Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
I seen someone far funnier than me call it "the holecaust" and it gave me a pretty good giggle. More so because of the lidl stuff, but still, funny name.
It's not that I don't want the farms to be an open minded and accepting community but it's the fact that Lidl Drip started to mald from the vagina when Josh made his Fair Access to Banking Act post. She completely ignores the whole purpose and point in Josh's statement and goes straight for "All men bad and are incels" without even trying to understand what the post was about. I'm a pretty retarded user on this site in general but I never thought someone would be more retarded than me.
 
Yep that's why Trumps second biggest voting group is white women

According to your chart:

White men: R+20
White women: R+6

"We support sanity by a razor thin margin after things got so fucking bad that the country no longer has a future" isn't a strong advertisement for your sex's political acumen, cupcake.
 
6b8bf2fe-cd96-4734-b073-191303dbedd3.webp
Interesting physiognomy for whatever this is supposed to be
 
According to your chart:

White men: R+20
White women: R+6

"We support sanity by a razor thin margin after things got so fucking bad that the country no longer has a future" isn't a strong advertisement for your sex's political acumen, cupcake.
Women not voting hard enough the way I want. Never enough for you guys
 
Now a few votes have been cast, the bottom 50 of that leader-board now truly looks like Jurassic Park.

At the bottom currently is Beverly Smith, overweight purple hair with 2 holes in her chin and a diaper stuck to her face. What a catch.

View attachment 7697035
That one's close to Spoony's Warthog level. Toss up I'd say. I highly doubt she'd be on there, but never know.
EklQUPZXEAApoWD.webp
 
Happy to oblige:
Much appreciated. Pew is actually pretty good about explaining all their data. Very interesting how there's a slight edge in men supporting/leaning Republican versus women and Democrats - like 1%, but it's still there. Also very cool how they include men and women who never married and do not cohabitate. I would be very interested in seeing data on divorced people, but it's not included in the Pew study or the American Survey Center study. The Gallup study only mentions it briefly, but it also has historical data which is great.

Do you have any more data on political affiliation among divorced men and women? Just curious, it's fine if you don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwisee
Much appreciated. Pew is actually pretty good about explaining all their data. Very interesting how there's a slight edge in men supporting/leaning Republican versus women and Democrats - like 1%, but it's still there. Also very cool how they include men and women who never married and do not cohabitate. I would be very interested in seeing data on divorced people, but it's not included in the Pew study or the American Survey Center study. The Gallup study only mentions it briefly, but it also has historical data which is great.

Do you have any more data on political affiliation among divorced men and women? Just curious, it's fine if you don't.

Nope, not my area of expertise, just a fast researcher. 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hey Johnny Bravo
>women have a self own
>most gracious of shinny white knights must CoRrEcT ThE ReCoRd by wheeling out their usual bogeyman....THAT DASTARDLY ANDREW TATE!!111111!1111

Where? And when is Andrew Tate not referenced in a completely negative context in the mainstream media? out of the 10 or so years I've been friends with right wingers, Andrew Tate has never come up in conversation one single time because his whole marketing campaign is setting up publicity stunts to enrage simps like you and remain relevant through outrage. It's very much in the same vein as twitter prostitutes promoting their OF through gym ragebait videos to mindless gooners. He's not relevant to any right winger with a tripple digit IQ and never has been. But, conversely, his marketing strategy seems to have worked fucking flawlessly on the absolutely insecure fragile egos of the femcel defense squad. God forbid anyone laughs at the double standards of some of these ladies without the entire conversation being reframed in the context of monkey man Tate and what obese NEETS on twitter with anime PFPs posted once.
I almost never hear anyone in real life talk about any of these people, and I seldom hear anyone with anything positive to say about the mainstream media. And I leave my house, usually several times a day, as scary as that is to some people. I basically live in Middle America, and if I walk up to a random and ask them about Andrew Tate, their going to ask me who the fuck he is. This kind of appeal to media consensus and internet notoriety is surprising from Johnny, to be honest. But I give people I like too much credit, too, same as every other human.

If a girl grows up seeing conservatism associated with aggressive male genderspergs, she will not gravitate towards it as an adult.
Appeal to what you consider popular opinion about Tate, aside, this is dead on accurate, and pretending otherwise certainly hasn't done the Right any favors. Null is correct, just too spergy to be the spokesman for it he wants to be.

I honestly doubt many decent women consider Alex Jones or really most "famous" Righties attractive, and if they did. I would question their judgement and mental health, to be quite honest. I've been with the Daddy's issues girl, and its fun only until its literal Hell. But, pain is how we learn.

Lets not even get into the cesspool that is the deep end of the online right, like Tate, or we even can go exteme, I'm talking Challenger Deep: Yeah, sure Ethan Ralph -an actual former leftist and living example of the grifting huwyte nigger- banged bitches and had kids. But those bitches didn't have any self worth in the first place, and were therefore already worthless. What an accomplishment, his essentially fatherless kids are probably receiving gibs. Or maybe closeted homesexual catboys, perhaps. The Right has those, too! Surely the humidity goes to Amazonian levels from all the moist pussies those dregs probably inspire, or surely would, if only normie women actually knew who the fuck the weirdos were...

But that's just my opinion. And I smoked a cone while walking my dogs a while ago. So, grain of salt or whatever.
 
I'd like to get some numbers on the amount of accounts that used fake or completely unrelated photos. It'd be interesting to get an idea just how retarded the user base is.
 
View attachment 7697162
There is very real regret in those eyes, it's like she subconsciously knew that only a complete retard would facedox like this and it showed on her face.
All I see is a "fuck my shit up, fam" meme.
Nope, not my area of expertise, just a fast researcher. 🤷‍♂️
I appreciate the effort nonetheless. Also very interesting how, in the Gallup study, party affiliation among married people dropped by like 30 points for both Democrats and Independents but Republicans stayed above 70%.
 
Back