US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What’s the most Reddit country?
Sweden, never seen a country that has consistently unforced error itself right out of hyperborea

BTW Fun Sweden fact, the allowed the Nazis to move troops through to Finland but would not allow allied aid from the US to USSR, straight to french or dare I say Italian level diplomacy
 
If your partner feels free to lie or ignore half of your agreement on flimsy pretenses, they will feel emboldened to ignore the rest. Trump must either renegotiate into a contract based on respect or ignore his end of the deal and turn up the flames until EU feels obliged to obey its part.
It's ragebait. The EU has absolutely not said that they won't honor the deal and definitely are not gloating about lying to Americans. All they are saying is very true, that the EU, being a capitalist leaning mixed market similar to the US, cannot just demand companies invest in the US. That investment must come voluntarily from private companies. Additionally, the skepticism that the $600bn can be met is not skepticism of it being possible at all, just skepticism that it can be done without EU government intervention. The EU commissioner hasn't announced incentives or a timeline. How I read it is that private companies and investors are waiting to see what incentives the EU will be offering to European companies to invest in the US, not that Europeans aren't going to invest at all.

Edit: Imagine I run a steel mill, and I sign a deal promising 20% increased output, and when asked, the head of the union representing my workers says he's skeptical we can hit that goal because he hasn't seen a timeline or incentives. He's not saying it's not possible, he's just waiting for me to announce incentives like overtime opportunities, production bonuses, or upgrades to the facility to determine how possible it is.
 
Last edited:
Mr trump I represent powerful rich country of Nigeria and there is slight problem with my funds but my billions and gorrillions will be all yours if you can do my the needful kindness of 10 million USD to unfreeze vast accounts. less millions of usd also work but 10 works best. ONLY MILLIONS THOUGH.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Shitlibs are reducing their Northeast/California bicoastal power base to pockets of rust. The silver lining is that blue states can serve as a cautionary tale for the rest of the country and the world at-large.

Democrats might be able to prop up blue state populations through mass Fifth World importation and by bribing women to have babies out of wedlock. If they can replace enough of the productive citizens they are driving out, they might prevail in national elections. Then the other states will be forced to perpetually pay their bills.

Fortunately, the Founding Fathers avoided directly proportional democracy so as to prevent densely populated regions from enslaving the rest of the country. You can see why libshits want to abolish the Electoral College and even the Senate.
The system as laid out by the Founding Fathers was directly proportional. The total electoral points each state has is the combined total of federal senators, and house representatives they sent to Washington. At a minimum of three (two senators, and one representative). What changed was the realization that congress could control the size of the house via a cap in 1929, and thus create what amounts to a small oligarchy of insiders. Something that continues to receive no major public backlash despite congress' decades long abysmal public approval. Democrats are only against the electoral college because they currently view it as a barrier to their never-ending rule. If tomorrow, reps started to consistently when the popular vote, dems would be all for the EC.

Also, and to your wider point, remember this post by the late Gehenna on the electoral 2030 apportionment. The democrats are staring down both barrels of demographic annihilation. Their whites don't reproduce, and Trump is deporting their browns.
 
Did anyone particularly care about EU companies investing in the US before this? Reading the terms of the agreement I just filtered that part out as white noise.
While the US has a significant trade deficit, the US enjoys a massive direct foreign investment surplus, so yes, we absolutely do care. It's a big deal. $600bn would be a 21% increase in EU investments in the US.
 
But I know youtube and shilling very well and that channel is 100% a paid shill channel.
Yeah that’s great and all but that’s just one of dozens of channels covering the oversupply of vehicles. I picked it at random. And dealers don’t take tens of thousands of dollars off the sticker prices of dozens of vehicles on their lot for nothing.
Even assuming it is a shill channel, it doesn’t change the point.
 
Sweden, never seen a country that has consistently unforced error itself right out of hyperborea

BTW Fun Sweden fact, the allowed the Nazis to move troops through to Finland but would not allow allied aid from the US to USSR, straight to french or dare I say Italian level diplomacy
they also gave weapons and materiel support to north Vietnam during the war.
 
Stumbled on a interesting fact and Id love the classes thoughts

Was doing a little market research and wanted to find out who the largest private employer of scientists are, like if your in school and your big thing is science and your super smart and get a degree in "insert whatever general science degree the particular individual is called to" what are your job opportunities you know?

Sorry if this seems retarded but this fascinates me, we give liberal arts majors deserved shit for picking an unemployable for 99% field. I though STEM was considered a golden ticket more or less, that the people smart enough to parse advanced botany or complex physics or any of the other countless fields of esoteric high learning could find copius employment and at a good rate.
Like I realize writing it down like this it sounds RETARDED but you cant understand how much STEM was drilled into me during my time before college like it was some silver bullet to ever having employment issues, thats genuinely how it was sold by all my older relatives as well.

Ok big reveal
1753735791763.webp

So I get this is just a vast oversimplification but Ive found this search tool to be wildly accurate (to a certain degree) given specific and easy to parse criteria and of course this leaves out lots of jobs or company it might not deem as "scientist" jobs but the fact it included pharmacists tells me there is very few employment opportunity for people with anything other than medical focused science degrees, just look how start just the jump down to adding BIO in front of those Pharmaceuticals.

I dont think this is indicative of the collapse of society or anything like that I was just blown away by how stark it shows where our "high minded" priorities are atleast when it comes to the business world. I guess the only reason this worrys me is without robust sectors of private high end science and research we truly have to take the governments word for most major advancements, medical science is very good and important and I dont want to discount it but It should be remembered the MRI was discovered by rocket engineers at NASA (I know its a government body, its just a good example of how we will make surprising advances in all fields by having a well round scientific base)

I just wonder if we had a 100,000 top level physicist working around the clock just for one year, not to advance state agendas but to consume investment money and turn it into new ideas for HUMANITY

Might be a little to high minded but even if we make it more greed focused for the investors I think it could turn out innovations and progress we dont even think about in our modern era
 
Wind turbines are monuments to neoliberalism and ought to be abolished. Ursula von der Leyen, über-shitlib president of the European Commission, does not seem to be enjoying herself as Trump explains why:
https://xcancel.com/craigkellyAFEE/status/1949651819325739191
View attachment 7704374View attachment 7704395

To sum up, wind turbines are economically inefficient, require coercive subsidies, ruin scenic beauty, cannot be disposed of, are made mostly by the Chinese, have no measurable effect on the supposedly problematic weather, kill birds (prominently including America’s national symbol), kill whales, have failed in von der Leyen’s home Germany, create noise pollution, are a con job, and consequently should not be allowed.
This was really eye opening to me.

 
It's ragebait. The EU has absolutely not said that they won't honor the deal and definitely are not gloating about lying to Americans. All they are saying is very true, that the EU, being a capitalist leaning mixed market similar to the US, cannot just demand companies invest in the US. That investment must come voluntarily from private companies. Additionally, the skepticism that the $600bn can be met is not skepticism of it being possible at all, just skepticism that it can be done without EU government intervention. The EU commissioner hasn't announced incentives or a timeline. How I read it is that private companies and investors are waiting to see what incentives the EU will be offering to European companies to invest in the US, not that Europeans aren't going to invest at all.
If I promised you a million dollars, and after we agreed on it, I suddently told you that I will not give you even a cent, would you feel I was honest or a liar (intentional or otherwise)?
This doesn't actually mean it's not going to happen, though. This kind of just seems like EU bureaucrats being autistic.
Isn't that a reason enough to seek a real deal not "ah, maybe we'll do it" deal? Furthermore, Trump should not allow EU to make promises it does not intend to keep or are too autistic to fulfill.
 
Back