AI Art Seething General

Well. If I disappear for a while I am redoing my entire fucking computer so I can actually do shit again and not have to dox myself to a government that will literally give people a longer jail sentence for mean words online than the fucking possession and distribution of child porn.
rfebeqwfgd - Copy.webp

I will not say anything. The feelings I have are too raw to communicate through text on a forum and I will refrain from fedposting. You are smart enough to fill in the gaps.

All I will say is that while treasonous scum deserve to be hung, orwellian fascists deserve a fate that would make mussolini and tianenmen look ethical and humane.

We will never have state mandated tv time, not because they don't want it, but because we have this instead. You will only consume media from preapproved sites. You will get your opinions from exclusively government vetted propagandists. You will not question. You will smile and nod like a good brit should. Make no fucking mistake this is the first step towards our own Chinese firewall, the foundations have already been set, the laws are in place, we already have facial scanners, we already do not have freedom. And yet the niggercattle still do not see the writing on the wall, they will parrot the lies of the government and say it's just a few websites. I look forward to when the powder magazine I live in catches.
 
How many times has it been found out that some tech startup's AI was literally just a bunch of indians at this point?
I used to be perturbed. I think the point I'll worry about AI is when it is about as intelligent as a dog. It hasn't reached that point yet.

But we'll seriously have to worry about jeets when they're as intelligent as our current AI.
 
The curation aspect exists in many forms of things people readily recognize as art, e.g. photography.

I'd wager a guess and claim that most good AI art is not recognized as such as people will put in the effort to use it as base to rework it. A simple example is pixel art. Most models can generate pixel art but it'll have errors, color palettes and things that make no sense, It's trivial to rework, fix up, and/or use it as base for whatever it is you wanted to do though. Things like that.

Then there's also loras, which can be made to do very specific things. People share these and most are crap, but there's a ton of actually well-made loras for specific purposes out there people are never going to share, too.

There's a good chance you already looked at a lot of AI art you did not identify as such.
 
I'd wager a guess and claim that most good AI art is not recognized as such
I mean most AI art is just being posted to twitter. You're not up against Dali or VanGogh, you're up against twitter user MikuClussy who posts clown shoe foot fetish art. It's the same on civitai too, sort by new and it's all just futa and hairy fanny. No one is going to go through the equivalent of /r/dickgirls looking for the next mona lisa to put in an art gallery.

That being said I did see a guy who honestly saying miku clussy would be more explainable. Latex jellyfish headed cyclops women? Obviously AI generated, still got thousands of likes and no one noticed despite him posting hourly for a week straight. There's another guy that makes actual foot fetish porn with at least the backgrounds AI generated and just paints the characters in by hand if not using the AI as a guide for them too. No one says anything in his comments either. Despite the honed pattern detection I have gained from this site it honestly took me a while to notice too. Most of the nijijourney posters I see also get 5k routinely and no one even questions it. Those are going under the radar despite, to me, being obviously AI generated let alone something retouched by someone who has traditional art skills. When I say under the radar I mean that the normal people that show up to complain about AI were not there, as we've seen countless times most people don't give a shit either way. I have noticed a little niche of mostly nijijourney posters that have kinda carved out a separate niche on twitter for just that sort of stuff, something divorced from the general art community and more insular so less annoying faggots and still a large viewerbase. Maybe that's where we'll find the vijijournian man or whatever.

Honestly the more I try the more I kinda wish I could do the sort of shit you say. Don't get me wrong I still kinda like going full lazy nigger character + whatever lora looks interesting and slapping the recommended prompts in and going from there. But man trying to do something specific and getting a super promising base only for the denoiser to mangle it regardless of settings is a ballache. Then again even if I tried to learn how to do digital art by the time I was good enough to fix the image the AI could do it for me anyway and I fucking hate digital art so.
 
That being said I did see a guy who honestly saying miku clussy would be more explainable. Latex jellyfish headed cyclops women? Obviously AI generated, still got thousands of likes and no one noticed despite him posting hourly for a week straight. There's another guy that makes actual foot fetish porn with at least the backgrounds AI generated and just paints the characters in by hand if not using the AI as a guide for them too. No one says anything in his comments either.
I don't know if this was related to the point you were making, but along these lines, I don't think anyone should mistake tolerance for AI porn as general AI acceptance. Feels like it's a ""unique"" corner of society and norms where people aren't gonna bite the hand that feeds them.

If you're posting something vaguely pretty/cool/interesting with AI that isn't pornographic, nobody needs that like they need porn, so they're going to say "ew AI slop."
 
If you're posting something vaguely pretty/cool/interesting with AI that isn't pornographic, nobody needs that like they need porn, so they're going to say "ew AI slop."
I wasn't really making a point, just observing. Honestly most of the time I'm not trying to say anything, just talking. Most of the AI porn I see actually has less likes than the nijijourney stuff, though normally more than the average sdxl whatever non porn anime characters. The actual ai art is what has carved a corner out for itself, the porn just slots in to the average gooner feed.

I'll agree that because the average person seeing ai art is actually looking at the whole image and properly looking at it instead of just looking at the naked bits with one hand they will normally be more critical, I wouldn't say that ai porn gets a pass though. I would say that a larger number of porn artists hate ai compared to regular fanartists just on the basis that drawing porn is more likely to get more and higher paying commissions that they desperately want to keep. Obviously if you're constantly being told 'I will stop drawing your porn for you if AI exists' then you're more likely to hate it, especially if you're too busy thinking about your cock instead of critically. Of the artists I've seen talk about ai I have not seen any porn artists talk about it positively but I have seen several normal artists do so.

Also you know how twitter does that thing where you like someone's art so it starts showing you random fucking text posts of people similar to that account for some fucking reason. Yea.
rfwevsdefrswwrdvgdgrvw - Copy.webp

Idk what the fuck they're on about. I haven't seen much realistic ai anime stuff, most of the people I follow still post the exact same shit. I just think it's beautiful because they're a fucking evangelion artist. As in they draw exclusively 'white' people lol. Not sure how that's less than zero effort though? I mean it takes as much time to type 'white skin' as 'dark skin', honestly I can type dark faster than white. I would go generate some asuka gollywog to put here but I mean that's just too much effort really. Though maybe that's a good thing, 0 is greater than infinity or whatever the fuck that evangelion quote is, maybe I am actually putting in the most effort anyone could ever conceptualise? It's just been a while since there has been any big shitshow to post here. Even then the most recent ones have been kinda boring.
 
Finally some more people being pissed off at AI art being good again and seeing imaginary shit.
Here's our post.
wegrdewvgdegvw - Copy.webp

Is it AI? Looking at the hands and the joint of the fan, probably. Looking at the guy's account, almost definitely. And there's 50,000 people that do not give a shit.
People are pissed off that once again a genuinely visually appealing and cool image was made by AI instead of just going 'yep it's visually appealing and cool', pressing like and moving on. As always.
The guy has posted 15 images, most of them got 500 likes. Some of them got 10k+. Enough to reach the dregs of society.

The main 'criticism' of this guy is people just fucking hallucinating that he is copying some other artist. For some reason. These people are fucking retarded and also really fucking retarded. Nakatori does not post porn, at all, none. It is goonjacent. I would not show my mother these images but at the same time they're not hard to describe. It's just women with massive tits, the most basic ass thing going. The person they say he is 'stealing' from, Brekkist, posts full on porn, as in tits out cocks in. So like, not really copying him if it's an entirely different niche is it? But just keep that in mind, these people are not just defending their favourite twitter artist, they are defending their favourite twitter hentai artist.

But that's your warning. This spoiler will contain tits and pussy and ass and a bit of feet.

So let's get the fucking obvious out the way first.

Is this guy copying Bekkist's style?
No.
Simply no.
Here's something else this guy made.
NakatoriCD-1944794518316073315-01 - Copy.webp

Finding a comparison for Bekkist is a bit hard because he's one of these niggers that fucking post everything and spam gif replies as well as posting 50 sketches per image. It's hard to find what the finished images are and what's just chaff. But here's a few.
brekkist-1885572743544070482-01 - Copy.webpbrekkist-1549121647705067521-01 - Copy.webpbrekkist-1475854430448717824-01 - Copy.webp
You fucking tell me. You fucking tell me that any of those images look like either from the AI. Because they fucking don't and you are clinically retarded if you think that these were made by the same person. The style looks fucking nothing like each other. How the fuck is this stealing? Even by anti ai nigger standards holy fuck this isn't a stretch this is just fucking lying and hoping no one bothers to check. What fucking style even is there? There's no consistent style between even these three images let alone the rest of this guy's shit. I could have told you these were made by three different people and you would believe me.

I was about to say I was wrong for a second. I was about to say that actually I was incorrect. But no. I am still the fucking unquestionably correct arbiter of this shit. I am never fucking wrong. I know these niggers inside and out, they are the most predictable faggots to exist. They work on a fucking cycle, they say the same shit, do the same shit, all on a loop. Because of fucking course this guy didn't steal from anyone. I saw this and thought maybe he did.
wefwwedvdevw - Copy.webp
Someone posted a screenshot of that post in the comments. I thought the AI was stolen from this image, of fucking course not because these uncreative faggots can't even come up with a basic prompt, somehow lazier than the AI is. Because this was posted Aug 1st, the original AI was 31st July. And it looks like fucking shit. The tits look worse because of course they have to pump them up instead of just leaving it as a cute wholesome and relatable image. Can't have that. Also the actual shirt looks like shit and not how clothes work. A machine has more understanding of how to draw clothes than you do. Kill yourself nigger. Hand's fucked about as much as the AI version too. The hair's shit too. The original was nice and vibrant and the contrast made it look good. Now it's dull and shitty. Your best attempt is a fraction of what a machine can spit out and you should kill yourself in shame. I have censored the name because you are a talentless faggot desperate for any form of attention and you deserve nothing other than being called a nigger and told to kill yourself.

I mostly thought this because there's some guy in the comments that can't even fucking tell the time.
rgvw3erwgvde - Copy.webp
Doing the basic amount of fucking looking at things with your eyes is apparently hard. You are maliciously retarded and should be lobotomised, if that would even have any impact. Is this the mystical american education I hear so much about? Is this the new level of it. Can't read an analog clock, can't read 24h time, now don't even know that august comes after july? Is that where we are now? Or are you just such an indoctrinated faggot that you can't even do the most basic of checks before your brain goes into a ludditic haze of hatred?

Now for the faggots in the comments.

Here's retard number one. Our baseline. Here's someone on the fucking rosalina image from the top, the one that looks objectively absolutely fucking nothing like anything Brekkist has ever done at all in their entire posting history.
rwgdvgrwrewgsbegrw - Copy.webp


Here's the first retard I can find saying that this guy copied some random porn artist.
rewdgvrdesgv - Copy.webp
What do I see when I open their profile? Bowser x Peach hentai. Sorry but why the fuck should I listen to you? Why the fuck do you think I would ever take your opinion seriously? You want Peach to have sex with a fucking hedgehog turtle and in the same breath you want to be the arbiter of quality for twitter art. I don't even think that image is particularly good but it's better than everything this guy posts. Even if it wasn't all porn it's just worse quality anyway.

40 comments on that post, three of them are complaining about how it's AI. I know how retarded it is to say this in this thread on this account, but I fucking love the sheer apathy. I love looking at shit like this, 200k views and 14k likes, yet the top comment saying it's ai stealing some random cunt's style can't even break 30 likes. Your best attempts are pointless. Years of your autistic screeching and bitching and no one even interacts with you, you are sat alone in the corner of the sen class talking into the windows you lick all while the rest of society moves on not just uncaring of your opinions but not even caring enough to listen to you. Your best efforts pale in comparison to even the most mid AI user and the rest of society are wholly uncaring of that.

I can't even do the normal joke here.
rewdvgerwdvg - Copy.webp

I hovered over the name for snipping tool to work and saw autism in the bio. It's just obvious. However holy fucking shit. Your entire account is spamming gifs under popular tweets. Where's your 'something great'? Why haven't you painted the next Mona Lisa? Why are you just choosing to be a lazy dick and spending all your time spamming gifs under random tweets. It's such fucking autist 'took kids shows too seriously' thinking too. No. You do not have the talent to make something great. Most people don't. That's what average means. I do not have the capability to create something great, I do not have the ability to paint anything worthy of exhibition. You don't either. None of your friends do. No one you know has that ability. The greats are not merely average men. They are not just average people that wanted something really bad. They are people who were born with a special ability and gift. You will at most make mid tier anime slop and if you spend years doing it maybe you can get a bit of money from your followers at most, you will never make anything that is remembered by more than 10 people. You are a speck in society, you will be forgotten and everything you have ever done will be burnt and forgotten by history. The greats came once in a century. You will never be one of them. Also because I have a fucking job you nigger. Sorry I can't spend 10 hours a day learning art because I have to go and lay brick so I can pay to fucking eat.


rwevdgervwwrdevg - Copy.webp

8k on the 50k likes post. Parroting the fucking delusion that this is in any fucking way similar to anything brekkist has posted. You didn't remove the tag because you don't want to disturb the guy, you removed it because if you have an easy way for people to check they will realise how much of a disingenuous nigger you are.

You are a fucking delusional fraud and should kill yourself.
rwgedvrwegdv - Copy.webp

What you mean the very fucking intentionally asymmetrical eyes are a sign of AI? You're meant to be an artist you should fucking know that faces aren't symmetrical and even if there were this is very fucking obviously intentional. No one would look at this in the AI output and think oh yea that's how faces look if they were not obviously going for this fucking style you dumb cunt. This is just fucking obviously what the guy wanted to create. AI doesn't have a pipeline straight from the program/website straight to your twitter feed, you choose what you post, you do understand that right? Because honestly after these people half the time I start thinking they just fucking don't. And what the fuck do you mean strands of hair coming out of nowhere? They're coming out her fucking head you retard. That's how literally every artist draws fluffy/messy hair. Fuck pick up the pencil how about you pick up the prescription glasses you retard?

erbswbegrwrdvwegs - Copy.webp

Cuck yourself in the algorithm for no fucking reason other than I'm a fragile little faggot who cannot stand having to see something that an AI made.
Objectively true.
'AI slop' is now objectively good looking images that not even human artists can trump? AI slop is anything I don't like and everyone I disagree with are 13 year old nazis because I have the brain of a child.
'Develop talent' from a guy who spams twitter reaction images. Develop an argument with words faggot. Also no one owes you anything. It is their life to do whatever with as they please, they do not owe you art or personal development. And why would you give a shit anyway if you block them?
Agreed.
'pick up a pencil' said by someone who themselves has not fucking done that. You are not an artist either you retard. Those in glass houses should not throw stones. The guy is infinitely more talented than you are.

rvwedbwvds - Copy.webp

50,000 people disagree. Cope, seethe, mald, die.
Brazilian
Follow the guy that does not post this type of content, of these characters, in this style, for more?
TRANSGENDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
'i have told on you and you will be grounded GROUNDED GROUNDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!' also if the guy doesn't even reply maybe it's because he knows it looks nothing like any of his art and he doesn't give a shit, or is that too big of a thought for your brain to handle?
worst xbox360 default pfp
and the most creative comment goes tooooooooooooooooooooooo. The fucking 50th of the exact same post.



There's your controversy. There's your AI seething. There's my excuse to use the nigger license I got free with my tor download since I don't trust any other platform with how the government is at the moment. The vast majority of people are fucking delusional and seeing monsters in the dark. I look forward to some prominent AI poster to get called a clone of someone else and sue for libel or something. The people that aren't just outright delusional are not much better, spamming the same two lines over and over. Yes we get it you think that everything you don't like is slop, it's a very original thought. I mean since when did words have meanings anyway? Why do we even call it slop, the word slop is meaningless at this point, let's just go call it idk AI porridge instead? The word slop is less meaningful online than fascist/nazi or terf or woman at this point. I say fuck it can we go back to when it was zogslop so all these people will be too afraid to say it? Fuck it who am I kidding they don't know what that means anyway, they don't even have the ability to look at two images without going on an autism bender ffs. Also yes this is the most I could get. They are boring. These people don't even want to say some shit I can laugh at. They just pump out the same shit and post screenshots nowadays. Yawn. There's not even that many of them either. Look at the ratio, thousands of views under a massively popular post, yet struggle to get a handful of likes. Even the people calling it out are being ignored. Even the circlejerk of AI hate can't even go and support itself enough to get even a fraction of a percentage of the original post's likes. There's probably people in soygon's comments bitching about gamergate getting more attention than you. My nigger in kek go outside.
 
Finally some more people being pissed off at AI art being good again and seeing imaginary shit.
Here's our post.
Liked your comment that was meant to be directed at the annoying subhumans. Probably my most favourite was towards the brownzilian.

Why do these people care so much about style imitation? There are some niggers who don't even open commissions, and I guess some would love to imagine some ridiculous OCs or maybe specific cartoon characters in the artist style or something. What's the problem?
Then there's retards like MilkChaoTea, a SAHNIC artist that while isn't an "AI Seether", has quite a funny thing going on. She's a lesbo who demands "toxic positivity" to her profile that everything has to be positive vibes. I heard she opened commissions for $200, and if people don't like the price they can continue scrolling. OK, all good.

Yet, wouldn't a client be able to ask "why"? Strange. Some artists really feel like those who "It's like that, take it or leave it. I'm made out of glass/I'm a massive faggot who cannot be talked back!!!". At least just provide a plausible reason "Help with bills, travel, house expenses whatever."
"Keep scrolling", well, keep taking lllllllllllzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
 
"Cuz I as an artist know muh worth, muh pain, muh suffering." That's their actual explanation.
I heard she opened commissions for $200, and if people don't like the price they can continue scrolling. OK, all good.

Yet, wouldn't a client be able to ask "why"?




This AI art thing should honestly serve as a wake-up call to artists. Their art circles just don't want to accept it, but AI tends to copy anime, and hyper/semi realistic styles more.

These artists' problem is, they constantly copy some famous artist's rendering and art style to the point where one cannot be told from the other properly. I've been scrolling through TikTok and I have seen a person comment that so many artists online tend to copy styles, so they don't truly develop a style and simply end up with a mediocre duplicate. These styles work best with cute, big-eyed anime girls, which, in turn, is one of the most-emulated styles by the AI. Since AI learns from what is constantly visible, I don't think we need any explanation for this.

In short, AI is weeding out the weak. It's weeding out those who cannot adjust to the changing times and systems. Charles Darwin was right.
Finally some more people being pissed off at AI art being good again and seeing imaginary shit.
 
I heard she opened commissions for $200, and if people don't like the price they can continue scrolling.

Yet, wouldn't a client be able to ask "why"? Strange.
>art is a luxury
>artists don't owe you anything
>my time is valuable

Yeah nigga a can of pepsi is a luxury as well but I'd ask some questions if it was being sold at ten times the price.
It's just entitlement and nothing else. Xitter artists think too highly of themselves and don't realise that the market of the services they provide is oversaturated as fuck.
If they're some big name truly unique artist then sure they can charge fuck you money and people will still pay for it but it's insane to me to click on some random with 400 followers and see them ask hundreds of dollars for dime a dozen generic sloppily drawn shit. Bonus points if they have some esoteric limits to what they won't draw or from whom they won't take commissions.
 
>art is a luxury
>artists don't owe you anything
>my time is valuable

Yeah nigga a can of pepsi is a luxury as well but I'd ask some questions if it was being sold at ten times the price.
It's just entitlement and nothing else. Xitter artists think too highly of themselves and don't realise that the market of the services they provide is oversaturated as fuck.
If they're some big name truly unique artist then sure they can charge fuck you money and people will still pay for it but it's insane to me to click on some random with 400 followers and see them ask hundreds of dollars for dime a dozen generic sloppily drawn shit. Bonus points if they have some esoteric limits to what they won't draw or from whom they won't take commissions.

Strange. These artists are usually the anti-capitalist, commie types.

"Well, it's bad if it is someone else, but it's OK if I'm the one doing it."


Anyway, about the fuck you money, I have mentioned over and over again that they do that because they see themselves as Raphael Santi, Michaelangelo, Donatello, or Leonardo da Vinci who were getting all the commissions from the nobility and the church for their art to the point where these people were able to feed themselves and keep doing their thing. What these retarded artists are missing is that the Renaissance artists were commissioned because they knew how to appeal to the actual political figures, not random niggas in your audience. Renaissance artists managed to catch the eye of the church and nobility and the ones we know very well are not even the majority - imagine how many more Renaissance artists that we don't know are out there because they failed to attract a patron who would guarantee them a name in history. Looking back at the AI haters, do they think the royal family of England or Norway would give two fucks about their Panty and Stocking fanart and futa diaperfur porn in their anime and furry art portfolio?
 
Last edited:
Back