US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
more people ALLEGEDLY died in the civil war then all the other conflicts America has been in COMBINED
That's maybe just barely true, WWII is the closest at about 2/3 and the adding in the others brings them right into the same ballpark. Now, why should that be the case? Two big reasons. First, the casualties counted on both sides. Second, other wars in which the US was involved did not occur on US soil, keeping civilian casualties minimal in a way that is not true for other participants.

One other reason is that the only time the US faced a competent peer adversary was when it literally fought against itself, every other country sucks...or at least got gutted in WWI by the time we even joined, and then never recovered.
 
Say what you want about the incomprehensible drunken tirades, at least they bring something new to the table every day instead of the same boring repetitive crap.
It's not even new, it's part of the "Tartaria" conspiracy theory. Lore Lodge has a bunch of videos talking about it (and how it's largely just refusal to acknowledge actual history), although since Aiden is openly a mason I'm sure Stud is going to take that as proof of the theory.
 
more people ALLEGEDLY died in the civil war then all the other conflicts America has been in COMBINED, I said I want DIVISIONS, not companys nigger retard faggot
Not people, AMERICANS, and that bit of trivia is because America suffered comparatively fewer casualties in all other wars it was involved in, but in the Civil War all casualties were Americans, and because it actually took place within America itself with actual cities and forts to siege rather than overseas bases. More people died in other wars since then, but mostly not ours
 
Stud may be on to something, you ever noticed that old timey photographs and footage were black and white, and the resolution was usually fucked up or terrible? Then they tried to fake it by colorizing shit amongst the bourgeoise who could afford to LARP, but actual real color didn't happen till after WWII?

It's almost like them dropping the bombs invented color and all the people old enough to remember living in black and white or sepia are all dead or too alzheimery to speak on it.

What I wonder is what the rate of nuclear whatchamacallit increasing across preceding eras has to do with old timey footage being more fuzzy and generally getting sharper each subsequent generation, and how everyone didn't notice it at the time/no one mentions the discrepancy.

It's like hello, TV doesn't just get sharper for no raisins, clearly something fucky was/is going on.

I've seen those old VHS rips of infomercials/classic news broadcasts, and I don't remember it being that fuzzy in real life!
 
It's not even new, it's part of the "Tartaria" conspiracy theory. Lore Lodge has a bunch of videos talking about it (and how it's largely just refusal to acknowledge actual history), although since Aiden is openly a mason
Wait, what? I thought the Lore Lodge guy was a devout Evangelical? What made him join the Freemasons?
 
This does bring up one interesting topic, that you can always tell the era a video or picture was made based on its quality before digitized. And then again on how well digitized things are. You can tell when a pic/vid was made fairly accurately to decades usually. Then secondary is when/if it was digitized and the quality of that. Film degrades quick, usually colors. Tape with fidelity overall. Digital stays the same.

At some point I think we're getting to where it'll be hard to tell. 4k/8k/Xk high def probably won't, in theory, look that much better than 2d 2025-era pics in the future, video is getting there or is there too now.. We're hitting the era of fast dimishing returns and endless same retention of quality.

Maybe there will be some breakthrough that'll make 2020+ images look dated but it's hard to see how now. Kinda sick of this derailing on here, but oh well. There are some older movies that had well maintained film stock and digitzed well that look fairly modern. But you can certainly see the difference between Attack of the Clones which was pretty much the first digital movie shot, and it looks awful, and just a few years later with Revenge of the Sith and it looks much better.

AI cleaning up though might mitigate a lot of the lousier versions shot/stored to look a lot better over time too.
 
Last edited:
I've seen those old VHS rips of infomercials/classic news broadcasts, and I don't remember it being that fuzzy in real life!
Consumer VHS was different from commercial VHS (for transmission).
What you are also seeing is digitizing effect of vhs which is unreproducible correctly.
You would have to take in line scan from tape, digitize that, then reproduce it in what mpeg or h265 codec is.
Instead you are taking vcr output, which suffers from line scan issues that don't fit modern tech, decode it in capture card, store it as jpg or whatever card used at that time, then assemble a video from it.
TV's were also made to smooth out frames passively due to phospor light retention as well as line scanning was not by frame but continuous so it hid all the issues.
All TV did overscan on purpose, you just didn't see it. This doesn't get captured well on tapes or digital media, so the actual image was stretched. (edges were more fuzzy/without detail)
If you remember TV test image, it was really clear.
1754212819301.webp
 
Consumer VHS was different from commercial VHS (for transmission).
A lot of it used Betacam too, which was marginally superior in the back end for transmission. The display quality you got only marginally increased from the 60's CRT TV's to mid 90's with S-VHS and the component with laserdisc. It did look better, but also your frame of reference over time at what was 'best' changes your opinion on how it looked then too. I've been watching some older Youtube stuff, pre around 2014 and it mostly looks awful. But it's hard to tell ones made since 2016 to now unless it's 60fps. Back then those videos looked 'good', but as you adjust to better modern things, older looks crappy.

Again I think we're in an era of hard dimishing returns. Only thing that can really be improved much in the home is dynamic range and color depth, but they're getting close to topped out there too. I think after around 2020 era good video the only way future gens will be able to tell the era things were made are the content of it. How woke, the fashion, and so on.

Like I've noticed now you can sure tell 2020-2021 because of the masks and isolation insanity alone on shows and movies. One thing that really dates video is the darkness levels. Lots of 2010-2020 was very darkly shot, just a style choice. Looks AWFUL mostly. I've heard it was just the general mood and style of the cinematographers and also the adjusting to the new higher contrast HDR video has.
 
Last edited:
Dark scenes were pretty good on CRT's. Even tho they don't display modern lcd parameters well, things look good as well.
It was matched with technology and being analogue it was maxed out in stats.
Yes, I was talking about a more general darkness for awhile that was in vogue. Just couldn't see much of what was going on in a lot of movies. That wasn't a tech issue, but cine choices. Youngsters now have no idea how crappy projection TVs were back in the 90s and cost as much as a house, literally. And had screen door effect with giant visible pixels. Crap cost over $100k and look awful. Or you had a 40" rear CRT that looked bad, or a 32" CRT that looked fine, but tiny.

And that wasn't ALL that long ago either. The bitch now is physical media dying. Streaming will cut the bandwidth that 4k discs can at 100 megabit every time possible to save bucks.

Anyway, I'm a bit glad the political news has kind of quited a bit. Needs a break sometimes.
 
Here’s something more interesting than sperging out over Civil War photos:
View attachment 7729731
China is in a worse financial situation than we are. I’m aware that this graph is a few years out of date, but I can only assume their debt has worsened since then. Combine this with their abysmal birth rate (reportedly 0.8) and their staggering youth unemployment rate of 35%, they’re close to the abyss. Of course, so is America due to many of the same reasons.
Keep in mind that California, Illinois, and many other blue states are functionally bankrupt due to pension obligations.
 
Cutie pie have you ever tried to "scorch" a paving stone like that? it almost likes like a damn laser hit the wall, its a small directional blast, not overall blackening
When I was little, we set off these "snake" fireworks on our sidewalks. The scorch marks stayed for at least a decade, clear as day, until the cement was replaced. And that was from cheap, poor quality fireworks.

On another note, all those men had real lives they went back to if they survived and their families passed down the things they took from battlefields, such as swords, guns, and journals. My family has a Civil War journal kept by a relative describing his daily life in the army. Could some of those artifacts be faked? Sure, but there are hundreds of similar such items and its not an easy thing to make a good fake, especially one that has been held onto by a family for generations.
 
Back