1 hour ago
Mr. Ortiz, great article at how politics mess up sound technical evaluations for personal Defense weapons that protect our military.
As the XM9 Program Manager for Saco Defense & Sig Sauer back in 1980s, I am intimately familiar with how Beretta maneuvered the Army contract for the 92F. President Reagan and Casper Weinberger were involved in deep negotiations with the Italian PM in 1983-1984 to place US ballistic missile sites into Italy as part of the Cold War Defense strategy.
The initial XM9 Army contract award formula was presented to all of the 9MM weapon bidders, which was highly leveraged on the price of the weapon itself. Jane's Defense Weekly "sources" announced the P226 as the initial winner.
Out of nowhere, the Army Defense Command announced a "Best & Final" bid which they claimed was predicated on changing anticipated orders for spare parts. Records provided to the Defense Arms Appropriation Committee in Congress during Saco's appeal, uncovered insinuations from the Italian Prime Minister for a Quid-Pro-Quo on the missile site discussion, where the XM9 pistol contract was mentioned. Despite the P226 Best & Final weapon price still being lower than the 92F, the numbers tilted to Beretta due to the unexpected massive number of spare magazines that were announced.
A month after Beretta was awarded the M9 contract, Italy approved placement of the US missile site. Sig Sauer leadership swore they would not be beat on pistol pricing the next go around.