UK law, a child is any person below the age of 18, but by the time of the next UK General Election those age 16 and 17-years-old will be legally allowed to vote for their next Member of Parliament and won’t need photo-ID to do it, the Labour government has announced.

The point of allowing children to vote is that they have not had time to outgrow neoliberalism.

Consequently, even though those under 18 are not allowed to buy alcohol or even lottery tickets, they will be able to vote to enslave adults via the increasingly all-powerful government.

The point of not requiring ID is to facilitate cheating. This will be done in part by the often illegal gimmegrants Starmer et al. have allowed to flood the country to displace the native population. Pandering to Moslems is not cutting it, so Pajeets and tribalist Africans will have to make do.

In the short term, lowering the voting age could blow up in Starmer’s pudgy face, due to encouraging support for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK Party among young voters. However,
Farage said he didn’t back the change “even though we’d get lots of votes”, adding: “I don’t think you should be able to vote in an election unless you’re also eligible to be a candidate, and I don’t think 16 year olds should stand for Parliament.”

Speaking of Farage, the new measures will also conveniently prevent Elon Musk from financially supporting him.

On the positive side, limitation of the franchise to Moslems probably will not be imposed for at least a generation.
 
The point of not requiring ID is to facilitate cheating. This will be done in part by the often illegal gimmegrants Starmer et al. have allowed to flood the country to displace the native population. Pandering to Moslems is not cutting it, so Pajeets and tribalist Africans will have to make do.

In the short term, lowering the voting age could blow up in Starmer’s pudgy face, due to encouraging support for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK Party among young voters. However,
illegal vote yes but Labour is hoping to tap into one particular voting demographic and that is young women. Young women vote insanely left leaning and I guess the idea is hoping enough young 16-17 year old women vote to flip it in his favour.
 
In the short term, lowering the voting age could blow up in Starmer’s pudgy face, due to encouraging support for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK Party among young voters. However,
On the positive side, limitation of the franchise to Moslems probably will not be imposed for at least a generation.
Reform are toast, they're having a moment in the sun as a distraction and to keep people with a small bit of hope, half to keep the relief valve cracked open and half to take focus away from labour.
Who voted for these changes? Why did they happen out of nowhere?

Starmer has been given the backing by the muslim members of government that Starmer is safe until 2029. Muslims vote in blocks and follow what the community mosque tells them, look at the vote for brexit where 95% of Bradford voted to leave.

Now here's the game. The muslims will vote for independent councillors, all over the country, standing on issues that are only attractive to that local council, like the paki from south leeds who ran as independent and ran on "fuck jews, shariah good". That was a test of the system.
Now, the greens, labour, tories and reform set out manifestos which cover the country as blanket statements. Who cares if West Midlands are getting a new train station if you're a Geordie with terrible roads? Who cares if more money for northern infrastructure is promised if you're a norfolk swamp-donkey still waiting for a dual carraigeway?
Those independent councillors, who will be 90% muslims and a few daft liberal-whiteys chucked in, can offer solutions to local problems. They will form a group/coalition and enter government as a group of individuals, who all agree on muslim law to rule the country.

Watch over the next year or so changes to how independents can run, form parties and what happens to their party affiliation when they're elected and change/join parties.

I know pakis. I know what they've been striving for, for four decades. They've never been closer and we've never been so powerless to stop it, because those who can stop it, don't want to and those who see no problem see the solutions as problems.
 
Who voted for these changes? Why did they happen out of nowhere?
To quote myself, reply to myself and double-post like a massive faggot, the answer is:

"To distract you from the afghan leaks, not because of the afghans and the payments, but because the media and government have much more and much worse superinjunctions related to immigrants, crimes and cover ups than we know. Ones that will seriously destabilise the country."

Think paki rape gangs, except there's evidence to say that all of government knew for decades and they all covered it up.
 
Moygashel bonfire was set alight in the end, police didn’t dare try and stop this vicious hate crime, resulting in some inspiring images:
I know I'm late but like am I just turning into a grandad too much when I see those massive piles of pallets and think like fuck I could make a shit load of birdboxes and shit from that? Idk call me back when they build the bonfire out of qurans and actual migrant boats.

Also am I just being a cynical schizo cunt but the whole voting age thing seems like this global push to make people think that children are more mature than they really are and personally I am betting that this whole 'no 16 is super mature basically got a mortgage and kids' type bullshit is trying to pave the way for them to lower the age of consent down to 13. Like yea ok pakis breed like rabbits and they want to get the rodents voting for them asap but is a two year difference really that much? Idk maybe I won't ever be proven right, but just remember me when I am.

And while I'm here I saw a post from our local police a month or so ago, they had to make a video to teach people how to fucking cross the road. People here are so fucking retarded and narcissistic here that they just fucking walk into oncoming traffic and expect the car to stop. The best part? The fucking police page that made the post was the one closest to the most fucking diverse area. Not the one near the council estate full of poor englishmen that are fucking retards most of the time, not the one in the town centre where it's busiest, the one nearest all the fucking immigrants. Personally I don't see the problem, I'd be encouraging them to walk into traffic but apparently we can't do that. They included a video too of where it happens most, straight road people love speeding on, also happens to be almost 100% niggers pakis and indians with the occasional white person that's stuck there and too poor to move because god knows you're not selling the house for more than you bought it at. The bus into town has to go through that area, not too long ago some fucking nigger gets on. Even worse than the typical headphone dodger, wasn't an indian is why, not only did he have his phone playing out loud on full volume but was 'YASSSSSS FAXXXX 💯💯💯💯💯💯'ing back at the video he was watching. It was a legitimate south african propagandist video. I didn't listen to it much because I value my sanity, at least as much as I can for someone who visits this site, but I heard one specific topic. They are fucking pissed off at us because when they told us to fuck off and we left that the trains we left behind are old and that England hasn't gone back down to south africa, where being white can get you killed, to renovate the shit that we gifted them with. Legitimately pissed off that after they stopped being of value to us that we stopped being of value to them. Absolutely insane levels of entitlement and I hope all their crops fail and die horribly. I also hope that this faggot on the bus gets deported back to where he came from just as that happens. But I'm not allowed to list objective facts because that's racist propaganda and illegal right?
 
illegal vote yes but Labour is hoping to tap into one particular voting demographic and that is young women. Young women vote insanely left leaning and I guess the idea is hoping enough young 16-17 year old women vote to flip it in his favour.
Labour have got it badly wrong.

16/17 year olds may vote Left more than they do Right, but let's consider that the parties the Left kids will vote for are Lib Dems, Plaid, SNP and Greens (and, for two of these, only if they are pro-independence).

Added to the mix is the 'Jezbollah' party which will secure a good chunk of the Muslim votes if they're also not split with George Galloway's Workers Party.

That's six potential options, and (whatiffery moment) the Black Lives Matter Alliance, LGB Rights Party, Trans Rights Party, The Woke Party etc. all suddenly appear - that's eleven at least to choose from and kids will be under pressure to choose the 'correct' option... you didn't vote for BLM? Expect a mass kneelathon outside your house, bigot!

The Left vote will then be split, because Lefties always have to be seen as doing the right (or left) thing by doing as they're told and voting accordingly. 'If I vote Lib Dem, I can't vote for The Woke Party - that makes me a bad person as I believe in Wokery... oh what to do...sob sob.'

All that the Right then needs to do is to back Reform UK or the biggest 'Far Right' party and the split votes will ensure that, unless in certain seats where they have little chance of winning, Reform UK will win.

Let's not kid ourselves about Nigel's appeal - even kids who don't support Brexit recognise him and what he stands for... do they know their MP and what he/she stands for? Nigel's the rock star of politics, yes a Marmite character, but his profile is constantly amplified by the MSM who supposedly hate him and cannot stand him nor what he stands for. Just look at how many TikTok videos are about him, how many Question Time appearances, his show on GB News etc. No other leader, even Queer Keir, gets that level of 'amplification' and in the digital age this will be crucial.

Not every kid is going to vote Left either, and in rural and working class areas the vote is almost 100% going to Reform UK. In Wales, out of the current 32 Parliamentary Seats, 22 are likely to go to Reform with the other 10 going to Plaid (would be their high-water mark as a party). None for Labour, Conservative, Lib Dems or Greens where the 'Votes at 16' law was first introduced.

Kids will be expected to vote how they've been taught to think, but when a lot of teenagers are 'buying out' of what they've been told or are expected to do/like/watch then the influence of the Left is dissipating. When a friend of mine told me recently that his 12 year old son and his friends are into the following bands and not Taylor Swift or Ed Sheerhan my faith in humanity was restored:

A Perfect Circle, Alice in Chains, The Beatles, Deftones, Doors, Enigma, Evanescence, Keren Ann, Korn, Led Zeppelin, Marilyn Manson, Metallica, Muse, Nine Inch Nails, Nirvana, Otep, Pearl Jam, Queen, Radiohead, Rage Against the Machine, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Smashing Pumpkins, Staind, System of a Down, Team Sleep, and Tool.

One final thought - why with two days of Parliamentary business left until recess has this been fudged through? If Starmer has no qualms about how he was elected, and if his majority is superior to that of other parties, why not wait until the Conference in October and introduce it then?

I have my thoughts, but we'll see what happens...
 
Last edited:
Back