Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
Is a bullet an option?
1753550702829.webp
 
Warms my heart that a couple thousand retarded women get exposed for being retards on the innernet and it starts a civil war thread on the farms between two factions of hateful losers who are not involved in the inciting incident in any way

It's the thread that keeps on giving. I'm pretty sure the leaked number is close to 100k though.

Dumb women accidentally doxxing themselves happens all the time and I'm less enthusiastic about that, especially since there's no way to tell if they made an account out of curiosity, posted anything, or tried to leave positive reviews/support the men getting slandered. The only people that I feel zero sympathy for are the ones that are stupid enough to post their government/LEO/military IDs. You are supposed to be above the rest of the normie cattle and should be held to higher standards because you run the fucking government. They all should be fired.
 
Welcome to the farms. Since this is your first day here you should try reading some threads on the main topic of the forum. Lolcows and the people who have relationships with them.

Cobra JFS got laid. He's a bald alcoholic with rotting teeth and he got laid.
Good point! This is why it's never a good idea to go for a partner below your level, Cobes didn't deserve to be wrapped up with NAL, she would have been better for someone like Cyraxx.
 
I think the funniest thing is the lack of self awareness on the left that the majority of their young men are also incels, yet they throw that around as if incel can only mean someone who is a right wing loser.
The difference is the lefties have a lot of women, meaning there is a chance of getting laid. Null said this on his last stream and he was right: these retarded le ebin based redpilled "movements" will fail because they are hostile to women. You will not succeed without women supporting you. The Tea Party had women young and old. MAGA has women. The Nazis had women. Communists mobilize women. If you are inherently hostile to women like incels are and say shit like "repeal the 19th Amendment" and "your body, my choice," women gravitate elsewhere.
 
The difference is the lefties have a lot of women, meaning there is a chance of getting laid. Null said this on his last stream and he was right: these retarded le ebin based redpilled "movements" will fail because they are hostile to women. You will not succeed without women supporting you. The Tea Party had women young and old. MAGA has women. The Nazis had women. Communists mobilize women. If you are inherently hostile to women like incels are and say shit like "repeal the 19th Amendment" and "your body, my choice," women gravitate elsewhere.

Null is right to an extent, but from the majority of the women I've dated they have mostly been left wing and without fail, at some point in the relationship, they will make an aside about how 99% of left wing men are effeminate pussies. The last time this was brought up was when my ex's sister was single again and we all went out to grab a bite to eat and the two of them were openly joking about how every she wanted to date was a "conservative" (the dude in question wasn't even MAGA but to normies anyone who thinks we should have the second amendment might as well be).

Sure, there is a chance that being adjacent to women will increase your odds - kind of like how the male feminist slowly lays traps and moves in when his friend is heartbroken - but attraction isn't a choice. Men with certain qualities and principles are naturally inclined to be drawn to one side or the other, and for a lot of the qualities a woman looks for in a man these are values are currently being extolled by the Republican party. We've been hardwired over thousands of years of evolution (or by God, whatever you prefer) to gravitate towards certain traits in a partner and that kind of draw typically takes priority over ideological party lines that have been around for a very short time by comparison.
 
Last edited:
Null is right to an extent, but from the majority of the women I've dated they have mostly been left wing and without fail, at some point in the relationship, they will make an aside about how 99% of left wing men are effeminate pussies. The last time this was brought up was when my ex's sister was single again and we all went out to grab a bite to eat and the two of them were openly joking about how every she wanted to date was a "conservative" (the dude in question wasn't even MAGA but to normies anyone who thinks we should have the second amendment might as well be). Sure, there is a chance that being adjacent to women will increase your odds - kind of like how the male feminist slowly lays traps and moves in when his friend is heartbroken - but attraction isn't a choice. We've been hardwired over thousands of years of evolution (or by God, whatever you prefer) to gravitate towards certain traits in a partner and that kind of draw typically takes priority over ideological party lines that have been around for a very short time by comparison.
What you're overlooking there is the woman in question views "conservative" men as a threat. Why is that, you think? Is it because women are le heckin stupid? Is it DA JOOOOOOOZ? Or is it because there are "conservative" men all over social media saying dumb shit like women don't deserve bodily autonomy and shouldn't be allowed to vote? Men can justify their shit however they please, but they are still shooting themselves in the foot when they say things like that and/or orbit other men like that.

When an incel stops assuming the worst about every woman and takes some personal responsibility for himself and who he associates with, he improves.
 
Before you spend 5-10 minutes organizing your thoughts into something to post on this thread, keep in mind the women you're talking about look like this
It's almost like women, on average, have average levels of attractiveness. If you had the same grid of faceshots from KF users I am not sure it would fare any better.
 
What you're overlooking there is the woman in question views "conservative" men as a threat. Why is that, you think? Is it because women are le heckin stupid? Is it DA JOOOOOOOZ? Or is it because there are "conservative" men all over social media saying dumb shit like women don't deserve bodily autonomy and shouldn't be allowed to vote? Men can justify their shit however they please, but they are still shooting themselves in the foot when they say things like that and/or orbit other men like that.

When an incel stops assuming the worst about every woman and takes some personal responsibility for himself and who he associates with, he improves.

She didn't though, she was clearing complain-joking about him. She didn't view him as a threat. It's kind of like how people bitch about capitalism but then soyface out when the new iPhone drops. Or the fatty that hates how good McDonalds fries taste. I think shakespeare had a quote about dothing and protesting or something.

I think you're lumping the average weight lifting, gun shooting, right leaning dude with the hyper partisan hack jobs that grift engagement on Twitter or chronically online Twitterfags. I don't know any dude IRL that listens to Andrew Tate or Nick Fuentes.
 
Agree. Though as noted, whether saying "so and so was a cad to me" is life-ruining is highly contextual.
Hey, I know we're on a the most evil, racist website to have ever existed, but I first wanted to say that I appreciate your candor in your response. That being said, I don't care if someone calls someone else a "cad" anonymously on some app. I think you and I both know that. There are some serious, life-ruining allegations made on that app. Are some of them true? I'm sure plenty are. Are some of them false? I'd bet money on it. Which are which? We'll never know because the only proof needed is that you have access to a smartphone.

But getting down to it, free speech is a thing. Short of actual defamation proved in a court of law, are we really on Kiwi Farms saying these people shouldn't be allowed to name and shame?
I'm all for free speech, but does attempted/successful life ruination count as free speech? I honestly don't know. I'd think it would fall under defamation, but I'm not an expert. If it is legal, then I have no sympathy for those who are hoisted by their own petards.
 
Back