Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[800 Chupacabras]

Today was the Brian Kohberger sentencing hearing, and it’s funny to think of an alternate timeline where Balldo actually streamed it. Could have been a neat little bonus pot after the payday that would have been the Karen Read trial. No hardball commentary needed, maybe just inviting on all the other lawtubers in his court to shoot the shit and discuss things like the victim impact statements. If he were even close to his peak and didn’t know what I do now, I would have watched that stream over the straight court footage any day.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Nothing like a dirty joke between father and son.

View attachment 7684448

What a disgusting family.

But what strikes me most about Nick lately is how forced and fake all of his laughter is. Does literally anyone think he’s having a good time?

 

[LiquidKid]

First Aaron mention came 23 minutes into the stream. He just can’t help himself.

So far there's only been a super chat to get him to watch the video of Vito losing his mind at the guy who rang his doorbell.

Nick said he’ll move on to Kurt interview videos once he’s got through all of the cooking streams. I pray Kurt continues to ignore Nick’s faggot ass.

I feel like Nick is trying to force Kurt into being a lolcow and failing horrifically at it. And it’s probably killing him inside because there was absolutely a point in his career where he had enough blind followers to make a lolcow out of people and now it just makes him look petty

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

Nick claims you can't lie for profit and mentions Ashcroft v Iqbal.
"There's nothing wrong with a lie for profit other than your own personal morality or ethics."
"The lies have to cause damage, not generate profit."
"In America, you can lie for profit."
One cannot say a false statement of fact that causes harm.

Hmmmm... perhaps the legal nerds here can pick this one apart.

He is muddling a few concepts.


In the U.S., you can lie for profit in some contexts (like satire or puffery), but not when the lie is a false statement of fact that causes reputational or financial harm. That’s the heart of defamation, fraud, and false advertising law. Profit doesn’t protect you—if anything, it can support punitive damages. Ashcroft v. Iqbal has nothing to do with this; it’s about pleading standards, not whether lying is legally okay. So no, you can't just lie for profit without consequence if it hurts someone.

 

[Milkshake Sniffer]

Nick claims you can't lie for profit and mentions Ashcroft v Iqbal.
"There's nothing wrong with a lie for profit other than your own personal morality or ethics."
"The lies have to cause damage, not generate profit."
"In America, you can lie for profit."
One cannot say a false statement of fact that causes harm

There be nuance here. He's taking about Butch Brigitte Macron's defamation claim against Candace Owens for saying she was born with a schlong. He is saying that defamation has to cause damage to be actionable which is generally true. There is the exception of defamation per se covering defined categories of scandalous claims of largely historical relevance (e..g moral turpitude such as calling a woman a prostitute) where you don't have to show damage. The whole premise of tort law (of which defamation is part) is to remedy a wrong by putting the wronged party into the position they would have been in had the wrong not occurred.

The wider claim of in America you can lie for profit ain't a statement of general application. Try doing that on corporate filing or tax returns and see how that works out for you. There's again the nuance that even where a prohibition (e.g. wire fraud) requires defrauding another out of money the profit gained be lying come from somewhere and usually it came from someone being defrauded. That's just the other side of the same coin.

 

[Cringemaster Supreme]

Nothing like a dirty joke between father and son.

So Bob let his son play a game where a penis shoots missiles at breasts, as a child. This perversion is genetic. He's probably letting his sons play similar games that they shouldn't.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

So Bob let his son play a game where a penis shoots missiles at breasts, as a child. This perversion is genetic. He's probably letting his sons play similar games that they shouldn't.

I hate that I looked at Bob and Celeste over a year ago and thought they looked like swingers. I try not to base judgments like that on mere looks. But everything we’ve learned about them since then has only confirmed that, even if they don’t actually swing, they encourage and enable degeneracy — even if it requires lying under oath in a court of law.

Thank God for the Slettas. Without them those five kids wouldn’t stand a fucking chance.

 

[Kheapathic]

Does literally anyone think he’s having a good time?

No, it's fake as shit, his laughter and interest in Kurt is faker than DSP's laugh. Like another said, he's probably trying to force Kurt into lolcowdom. The problem being, and while this isn't a 1:1, Nick trying to force something onto Kurt is like Isabell Janke manipulating Chris Chan; right down to the random animal murder. "Look at how stupid Kurt is" he screams; while his dick wilts in his pants and his wife vegetates to Star Trek.

 

[RotPockets]

I hate that I looked at Bob and Celeste over a year ago and thought they looked like swingers. I try not to base judgments like that on mere looks. But everything we’ve learned about them since then has only confirmed that, even if they don’t actually swing, they encourage and enable degeneracy — even if it requires lying under oath in a court of law.

Thank God for the Slettas. Without them those five kids wouldn’t stand a fucking chance.

All of the Rekietas look like Parrotheads or Juggalos.

 

[Sneed on Cloud 9]

It'd be nice if Kurt deleted his old pay-walled content just to take what wind is left out of Nick's sails.

 

[Chibitzen]

No, it's fake as shit, his laughter and interest in Kurt is faker than DSP's laugh. Like another said, he's probably trying to force Kurt into lolcowdom. The problem being, and while this isn't a 1:1, Nick trying to force something onto Kurt is like Isabell Janke manipulating Chris Chan; right down to the random animal murder. "Look at how stupid Kurt is" he screams; while his dick wilts in his pants and his wife vegetates to Star Trek.

Yes, he is also looking for something to milk that can't milk him back the same way. That list is very small now compared to past Nick. He needs to get that social media expert high where at least some people will engage his opinions like they seem important and that he is at the top of his game.

Since he isn't a practicing lawyer, this is as close as he can get to persuading a captive audience. I think there is some truth to the rumors that he has breakdowns over his insecurities about sucking at law.

He can talk about actual cases but that inevitably exposes his lack of practical knowledge where there is more competition that actually excels at that.

 

[LiquidKid]

Like another said

God damn. Bro couldn’t even remember my name when the post was only six posts above his.

Edit: the reactions to this post, and the people left them, have made it clear that users from 2024 do not understand sarcasm

 

[John Andrews Stan]

It'd be nice if Kurt deleted his old pay-walled content just to take what wind is left out of Nick's sails.

No, Kurt should continue to do exactly what he is doing. Nick wants attention and should be deprived of it.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

No, Kurt should continue to do exactly what he is doing. Nick wants attention and should be deprived of it.

Yup. Imagine he will be stumbling on Kurt's videos and he will start seeing they have more views than his.

 

[Chibitzen]

No, Kurt should continue to do exactly what he is doing. Nick wants attention and should be deprived of it.

Kurt, if you are reading this, he may never stop until he runs out of Youtube footage and has to resort to digging up childhood videos of you to mock. Take it as confirmation you have driven him fully insane and don't be an Aaron and turn multiple W's into L's. Just take the win.

 

[Oxyjen]

Nick, though, is clearly malding for some reason.

It’ll be funny if Nick panics due to paranoia about all these mysterious legal switcheroos, and accepts the settlement.

 

[Sneed on Cloud 9]

No, Kurt should continue to do exactly what he is doing. Nick wants attention and should be deprived of it.

You're right. My emotions got the best of me.

 

[Kheapathic]

God damn. Bro couldn’t even remember my name when the post was only six posts above his.

I'm less formal when phone posting.

 

[Swole McPole]

Nick said he’ll move on to Kurt interview videos once he’s got through all of the cooking streams. I pray Kurt continues to ignore Nick’s faggot ass.

This will really bring the crowds back, won't it? All those wine moms who signed up to watch Depp vs Heard and the Rittenhouse trials will be falling over themselves to watch Nick pleasuring himself to Kurt's cooking streams.

Now shut up, nigger. The man is a social media genius. Number one recipient of superchat monies in the USA. Rumble gib him a zillion dollerz! Aaron ate his goo!

You know nothing!

All of the Rekietas look like Parrotheads or Juggalos.

I've just had a horrific vision of Ma Rekieta flashing her saggy baps for a bottle of Faygo.

 

[daffodils]

Macron v Owens: Comedy Cometh, Ketamine Convictions, Epstein...​

Good night for Nick. 427 unique chatters. $297.89 in 34 donations ($8.76 average/~$52 per hour). About 33% ($100) of this came from a single whale named Ryan Blue Thunder. He streamed until 4:40AM.

Top three in supertips.