@StudMccool is just trying to be an inflammatory faggot.
Maybe you guys should pay more attention to the LLP thread every now and again and you wouldn't be so moronic.
Trump doesn't have to prove that it's fake. WSJ has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they have enough credible evidence to assume that it's real and that they did their journalistic due diligence to verify its authenticity to publish this story. They can't possibly do that because it's a 20 year old letter. That's precisely why they won't even fight it in court and they'll just settle. That's why nearly everyone who's sued over claims like these has won or gotten a settlement. It is NOT on Trump to prove that it's false. You can't prove it's false or true. The fact media companies have done this before and lost, only emboldens Trump's case. It's an absolute slam dunk. Rupert Murdoch is fucked and he's going to just give Donald whatever he wants to make it go away.
Past this weekend, you will never hear about this story again except as a funny anecdote.