💰 Grifter Kino Casino - Read Kiwifarms with abortionist A-a-andy Warski and lardy PPP. A lolcow drama show. 2/28/2019, never forget.

THE COKE KING BEEJAMS RULES SUPREME
THE COURT HE HOSTS HOLDS GREAT ESTEEM
A PEDOHIVE, A LESBIAN QUEEN
THE HARDEST SWEEPING YOU HAVE SEEN

THE KING HIS COURT DOES ENTERTAIN
THE PARASOCIAL IS MAINTAINED
FOR TONS OF SHEKELS HE PLAYS GAMES
YES SUBS AND DONOS IS HIS WAY

THE QUEEN IS CUNNING TOO YOU SEE
SHE SUBTLY SUCKED OFF DSP
WHICH MADE, OF COURSE, DETRACTORS SEETHE
THE KING HIMSELF WAS ILL AT EASE

WHAT IS THE CUNNING FAT QUEENS PLAN?
WHY DOES SHE VISIT FOREIGN LAND?
WHY IS SHE STRAYING FROM HER MAN?
WITHOUT THE QUEEN THE KING IS DAMNED

FOR EVERY SINGLE BODY KNOWS
THE FAT QUEEN IS THE FUCKING SHOW
THE PEDO KING AND PEDO COURT
IS NOTHING BUT AN EVIL FORCE

PPP BISH PLEASE COME HOME
RECLAIM YOUR AUTIST THUNDERDOME
ITS NOT SO BAD TO BE ALONE
THE SEKTUR IS BUT GUNTS AND GNOMES



Lol, thank you do @Crocodylus Acutus for reccomending me Suno, I have now made an AI rap song out of this:


pro tip: to anyone reading this poem, the queen is PPP, and the king is Warski
 
1000009033.webp
This thread for the past 40 or so pages
 
There is really nothing left to try to convince these retards. They all showed their ass saying "I don't care if there is evidence, if it annoys me I will ignore it". Ok let's take a look at the most objective claim, WARSKI BOTCHED A PEDO STING AND LET PEDOS FREE. Notice how people are focusing on the snapchat thing and not this, which is ironclad and objective. Ok so warski didnt botch a sting? So he made it up for clout and money? Still bad. But no, you'll still see the sweepers ONLY talk about the iffy snapchat stuff (if you ask me, Warski is a degen who wanted to fuck some undersage girl and got caught TCAP style).

Balldo's gate and Altistic Right both did great write ups that is not sperging, but still people complain "the way you say things are annoying". If anything I think this vindicates the Red Text Crusade when the Kino Casino fans say "Yeah I dont care about evidence, it annoys me so I will ignore it", really aight beating the pedopig discord server allegations.

Thoughts on last show: holy fucking shit did they drag the Ralph segment out. Warski fucked up the intro so fucking bad. WE DONT NEED BACKGROUND, JUST SHOW RALPH. They kept coping since they knew the content was shit "if you follow ralph this is like the superbowl!". Implying if you thought the content was bad you just "didn't get it". How many times can you say "He's small, awkward, and uhhh small". No commentary was good, nothing was added, they might as well just laugh along and stay silent. Stop fucking spoiling the segment by telling people what happens at the end.
 
This thread is savage. Blood of crucified sweepers colors each page. Rebelious posters have tripled since All Becomes Spartacus has been fated. What have you created Jewsh.
 
Just to drop in on this.....everyone over looks the patebin.exe fuck up that ruined this 6 years ago. When it happened that made the Snapchat shit doomed to fail.

Granted warski is totally a Degen. But it's the wrong hill to die on when the hill was originally constructed by idiots.

Shouldn't the farms be more upset that last night this fucking cum stain claims to have edited 14 hours of Ralph footage. Footage that im fairly sure was near identical to stuff from the ralph thread.

The real tip off is if you clipped it you wouldn't shouldn't be shocked at what you are watching. He clearly made a point of how his meth addled mail order bride asked why he was shot. PS dont they make fun of that pedo Cog for airmailing a cut rate jeet in but I guess drug addicted hump backed aussies are okay?
 
Just to drop in on this.....everyone over looks the patebin.exe fuck up that ruined this 6 years ago. When it happened that made the Snapchat shit doomed to fail.

Granted warski is totally a Degen. But it's the wrong hill to die on when the hill was originally constructed by idiots.

Shouldn't the farms be more upset that last night this fucking cum stain claims to have edited 14 hours of Ralph footage. Footage that im fairly sure was near identical to stuff from the ralph thread.

The real tip off is if you clipped it you wouldn't shouldn't be shocked at what you are watching. He clearly made a point of how his meth addled mail order bride asked why he was shot. PS dont they make fun of that pedo Cog for airmailing a cut rate jeet in but I guess drug addicted hump backed aussies are okay?
Breaking news alert! Andy is a lazy retard who steals the work of others and claims as his! Up next: is Andy really a boxer?!
To be honest PPP mentions all the time that they steal from kiwifarms. Shameful but what are you going to do. Watermark could help but I am not going to judge our beautiful kiwiclippers for not doing it.
 
REMEMBER WHEN A KINO CASINO FAN WAS CAUGHT BY A PEDO BUSTER TRYING TO HOOK UP WITH A MINOR? IN HINDSIGHT, THIS PEDO SWEEPING BY THE CASINO AUDIENCE MAKES PERFECT SENSE
 
I feel like Josh saying he hasn't decided whether or not he wants Warski on the Fuck Gator Festival or not is proof enough we've won. Since when did Josh ever condition his apperances with the stipulation Warski not be on the show? It never seemed to be a problem before during all his other appearances on this show, why now?
 
I feel like Josh saying he hasn't decided whether or not he wants Warski on the Fuck Gator Festival or not is proof enough we've won. Since when did Josh ever condition his apperances with the stipulation Warski not be on the show? It never seemed to be a problem before during all his other appearances on this show, why now?
Warski shouldn't be on solely because he is buddies with Gaytor and Pedmenco and he sabotaged the Pedmenco interview.
 
If you want to convince people about the evidence you guys have, make a video that definitively proves what you are trying to say rather than acting like it's definitively proven.
No. Why would I need to make a video about it like a faggot when you can readily access serious discussion and analysis of the Snapchat and 2/28/19 situation that isn't all caps "sperging"?

No one needs to convince you it's true either. When Lard&Tard "gild the lily" by blowing something out of proportion, should they then have to back it up with a super serious three hour long takedown video to prove their righteousness? Or can you just accept they're joking/trying to fuck with someone and laugh at it nonetheless? Why would 2/28/19 posting be any different?

It seems like your argument is there's no evidence but you're just being obstinate and lazy; go back and read the thread.

Discussion regarding Cog's video
The Cog video (re-embedding here for context) is better than it has any right to be. I watched the whole thing. If you wanted to summarize the case against Warski in a 20-minute package, you'd be hard pressed to come up with something much better than this.

@Balldo's Gate 's writeup
I took the claim it was fake at face value but the more I look into it the logic seems circular? It seems to me that Metokur swept it up for Andy regardless of whether he was guilty or not of the sins he was accused of just like he would later sweep for a guilty Flam and now guilty VTubers. I'm not saying it's 100% guaranteed to be real, but instead that I'm not seeing the obvious conclusive proof that these were fabricated that I would expect for people to be as confident in dismissing it as they are.

@AltisticRight 's 1st writeup
Okay, I'm starting to think the snapchat messages were real. It was completely mishandled once Corey Barnhill got involved.

The Sinead connection (part of the aforementioned writeup but I found this pretty damning)
When did Tardski fight with Sinead and when was it made public? If we're able to find the dates, it might be the smoking gun.
1. If the breakup became public after these chatlogs, then it's probably real.
Andy didn’t publicly reveal the breakup until November 8, 2018.

@BicketyBuckBumble 's observations
It'd be a pretty big coincidence for them to fabricate messages that accurately laid out details of the break up a month before it was publicly revealed by Andy.

Interview with Tanya (the girl Warski was sexting)
https://www.youtube.com/live/l8XwkVaG6qM?si=LqY_9Ge5OAay931o (They start discussing her age around 1:41:54).
[...]
[A]t 1:47:32 they mention that she was actually 15 and [initially] lied to Andy about her age.

@AltisticRight 's 2nd writeup and compilation of all the Snapchat messages
Here's all the chatlogs I can find, I cannot find the video where they show animations and the profile. It is likely in a Zoom / Corey Barnhill stream

Screen recording of the Snapchat messages, shown on the Killstream
Zoom made Tanya record it. The entire "this thing is fake" came from a lying paedophile who pressured a 15-year-old alleged victim of grooming into recording stuff, it's no wonder she decided to DFE instead.
Analysis of the stream (after Jewsh tried to sweep it up)
So at 24:16 he shows uncensored pictures of children in their underwear, at 29:41 he shows a full body shot of a little girl in nothing but a string bikini top with her crotch visible, aaaand fuck you and @Null for saying this was censored JC Penney catalog level content I'm not watching the rest of this.
31:42 - 14 year old girl with her tits out, uncensored, partially clothed

32:16 - little girl with her tits out, naked, censored

33:17 - little girl with her tits out, naked, censored

This is only 5 minutes past where I last stopped and I'm barely a third of the way through the stream.
@Ground Around then analyzes the timestamped pictures using the Dost standard, described here:
  1. Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child's genitalia or pubic area.
  2. Whether the setting of the visual depiction is sexually suggestive, i.e., in a place or pose generally associated with sexual activity.
  3. Whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of the child.
  4. Whether the child is fully or partially clothed, or nude.
  5. Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity.
  6. Whether the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.

If this isn't enough to cast doubt on Tardski's innocence in your eyes I'm not really sure what will.
 
I feel like Josh saying he hasn't decided whether or not he wants Warski on the Fuck Gator Festival or not is proof enough we've won. Since when did Josh ever condition his apperances with the stipulation Warski not be on the show? It never seemed to be a problem before during all his other appearances on this show, why now?
The dirty little secret is that it's probably not actually Nulls decision, if his half-Mexican half-Jew kingpin declares that he will run the show, it will be done and Null will be be forced to cope about how he's actually ok with it because it will lead to more deportations or some shit.

But we all know what will be in the back of his mind as he shakes the hands that have sexted minors.
 
Back
Top Bottom