- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yesThis thing is already gargantuan. You want me to add a political dissertation to it, too?
the horrorI rated your post optimistic
Everyone seems to have overlooked that there is far more about me to laugh derisively at...
I have literary and game aspirations which might fascinate or amuse people.
(the fantasy)
...logical and honorable...
... I do have a sense of dignity and self-respect...
...collided with and largely overcome my mental illnesses and immaturity and other negative traits...
... immense self-knowledge ...
....substantial talents...
...For those who like being generally fascinated and intrigued, there are benign quirks of mine which could be explored...
(the reality)
... awkward and obnoxious autist...
...feelings of superiority and disdain towards people in general, various other things.
...ugly IRL
...and a severely disordered brain...
You're actually correct, except for one crucial aspect I just mentioned in my last post- I never was certain this would happen. I cannot control people and I find predicting others' behavior and motivations to be problematic at best. The reverse was about as much a possibility in my mind as this one you stated.
I don't know what post(s) you're referring to. It sounds like you were trying to argue with me about my perceived or actual sexual ideology. While I chose to counter-stroke on this with someone else a while back because he was being especially obnoxious and I wanted to watch reactions, I have generally decided not to engage in these arguments here because no one would be persuaded and I don't find the exercise rewarding to me or this thread in general.
If it was something else and you weren't merely trying to anger me, ask it again and I'll answer it.
That might be one factor. I cannot read minds so if people are silent I don't know how they feel. However, based on the comments I've received, at least some believe I'm either heading to an event or do this as part of my job. Ironically, I'm often seen as an entertainer of children professionally, yet children almost never respond to my appearance. Every time, I respond I'm merely wearing what I prefer to.
See, you can't really proclaim moral superiority when you're loudly calling for a lolcow's immediate family to be doxed and subject to harassment over things they have no control over and even oppose. Also, yes, like almost everyone else here and in the world at large, I prefer my family to not be successfully doxed, because I'm not completely sociopathic.
Actually, I've received several responses to that effect since being a full-on furry femboy. I like knowing I had a positive effect on someone just by being there as myself.
Yeah, I knew Kiwis would be amused by that outburst of mine. I really just dislike that buffoon. I side with him on tolerance and treatment for non-offending MAPs, but he just goes about it in such a exceptional and self-defeating way. He's even openly dared people to dox him and mocked their perceived inability to do so, which is unbelievably stupid to do as a pedo/hebephile regardless of ideology. He's embarrassing, and if me tormenting him entertains other people, so much the better.
There's no reason someone can't be both of those things. I think it's obvious that the vast majority of us like to gawk at those we perceive to be dysfunctional and inferior to us. It's also obvious many or most of the actives here like making edgy remarks about lolcows to amuse people and/or stroke their egos. Since I'm well familiarized with the culture here, I understand much or most of it is insincere or exaggerated and reflects the coarse sense of humor which pervades KF, and also designed to anger the lolcow. So, unless I'm misinterpreting what you mean by "edgelord", I would characterize this community as having both traits: edgelord lolcow critics who scorn perceived and real degeneracy.
It's a shame your post on them was eaten by that forum program issue you mentioned a while back. I read it before that happened (before I registered IIRC) and I also found it informative. As you say, there are some who genuinely hate their sexuality and abhor the concept of sexualizing children, but so many people refuse to accept the notion they will not break laws and deserve treatment if they need it. I see this attitude here displayed frequently. I do not deserve much sympathy or tolerance because I openly repudiate society's attitudes towards sex, but many of those you spoke of are indeed anti-reform and just want to be tolerated by society and live their lives peacefully.
I think people here have described me as "virtuous" or "VirPed", which demonstrates their ignorance of them and me. Anyway, one reason I did not object to the covert investigations of that organization is they are anti-reform publicly, but many of their members only refrain from such behaviors because of legal factors. Some posts by Nickerson IIRC were rather concerning, and him shutting down dialogue with that other person was morally repulsive to me. I suspect their organization is highly corrupted. I also found their FAQ to be badly made and largely erroneous.
I hope YOU of all people knew I was being sarcastic. The "I see no problem with this plan whatsoever" part should have indicated to the average person aware of my case I was trolling/joking. To be honest, if a hebephile actually did wish to pursue that career, I would have grave reservations about that.
Perhaps some are. They and B4UACT do actually perform critically needed advocacy. I have had highly trained therapists recoil or become deterred when I informed them of being hebephilic (some didn't even know what it was- one though I meant snakes at first). Many have been trained to distrust MAPs completely regardless of their history or ideology. This is not conducive to treating them in general or reducing sexual offenses. And, yes, I know some will respond with "Just kill them all.", but most aren't suicidal and thus won't oblige that strategy.
I actually really dislike conflict in a physical medium. I'm not proficient in verbal conflict and find the prospect generally frightening. There were a few people at FWA I really despise, but I avoided them entirely instead and never even considered trolling them there (and also I just think cons should be safe spaces where people celebrate). This is a natural aversion to IRL conflict most people have.
Actually, based on my vague recollection of his facial features (youthful, soft, little to no facial hair), he was at least slightly attractive. I think he was twinkish in build, too. If he had longer hair and had no acne I might have found him substantially attractive.
20 Tweets is only 2,800 characters. I need 100x that to describe grand Kiwi Farms strategy at a minimum.
I was screaming and swearing the morning I read this... because I couldn't find my brush and my hair extensions were infuriatingly difficult to put in. I was actually greatly amused by seeing this earlier that morning. While I have to commend you for at least trying to cause damage rather than just posture like everyone else here was doing, this was a botched attempt and it was likely doomed to fail even if someone of my caliber had attempted it.
There are several things about this I could critique but this is already very long and I'm not going to be a tactician for your side. Suffice it to say, this message was badly planned and comes across as blatant drama-whoring. And why would you include a screenshot of what I presume was the Halloween candy tweet of mine to Cartograph, something that's mitigating evidence? Amateur!
I rated your post optimistic. To be honest, I have minimal familiarity with their staff and leadership. In general, conventions are far less willing to preemptively ban someone than you and others presume. You have to be Evil Sibe levels of terrible or a recently convicted sex offender before preemptive banishment becomes a major possibility.
You really should take your case to DragonCon. They're the biggest con in that region. Why stop at comparatively small AWA? Why just limit yourself to one state? Try MegaPlex or MFF! If you're going to mobilize offensively, go big! All you've done so far is warn me of your intentions.
It is unlikely I'll be at AWA this year anyway. That being said, I have heard nothing from them, and it may well be completely irrelevant because I remember not needing to present ID for my membership in 2015.
People love to say furrydom is extremely drama prone. I suspect it's not that much worse than other fandoms. There's also a lot of sexuality within furrydom and sexuality seems to naturally breed drama overall.
Did I really look that old and crappy? Honestly, I don't care for my face generally either, but especially on the left side at certain anglesI sometimes like the way I look.
I knew to expect him or some other Kiwi there, and I did not resent that possibility. As he said, I had invited people here to respectfully interact with me upon spotting me.
I strongly suspect more than one person has done this already. Melkor's just the only one to openly brag about it.
I've always been amenable to chatting about difficult or contentious aspects of me. It's just that most here were too busy trying to come up with the wittiest retort or too fixated on my sexuality to notice or care. If I didn't have thick skin I never would have even considered coming here as a lolcow.
No one from the organization spoke to me at all, and I strongly doubt anyone will. I doubt they even spoke to Tora, who actually IS a convicted sex offender and allowed to attend (IIRC he's friendly with the chairman). Hell, Kage and AC didn't ban him when there was a huge uproar years ago.
The person probably was being facetious. Anyone who would seriously advocate violence in a crowded room at a furry con over online drama is utterly exceptional.
You could always try this yourself. Should you decide to, you should also relay I think Kage is a disingenuous fuck and I'm glad the board overruled him and disinvited that reprehensible friend of his, 2 Gryphon. Also, you can inquire why he didn't ban the RSO and attempted re-offender Tora while demanding my preemptive banning.
I'll have you know I'm a 23rd Degree black belt and carry six firearms at all times. Anyway, in all seriousness, one doesn't have to have a large muscular masculine frame to be capable of formidable defense.
Ahh, were there people who presented questions to ask? To be very candid, you really should have done this at some point. I was at my weakest point with regards to fitness and preparedness for questioning. I am not very proficient in verbal mediums and I was acutely exhausted mentally and physically, and I would have stood alone. The chance of me saying something stupid, incriminating, or otherwise useful was at its greatest there.
Virtually everyone is at least minimally affected by even trivial things. I don't believe someone when they assert they are completely immune to insults or provocation. I think regarding this thread, fixated or even obsessed are far better descriptors than bothered or agitated, but the latter reactions do occur. The difference is they are momentary and minimal, and I don't reflexively charge into battle over them. Many I also find amusing to a degree.
I am a natural Random Text generator.
I'm spoilering my response since it's rather gross to the average Kiwi and even I display a modicum of restraint and awareness. Don't complain to me if you look and are horrified.
I've never envisioned him sticking his 30-cm knotted dick into a pre-teen cub (or an adult with such a body- their advanced medical technology allows people to set permanent physiological ages and adjust other traits that are generally immutable to us). They tend to have bodies which can accommodate larger penises and more frequent sex, but not to absurd levels like is often depicted in furry porn. Roketsune's 12-year-old partner, the femboy otter Lucien, has never been the bottom/uke with Roketsune either in my stories or my fantasies, for the general reason you just stated (and I'd never want either of them yiffing me anally IRL because I'd fucking die or at least have severe anal trauma). Lucien's always the top in that pairing, sometimes the bottom with male classmates.
Even then I'd doubt they'd care, especially if they realized I posted those pictures primarily to anger enemies. They're extremely reluctant to ban anyone who isn't causing them direct and severe grief. They're also aware of my sexual inclinations, including the person who leads Con-ops and most likely responded to his e-mail. He even once linked me to a story of a teenage anti-reform pedophile I guess out of sympathy or empathy.
Pretty much. Though, what exactly does "taking the piss" mean? That's a British phrase, isn't it?
Virtually all of my trolling is sincere. Meaning, I almost never say something I don't actually believe to upset people. Not that there's any need to with the great abundance of material I have to work with.
I suspected if anyone here understood this reality, it would be you. Too many people just respond like Pavlov's Dog to bait like that. I'm rather disappointed it didn't result in a massive firestorm here or on that Tumblr blog. I was trying to pull a Tay Ferret, but I suppose only he has the ability to enrage legions of people with innocuous pictures and silly Inkbunny-directed remarks. *sighs heavily and enviously*
Yeah, I probably could. If I hadn't already near-catastrophically ruined my financial health I definitely would pay 26k for fatso's Classic to push my Trolling stat to over 9k.
I have been monitoring the CWC forum FAR more than I should have been over the last few days, speaking of which. These spectacles are just indescribably ludicrous. I really need a better hobby.
I don't know why people are pushing this notion. I never proclaimed I was pretending to be or do anything. I'm not actually seeking children and never claimed to, but the hebephilia in general I've consistently admitted to for years. Why would I suddenly recant this now?
I probably will if people wish this. Honestly, the exchange in general is pretty boring, short, and unremarkable. We were talking about the TLL wiki overhaul. He added the section on LordkaT's testing and generally wished to help the process. The most memorable thing about it was him opening by saluting and asking if he had permission to speak. Even I was caught off guard by that, and I have a fucking military strategist fursona. But it was just an innocuous quirk.
I haven't the faintest idea why he made that outburst, but it provided a lot of levity at a time the acrimony and posturing had reached tedious peak levels, so I was happy with it.
I actually do hope that with enough personal rehabilitation and consolidation, I'll become capable of some safe and well-deliberated part-time work, maybe even college education. Or maybe my military strategy game idea will come to fruition 5-10 years from now and provide a modest income. Right now though, despite suffering high debt I have quickly disregarded the prospect of part-time work even at a library or from home every time I considered it. I'm just too neurotic and overextended for this to be feasible currently.
I'm not very familiar with Lagatto's remarks and only specifically remember the whole 6-inch foxdick thing. However, I wouldn't be surprised if my more extreme rhetoric was even more odious than his.
This thing is already gargantuan. You want me to add a political dissertation to it, too?
I've always been enamored with raccoons, and I have several traits in common with them. I'm intelligent, curious and inquisitive, adaptive, and reclusive and solitary. It was very easy to choose that as my furry species.
I don't have a diaper fetish at all and there's a mild visceral discomfort I have about DL/AB things. However, that alone is not a worthy cause of malignment or abuse, and I defend them and babyfurs in general who aren't creepy or inept. Of course, KF loves a good diaperfur/babyfur horror story and some maladroits do exist in that demographic (probably a disproportionately high number of them), so they seem more predisposed to insanity and idiocy than they actually are.
I think you're misapplying that label. I don't deserve the title "virtuous" in that regard.
You're actually correct, except for one crucial aspect I just mentioned in my last post- I never was certain this would happen. I cannot control people and I find predicting others' behavior and motivations to be problematic at best. The reverse was about as much a possibility in my mind as this one you stated.
I don't know what post(s) you're referring to. It sounds like you were trying to argue with me about my perceived or actual sexual ideology. While I chose to counter-stroke on this with someone else a while back because he was being especially obnoxious and I wanted to watch reactions, I have generally decided not to engage in these arguments here because no one would be persuaded and I don't find the exercise rewarding to me or this thread in general.
If it was something else and you weren't merely trying to anger me, ask it again and I'll answer it.
That might be one factor. I cannot read minds so if people are silent I don't know how they feel. However, based on the comments I've received, at least some believe I'm either heading to an event or do this as part of my job. Ironically, I'm often seen as an entertainer of children professionally, yet children almost never respond to my appearance. Every time, I respond I'm merely wearing what I prefer to.
See, you can't really proclaim moral superiority when you're loudly calling for a lolcow's immediate family to be doxed and subject to harassment over things they have no control over and even oppose. Also, yes, like almost everyone else here and in the world at large, I prefer my family to not be successfully doxed, because I'm not completely sociopathic.
Actually, I've received several responses to that effect since being a full-on furry femboy. I like knowing I had a positive effect on someone just by being there as myself.
Yeah, I knew Kiwis would be amused by that outburst of mine. I really just dislike that buffoon. I side with him on tolerance and treatment for non-offending MAPs, but he just goes about it in such a exceptional and self-defeating way. He's even openly dared people to dox him and mocked their perceived inability to do so, which is unbelievably stupid to do as a pedo/hebephile regardless of ideology. He's embarrassing, and if me tormenting him entertains other people, so much the better.
There's no reason someone can't be both of those things. I think it's obvious that the vast majority of us like to gawk at those we perceive to be dysfunctional and inferior to us. It's also obvious many or most of the actives here like making edgy remarks about lolcows to amuse people and/or stroke their egos. Since I'm well familiarized with the culture here, I understand much or most of it is insincere or exaggerated and reflects the coarse sense of humor which pervades KF, and also designed to anger the lolcow. So, unless I'm misinterpreting what you mean by "edgelord", I would characterize this community as having both traits: edgelord lolcow critics who scorn perceived and real degeneracy.
It's a shame your post on them was eaten by that forum program issue you mentioned a while back. I read it before that happened (before I registered IIRC) and I also found it informative. As you say, there are some who genuinely hate their sexuality and abhor the concept of sexualizing children, but so many people refuse to accept the notion they will not break laws and deserve treatment if they need it. I see this attitude here displayed frequently. I do not deserve much sympathy or tolerance because I openly repudiate society's attitudes towards sex, but many of those you spoke of are indeed anti-reform and just want to be tolerated by society and live their lives peacefully.
I think people here have described me as "virtuous" or "VirPed", which demonstrates their ignorance of them and me. Anyway, one reason I did not object to the covert investigations of that organization is they are anti-reform publicly, but many of their members only refrain from such behaviors because of legal factors. Some posts by Nickerson IIRC were rather concerning, and him shutting down dialogue with that other person was morally repulsive to me. I suspect their organization is highly corrupted. I also found their FAQ to be badly made and largely erroneous.
I hope YOU of all people knew I was being sarcastic. The "I see no problem with this plan whatsoever" part should have indicated to the average person aware of my case I was trolling/joking. To be honest, if a hebephile actually did wish to pursue that career, I would have grave reservations about that.
Perhaps some are. They and B4UACT do actually perform critically needed advocacy. I have had highly trained therapists recoil or become deterred when I informed them of being hebephilic (some didn't even know what it was- one though I meant snakes at first). Many have been trained to distrust MAPs completely regardless of their history or ideology. This is not conducive to treating them in general or reducing sexual offenses. And, yes, I know some will respond with "Just kill them all.", but most aren't suicidal and thus won't oblige that strategy.
I actually really dislike conflict in a physical medium. I'm not proficient in verbal conflict and find the prospect generally frightening. There were a few people at FWA I really despise, but I avoided them entirely instead and never even considered trolling them there (and also I just think cons should be safe spaces where people celebrate). This is a natural aversion to IRL conflict most people have.
Actually, based on my vague recollection of his facial features (youthful, soft, little to no facial hair), he was at least slightly attractive. I think he was twinkish in build, too. If he had longer hair and had no acne I might have found him substantially attractive.
20 Tweets is only 2,800 characters. I need 100x that to describe grand Kiwi Farms strategy at a minimum.
I was screaming and swearing the morning I read this... because I couldn't find my brush and my hair extensions were infuriatingly difficult to put in. I was actually greatly amused by seeing this earlier that morning. While I have to commend you for at least trying to cause damage rather than just posture like everyone else here was doing, this was a botched attempt and it was likely doomed to fail even if someone of my caliber had attempted it.
There are several things about this I could critique but this is already very long and I'm not going to be a tactician for your side. Suffice it to say, this message was badly planned and comes across as blatant drama-whoring. And why would you include a screenshot of what I presume was the Halloween candy tweet of mine to Cartograph, something that's mitigating evidence? Amateur!
I rated your post optimistic. To be honest, I have minimal familiarity with their staff and leadership. In general, conventions are far less willing to preemptively ban someone than you and others presume. You have to be Evil Sibe levels of terrible or a recently convicted sex offender before preemptive banishment becomes a major possibility.
You really should take your case to DragonCon. They're the biggest con in that region. Why stop at comparatively small AWA? Why just limit yourself to one state? Try MegaPlex or MFF! If you're going to mobilize offensively, go big! All you've done so far is warn me of your intentions.
It is unlikely I'll be at AWA this year anyway. That being said, I have heard nothing from them, and it may well be completely irrelevant because I remember not needing to present ID for my membership in 2015.
People love to say furrydom is extremely drama prone. I suspect it's not that much worse than other fandoms. There's also a lot of sexuality within furrydom and sexuality seems to naturally breed drama overall.
Did I really look that old and crappy? Honestly, I don't care for my face generally either, but especially on the left side at certain anglesI sometimes like the way I look.
I knew to expect him or some other Kiwi there, and I did not resent that possibility. As he said, I had invited people here to respectfully interact with me upon spotting me.
I strongly suspect more than one person has done this already. Melkor's just the only one to openly brag about it.
I've always been amenable to chatting about difficult or contentious aspects of me. It's just that most here were too busy trying to come up with the wittiest retort or too fixated on my sexuality to notice or care. If I didn't have thick skin I never would have even considered coming here as a lolcow.
No one from the organization spoke to me at all, and I strongly doubt anyone will. I doubt they even spoke to Tora, who actually IS a convicted sex offender and allowed to attend (IIRC he's friendly with the chairman). Hell, Kage and AC didn't ban him when there was a huge uproar years ago.
The person probably was being facetious. Anyone who would seriously advocate violence in a crowded room at a furry con over online drama is utterly exceptional.
You could always try this yourself. Should you decide to, you should also relay I think Kage is a disingenuous fuck and I'm glad the board overruled him and disinvited that reprehensible friend of his, 2 Gryphon. Also, you can inquire why he didn't ban the RSO and attempted re-offender Tora while demanding my preemptive banning.
I'll have you know I'm a 23rd Degree black belt and carry six firearms at all times. Anyway, in all seriousness, one doesn't have to have a large muscular masculine frame to be capable of formidable defense.
Ahh, were there people who presented questions to ask? To be very candid, you really should have done this at some point. I was at my weakest point with regards to fitness and preparedness for questioning. I am not very proficient in verbal mediums and I was acutely exhausted mentally and physically, and I would have stood alone. The chance of me saying something stupid, incriminating, or otherwise useful was at its greatest there.
Virtually everyone is at least minimally affected by even trivial things. I don't believe someone when they assert they are completely immune to insults or provocation. I think regarding this thread, fixated or even obsessed are far better descriptors than bothered or agitated, but the latter reactions do occur. The difference is they are momentary and minimal, and I don't reflexively charge into battle over them. Many I also find amusing to a degree.
I am a natural Random Text generator.
I'm spoilering my response since it's rather gross to the average Kiwi and even I display a modicum of restraint and awareness. Don't complain to me if you look and are horrified.
I've never envisioned him sticking his 30-cm knotted dick into a pre-teen cub (or an adult with such a body- their advanced medical technology allows people to set permanent physiological ages and adjust other traits that are generally immutable to us). They tend to have bodies which can accommodate larger penises and more frequent sex, but not to absurd levels like is often depicted in furry porn. Roketsune's 12-year-old partner, the femboy otter Lucien, has never been the bottom/uke with Roketsune either in my stories or my fantasies, for the general reason you just stated (and I'd never want either of them yiffing me anally IRL because I'd fucking die or at least have severe anal trauma). Lucien's always the top in that pairing, sometimes the bottom with male classmates.
Even then I'd doubt they'd care, especially if they realized I posted those pictures primarily to anger enemies. They're extremely reluctant to ban anyone who isn't causing them direct and severe grief. They're also aware of my sexual inclinations, including the person who leads Con-ops and most likely responded to his e-mail. He even once linked me to a story of a teenage anti-reform pedophile I guess out of sympathy or empathy.
Pretty much. Though, what exactly does "taking the piss" mean? That's a British phrase, isn't it?
Virtually all of my trolling is sincere. Meaning, I almost never say something I don't actually believe to upset people. Not that there's any need to with the great abundance of material I have to work with.
I suspected if anyone here understood this reality, it would be you. Too many people just respond like Pavlov's Dog to bait like that. I'm rather disappointed it didn't result in a massive firestorm here or on that Tumblr blog. I was trying to pull a Tay Ferret, but I suppose only he has the ability to enrage legions of people with innocuous pictures and silly Inkbunny-directed remarks. *sighs heavily and enviously*
Yeah, I probably could. If I hadn't already near-catastrophically ruined my financial health I definitely would pay 26k for fatso's Classic to push my Trolling stat to over 9k.
I have been monitoring the CWC forum FAR more than I should have been over the last few days, speaking of which. These spectacles are just indescribably ludicrous. I really need a better hobby.
I don't know why people are pushing this notion. I never proclaimed I was pretending to be or do anything. I'm not actually seeking children and never claimed to, but the hebephilia in general I've consistently admitted to for years. Why would I suddenly recant this now?
I probably will if people wish this. Honestly, the exchange in general is pretty boring, short, and unremarkable. We were talking about the TLL wiki overhaul. He added the section on LordkaT's testing and generally wished to help the process. The most memorable thing about it was him opening by saluting and asking if he had permission to speak. Even I was caught off guard by that, and I have a fucking military strategist fursona. But it was just an innocuous quirk.
I haven't the faintest idea why he made that outburst, but it provided a lot of levity at a time the acrimony and posturing had reached tedious peak levels, so I was happy with it.
I actually do hope that with enough personal rehabilitation and consolidation, I'll become capable of some safe and well-deliberated part-time work, maybe even college education. Or maybe my military strategy game idea will come to fruition 5-10 years from now and provide a modest income. Right now though, despite suffering high debt I have quickly disregarded the prospect of part-time work even at a library or from home every time I considered it. I'm just too neurotic and overextended for this to be feasible currently.
I'm not very familiar with Lagatto's remarks and only specifically remember the whole 6-inch foxdick thing. However, I wouldn't be surprised if my more extreme rhetoric was even more odious than his.
This thing is already gargantuan. You want me to add a political dissertation to it, too?
I've always been enamored with raccoons, and I have several traits in common with them. I'm intelligent, curious and inquisitive, adaptive, and reclusive and solitary. It was very easy to choose that as my furry species.
I don't have a diaper fetish at all and there's a mild visceral discomfort I have about DL/AB things. However, that alone is not a worthy cause of malignment or abuse, and I defend them and babyfurs in general who aren't creepy or inept. Of course, KF loves a good diaperfur/babyfur horror story and some maladroits do exist in that demographic (probably a disproportionately high number of them), so they seem more predisposed to insanity and idiocy than they actually are.
I think you're misapplying that label. I don't deserve the title "virtuous" in that regard.
Nah, die furries (and pedos).The person probably was being facetious. Anyone who would seriously advocate violence in a crowded room at a furry con over online drama is utterly exceptional.
Stop talking about the pix I DM'd youThis thing is already gargantuan.
I see what you're doing here. You've disguised it well, but I'm not tricked. You continue to post edgy shit and things that you know will get a rise out of Kiwis on Twitter. You aren't responding for the sake of clarifying yourself or presenting your argument. You are doing this for attention. You have quoted a pretty decent number of the people who frequent this thread, which means they will see your post in their notifications. With that, more people are likely to rebuttal you, and your desire for the attention you so desperately crave is sated by people who think you are being genuine. You are not. You are trying to make up for the lack of attention you get in your life, and you don't care how you get it or whether it's positive or negative. Quite frankly, it's pitiful, and the fact that you have been trying and succeeding at getting more attention when talk of you dies down only shows that you deserve nothing more than to be forgotten.You're actually correct, except for one crucial aspect I just mentioned in my last post- I never was certain this would happen. I cannot control people and I find predicting others' behavior and motivations to be problematic at best. The reverse was about as much a possibility in my mind as this one you stated.
I don't know what post(s) you're referring to. It sounds like you were trying to argue with me about my perceived or actual sexual ideology. While I chose to counter-stroke on this with someone else a while back because he was being especially obnoxious and I wanted to watch reactions, I have generally decided not to engage in these arguments here because no one would be persuaded and I don't find the exercise rewarding to me or this thread in general.
If it was something else and you weren't merely trying to anger me, ask it again and I'll answer it.
That might be one factor. I cannot read minds so if people are silent I don't know how they feel. However, based on the comments I've received, at least some believe I'm either heading to an event or do this as part of my job. Ironically, I'm often seen as an entertainer of children professionally, yet children almost never respond to my appearance. Every time, I respond I'm merely wearing what I prefer to.
See, you can't really proclaim moral superiority when you're loudly calling for a lolcow's immediate family to be doxed and subject to harassment over things they have no control over and even oppose. Also, yes, like almost everyone else here and in the world at large, I prefer my family to not be successfully doxed, because I'm not completely sociopathic.
Actually, I've received several responses to that effect since being a full-on furry femboy. I like knowing I had a positive effect on someone just by being there as myself.
Yeah, I knew Kiwis would be amused by that outburst of mine. I really just dislike that buffoon. I side with him on tolerance and treatment for non-offending MAPs, but he just goes about it in such a exceptional and self-defeating way. He's even openly dared people to dox him and mocked their perceived inability to do so, which is unbelievably stupid to do as a pedo/hebephile regardless of ideology. He's embarrassing, and if me tormenting him entertains other people, so much the better.
There's no reason someone can't be both of those things. I think it's obvious that the vast majority of us like to gawk at those we perceive to be dysfunctional and inferior to us. It's also obvious many or most of the actives here like making edgy remarks about lolcows to amuse people and/or stroke their egos. Since I'm well familiarized with the culture here, I understand much or most of it is insincere or exaggerated and reflects the coarse sense of humor which pervades KF, and also designed to anger the lolcow. So, unless I'm misinterpreting what you mean by "edgelord", I would characterize this community as having both traits: edgelord lolcow critics who scorn perceived and real degeneracy.
It's a shame your post on them was eaten by that forum program issue you mentioned a while back. I read it before that happened (before I registered IIRC) and I also found it informative. As you say, there are some who genuinely hate their sexuality and abhor the concept of sexualizing children, but so many people refuse to accept the notion they will not break laws and deserve treatment if they need it. I see this attitude here displayed frequently. I do not deserve much sympathy or tolerance because I openly repudiate society's attitudes towards sex, but many of those you spoke of are indeed anti-reform and just want to be tolerated by society and live their lives peacefully.
I think people here have described me as "virtuous" or "VirPed", which demonstrates their ignorance of them and me. Anyway, one reason I did not object to the covert investigations of that organization is they are anti-reform publicly, but many of their members only refrain from such behaviors because of legal factors. Some posts by Nickerson IIRC were rather concerning, and him shutting down dialogue with that other person was morally repulsive to me. I suspect their organization is highly corrupted. I also found their FAQ to be badly made and largely erroneous.
I hope YOU of all people knew I was being sarcastic. The "I see no problem with this plan whatsoever" part should have indicated to the average person aware of my case I was trolling/joking. To be honest, if a hebephile actually did wish to pursue that career, I would have grave reservations about that.
Perhaps some are. They and B4UACT do actually perform critically needed advocacy. I have had highly trained therapists recoil or become deterred when I informed them of being hebephilic (some didn't even know what it was- one though I meant snakes at first). Many have been trained to distrust MAPs completely regardless of their history or ideology. This is not conducive to treating them in general or reducing sexual offenses. And, yes, I know some will respond with "Just kill them all.", but most aren't suicidal and thus won't oblige that strategy.
I actually really dislike conflict in a physical medium. I'm not proficient in verbal conflict and find the prospect generally frightening. There were a few people at FWA I really despise, but I avoided them entirely instead and never even considered trolling them there (and also I just think cons should be safe spaces where people celebrate). This is a natural aversion to IRL conflict most people have.
Actually, based on my vague recollection of his facial features (youthful, soft, little to no facial hair), he was at least slightly attractive. I think he was twinkish in build, too. If he had longer hair and had no acne I might have found him substantially attractive.
20 Tweets is only 2,800 characters. I need 100x that to describe grand Kiwi Farms strategy at a minimum.
I was screaming and swearing the morning I read this... because I couldn't find my brush and my hair extensions were infuriatingly difficult to put in. I was actually greatly amused by seeing this earlier that morning. While I have to commend you for at least trying to cause damage rather than just posture like everyone else here was doing, this was a botched attempt and it was likely doomed to fail even if someone of my caliber had attempted it.
There are several things about this I could critique but this is already very long and I'm not going to be a tactician for your side. Suffice it to say, this message was badly planned and comes across as blatant drama-whoring. And why would you include a screenshot of what I presume was the Halloween candy tweet of mine to Cartograph, something that's mitigating evidence? Amateur!
I rated your post optimistic. To be honest, I have minimal familiarity with their staff and leadership. In general, conventions are far less willing to preemptively ban someone than you and others presume. You have to be Evil Sibe levels of terrible or a recently convicted sex offender before preemptive banishment becomes a major possibility.
You really should take your case to DragonCon. They're the biggest con in that region. Why stop at comparatively small AWA? Why just limit yourself to one state? Try MegaPlex or MFF! If you're going to mobilize offensively, go big! All you've done so far is warn me of your intentions.
It is unlikely I'll be at AWA this year anyway. That being said, I have heard nothing from them, and it may well be completely irrelevant because I remember not needing to present ID for my membership in 2015.
People love to say furrydom is extremely drama prone. I suspect it's not that much worse than other fandoms. There's also a lot of sexuality within furrydom and sexuality seems to naturally breed drama overall.
Did I really look that old and crappy? Honestly, I don't care for my face generally either, but especially on the left side at certain anglesI sometimes like the way I look.
I knew to expect him or some other Kiwi there, and I did not resent that possibility. As he said, I had invited people here to respectfully interact with me upon spotting me.
I strongly suspect more than one person has done this already. Melkor's just the only one to openly brag about it.
I've always been amenable to chatting about difficult or contentious aspects of me. It's just that most here were too busy trying to come up with the wittiest retort or too fixated on my sexuality to notice or care. If I didn't have thick skin I never would have even considered coming here as a lolcow.
No one from the organization spoke to me at all, and I strongly doubt anyone will. I doubt they even spoke to Tora, who actually IS a convicted sex offender and allowed to attend (IIRC he's friendly with the chairman). Hell, Kage and AC didn't ban him when there was a huge uproar years ago.
The person probably was being facetious. Anyone who would seriously advocate violence in a crowded room at a furry con over online drama is utterly exceptional.
You could always try this yourself. Should you decide to, you should also relay I think Kage is a disingenuous fuck and I'm glad the board overruled him and disinvited that reprehensible friend of his, 2 Gryphon. Also, you can inquire why he didn't ban the RSO and attempted re-offender Tora while demanding my preemptive banning.
I'll have you know I'm a 23rd Degree black belt and carry six firearms at all times. Anyway, in all seriousness, one doesn't have to have a large muscular masculine frame to be capable of formidable defense.
Ahh, were there people who presented questions to ask? To be very candid, you really should have done this at some point. I was at my weakest point with regards to fitness and preparedness for questioning. I am not very proficient in verbal mediums and I was acutely exhausted mentally and physically, and I would have stood alone. The chance of me saying something stupid, incriminating, or otherwise useful was at its greatest there.
Virtually everyone is at least minimally affected by even trivial things. I don't believe someone when they assert they are completely immune to insults or provocation. I think regarding this thread, fixated or even obsessed are far better descriptors than bothered or agitated, but the latter reactions do occur. The difference is they are momentary and minimal, and I don't reflexively charge into battle over them. Many I also find amusing to a degree.
I am a natural Random Text generator.
I'm spoilering my response since it's rather gross to the average Kiwi and even I display a modicum of restraint and awareness. Don't complain to me if you look and are horrified.
I've never envisioned him sticking his 30-cm knotted dick into a pre-teen cub (or an adult with such a body- their advanced medical technology allows people to set permanent physiological ages and adjust other traits that are generally immutable to us). They tend to have bodies which can accommodate larger penises and more frequent sex, but not to absurd levels like is often depicted in furry porn. Roketsune's 12-year-old partner, the femboy otter Lucien, has never been the bottom/uke with Roketsune either in my stories or my fantasies, for the general reason you just stated (and I'd never want either of them yiffing me anally IRL because I'd fucking die or at least have severe anal trauma). Lucien's always the top in that pairing, sometimes the bottom with male classmates.
Even then I'd doubt they'd care, especially if they realized I posted those pictures primarily to anger enemies. They're extremely reluctant to ban anyone who isn't causing them direct and severe grief. They're also aware of my sexual inclinations, including the person who leads Con-ops and most likely responded to his e-mail. He even once linked me to a story of a teenage anti-reform pedophile I guess out of sympathy or empathy.
Pretty much. Though, what exactly does "taking the piss" mean? That's a British phrase, isn't it?
Virtually all of my trolling is sincere. Meaning, I almost never say something I don't actually believe to upset people. Not that there's any need to with the great abundance of material I have to work with.
I suspected if anyone here understood this reality, it would be you. Too many people just respond like Pavlov's Dog to bait like that. I'm rather disappointed it didn't result in a massive firestorm here or on that Tumblr blog. I was trying to pull a Tay Ferret, but I suppose only he has the ability to enrage legions of people with innocuous pictures and silly Inkbunny-directed remarks. *sighs heavily and enviously*
Yeah, I probably could. If I hadn't already near-catastrophically ruined my financial health I definitely would pay 26k for fatso's Classic to push my Trolling stat to over 9k.
I have been monitoring the CWC forum FAR more than I should have been over the last few days, speaking of which. These spectacles are just indescribably ludicrous. I really need a better hobby.
I don't know why people are pushing this notion. I never proclaimed I was pretending to be or do anything. I'm not actually seeking children and never claimed to, but the hebephilia in general I've consistently admitted to for years. Why would I suddenly recant this now?
I probably will if people wish this. Honestly, the exchange in general is pretty boring, short, and unremarkable. We were talking about the TLL wiki overhaul. He added the section on LordkaT's testing and generally wished to help the process. The most memorable thing about it was him opening by saluting and asking if he had permission to speak. Even I was caught off guard by that, and I have a fucking military strategist fursona. But it was just an innocuous quirk.
I haven't the faintest idea why he made that outburst, but it provided a lot of levity at a time the acrimony and posturing had reached tedious peak levels, so I was happy with it.
I actually do hope that with enough personal rehabilitation and consolidation, I'll become capable of some safe and well-deliberated part-time work, maybe even college education. Or maybe my military strategy game idea will come to fruition 5-10 years from now and provide a modest income. Right now though, despite suffering high debt I have quickly disregarded the prospect of part-time work even at a library or from home every time I considered it. I'm just too neurotic and overextended for this to be feasible currently.
I'm not very familiar with Lagatto's remarks and only specifically remember the whole 6-inch foxdick thing. However, I wouldn't be surprised if my more extreme rhetoric was even more odious than his.
This thing is already gargantuan. You want me to add a political dissertation to it, too?
I've always been enamored with raccoons, and I have several traits in common with them. I'm intelligent, curious and inquisitive, adaptive, and reclusive and solitary. It was very easy to choose that as my furry species.
I don't have a diaper fetish at all and there's a mild visceral discomfort I have about DL/AB things. However, that alone is not a worthy cause of malignment or abuse, and I defend them and babyfurs in general who aren't creepy or inept. Of course, KF loves a good diaperfur/babyfur horror story and some maladroits do exist in that demographic (probably a disproportionately high number of them), so they seem more predisposed to insanity and idiocy than they actually are.
I think you're misapplying that label. I don't deserve the title "virtuous" in that regard.
20 Tweets is only 2,800 characters. I need 100x that to describe grand Kiwi Farms strategy at a minimum.
Bud I don't want to diddle children so that automatically makes me morally superior. You're pretty much asking for it.See, you can't really proclaim moral superiority when you're loudly calling for a lolcow's immediate family to be doxed and subject to harassment over things they have no control over and even oppose. Also, yes, like almost everyone else here and in the world at large, I prefer my family to not be successfully doxed, because I'm not completely sociopathic.
I think, of all the cows I've seen, this is the one that comes across as the most autistic (not necessarily the most crazy of course). Something about the weird, stilted way he tries to be witty reminds me of several people I've known with the disorder, except they weren't paedofurs and didn't act like that every waking minute.
While I agree wholeheartedly, don't respond to him. That's what he wants. Let him be forgotten to time or wait for him to actually do something so that he can be punished for his crimes, then be forgotten as one of the many cases the court system deals with.Bud I don't want to diddle children so that automatically makes me morally superior. You're pretty much asking for it.![]()
The most severely autistic lolcow is probably Bryce Cherry, who thinks in ways incomprehensible to mere neurotypicals like us and was ruled mentally unfit to stand trial.