Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

Abella said:
I don’t understand the point of bothering with making an account here to do that and try to cape for these freaks.
Click to expand...
There is no logic to it. Their socks and their cheap defense of freaks isn't going to do any good, but they don't think far enough ahead to care.
WelperHelper99 said:
They make it hard to talk about a real issue, which is payment processors. Like nigga, you guys were no barrier. They wiped you away like cobwebs. And the public won't care that it happens, or that the payment processors can even do this. It's sickening how much they make it all about themselves
Click to expand...
The loli fags had no issue with this until their incest games and their pedo games got wiped away. Censorship only matters to them when it effects them. The prior reference to trannies is spot on. Trannies only start to talk about "child safety" when they can use it to slide in the "Oh, but kids need hormones" lie, and similar agenda points.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Scarface1, Gatcha Gonna Getcha, NaggotFigger and 12 others
SocialJusticeWario said:
I'll never understand why these degenerates feel they gotta signpost their mental illness all the time.

Like yeah sure everyone has a kink or two. We just keep it to ourselves. But making your one kink your entire personality? And a kink that somehow only exists in one country?

They scream for attention for their special fetish and then whine when they're persecuted for it. Then they just scream louder when other pedos get more attention. Fucking freaks.

You gotta wonder why these pedos don't stop to wonder why their fetish only exists in Japan. Then again they also pretend it's not persecuted there too because they gotta pretend they ain't pedos.

News flash, lolifags. if your fetish is exclusive to one insular country that got hit with nuclear fallout then you can't pretend you ain't a degenerate freak.
Click to expand...
These freaks never outgrew their Tumblr phase from the 2010s. Tumblr was the platform which normalized putting your mental illnesses and kinks on full display. No matter how many “1488”s the Lolicon may put into their screen names, they are still stuck in their Tumblr phase.

While Tumblr has the reputation of being the hiveplace of the original SJWs (I cringe typing that acronym out), it used to be the platform for reblogging porn. It was hard to browse the anime side of Tumblr without stumbling onto hentai at some point.

There were hentai blogs that would curate specific fetishes and pander to the most degenerate of degenerates. These blogs fostered communities of “no kink shaming” which went mainstream. These were the same communities that normalized online prostitution.

You know what else Tumblr was infamous for?

Brigading people for stating unpopular opinions. It was also famous for coordinating mass reporting efforts against people who didn't tow the line.

In just the last couple of years, I've lost count of how many “Antis” YouTube channels were hit with false DMCA claims thanks to Lolicoons taking offense with being called what they are.

Despite what your average Lolicon Twitter user may claim, everything about their behavior is a byproduct of their Tumblr days. Many Tumblr users were 4Chan users as well, no matter how progressive they would outwardly appear.

They are spiritual “SJW”s when you think about it.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Nigger Cobson, Scarface1, CEO of Lurkers and 18 others
Ghoul Road said:
The loli fags had no issue with this until their incest games and their pedo games got wiped away. Censorship only matters to them when it effects them. The prior reference to trannies is spot on. Trannies only start to talk about "child safety" when they can use it to slide in the "Oh, but kids need hormones" lie, and similar agenda points.
Click to expand...
Bullseye on the censorship. They only care when it affects them and their interests. If it doesn’t get in the way of their consumption of this media, they couldn’t give less of a shit.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Scarface1, twinArmageddons, Carlongos2 and 3 others
Abella said:
Bullseye on the censorship. They only care when it affects them and their interests. If it doesn’t get in the way of their consumption of this media, they couldn’t give less of a shit.
Click to expand...
And now, coomers and xitter pornographers are angry at (b)itch.io for banning their porns. Yeah, too fucking bad, I'm taking Null's route of people deserving the tyranny we get. Niggercattle.
KuwabaraTheMan said:
It really is terrible that troons and the like have polluted a very legitimate issue with their bullshit, thereby insuring nobody cares.
Click to expand...
WelperHelper99 said:
They make it hard to talk about a real issue, which is payment processors. Like nigga, you guys were no barrier. They wiped you away like cobwebs. And the public won't care that it happens, or that the payment processors can even do this. It's sickening how much they make it all about themselves
Click to expand...
They can't help themselves, with their narcissism and just looking at their own bellies while thinking they'll have a "juggernaut of a moobment".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Abella, Kiwisee and Markass the Worst
WelperHelper99 said:
Nobody is, it's only surprising it took this long.

Also a response to this retard I saw on twitter
View attachment 7685481
On the payment processor shit: you Lolicons stopped nothing. The payment processors raped you like they rape everything. They just finally noticed you. The payment processors are fucking evil. Don't act like you're some martyr. The farms has taken the brunt well before you. Fuck off.
Click to expand...
Nobody but tankies have said they want it banned. We just want them pushed into a closet, bullied, or looked into. If their shit is banned we first and foremost cannot identify that they are dysgenic freaks that need to be avoided at all costs, and second off the laws would be so vague that it'd fuck over all of us even more.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Scarface1, Twilight Twill*^, Outer Space Traveller and 3 others
Waff said:
Nobody but tankies have said they want it banned. We just want them pushed into a closet, bullied, or looked into. If their shit is banned we first and foremost cannot identify that they are dysgenic freaks that need to be avoided at all costs, and second off the laws would be so vague that it'd fuck over all of us even more.
Click to expand...
Payment processors should not act as judge and jury. We have a legal system for that. We already have laws on the books. The justice system should enforce it if they so choose, not some banker worried about "Risk Assessment".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Scarface1, Jershua Coomer Troon, Gatcha Gonna Getcha and 9 others
TATE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODE!! said:
The sheer fact there are people on the Farms of all places who seem to have a vested interest in protecting loli or even AI generated CP in that recent A&H thread is astounding. Rest in piss @Suel Forrester.

Here's something that always sickened me with this shit from an artists standpoint I don't think people bring up often if ever is that a lot of these artists are probably using real CP for reference to get better at there art.
Click to expand...
Excuse the necro but this is a good point.

I don't know if this has been brought up in the thread yet but I'm curious: in territories where loli drawings are legal, what would happen if someone traced a bunch of real CP? Of course the artist would be legally fucked but what about the drawings? Do they still get considered as "fictional representation"? What is the border for "fictional depictions?" is what I'm getting at.

Yes, technically, the drawing isn't a literal photograph of a real child but it's still based on a depiction of someone real. Kinda just trying to extend the line of thinking here on the morality at play when there has to be a reference for the drawn image ultimately.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: TATE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODE!! and Markass the Worst
4090 Chad said:
Everyone that follows this bitch needs to be on a government watch list.

Also with all the creepy makeup and filters, she really looks like a demon from hell, very unsettling to look at.
Click to expand...
Oh my friend, that isn't her. That is a completely different woman using costuming, angles, and a face filter to make herself look like the model that Ms. Howard is puppeting.
1753389839611.webp
1753389683907.webp1753389777417.webp1753389894968.webp1753389972939.webp1753390017276.webp




 
  • Islamic Content
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Scarface1, Cheese_lad, Gatcha Gonna Getcha and 10 others
BussyBusta said:
Excuse the necro but this is a good point.

I don't know if this has been brought up in the thread yet but I'm curious: in territories where loli drawings are legal, what would happen if someone traced a bunch of real CP? Of course the artist would be legally fucked but what about the drawings? Do they still get considered as "fictional representation"? What is the border for "fictional depictions?" is what I'm getting at.

Yes, technically, the drawing isn't a literal photograph of a real child but it's still based on a depiction of someone real. Kinda just trying to extend the line of thinking here on the morality at play when there has to be a reference for the drawn image ultimately.
Click to expand...
I think I've seen Null mention an artist that used real CP references for his porn get busted.

Dunno who it was, but people still continue uploading his work on 4chan knowing full well its real kids the artist is depicting (I know its not Shadman).

That assigned male or whatever webcomic artist got caught using toddlers for cub porn but I don't think anything really came from that.

15ish years ago I was living in Japan. I used to be cautiously ambivalent towards lolicon, most of the time it was derpy artwork with autism face (lucky star?) so was like "whatever" at the time. Couldn't be too bothered by bad drawings of girls with goldfish faces.

Wasn't until I went on a trip to Tokyo and was checking out their doujin book stores with much more varied and hyper realistic artwork when I'd first started to get this sick feeling actual references were being used.

I think it was about ten years ago when Japan announced they were outlawing child porn in full that I started to realize that I might of been right (I was blissfully unaware CP was in some gray area over there. Something about how you could possess it but not distribute it iirc).
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Nigger Cobson, DeeNaMeeTay, The Foxtrot and 5 others
WelperHelper99 said:
Payment processors should not act as judge and jury. We have a legal system for that.
Click to expand...
Saw something here that I thought might be topical. Denpasoft getting restricted regionally due to local laws.
Thought it was interesting that it was snuck in with the other "brand protection" takedowns, when really it's more akin to pornhub requiring ID in certain states. Same intent, same approach, different legal basis. It's not saying "this doesn't align with our values, therefore we will not process the payment" it's "you need to adhere to regulatory compliance for the location you are doing business in".
And then that can also extend to if the seller does not have the ability to restrict regionally, they would have to take everything down until they are able.
It's the flip side of something like Stop Killing Games where you hope to see the downstream effects of a global market. I'm conflicted.
1753389288373.webp1753389510561.webp
[A]
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: The Foxtrot, Waff, terraform45 and 2 others
TATE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODE!! said:
Dunno who it was, but people still continue uploading his work on 4chan knowing full well its real kids the artist is depicting (I know its not Shadman).
Click to expand...
Probably Rufus. There's an old thread screencap something to the effect of "I noticed it says PTHC on her sock so I googled it and now I'm afraid the cops are going to bust in my door".
 
  • Informative
Reactions: TATE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODE!!
Fat At The Internet said:
Saw something here that I thought might be topical. Denpasoft getting restricted regionally due to local laws.
Thought it was interesting that it was snuck in with the other "brand protection" takedowns, when really it's more akin to pornhub requiring ID in certain states. Same intent, same approach, different legal basis. It's not saying "this doesn't align with our values, therefore we will not process the payment" it's "you need to adhere to regulatory compliance for the location you are doing business in".
And then that can also extend to if the seller does not have the ability to restrict regionally, they would have to take everything down until they are able.
It's the flip side of something like Stop Killing Games where you hope to see the downstream effects of a global market. I'm conflicted.
View attachment 7686740View attachment 7686756
[A]
Click to expand...
It's the age verification. I know, my state is on the list. This one is a little more clear cut. They didn't give a way to verify ages in these states with ID. That's the law now. Now, payment processors being used as leverage is bullshit. Do none of these states have attorney Generals if they think something is in non compliance?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back