Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
It's a fucking Yenta, goddamn. Jew women just look kinda manly sometimes.
I'd be inclined to agree given the beak, but Jews really aren't allowed to get cosmetic surgery (although they do usually find their workarounds, as with anything)
it does look like she may be wearing one of those orthodox wigs but I dunno
 
pretty rough lookin gal on the right.... lmao
1753578418631.webp
 
Getting married and staying married in a two-income household and living well within your means is one of the few paths to relative prosperity left for the average person.
Yeah this is a real problem. I wouldn't blame single women though, I'd blame cultural Marxism and the leftist "women's liberation" movement. Remember that the laws and precedents you're complaining most about were originally put in place by men, men like Lyndon "I'll have those niggers voting democrat for the next hundred years" Johnson. It was an intentional choice.

Personally though, I think the boomers fucked up a lot by abdicating a lot of the role of parenting to women. If you look at the Greatest Generation, it's nuclear families, involved fathers, strong male role models. With the boomers you really start to see that double whammy of the beginning of the cultural Marxism trying to destroy the nuclear family and the male reactionaries that, claiming "conservative values," become the workaholic breadwinner while abdicating child rearing to the women. That being said, I think we're turning the corner. I really do. While the rate of single parent households have increased, I think that there's significantly more male involvement in child rearing and parenting. I see a lot more dads at events, I see more dads with equal custody and visitation, I see more fathers being positive role models for their kids. It's my hope that there's a similar cultural shift where it becomes more common for women to value the nuclear family and stable household.
 
oh there is no question the one on the left is a tranny. zero doubt about it. 100% man.
Yeah just found the looks of it hilarious, particularly the eyebrows.
wasn't the girl on the right on kitchen nightmares? she looks a lot like that Amy chick, and anybody who watched that show knows how much of an insufferable twat she was.
The Amy's Baking Company lady?
amys-baking-company-shutter.0.0.1436547903.webpamy_bouzaglo2.webp
I doubt it's her but never know, small world and all. I believe her shop shut down few years ago something like that, not sure if they tried again or are even still a couple. She was from Arizona iirc
 
shouldn't be allowed to vote
Can you blame women on this site for developing the opinion that men are misogynistic pigs out to get them when every thread even tangentially related to women is filled with these sentiments?
the majority of this thread is shitting on women as a class, spewing vitriol and saying shit like "women shouldn't vote."
I'm simply arguing that people should use their critical thinking skills and recognize that they are being unreasonable and irrational.
I just think women deserve "rights"
Why don't you tag the one poster saying women shouldn't vote? Why don't you make an argument that women deserve the vote while having no obligation to die for it? Oh, because you can't. What "rights" do you think we misogynists don't think women should have? The "right" to murder a baby? If a man holding these views is enough to turn a woman off men, so be it, and better yet good. If the future is brown pod communism, so be it.

Remember that the laws and precedents you're complaining most about were originally put in place by men
Who were elected by women.
 
Why don't you make an argument that women deserve the vote while having no obligation to die for it?
I am for women being registered with the Selective Service. I firmly believe it is the obligation of all of us to protect our nation and its people. That being said I firmly believe women should be in their own units and denied from serving in active duty combat roles. Studies have shown that all male units perform the best, all female units perform pretty well, and mixed units perform the worst.
What "rights" do you think we misogynists don't think women should have?
As I said, the right to vote, nigger.
The "right" to murder a baby?
Morally I am opposed to abortion. This isn't a women's rights issue.
Who were elected by women.
And men. It isn't like women have the sole blame. As it has been pointed out, women in committed marriages tend to break conservative.
 
Back