Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[FataBataRang]

Sure it is. It's a published finding. This isn't a normal public venue is it? It's a forum of slandering assholes. The same comment on a forum of decent people would be largely agreed with.

You are delusional. Most people do not support pedophilia. Go ahead and post that somewhere else, then show us their reactions. Pedo websites don't count.

 

[CatParty]

Sure it is. It's a published finding. This isn't a normal public venue is it? It's a forum of slandering assholes. The same comment on a forum of decent people would be largely agreed with.

lol you're just salty because we ruined every google search for your name

 

[YankeeTrader]

Sure it is. It's a published finding. This isn't a normal public venue is it? It's a forum of slandering assholes. The same comment on a forum of decent people would be largely agreed with.

If by slander, you mean call 'tards out on things they have done publicly or allowed to be shared....

Slander
1. Law Oral communication of false and malicious statements that damage the reputation of another.
2. A false and malicious statement or report about someone.

In this case, you said you were attracted to 15 year old kids. How is that a false and malicious statement for us to repeat it verbatim?

 

[Mikemikev]

Also, while I admittedly haven't gone through the entire thread, you definitely didn't answer the questions I asked already today, as you claim.

I exactly did answer the same point earlier today. Even if I hadn't, you don't get to assume the worst if someone doesn't answer you. You're a sick slandering piece of shit. You are not a good person.

Just the same crap repeated over and over again. Pretty sad this is the best thing you have to do.

 

[YankeeTrader]

New Just the same crap repeated over and over again. Pretty sad this is the best thing you have to do.

Oh the irony lays on thick like morning dew.

 

[FemalePresident]

Mike do you sympathize with the alt-right?

 

[FataBataRang]

Just the same crap repeated over and over again.

That is all you ever do. Once again, pot, meet kettle.

 

[Doc Cassidy]

I agree with @Mikemikev, if there's grass on the field then play ball.

 

[FataBataRang]

I agree with @Mikemikev, if there's grass on the field then play ball.

Gr8 b8 m8, I r8 8/8.

 

[sbm1990]

^ @Mikemikev IRL.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

You mean White people who oppose Jewish lies and genocide are not tolerated by you, so you slander them.

Everything said about you on this site isn't slander. Just look at the shit you post moron.

 

[José Mourinho]

Wonder where did @Mikemikev get his idea of this 15 year old shit from

Spoiler

Muhammad maybe? No wonder @Mikemikev is a Muslim to get that sweet 15 year old attraction

 

[FemalePresident]

Not skizo anymore?

 

[Feline Darkmage]

Oh hey the prefix changed. @Alan Pardew, was this you?

 

[José Mourinho]

Yeah.

Maybe thats why he's considered a skitzocow. Honestly, he ain't even worthy of this label anymore.

@Null Can we change Mikemikev's tag to "lolcow"? This clown lost his skitzocow rep a long time ago.

Along with him keeping on coming here and being a Muslim.

 

[YankeeTrader]

Wonder where did @Mikemikev get his idea of this 15 year old shit from

Spoiler

Muhammad maybe? No wonder @Mikemikev is a Muslim to get that sweet 15 year old attraction

Hey... you might be on to something there.

 

[sbm1990]

Oh hey the prefix changed. @Alan Pardew, was this you?

Skitzocows are actualy kind of intimidating and thus someone you probably shouldn't try to milk (eg. John Bulla). This is definitely not the case with Mikemikev. This clown deserves his new prefix!

 

[Cato]

I exactly did answer the same point earlier today. Even if I hadn't, you don't get to assume the worst if someone doesn't answer you. You're a sick slandering piece of shit. You are not a good person.

In fairness to you I did see you write this:

I specifically stated that I have no problem with age of consent laws.

I'm assuming this is what you are referring to, but it's actually not "the same point" I was inquiring about. "Having no problem" with something could imply indifference rather than endorsement, could suggest you just consider yourself smart enough to avoid being caught or facing consequences, etc. It is not a statement of agreement or endorsement.

Hell, even there you say you "have no problem with age of consent laws" but you don't specify which ones. For all I know you could be fine with some form of age of consent laws in principle but think the age should be lowered to 12 or something.

If you are going to wade into debating controversial and delicate subjects, specificity and choice of language matters. And if people ask a question about your beliefs on a subject like this and you demonstrate a complete inability or unwillingness to be specific, especially after making vague and highly questionable statements, the only person at fault for uncharitable assumptions being made about you is you.

 

[Mikemikev]

f you are going to wade into debating controversial and delicate subjects, specificity and choice of language matters. And if people ask a question about your beliefs on a subject like this and you demonstrate a complete inability or unwillingness to be specific, especially after making vague and highly questionable statements, the only person at fault for uncharitable assumptions being made about you is you.

Bollocks. I'm under no obligation to waste my time answering questions from some anonymous dipshit and you don't get to assume the worst when I don't. Fuck you.

 

[sbm1990]

Bollocks. I'm under no obligation to waste my time answering questions from some anonymous dipshit and you don't get to assume the worst when I don't. Fuck you.

You like the new prefix for you thread, Mike? I think it better suits you, tbh.