US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
your party agrees with his party.
If Biden did anything Trump did in his first term or now, Dem voters would love it, but it's a problem when Trump does it; it doesn't help when the GOP works with Biden but in the meantime acts like they hate him to make the masses think the kabuki theater is real.
 
I also like this piece that Chris DeRose guy doodled after Trump lost the 2020 elections
View attachment 7675454
(Archive)

Talk about poorly aged...
From his IMDB page he didn't even work on Powerpuff Girls, which makes the image feel even more random.
Screenshot 2025-07-21 210837.webp


This niggas only claim to fame is designing characters in slop era Spongebob and the dogshit Patrick Star Show.
 
That's an easy one, Obama ran on 'hope' and 'change' but ended up being nothing more than a race hustling Islamist warmonger who spent both of his terms handing out 'fell for it again' awards to the poor fucks who thought he'd actually put a stop to the war machine.
It's very fascinating watching the left manage the Obamas by essentially acting as if they never existed.
-They're not woke enough for the modern left
-They're not sane enough for the old left
-They didn't do anything leftists really wanted them to do
-They didn't really stop any of the shit leftists wanted them to stop
-They weren't black enough for black people
-They were too black for Hispanics
-And yet nobody can publicly disown them because that would be racist which is illegal for every single subset of the left

So they have to just pretend that other than Biden we've had 25 years of white male republican control.
Except for the one with the hand and thigh guy. That one was pretty funny.
How did that turn out? I ignored that faggot like 4 messages in.
 
It's very fascinating watching the left manage the Obamas by essentially acting as if they never existed.
-They're not woke enough for the modern left
-They're not sane enough for the old left
-They didn't do anything leftists really wanted them to do
-They didn't really stop any of the shit leftists wanted them to stop
-They weren't black enough for black people
-They were too black for Hispanics
-And yet nobody can publicly disown them because that would be racist which is illegal for every single subset of the left

So they have to just pretend that other than Biden we've had 25 years of white male republican control.
That's not true, Michelle was an inspiration for trans women all over the world
 
If God is all powerful (capable of doing anything) then He would be able to make it such that free will does not require sin.
How long are you going to throw this tantrum of insisting that "all powerful" is essentially meaningless? Seeing as you are able to form sentences, you must at some level understand that communication operates at the level of concepts and ideas, not literal syntax, right? "All powerful" does not mean "I can put literally any text after 'God is capable of' and it will be a true and sensible statement". You are communicating at the same level of sincerity as someone who replies to "tell me what you think about this" with "what you think about this".

Allow me to demonstrate this with a far more straightforward example: is 2^(2^(2^999999999999)) - 1 prime? I don't know, and I doubt you know either. Maybe @WelfareNiggerQueen thinks it is. Can God factor it into nontrivial components? Maybe, depends on whether it's prime. But you stubbornly insist that "all powerful" means that it doesn't depend on whether it's prime. Your actual contention, if you were discussing in good faith, is that you don't believe "all powerful" can have a consistent meaning. But you're not mentioning that, either because you're determined to baitpost, or because you read this argument used by someone else and decided to mindlessly parrot it without pausing to think about what it actually assumes (or quite possibly both).

It is telling that the disingenuousness of your argumentation has to rise to the level of attacking language itself.
 
Back