US Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files - Bondi also told president at the meeting that Justice decided to not release more Jeffrey Epstein documents because of the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims

When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told. Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing.

The officials said it was a routine briefing that covered a number of topics and that Trump’s appearance in the documents wasn’t the focus.
They told the president at the meeting that the files contained what officials felt was unverified hearsay about many people, including Trump, who had socialized with Epstein in the past, some of the officials said. One of the officials familiar with the documents said they contain hundreds of other names.

They also told Trump that senior Justice Department officials didn’t plan to release any more documents related to the investigation of the convicted sex offender because the material contained child pornography and victims’ personal information, the officials said. Trump said at the meeting he would defer to the Justice Department’s decision to not release any further files.

The meeting set the stage for the high-profile review to come to an end. Bondi had said in February that Epstein’s client list was “sitting on my desk right now to review.” Trump said last week in response to a journalist’s question that Bondi hadn’t told him that his name was in the files.
The administration didn’t publicly announce the decision until weeks later on July 7, when the Justice Department posted a memo on its website. The statement, which was unsigned, stated that a thorough review had turned up no list of Epstein’s clients, no evidence that would lead to an investigation of uncharged third parties and no additional documents that merited public disclosure. It said that much of the material would have been sealed in a trial to protect victims and to block the dissemination of child pornography.

Typically, the FBI doesn’t disclose materials that aren’t related to a charged offense.
“This is another fake news story, just like the previous story by The Wall Street Journal,” said White House communications director Steven Cheung.

In a statement to the Journal on Friday, Bondi and the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, said nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution. “As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings,” they said.

On Tuesday, Blanche said on X that the Justice Department was seeking to arrange a meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell in the coming days to discuss any possible information about anyone who has committed crimes with Epstein.

Maxwell was found guilty in 2021 of helping Epstein’s sex trafficking and sentenced to 20 years in prison. She has been in custody since she was charged in 2020 and didn’t testify at her trial.

One of Maxwell’s lawyers, David Oscar Markus, confirmed the discussions and said, “We are grateful to President Trump for his commitment to uncovering the truth in this case.” Maxwell has been seeking to have her conviction overturned, contending she didn’t receive a fair trial.
Both Epstein and Trump said years ago that they had a falling out. Trump has said their friendship ended before the financier was indicted for soliciting prostitution in 2006. Epstein later pleaded guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution in 2008, served time in a Florida jail and registered as a sex offender. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, Trump said he hadn’t talked to Epstein for about 15 years. Epstein died in jail that year while awaiting trial on federal charges of sex trafficking.

FBI Director Kash Patel has privately told other government officials that Trump’s name appeared in the files, according to people close to the administration.

Patel declined to answer an inquiry from the Journal about the Epstein case, but said in a statement that the memo on the Justice Department website explaining why the department wouldn’t release more Epstein documents was “consistent with the thorough review conducted by the FBI and DOJ.”
Details of Bondi’s meeting with Trump haven’t been previously reported. Trump’s advisers had for months, including during the presidential campaign, said they would release the files, and Trump, while at times equivocal, indicated he would support the release.

Trump’s supporters, including some now serving in senior roles in the administration, claimed that the documents would expose global elites and powerful Democrats who spent time with the disgraced financier.

The decision to not release the files has triggered the most serious backlash from Trump’s political base since he launched his bid for the White House a decade ago, with a vocal group of the president’s allies seeing the move as a massive betrayal.

Trump has told administration officials in recent weeks that he wanted the growing public attention on Epstein to go away. On Tuesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson cut short the legislative session as some lawmakers demanded votes on more releases related to the Epstein files.

Last Thursday, The Wall Street Journal published an article about a letter bearing Trump’s name that was included in a 2003 birthday album for Epstein, which was assembled before the financier was first charged. On Friday, Trump sued the Journal’s reporters, Journal publisher Dow Jones, parent company News Corp and executives, calling the letter “nonexistent” and alleging the article defamed him.

A spokeswoman for Dow Jones said, “We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.”
Pages from the leather-bound album are among the documents examined by Justice Department officials who investigated Epstein years ago, according to people who have reviewed the pages. It’s unclear if any of the pages are part of the Trump administration’s recent review.
On Thursday, Trump said he had directed Bondi to “produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval!” On Friday, Bondi and Blanche asked a federal court to do so, saying it was “a matter of public interest.”

The grand jury testimony makes up only a portion of the more than 300 gigabytes of Epstein-related material the FBI compiled as part of the recent review. Among other material, the FBI confiscated digital and documentary evidence from Epstein’s properties in the U.S. Virgin Islands and New York in 2019 when he was arrested.

Grand jury testimony is subject to secrecy protections and faces potentially high hurdles for public release. Administration officials privately acknowledge that the court is unlikely to release the testimony.

On July 15, an ABC News journalist asked Trump, as he took questions from reporters at the White House, what Bondi told him about the Epstein files: “Specifically, did she tell you at all that your name appeared in the files?”

“No, no, she’s—she’s given us just a very quick briefing,” Trump responded. He also said Bondi had “really done a very good job” on the Epstein review.

The decision to not release the files and the harsh fallout among the public has roiled some of Trump’s senior staff, who have staked their reputations on exposing the ties between Epstein and moneyed elites.

Patel, the FBI director, and his deputy, Dan Bongino, had been in favor of releasing more documents, people familiar with their efforts said.

Bongino has told colleagues that his association with the administration’s decision to keep the files private has eroded his credibility among the base of support that fueled his rise as a successful podcaster and media personality on the right, according to a senior administration official. Bongino didn’t respond to requests for comment.

On July 9, after ABC News reached out to the White House about Bondi’s briefing to the president, Bongino and Bondi clashed in a meeting in which Bondi alleged that Bongino secretly provided information to the media to damage her reputation, people familiar with the meeting said.

Bongino in turn exploded about Bondi, his face red, and called her a liar, a senior administration official said.

(Link) (Archive)
 
There just isn't the capacity at the Fell For It Again Award factories to produce the required number of medals for all the miga child rape apologists.
Even people on reddit are saying this is nothing, they just like Trump flailing around this issue. Good to know you'd rather have Kamala letting in millions of spics and niggers while Democrats also support Israel. Retard.
 
I mean maybe Biden is as well? Guy molested his daughter after all.
If an "Epstein list" ever was made, it's not a list of child molesters. It's a list of his "associates."

If the list is accurate, almost everyone I know is on it. I was in a band with a dude whose father was one of the actual villains in the story (finance/intelligence guy).

Epstein was a similar guy with an overwhelming shiksa defilement fetish (partly expressed in pimping).
 
this is a self-inflicted wound by Trump letting this story stay longer than it should.
The fact he hasn't released the files in order to prove his name being in them wasn't for the reason that immediately comes to mind is a very, very bad look.

Look, I voted for the guy three times now. And I knew he was a shady fucker going in, as any person of his level of riches probably is, but that doesn't mean I'm going to pretend like this kind of thing is just a liberal plot. The base should be pushing him harder to release these documents like he campaigned on doing; Either it will exonerate him of everything besides just being friends with Epstein, or it will let us know that it's time to put hopes for change elsewhere.
 
The fact he hasn't released the files in order to prove his name being in them wasn't for the reason that immediately comes to mind is a very, very bad look.

Look, I voted for the guy three times now. And I knew he was a shady fucker going in, as any person of his level of riches probably is, but that doesn't mean I'm going to pretend like this kind of thing is just a liberal plot. The base should be pushing him harder to release these documents like he campaigned on doing; Either it will exonerate him of everything besides just being friends with Epstein, or it will let us know that it's time to put hopes for change elsewhere.
I said it in another thread, but it's likely that whatever is in the Epstein files is connected to Israel.
 
He really does need to release it and damn the consequences.

I doubt he's actually 'in' the files as anything more than an acquaintance (as Epstein was acting as a financial adviser/broker, he probably had a LOT of acquaintances). If there had been ANYTHING on Trump more tangible than 'Oh he was friends with Epstein at one point', the Uniparty would've deployed it.

I mean, dear God, they threw everything else at him, including bullshit charges in Georgia and NY and multiple attempted assassinations. No way in hell would they turn up their noses at a 'selective leak' to ruin him. So no. Sorry left wing faggots, but Trump isn't a pedo no matter how much you want him to be.

The speculation I have is that the 'list' will cluster bomb the fuck out of the GOP as well as the Dems, and cause Trump no small amount of headache trying to push through actual laws. Which... is a bit of a nasty dilemma. Do we let these politicians, some of whom are certainly kiddie fuckers, remain so we can push through desperately needed reforms? Or do we burn them too and hope we get a better roll?
 
I gotta say, I never got into the Epstein files thing. I thought it was retarded back when it was stupid qanon shit and I still think it's stupid now that it's stupid democrat shit.

This is the thing, the nature of any kind of weirdo elite party scene is that they might invite 200 rich dipshits but only like 10% get invited down into the perv rape dungeon. Everyone else is being served expensive wine by strippers up top. Degenerate but still legal. The list will be useless for basically anything other than aggressively partisan propaganda, on both sides. The Dems like to pretend they're above that sort of stuff but as we're seeing recently, that's absolute bullshit.
 
If he really was implicated in something bad why didn't the Biden admin do something about it? They had every federal agency they could up Trump's ass for the last 4 years.

The files themselves are everything related to Epstein, Trump's name would be in it no matter what because he used to be friends with him. It's likely there's logs that had him on flights with Epstein, but nothing about him interacting with minors that way. We won't know until the files are released.
People are forgetting that this ain't the first investigation related to Epstein and, iicr, Trump was a witness in a previous one after some misbehaviour happened in Mar-A-Lago and Epstein was asked to leave. Trump name is there surely related to this case.

Also, if the files say something like "...she kept asking Donald Trump to join them but he kept refusing", his name is them technically in the files but it means nothing.

It's amazing how people hate Trump so much that they want him to be a pedophile, like they're secretly wishing there was a video of him fucking a child to prove everybody that he's a bad person. Do they realise this involves a child being hurt?

Such video, very very likely doesn't exist. At most, he might have gone to one of his parties or met at some gala for important people, but that's it. Trump stopped being friendly towards him when he was exposed as a sex trafficker and did all the opposite.
 
I think everyone is getting worked up about the wrong thing and we’re being misdirected by the lying MSM. Donald Trump is NOT a pedophile. He’s a hebephile.

Don’t get it twisted.
Wrong. He is a heebephile. He didn’t fuck underaged girls, he was fucking Epstein!
Melania and Ivanka are beards for him and Jared Kushner.
So why wasn't it leaked years ago to ruin Trump? It's not like the Biden admin was just so moral that they couldn't do it.
Trump made sure to only incriminate himself while a member of the elite was with him and Jeff. Probably spit roast Diane Feinstein and ran a mini train on some Rothschild heir. Now we all know why Bibi calls him ‘Israel’s Greatest Friend’
 
I have never posted about this, and probably never will again. I really do not understand why anyone thinks the “Epstein files” are relevant. Do people honestly think the man kept a list titled “People who fucked kids on my sex island” so that he could use it against them later? The only chance of any elite pedos being called out died with Epstein himself. That’s why they killed him. How is this not obvious? I voted for Trump because he’s funnier than Kamala, and because I dislike immigrants.

Trump used the “Epstein files” as a talking point to pander to paranoid retards, and now Dems are using it to turn the same paranoid retards against him. Did Epstein have dirt on a bunch of rich pedos? Yeah probably. Does it matter now that he’s dead? Fuck no.

The recent Epstein faggotry has made me realize many of you are just actual retards, and every other board is right about A&N. I’m pretty drunk, but holy shit it’s so annoying seeing you fags fall for such gay bait. I was mad about Epstein when it happened, then I gave up on it. I can’t imagine hanging onto that hope for years, thinking there’s some magic file sitting in a drawer at the FBI that’s going to expose all the elite pedos.
 
Last edited:
The recent Epstein faggotry has made me realize many of you are just actual retards, and every other board is right about A&N. I’m pretty drunk, but holy shit it’s so annoying seeing you fags fall for such gay bait. I was mad about Epstein when it happened, then I gave up on it. I can’t imagine hanging onto that hope for years, thinking there’s some magic file sitting in a drawer at the FBI that’s going to expose all the elite pedos.
No child, Donald Trump is a russian spy, a pedophile, a cheeto skinned negro, and a pedophile. Enjoy prison for defending pedophiles.
 
I have never posted about this, and probably never will again. I really do not understand why anyone thinks the “Epstein files” are relevant. Do people honestly think the man kept a list titled “People who fucked kids on my sex island” so that he could use it against them later? The only chance of any elite pedos being called out died with Epstein himself. That’s why they killed him. How is this not obvious? I voted for Trump because he’s funnier than Kamala, and because I dislike immigrants.
Because its an exposed nerve that is obviously rustling Trump's jimmies to the point he is literally dragging out the "Hilary's E-mails and Obama" shit again.

So why wasn't it leaked years ago to ruin Trump? It's not like the Biden admin was just so moral that they couldn't do it.

Because it was radioactive dogshit and no one wanted to touch shit.

The only difference is that the Biden Administration didn't hire people who's whole shtick is "Release the Epstein files" whereas Trump hired a bunch of nepo hires who's whole base was "Release the Epstein Files"
 
So why wasn't it leaked years ago to ruin Trump? It's not like the Biden admin was just so moral that they couldn't do it.
You can tell the 2020 election wasn't rigged because Trump is reaching back out to 2017 Russiangate shit again instead. You would think he'd focus more on one of the most serious crimes committed against him if he had any grounds to do so.
 
Because it’s an exposed nerve that is obviously rustling Trump's jimmies to the point he is literally dragging out the "Hilary's E-mails and Obama" shit again.
Well yeah, Trump is kind of a retard and he gets riled up easily. I understand why the articles get published, I’m asking why any Trump voter on A&N cares. Anyone who unironically thought he’d “drain the swamp” is a retard. US politics has been a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils (or at least the funnier of two evils) since before I was old enough to vote, so I guess I’m just surprised when anyone is naive enough to expect dramatic change.

I see we've reached the next stage of cope, going from "Trump isn't in the Epstein files" to "Trump is in the Epstein files a billion times but only as a golf acquintance".
Trump could fuck a 14yo on live television and I still wouldn’t regret voting for him over Kamala tbh. My default assumption is that every single politician is a gross weirdo, so I just vote based on whatever issue I care about at the moment. This time it was immigration. (I know serious conversations aren’t part of your gimmick, but I think your posts are funny and I’m drunk so I decided to bite)
 
Last edited:
Back