Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
As dumb as these people are, I very seriously doubt they where taking selfies in top secret locations.

Ever seen a selfie or picture from inside Area 51? No because you cant. Same applies to the above.

I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that Area 51 is treated like a giant SCIF. Like I posted early, normies have had data breeches with shit like FitBits on secret bases numerous times and a lot of people in the Ashley Madison leaks signed up with .mil addresses.

 
Teaspill gays.webp

Almost all the dudes I've seen on teaspill look like this guy. Brown hair, long face, strong chin, stubble. I kept swearing it was the same dude with multiple pictures. It honestly has me wondering about gay phenotypes.
 
You ever hear the phrase "There's always someone stronger than you?" I'm assuming you have. So keep in mind this phrase "There's always someone more retarded than you." I'm sure someone else will end up being more retarded than Lidl Drip with enough time. We'll all be hear to laugh at them with the friends we made along the way.

I sure hope not. I feel the bar has already been set pretty high by going full schizo and posting baby gore in an fit of autistic femcel rage. Non-zero chance she's probably on Tea as well.

android.webp
 
I love going through 72 pages in two days, I don’t think anyone asked this though I might have missed it.

Could the app be sued in the basis of discrimination of sex? Obviously men aren’t a protected class and anything like this would probably be laughed out of a courtroom I’m more so thinking in terms of if an app/website can discriminate based on sex.

Also I don’t entirely think an app like this is a bad idea, I don’t want women to be raped and or abused. But can you legally allow an app like this if it discriminates?
 
Seems like online dating has convinced all the prospects on both sides that what they REALLY need is a date who likes all the things they like, listens to the same music, likes the same shows, etc.

TRUST ME, YOU DO NOT WANT THIS. Imagine never having a moment's peace to be alone, because when you go to pull out your Warhammer figures or whatever, your wife is there handing you the paintbrushes. Relaxing round of golf with your bros? Not gonna happen, because your wife plays golf too. And you can just forget about your anime waifu, because your new wife is a bigger weeb than you are. And guess what? She knitted matching coozies for both of your rifles just in time for hunting season.

The same goes for you ladies--imagine trying to craft when he's right there with a tube of glitter and a roll of rick-rack every time you want to crank out a quick coozy or anniversary card. Imagine if HE has special pots and pans in the kitchen that nobody is allowed to touch either. What if he wants to fucking watch 'Live Island'? My stars, the absolute CHAOS.

You don't need somebody with all the same interests you have. You need someone who has enough common ground and makes you feel comfortable enough that you can have random conversations about a variety of mundane topics at any time, that's it. As time goes on, you will come to appreciate it when your wife or husband just fucks off for a couple of hours to do their own thing and leaves you to your own devices.
 
I love going through 72 pages in two days, I don’t think anyone asked this though I might have missed it.

Could the app be sued in the basis of discrimination of sex? Obviously men aren’t a protected class and anything like this would probably be laughed out of a courtroom I’m more so thinking in terms of if an app/website can discriminate based on sex.

Also I don’t entirely think an app like this is a bad idea, I don’t want women to be raped and or abused. But can you legally allow an app like this if it discriminates?

De jure, laws against discrimination (including the Civil Rights Act of 1964) apply to everyone equally. I think courts have learned that lesson, especially with the current administration.

The app would 100% be legal if it stuck to its purpose of being a safety app. Discrimination is allowed if there's a legitimate reason; that's why we can have women-only sports and gyms and other places--safety and practicality. The problem is that "being a vapid gossip app" is not a legitimate reason, no matter how you dressi t up.
 
I love going through 72 pages in two days, I don’t think anyone asked this though I might have missed it.

Could the app be sued in the basis of discrimination of sex? Obviously men aren’t a protected class and anything like this would probably be laughed out of a courtroom I’m more so thinking in terms of if an app/website can discriminate based on sex.

Also I don’t entirely think an app like this is a bad idea, I don’t want women to be raped and or abused. But can you legally allow an app like this if it discriminates?

There's already apps that supposed to be for women only (not aware of any that explicitly for men). They only get problems when they count troons for what they are.
 
"There is no exquisite beauty," says Bacon, Lord Verulam, speaking truly of all the forms and genera of beauty, "without some strangeness in the proportion."

I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that Area 51 is treated like a giant SCIF. Like I posted early, normies have had data breeches with shit like FitBits on secret bases numerous times and a lot of people in the Ashley Madison leaks signed up with .mil addresses.
Giant SAPF, but yeah. They probably turn their phones off on the Janet planes and don't turn them back on when they land.
 
So what are the chances that the app makers left the info so easily accessible on purpose to fuck with the kind of fat ugly chicks that would happily use that kind of service?

when you go to pull out your Warhammer figures or whatever, your wife is there handing you the paintbrushes. And you can just forget about your anime waifu, because your new wife is a bigger weeb than you are. And guess what? She knitted matching coozies for both of your rifles just in time for hunting season.
GTQnG6XWwAA7mot.webp


Joking aside though, while it is important to have different interests, having a lot in common in terms of tastes is also a pretty big bonus in a relationship, at least in my experience.
 
Last edited:
Tangent 2: I find it odd how a lot of women will ignore a guy until he’s dating someone else. It’s a really fucking retarded strategy because if they do find someone this way, it’s someone that is willing to cheat on them too
The logic is that all the single men left are loser incels. After all, if they weren't someone would have snapped them up by now.

That is just a problem of not having shared values or goals. I mean, if having a collection of things is more valuable than working on your home or on your kid's future, that's fine, but you have to specifically look for a partner that agrees with you on that. I doubt I'd find many men either that would agree that a shoe collection is more important than either one of those things, for example.
It's not about the collection. It's that many woman hate the idea of a man having fun.

If a woman has half the bedroom covered in shoes, that's good. If a man has a shelf of vintage games, that's bad.

This is going in the history books as one of the biggest self-owns, ever. A company self-own, combining with hundreds of self-owns into a massive, growing, snowballing self-own.
Which is better, this, or Ashley Madison (I think that was the cheating site?).

Seems like online dating has convinced all the prospects on both sides that what they REALLY need is a date who likes all the things they like, listens to the same music, likes the same shows, etc.
Except they don't. Men are only allowed to like a very limited set of "macho" things, but not too macho as that's toxic masculinity.
 
I think it is not surprising that the majority is severly unattractive foids. You know how the average womans vs. the average mens experience goes in dating apps. Women have it so much easier they simply dont even need to review men bc they are floods of them coming at them.
 
Back