Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[RaptInPlastic]

(Machine generated.)
TROs in Minnesota: What They Typically Prohibit​

A TRO issued under Minn. Stat. § 609.748 (the Harassment Restraining Order statute) often includes one or more of the following prohibitions:

• No direct contact with the petitioner (in person, phone, email, text, social media, etc.)
• No indirect contact, including via third parties or public messages intended to be seen by the petitioner
• No harassment, stalking, or surveillance
• No posting about the petitioner online — if the judge includes a specific order limiting public speech

---

Are YouTube Videos or Tweets a Violation?​

1. If the content is directed at the petitioner: YES​

• If the respondent mentions the petitioner by name, reference, or implication (e.g., calling them “the liar who filed that restraining order”), this is often considered a breach, even if it’s posted publicly.
• Courts have held that posting harassing or intimidating content online that is clearly intended for the petitioner to see can violate the TRO — even if there's no direct message or tag.

2. If the content is not directly addressed to the petitioner: MAYBE​

• General content (e.g., “Here’s what happened to me last year” with no identifying details) might not violate the order — but it’s risky.
• If the intent or likely effect is to cause emotional distress or invite others to target the petitioner, courts may still consider it harassment or indirect contact.

3. If the order explicitly bans all public commentary or online discussion about the petitioner: YES​

• Some judges include special clauses barring all discussion of the petitioner on social media or public forums.
• In such cases, any reference — even vague or coded — may be a violation.

---

Minnesota Case Law and Precedent​

Minnesota courts take violations seriously, especially involving online conduct. Relevant points from case law:

• Courts often look at intent and impact, not just literal wording. If the petitioner can show they saw the content and were reasonably distressed, it can support a violation finding.
• Even coded language, initials, or inside jokes — if clearly aimed at the petitioner — can count.
• Posting to a large public audience doesn’t protect the respondent. The question is whether the content was targeted at the protected party, directly or indirectly.

---

Possible Consequences of Violation​

Violating a TRO is a criminal offense under Minn. Stat. § 609.748, subd. 6 and may result in:

• Misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor charges
• Jail time and/or fines
• The judge being less likely to dismiss the full HRO at the contested hearing
• Loss of credibility in future court proceedings

---

What About Free Speech?​

The First Amendment does protect free speech, but:

• It does not protect targeted harassment, threats, or violations of court orders.
• Once a TRO is in place, the respondent’s speech can be legally restricted in certain ways to protect the petitioner’s safety and peace of mind.

---

Summary​

Action	Likely Violation of TRO?	Notes
Posting a video naming the petitioner	Yes	Direct contact/harassment
Subtweeting about the petitioner	Possibly	Depends on clarity and tone
General content not about petitioner	Unlikely	But risky if it implies harassment
Making fun of the HRO publicly	Possibly	Courts consider intent and effect
Encouraging others to contact petitioner	Yes	Indirect contact via third parties
Silent or coded reference	Possibly	Can still be seen as targeted

...
Just to be on the safe side Felton and skelefag should pack a toothbrush.

 

[Vibralldo]

The /r/SteelToeMorningShow is already at full speed cope mode.

"The hearing is only 30 minutes, what could happen?"
That's what we were saying before Aaron's hearing and he left it in handcuffs

 

[not william stenchever]

But Nick can't help himself and is compelled to harass Aaron to smear him as a liar to prove that they really aren't gay, never were gay, not even a little bit gay, how dare you even insinuate they were gay. A very distraught and sexually confused Nick then confounded everyone when he insisted on putting on makeup for the photograph with the two women kissing him that was designed to prove he's not gay, not at all gay, not even a teensy bit gay, how dare anyone insinuate he's gay.

 

[Sneed Force One]

I'm gonna give it to Aaron, I just checked Aaron's cite for Exhibit 19 for June 10, 2024 (2:58:48 - 3:00:00)
And I gotta tell you ladies and gentlemen, he might have cooked. This does not. look. good!

Editors Note: I censored the children's name, added AI captions and a little dramatic flair. This is not strictly the original video.

"Am I going to be going after these children, not necessarily..."
"...he's now going to weaponise them in his war against Rekieta...
THAT MAKES THEM FAIR GAME"

 

[Sneed Force One]

I'm trying to autistically figure out Aaron's exhibit list. Give me some time.

 

[Captain Manning]

I'm gonna give it to Aaron, I just checked Aaron's cite for Exhibit 19 for June 10, 2024 (2:58:48 - 3:00:00)
And I gotta tell you ladies and gentlemen, he might have cooked. This does not. look. good!

If it works (and I hope it does), the credit should likely go to Montgomery. @Folgers Can is right. As funny as TWA's video is (Aaron cited it on the TRO application he likely filled out himself), pulling from the source material is the better way to go, and a lawyer would know that.

The other thing is that putting the biological mother on the stand is a real good move too.

"Yeah, my ex-husband is a bit of a moron, but this fat piece of shit won't leave my children alone."

*Chef's kiss*

Fingers crossed, I guess.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

I'm gonna give it to Aaron, I just checked Aaron's cite for Exhibit 19 for June 10, 2024 (2:58:48 - 3:00:00)
And I gotta tell you ladies and gentlemen, he might have cooked. This does not. look. good!
View attachment 7662121
Editors Note: I censored the children's name, added AI captions and a little dramatic flair. This is not strictly the original video.

"Am I going to be going after these children, not necessarily..."
"...he's now going to weaponise them in his war against Rekieta...
THAT MAKES THEM FAIR GAME"

For all that is good, I cannot understand the mindset of someone who hears Melton say that and thinks, “Yeah… Steel Toe is bad, and Melton is good.”

These people are sick. Fuck them.

 

[Sneed Force One]

It initially appears that Aaron is going for the "he keeps replying to posts tagging me after ex-parte order" for the Rekieta case.

There's a lot of Twitter reply chains here where Rekieta is replying to posts where he is tagged. Could very well be seen as indirect contact. Especially where posts are mocking him.

 

[Captain Manning]

For all that is good, I cannot understand the mindset of someone who hears Melton say that and thinks, “Yeah… Steel Toe is bad, and Melton is good.”

These people are sick. Fuck them.

I have seen a lot of Internet shit flinging in my time, but very rarely do I see people involving the children of the recipient. Most people seem to see that as a definite red line.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

It initially appears that Aaron is going for the "he keeps replying to posts tagging me after ex-parte order" for the Rekieta case.

There's a lot of Twitter reply chains here where Rekieta is replying to posts where he is tagged. Could very well be seen as indirect contact. Especially where posts are mocking him.

I smell potential for a Rekieta in prison speedrun!!!
In other news:

That's not a mislink, Sean covered it at the end of a bunch of boring depositions on Biden being senile.

Potentially Criminal covered the evidence list tonight on his stream, should be timestamped. Sean reiterates his position (thinking it will be another L for the Toe).

 

[Potentially Cat Mom]

It calls for a watch party if you wanna know the truth about it.

I might be able to put an earpiece in one ear and listen discreetly while at work.

 

[johnnynoname]

For all that is good, I cannot understand the mindset of someone who hears Melton say that and thinks, “Yeah… Steel Toe is bad, and Melton is good.”

These people are sick. Fuck them.

I have seen a lot of Internet shit flinging in my time, but very rarely do I see people involving the children of the recipient. Most people seem to see that as a definite red line.

YOU NERDS JUST DON'T GET EDGY HUMOR!!!!!!!!! BEAT IT, DORKS!!!!

 

[AnOminous]

Let's not get carried away here folks. We thought the fireworks were coming with the bodycam and the Monty lawsuit and look what happened.

Nobody ever expected a win from the very court that covered up the footage in the first place. It was always going to appeal.

 

[Captain Manning]

Sean reiterates his position (thinking it will be another L for the Toe).

Now watch /r/steeltoeboringshow still say that Sean thinks Aaron will win anyways.

If Aaron does win one or both, I will be sad can't gloat at them.

 

[RotPockets]

us>steel toe>balldo/nlo
simple as.
fuck your life balldo/steel toe/dabblefaggots
I hate so much about how you choose to be.

 

[USAroXX]

lol

View attachment 7662051

No Kayla?

Video with smelton and junkie n weirdo group on the whore tour?

She is part of the FORMER LOVER domestic Violence tour. In fact, filing multiple police reports is exactly what a scorned abusive lover does.

She posed artsy pix in a polycule.
Aaron NEVER POSTED IT ANYWHERE.
All crazy Minnesota caselaw deals with the embarrassment of mindfuck having a search for your name come up with RP nudes!!!

In fact, ask judge to go Google Kayla rekieta ALL NUDES POSTED ARE FROM HER POSTING ONLINE not Aaron.

They are making a boo boo not including her as witness or getting ahead of what you know THEY will try to claim she is a "victim."

Nope
Ex lover
As whore tour shows
She is part of the ABUSER Group

Aaron still loves her, I guess
Sorry Side piece

 

[Someguyiknow]

I dunno what, if any, of the referenced sections might be have been in TWA's video, but I will note that 19 is definately not TWA's video.

View attachment 7661727

That might make @Folgers Can happy.

Smelton. Got him.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Line 18 of the filing

Patrick Smelton......lord i had a hardy laugh over that

HES FAT AND HE SMELLS AND HES A PEDOPHILE

I am imagining the paedo's face on a smelt, and laughing.

"The hearing is only 30 minutes, what could happen?"
That's what we were saying before Aaron's hearing and he left it in handcuffs

I hope that they are reporting anything Nick or Melton do to the judge in advance of the hearing. That seemed to work for Nick against Aaron. Seeing the judge cross before the hearing starts would be karmic.

It initially appears that Aaron is going for the "he keeps replying to posts tagging me after ex-parte order" for the Rekieta case.

There's a lot of Twitter reply chains here where Rekieta is replying to posts where he is tagged. Could very well be seen as indirect contact. Especially where posts are mocking him.

There is caselaw in Minnesota at the appellate level that I found where 'tagging' was held to be contact.

I might be able to put an earpiece in one ear and listen discreetly while at work.

This is not your blog or diary. Please post about Nick--not yourself.

 

[Philly Phunk Machine]

I hate WATP and WATP listeners

 

[not william stenchever]

I hate WATP and WATP listeners

I only have enough time in my life to pay attention to one man named Carl and I picked the one from Swindon. I'm happy to hear that the smart money was on the smug chuckling.