Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
It would not be considered as evidence of anything. Those comments can't be verified, and the writers can't be cross-examined. Plus, none of them offers a medical diagnosis or qualified opinion. Absent arrests or some documented, objective history, it's nothing. Courts will literally tell you they don't care about your dirty laundry. Further, unless it's shown to impact the children, it wouldn't even be considered relevant to a custody determination.

And to someone else's point about child support rendering someone homeless, most if not all states have a baseline amount allotted to each adult's own living costs, and child support, if any, is calculated on the excess earnings over that amount, and also varies based on the differential between each's earnings and the proportion of parenting time each has.
Lets face it that nigger is pissed that someone said his dick is small not that he will lose custody of his keeedz. We all seen the stats about fatherlesness about niggers . Courts dont care about your small dick but the sheboons he tries to fuck ,do care , a lot. Thats it , this whole histeria isnt about MUH COURTS and MUH LIFE RUINATION is the fact that their shit will get called out and they can't get laid that easy anymore. They might have to actually put in effort, behave like women are people and form relationships THE HORROR .
 
Single mom get torn to pieces for daring to date while they have kids in their houses and are expected to spend sometimes decades alone and fuckless but the nigger over here to keep it in the pants for 2 years is too much???
Someone bringing another man around their kids is different to a single guy with kids fucking another woman. It's not the same situation.
The second (2020) study found only 2% of a mother’s sexual abuse allegations were believed in court. The impact of PA was gender-specific, only female partners suffering from it. In non-abuse cases, ‘parental alienation’ had a more gender-neutral impact
So we can assume 98% of mother's sexual abuse allegations are false or unproven at best. Which would support the men saying women fake allegations.
It would not be considered as evidence of anything. Those comments can't be verified, and the writers can't be cross-examined.
That doesn't matter. If someone is smearing you online it impacts the judgement. We can't unhear things and the mother will use it if they can.
So yeah, if you're a woman, and you're divorcing your husband because he won't wash his piss towel or whatever, if you want to keep your kids, don't make up some vicious story about him molesting them. False CSA accusations are surprisingly easy to unravel,
The problem is lawyers will coach women into doing these things. Charities supporting women will believe them 100% and let them run a harassment campaign. Even if the charity knows it's false.
 

“One woman who was the governor of a prison said to me that ‘every child born into a violent family is a point on my pension’.”

“The only reason they ever agreed to have anything to do with men is because they were told that they wouldn't get their grants if they didn't, under the Equalities Act.”

20250728_120610.webp
 
You can't FULLY clean with toilet paper Jerry!
E: I mean we got along great but- he had a piss towel! A piss towel, Jerry! That's not normal is it?
J: No way!
E: It's just gross!
J: I'll say! What a weirdo!
G: I mean... if you never wash the thing, sure...
J: George, what are you saying here?
G: Well, if you wash it regularly, you know... urine is sterile.
G: ALRIGHT, I JUST REALLY BELIEVE IN SAVING THE TREES, YOU KNOW!
(Jerry and Elaine look at George, horrified)
(Kramer slides into Jerry's apartment)
K: Hey George, I think you've got a sewer leak at your place, the bathroom smells like piss.
 
Again, contrary to popular redpill moid woman-hater belief, divorce court judges hate people who play fuck-fuck games in the courtroom and lie.
If anything I'd imagine the redpill manosphere "courts are stacked against you" talking point becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy - go to court expecting "bias," formulate fuck-fuck retard argument to "expose bias," judge rightly perceives this as operating in bad faith and slaps you down, "wow dood the courts were stacked against me just like the internet said."
I imagine something similar happens to feminists in patriarchy-court too.
Actually now that I'm typing it out I'm pretty sure I've seen this all play out a few times on Judge Judy.

I admire the stubbornness of piss-towel man. Faced with the constant piss spatter of peeing standing up, normal people choose:

1) pee sitting down
2) ignore it
3) clean toilet regularly, using paper towels on floor and discarding
There's nothing wrong with using a reusable cloth to mop up piss surfaces, the weird part is not then immediately washing it after. You don't keep yesterday's piss towel for tomorrow's puddles.
 
If anything I'd imagine the redpill manosphere "courts are stacked against you" talking point becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy - go to court expecting "bias," formulate fuck-fuck retard argument to "expose bias," judge rightly perceives this as operating in bad faith and slaps you down, "wow dood the courts were stacked against me just like the internet said."
I imagine something similar happens to feminists in patriarchy-court too.
Actually now that I'm typing it out I'm pretty sure I've seen this all play out a few times on Judge Judy.
Most men end up in red pilled sphere after a court fucks them. Not before.

@Cybertonia I assume it's something she has and tries to project it onto men. Men's foreskins don't get messy when peeing like women's labias do. And how many Americans have a foreskin to begin with? I would bet she has a piss towel and thought it was something she could project onto men. It fits the narrative of instagram man.
 
Mods, can an articles and news thread get a plagued sticker?

But now you want to come here and scold everyone else because you got rejected and the rest of the world isn't giving you the same validation that your girlfriends gave you.
And the best part, this is her version of events that are most sympathetic to her.


I keep seeing the term "vibe-coded" being thrown around. What does it mean?
 
Back