US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is everyone still all mad at Trump now or what? I think everyone is going off the deep end..
my biggest issue with Trump is that i think he hasn't done enough to put payment processors back in their place. his wife and son were debanked and endless politically spicy people on his side have been blocked from using normal payment options and the most he's done towards that so far is taking us one more step towards CBDC? i would have prioritized neutral banking enforcement over fluff like renaming military bases or the gulf
 
The funniest thing to me about the situation is I distinctly remember how back during covid you had leftist, with their pop culture addled brain, pointing out how "Batman, Spiderman, all superheroes wear masks!"
Yeah, Kevin Smith did that - he made some tweet about someone calling him out for being alone on a hike outside while wearing a covid mask. The irony is Batman's cowl doesn't cover his mouth.
 
I'm far superior Anglo-Franco-German mix. With a touch of Spanish nobility for flavor.
The french part of me hates the german part and vice versa, the anglo part hates both of them, and meanwhile the Scottish and the touch of Iberian in me are plotting against the other three.
 
Robert M. Price certainly does, among a number of others. The edit history of the wiki pages of Jesus and Historical Jesus have been quite thing to watch over the last fifteen years or so, and while it does currently say "no scholars argue he didn't exist" the foot note literally sources those that do.

All I am saying is saying scholarship uniformly agrees on anything is probably gonna get pushback.

Have a good nap grandpa.
Price needs to stick to editing Lovecraft stuff.
 
Omar Fateh has just won the Democrat Endorsement for Mayor of Minneapolis.

Omar Fateh once gave a speech at City Hall in which he said, "You want to know who the real threat is? They don't look like the folks up in the gallery or on the rotunda [pointing to Black people.] They look like many of the members that sit in the front [pointing to White people.]"
NY Post article.
And I think he’s just fine with ‘white people’ as long as they’re the right kind of ‘white people’ (you know the ones I mean) and backing his campaign.
IMG_1936.webp
IMG_1937.webp IMG_1938.webp
 
If this is talking about King Herod dying in Matthew after his massacre of male babies/toddlers in Judaea but appears later on to have John the Baptist executed, I'd like to point out the practice of names being passed down through dynasties. Detractors = modern day Sadducees who claim to be "experts" about scriptural issues but really aren't as they try to push for secularization by trying to look through a book without error with a fine-toothed comb to find something to lie about and spin.

@Potion_Time - Re: Herod, yes, The Jewish War by Josephus opens with a biographical account of King Herod's life, and what is known about him lines up with the account of his life in the New Testament - paranoid and jealous man prone to violent outbursts. Incidentally, I've seen some atheist Jews revile Christians and deny Jesus's existence in the process.
As @inetsone gathered I was referring to Herod being born in 72 BC and supremely unlikely to ever interacted with Jesus. Detractors in scholarship and academia use this inconsistency and, as there are a lot of independent accounts of Herod, throw historical Jesus out. It is fairly common from my experience in academia, and as someone who's primary focus was historical theory, it's an interesting debate.
 
Moist is a pseudointellectual faggot, he's an unironic centrist
Centrist? The dude is a full blown lefty and quite literally always has been. Didn’t forget how much he was behind BLM during the George Floyd bullshit? Or how he was playing Among Us with AOC? The only thing centrist about him is the parting of his hair
 
Centrist? The dude is a full blown lefty and quite literally always has been. Didn’t forget how much he was behind BLM during the George Floyd bullshit? Or how he was playing Among Us with AOC? The only thing centrist about him is the parting of his hair
He called himself a centrist multiple times pre-2020, I don't really keep up with the guy but he seems more performative if anything.
 
In my experience, I have to say that I don't think that the woman being crazy necessarily translates to them being good in bed.

You're right, it doesn't. The toothless methed out bitch at the bar probs isn't going to be that much fun. I've found tho that there's a range of woman. The crazier ones can be a lot of fun. Like blonde Russian women, for example, are legit nuts as fucking hell. They are stone cold ice and they will stab you in your sleep for lolz. They also fuck like it's the end of the world. Just saying.
 
Centrist? The dude is a full blown lefty and quite literally always has been. Didn’t forget how much he was behind BLM during the George Floyd bullshit? Or how he was playing Among Us with AOC? The only thing centrist about him is the parting of his hair
He's a jellyfish not a leftist. He'd be goose stepping if he thought that was the way the wind was blowing and would keep his lifestyle safe.
 
Back