- Joined
- Dec 23, 2014
I am trying to understand this statement. Are you trying to claim gynecological cancer is only lethal in fatasses?again, Obesity is the sole cause of mortality at gynecological cancers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am trying to understand this statement. Are you trying to claim gynecological cancer is only lethal in fatasses?again, Obesity is the sole cause of mortality at gynecological cancers
This is correct. We now know a lot more about the connection and adjusted hazard ratio between hysterectomy and dementia, particularly early onset dementia. Lifetime exposure to additional estrogen reduces dementia risk, and that plus other benefits such as the cardioprotective effects mean doctors are now more hesitant than ever before to remove the reproductive organs unless there is a real need (or unless you claim you're a man).And in the 1980s it would have been 90% of woman over 50. These days they are far more picky about who gets them, and there has to be very compelling reasons for deathfats.
Answer? Fat brain thinks retarded fatly things
M'lardy lookin' like a knight errantView attachment 7677626
People relying on ChatGPT for factual information when this is where it shines.
sir shits a lotView attachment 7677626
People relying on ChatGPT for factual information when this is where it shines.
She sounds sick and stuffed upIt's live behind a black screen
Foodie Beauty is live
I believe they are saying that gynaecological cancers are often estrogenic cancers, and that with extra estrogen released by fat cells, it’s a fatty cancer. While there’s an element of truth in that they are more prevalent in the obese, it’s not an absolute. Many normal weight women get gynaecological cancers.I am trying to understand this statement. Are you trying to claim gynecological cancer is only lethal in fatasses?
*again, Obesity is the sole cause of mortality at gynecological cancers
Don't forget the fact that she is phenomenally stupid, barely interacts with anyone except from her pet hyukhyuking retard who spends as little time with her as he can possibly get away with, and anyone she might encounter on her rare forays outside for oice cream or KFG most likely don't speak a lick of English so any language skills she did have are atrophying more by the day. Did I mention that's she's also a fucking idiot?It's a sign of lack of confidence in the narrative. She overuses filler words because she can't tell the truth about magnificent Syria so she's "you know"ing until her rotten brain can come up with something acceptable.
Plus, she's scared shitless (lol)
An example https://www.mdanderson.org/publicat...ne-cancer--what-s-your-risk-.h14-1592991.htmlI am trying to understand this statement. Are you trying to claim gynecological cancer is only lethal in fatasses?
This is absolutely not true. She was insanely passionate about Nader. He was the love of her life. Him and Nashies.There’s just no topics that I give a crap enough about, I’m not passionate about anything.
Chantal's hysterectomy happened in Canada.I realize you're not in the US, but this is America, Jack
[X] but I'll definitely watch it if true.- I think she's going to put out a cooking vlog with a local woman
Not really. Syria's birthrate has dropped substantially and is only 1 baby per woman higher than the US. Syria's at 2.70 babies per woman now and dropping.- people have big families there
Bad news if true, since it would means she's MUCH closer to Sweida and the Druze/Bedoin area than we think. This link has been posted before and it's updated hourly:- talking about Israeli helicopters in her area