Kids Online Safety Act - Do not think of the children. Think instead why they want to make you think of the children

mindlessobserver

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Hello Friends, our fearless leaders in Congress are crafting a replication of the UK's online safety act that we as a forum just had the misfortunate of dealing with by IP banning the entire nation of the UK.


This version of the Bill was not passed in the previous session, but has been reintroduced by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn for the current session.

---​

Shown Here:​

Kids Online Safety Act

This bill sets out requirements to protect minors from online harms.

The requirements apply to covered platforms, which are applications or services (e.g., social networks) that connect to the internet and are likely to be used by minors. However, the bill exempts internet service providers, email services, educational institutions, and other specified entities from the requirements.

Covered platforms must take reasonable measures in the design and operation of products or services used by minors to prevent and mitigate certain harms that may arise from that use (e.g., sexual exploitation and online bullying).

Additionally, covered platforms must provide (1) minors with certain safeguards, such as settings that restrict access to minors' personal data; and (2) parents or guardians with tools to supervise minors' use of a platform, such as control of privacy and account settings.

Covered platforms must also


  • disclose specified information, including details regarding the use of personalized recommendation systems and individual-specific advertising to minors;
  • allow parents, guardians, minors, and schools to report certain harms;
  • refrain from facilitating advertising of age-restricted products or services (e.g., tobacco and gambling) to minors; and
  • annually report on foreseeable risks of harm to minors from using the platform.
Additionally, the bill requires large (based on specified revenue, employment, or user criteria) websites, internet applications, and search engines (including social network sites) to meet certain requirements before using algorithms that prioritize information furnished to the user based on user-specific data. For example, such platforms must (1) provide users with notice that the website uses such algorithms, and (2) make available a version of the platform that uses algorithms that do not prioritize information based on user data.

The bill provides for enforcement through the Federal Trade Commission and states.

Further, the bill requires the commission to seek to contract with the National Academy of Sciences to study the risks of harm to minors by the use of social media and other online platforms.


The bill establishes a council to advise on implementing the bill. It also requires guidance for market and product research focused on minors and an evaluation of options to verify a user's age.

---


Needless to say it cannot be understated how dangerous this bill is, and under no circumstances can it be allowed to pass. The Bill establishes a hall monitor agency of the US Federal Government similar to the UK's OFCOM, ostensibly to "protect the children" but in actuality to enforce the provisions of the act which is a control of information and opinion in online discussion.

--

SEC. 12. Kids online safety council.


(a) Establishment.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall establish and convene the Kids Online Safety Council for the purpose of providing advice on matters related to this Act.
(b) Participation.—The Kids Online Safety Council shall include diverse participation from—
(1) academic experts, health professionals, and members of civil society with expertise in mental health, substance use disorders, and the prevention of harms to minors;
(2) representatives in academia and civil society with specific expertise in privacy and civil liberties;

(3) parents and youth representation;
(4) representatives of covered platforms;
(5) representatives of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Health and Human Services;
(6) State attorneys general or their designees acting in State or local government;
(7) educators; and
(8) representatives of communities of socially disadvantaged individuals (as defined in section 8 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637)).
--



All internet platforms will be required to establish age verification protocols. Must verify with full dox of all users, held in the custody of the website, complete with valid geolocation that will preclude the use of VPNs.

--
SEC. 9. Age verification study and report.


(a) Study.—The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in coordination with the Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and the Secretary of Commerce, shall conduct a study evaluating the most technologically feasible methods and options for developing systems to verify age at the device or operating system level.

--

SEC. 13. Filter bubble transparency requirements.

(a) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) ALGORITHMIC RANKING SYSTEM.—The term “algorithmic ranking system” means a computational process, including one derived from algorithmic decision-making, machine learning, statistical analysis, or other data processing or artificial intelligence techniques, used to determine the selection, order, relative prioritization, or relative prominence of content from a set of information that is provided to a user on a covered internet platform, including the ranking of search results, the provision of content recommendations, the display of social media posts, or any other method of automated content selection.
(2) APPROXIMATE GEOLOCATION INFORMATION.—The term “approximate geolocation information” means information that identifies the location of an individual, but with a precision of less than 5 miles.


--


READ THIS SHIT NIGGAS. THIS IS NIGHTMARE FUEL.


This version of the Bill was not passed in the previous session, but has been reintroduced by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn for the current session.

 
Last edited:
Isn't this the 3rd time this shit has been proposed?


As I said in the Porn I.D thread when ever anything is banned "For the kids" its just a way to stop anyone from arguing because you want to harm them. We have slowly began the march to remove any edge from the internet and turn it into a daycare.
 
72 senators??? So it's already fucking passed the hard part if the vote was held today. Any word on house?
Speaker Johnson has been trying to kill it, but he's been unable to tard wrangle the rank and file which are a mix of authoritarian fuckwits and gormless idiots who literally fall for the "think of the children" meme.
 
So will Null just block access to the entire United States if this passes like he did the U.K?
I think he's said he'll shut down if some crap bill like this passes, but given that the apocalypse will be spreading around, maybe he'll treat it like a challenge and look for an alternative. He believes that hosting in the US is best though.

Having read the quoted parts in OP, a possibility is that the forum won't end up a "covered platform" in the final bill. But you can't count on that, and it's a bad bill regardless of the effects on KF.
The requirements apply to covered platforms, which are applications or services (e.g., social networks) that connect to the internet and are likely to be used by minors. However, the bill exempts internet service providers, email services, educational institutions, and other specified entities from the requirements.
 
Speaker Johnson has been trying to kill it, but he's been unable to tard wrangle the rank and file which are a mix of authoritarian fuckwits and gormless idiots who literally fall for the "think of the children" meme.
At least there is some fucking resistance, fucking damn. Come on Johnson. Don't fail now
 
They only need to win once, it's not like the COPA and early 2000s anymore. Meanwhile people need to oppose this every single time it's being proposed. Without a massive campaign online like there was for SOPA 13 years ago, they will keep trying to pass those, the entire concept needs to become radioactive. US, UK, EU, nobody is safe. The purpose of those bills is obvious: make it impossible for small platforms to run or do anything because compliance is too expensive or impossible for them, and centralize access to the few, corporation-run ones left that may very well simply be another arm of the government.
 
Back