US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Hassou Tobi, Based Downie, Argh My Cigar and 144 others
Click to expand...
inetsone said:
That is not a burgerable offense, my fellow Kiwi in Christ. I took a break and debated not coming back. Nice job describing a short polite post as "tard rage" like a drama queen tho.

Anyway it's damn near impossible to find anywhere else on the internet where the conversation is anything but uncritical. They swallow the propaganda hook, line, and sinker without any question. Trannies, the titty drawing letter, whatever. Zero thought, just acceptance.

At least here, we argue, line by stupid line if needed. Some of you tho clearly argue in bad faith, with retard binary thinking and all the rest, like your "tard rage" comment. It's dumb af.
Click to expand...
Right.
inetsone said:
The irony in this statement. You straight up don't get who has the burden of proof here do you?

You dipshits literally can't read and love to strawman. I legit can't tell if you're this stupid or being paid. At no point did I say he was a pedo. We can talk about Clinton's intel links all day if you want. I said start with that book to enter the chat. As other Kiwis have mentioned, this is not some isolated event here.

You dumb fucks are STILL following a NYC liberal. YOU ARE A FUCKING LIBERAL. Get it?

Now seriously MAGAs, fuck off with your cope and bad faith arguing.
Click to expand...
Get in the burger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, World Famous Quasi Payer, ThisIsGonnaBeGood and 2 others
One Angry Computer said:
A more realist approach is to train niggers to exert control over their natural impulses since childhood, for it's been proven that most animals can be successfully domesticated if conditioned since birth.
Click to expand...
Most animals except those that come from the African continent. No animals from Africa have ever been domesticated. Good luck with the more violent hominids from there.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid and not william stenchever
autistic dog said:
What would that even look like? A magical world where no one wants to sin? A world where sin isn't bad? Like murdering someone is good? Does the raped person like it?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure because it would be a world where our logic likely wouldn't be applicable.
WelfareNiggerQueen said:
Then it wouldn't be free will.
Click to expand...
He can make it be that way, he is the origin of all things following the Christian interpretation. He was the one to have made the logic that determines sin to be an inherent part of free will and therefore he can make it no longer a part of free will or better yet not exist at all.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Noxe and Pomegrenade
gay porn is the best porn said:
If God is all powerful (capable of doing anything) then He would be able to make it such that free will does not require sin.
Click to expand...
I mean it seems fairly clear that even if there are no problems or sin to begin with humanity would still fuck themselves over and create them. Sin is the defiance of Gods will, and having free will inherently gives you the ability to defy him. That's what makes it FREE will.

Even in the perfect sinless existence of the Garden of Eden, man and woman still both chose to shoot themselves in the foot against Gods direct warnings simply because they wanted to.

Free will without choices or consequences, and thus sin, wouldn't be free will. You'd just sit in the garden for all eternity and be mildy happy, but you would never become closer to God. You never chose to do good or reject the temptation of evil or be content with embracing God because you never had the option not to. You'd just be a puppet, which defeats the entire point of creating something in your own image I.E. with it's own separate will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, FlappyBat, Autistic Gunspergings and 4 others
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, ThisIsGonnaBeGood, societyguy01 and 3 others
inetsone said:
Giving us another example of low iq bad faith debate? That's not the comment in question. And still not a burgerable offense.

Anything else, libtard?
Click to expand...
I mean, that was you responding to a request for a page number to back up one of your arguments since your source didn't say what you claimed it did. If you want to claim that's a low IQ, bad faith debate, knock yourself out. You then flounced off after being mad someone would question you, because I guess that's bad faith.
 
Look we can squabble over bullshit gotcha things to ‘own the theists’ like ‘well can God make a rock so big he can’t lift?’ But they made a whole separate thread for that in Mass Debates we should probably be good Redditors and take it there
Celebrate Nite

Thread 'Argue about Christianity and the Jews'

mandatorylurk said:
View attachment 7668228

The faggot on the right did all the groveling for blacks and somalis in that gay city, crying at St. George's funeral, but he doesn't understand group preference, he will never be one of them. And he'll think this is ok as some form of liberal absolvement.


edit: baptists must be destroyed, that this "pastor" acts like killing a baby is something in the Bible is just....

View attachment 7668235

View attachment 7668234
Click to expand...
>Jeremiah
Why do Christians constantly insist on interpreting the old testament when it's not their fucking book?
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Like
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Pomegrenade, World Famous Quasi Payer and 12 others
Catch The Rainbow said:
This specific passage is interesting because God is asking Moses to stop him



He's God, he doesn't need to tell Moses to leave him alone. He could have simply ended the prophecy, instead he subtly indicates to Moses that there's room for negotiation and that he wants to be stopped. Moses takes the opportunity and the Hebrews are saved.
Click to expand...
The idea of God putting his faith in us as we do in him is both compelling but also outright touching a concept; however, it would also speak to the strength of Moses that he comes to defence of his people, and trusts in their virtue and faith despite possibly risking the wrath of God to make his case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid and World Famous Quasi Payer
More AWS-8Q Than You said:
I mean, that was you responding to a request for a page number to back up one of your arguments since your source didn't say what you claimed it did. If you want to claim that's a low IQ, bad faith debate, knock yourself out. You then flounced off after being mad someone would question you, because I guess that's bad faith.
Click to expand...

More low iq bad faith arguing.

You were told you knew nothing about the topic even tho you tried to claim you did. You asked for something to start getting a clue. I gave you a starting place, a book you didn't know existed, which is hilarious given the topic. You were told it was a starting place.

You pulled your page number demand out of your ass to try to claw back from your loss.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lawltism2
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, World Famous Quasi Payer, invisibult plus+ and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back