- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
It's not even employment, right now he was PAYING (or minimally earning nothing) to chat in some fat cows' youtube channel. That's the reverse of employment!
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
Buster Bloodvessel
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2025
Wet brained Nick taking the most literal definition of "pro-sober" one can
And wanting to talk to kids in school - when it's summer so school is out. (Even if they were,.would they have to endure *8 hours* of Nick droning on & on. And would there be a Kurt cooking segment?)
He's so self-absorbed he doesn't understand the county can't afford someone to monitor him, and him alone, for those 8 hours. And of course, as others pointed out ... why would pro-sober community service involve driving drunks around?
Potentially Criminal
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2024
He didn't even contemplate the liability involved in this.
A state sanctioned taxi service, using probationers with their personally owned vehicles, would be a disaster in the making.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
The forget-me-not is canned food? This man sees a Spaghetti Os can, and is brought to TEARS!
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2022
god damn lookin like a salty chump while he's proving himself wrong
you know what laypeople are good at?
spotting a gay aids weasel
can't be an unlikable weasel in public if you want people to like you, take your side, or watch your tirefire of a show
PrestonHolt
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2025
Oh no, rakieta spawns are going to starve.Good idea
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
His pro-sober community service would just be him drinking the state dry so all the other addicts are forced to be sober.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2021
Which HRO is he referring to here during the stream? The one his ex-wife obtained against him, or the current one he is petitioning against Nick? Because if it is the latter, it does not make sense unless Rekieta believes Aaron is MPR.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
Is this whitebread nigga joking? Has he listened to his own show?
Every legal opinion is prefaced with "i dunno", "i don't care", "i haven't kept up" and "thats fine, its like, whatever".
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2020
It would be akin to hiring a serial killer as your personal bodyguard.
It would be akin to hiring Chester the Molester as your live-in nanny.
It would be akin to hiring someone you saw on an episode of Hoarders as a cleaning service.
It would be like hiring George R R Martin to finish your epic fantasy series after you die!
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
The HRO Aaron's ex-wife filed.
Melty Butter
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
I'm fairly sure he's referring to the HRO against Melton. Recall, just a week ago that no one knew about that.
Aaron revealed it on STMS which unleashed Melton who, surprisingly, hadn't mentioned it for at least a week after he was served in early July.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
"I am sober by court mandate, but actually alcohol and drugs are cool. You can trust me to deliver your granny for her dialysis on time, every time!"
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
This is where Ashley LaRue immediately, yet predictably, receives an email from rekietalaw@gmail.com saying PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE COMPLAIN TO THE COPS PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
The HRO against Aaron ran out, the one against April is still in place.
She has also let him see his kids all this time, she knows full well the actual problem was April who had been trying to worm her way into a faux replacement mother position with the kids.
I cannot wait to read the transcript or see life testimony of Nick sending his Barneswalker to ask her questions about the previous restraining order against Aaron and have it blow up in his face.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
What part of that sentence warrants all caps and where is the problem?
Or he still thinks MNPublicrecords is Aaron?
Wedding anniversary? I'm sure he cared about that.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
He thinks because Aaron talked about the HRO he had against himself by his ex-wife, he can now bring that up in court.
Because as we all know, because you were accused of harassing someone once, you cannot be harassed yourself by a totally unrelated third party.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
Bold of you to suggest he would ever think of anything other than himself in these situations. He doesn’t want to do actual community service, he wants to do made up contrived bullshit and cry when the government doesn’t let him. I’m half surprised he didn’t suggest he attends music festivals to test drugs for purity to make sure no one gets fent in their system. Instead he thinks he should drive around drunks in his very cool and very expensive car! (You know he wants to take the rustang out for it too)
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
One point to Nick for remembering Ashcroft v. Iqbal but minus several million for forgetting it's about federal pleading standards and the case is in a Minnesota court, and plus several million RETARD points for not knowing the Minnesota Supreme Court has REJECTED adopting that standard.
"We granted review in this case to decide a question of great interest and consequence to parties and their lawyers in civil cases: whether the plausibility standard announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009), applies to civil pleadings in Minnesota state court. We conclude that it does not." Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 2014).
The Minnesota Supreme Court has not since addressed this issue.
Nick doesn't just not know the law. At this point, thanks to drugs and wetbrain, he is globally incompetent and displays inability to understand anything at all about how society operates.
Let's not forget a state sanctioned taxi service, using massive drug addicts not even in recovery.
The fact that Nick would even advance such a brain-damaged idea apparently unironically displays severely diminished cognitive abilities. No sane person of normal intelligence would even propose something this ridiculous.
Last edited:
Pentamidine
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
Nick rekieta - legal genius unlicensed lawyer - is saying that Aaron can be sued for defamation by MAPton, because when Aaron disclosed the HRO existed against MAPton, that PROVES that Aaron made the HRO filing for the specific purpose of defaming MAPton through the filing.
This isn't quite "muh wadduhmahrk", it's more "dead to rights on the felony". Nick is the dumbest, blackest gorilla nigger I've ever seen. He is pants on head retarded. He ACTUALLY believes that just because he can bad-faith twist fact A to maybe sorta possibly imply conclusion B, that means B is definitely legally factually true and if a judge or jury disagrees it's only because they're Scandanavian prudes that squirt liquor out of their pussies.
We know he ACTUALLY believes this shit because of the massive meltdowns he has every time he gets beaten on this shit. Unfortunately for us, though, Melton will never actually sue Aaron so we won't get to see Nick's cope when this 200iq legal theory would inevitably fail.
He was even smarter with Melton. Aaron is always 2 steps ahead, you see, and he knew Melton would be less likely to announce to the world that the Toe had successfully gotten a (temporary ex-parte) HRO against him. But everyone already knew about Nick's, and thus knew Aaron was capable of deceiving the courts to violate peoples' first amendment rights. So when MAPton stopped talking about Aaron, people got suspicious. And about a week later, Aaron nonchalantly mentioned he'd gotten an HRO against Melton. That lead to MNPR to go to the courthouse, get the documents, and publish them thereby publicizing Aaron's dastardly defamation against Aaron to the whole world.
That all proves that the HRO's were made specifically to spread the LIES of the EVIL and CONNIVING Aaron Imholte, opening him up to legal liability.
This isn't quite "muh wadduhmahrk", it's more "dead to rights on the felony". Nick is the dumbest, blackest gorilla nigger I've ever seen. He is pants on head retarded. He ACTUALLY believes that just because he can bad-faith twist fact A to maybe sorta possibly imply conclusion B, that means B is definitely legally factually true and if a judge or jury disagrees it's only because they're Scandanavian prudes that squirt liquor out of their pussies.
We know he ACTUALLY believes this shit because of the massive meltdowns he has every time he gets beaten on this shit. Unfortunately for us, though, Melton will never actually sue Aaron so we won't get to see Nick's cope when this 200iq legal theory would inevitably fail.
It goes like this - Aaron is a Machiavellian mastermind evil genius. He filed the HRO against Nick and filled it with lies, knowing that Nick would not be able to resist telling everyone about the HRO which would lead MNPR to go to the courthouse and get the documents, publish them, and therefore publicize Aaron's defamation.
He was even smarter with Melton. Aaron is always 2 steps ahead, you see, and he knew Melton would be less likely to announce to the world that the Toe had successfully gotten a (temporary ex-parte) HRO against him. But everyone already knew about Nick's, and thus knew Aaron was capable of deceiving the courts to violate peoples' first amendment rights. So when MAPton stopped talking about Aaron, people got suspicious. And about a week later, Aaron nonchalantly mentioned he'd gotten an HRO against Melton. That lead to MNPR to go to the courthouse, get the documents, and publish them thereby publicizing Aaron's dastardly defamation against Aaron to the whole world.
That all proves that the HRO's were made specifically to spread the LIES of the EVIL and CONNIVING Aaron Imholte, opening him up to legal liability.
Last edited: