Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
His Linkdn says he used to work for Nvidea and he has ties to a bunch of shady tech companies that totally aren't defense department fronts.

He'll be fine.
“Tea was 100 percent self funded by Sean”
That’s a dog whistle for “every libel and defamation lawsuit will be 100 percent funded by Sean”

He’s fucked mate
 
What the fuck am I even looking at with some of these selfies? It's like you took the world's ugliest phenotypes and put them in a blender.
1000005559.webp
 
It is absolutely staggering to someone who grew up being taught to not share any personal information online, that there are so many people sharing so much personal information about themselves, up to and including driver's licenses.

Something went deeply, terribly wrong in the last 30 years.
 
You are missing my point: if left-wing spheres are telling young women online that men are dangerous, and then right-wing nutjobs online say shit like "women are stupid" or "repeal the 19th" or "your body my choice," it reinforces the left-wing propaganda. There are not enough conservative men gatekeeping the retards. That is my point. If you don't think it's a problem then fine, but you don't get to bitch when women complain about it and have the receipts.
Why would men gatekeep anything? Who gives a fuck if you join an incel forum and get upset by what they post? We think it's funny you're both cry babies. If you want men to protect you from the evil incel menace maybe try being a woman men will value enough to protect
 
Last edited:
Off-topic but I've always felt it's weird how KF users of all people get offended over stuff like this. You're willingly on KF, a place where people laugh at lolcows and say wacky offensive shit all the time, and at the end of the day hardly any of it matters. Who gives a fuck if some faceless forum poster uses a word you don't like? Just brush it off lmao.
We're laughing at lolcows right now, the women using Tea and getting their data leaked are the collective lolcow. The difference is that I'm not about to petition for new laws that prohibit the existence of Tea to protect my feelings. I'm not personally offended by the existence of this app, I'm celebrating the hack because it's funny. KF has been hacked more times than I can count, the developer(s) of Tea should've known better than to not anticipate becoming a massive target.
 
That's because the right to free speech in the U.S. literally only applies to the government censoring you. People seem to sometimes mean free speech means the right to say offensive things and be free of consequences. Which doesn't work, because you're taking someone else's right to be free of your shit away. Say whatever you want but expect consequences.

What consequences? Cause and effect, or “if you do what I don’t like, I expect some agent ( that obviously isn’t me lmao) to do something about it” regardless of right wrong good bad helpful useless?

Consequences isn’t a magic word to pre-empt a crashout.
 





 

Attachments

  • them folks done let a real one in😭 #teaapp #tea #foryoupage #teapplo... [7530635615692410143].mp4
    1.4 MB
Last edited:
That's because the right to free speech in the U.S. literally only applies to the government censoring you.
The first amendment's protection of free speech is not the same as the concept of free speech.

Free speech as a right is, again, not equivalent to the protection of speaking freely about the government.

They are two different concepts.

The right to free speech without government intervention is what the 1A is protecting.
 
So to try and summarize the timeline of this:
>app created by a gay man for women to identify crooks/married men/bugcatchers
>coded in Vibe in a weekend by a huehue because "we need less white men in coding" or something
>instead becomes app where 2-3/10 women seethe over being pumped and dumped by the exact same chads
>despite /r9k/ mythology of superhuman sexual attractiveness chad instead revealed to be shameless whale hunter
>foreveralone master hacker known as 4chan hacks app despite having no prospect of ever being on the app
>(doesn't even hack it, just enters unprotected domain on the internet anyone could have accessed if they bothered)
>debate immediately becomes mass sperg event between people who aren't dating and thus have no reason to fear or need it
>Alaska massively overrepresented for some reason
 
The biggest issue is poop touching. You don’t pozload my negholep here, because it’s retarded, and also it can cause legal consequences for yourselves and for Null. Regardless of the actual law, anyone can sue anyone for anything, and it can be quite expensive. Poop touching opens the door to litigation.

What these women and this app (and its Jewish creator) are doing is not just pozloading my negholep, they are smearing it all over their faces. The very first thing a lawyer will ask in litigation during a class action lawsuit is “ what is the intent of your website/app?” Here on Kiwi Farms, the answer is simple. It’s to discuss eccentric individuals and groups on the internet. At the Farms very core, that is its purpose. The Tea app, right away, will only be able to answer (regardless of how they answer) is that its intent is to judge, and defame individuals who never gave their consent. The second question will be “do you moderate your content” and if they answer anything other than “no” they are going to be hit with a plethora of evidence in discovery that says otherwise. Finally, the lawyers will ask “have you profited off of defaming anyone?” If they answer with anything other than yes, they will immediately be hit with every article glorifying their success. It’s over for the bald gay jew and the screeching cat ladies.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Grug
You will not succeed without women supporting you.

What do you really mean? This is vague, vibey, feelsy; but you're a smart poster. So, let's dig in a little?

But first, there's two things I want to say here, before you respond with what specifically was encapsulated within "women supporting you":

1) Women tend to support who is seen as powerful. Have we all forgotten how many women went on social media to tell everyone they had sex dreams about Trump after his first election? Pepperidge farms remembers:

2) In the USA, every single Republican presidential victory since 1988 was without the general, overall support of women.
2a) If we split by Married vs Unmarried women, guess what?

YearMarried WomenUnmarried Women
2020TrumpBiden
2016TrumpClinton
2012RomneyObama
2008McCainObama
2004BushKerry
2000BushGore

Republicans reliably get the support of married women. Democrats get the support of unmarried women. Married women make up a larger share of the electorate, but the unmarried cohort is growing.

So, my dude, what I want to ask you is this:
Who wants, or needs, the support of what kind of woman?
 
Back