US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Obviously biased here but good general overview

A lot on there to be proud of. I wasn't aware of a lot of those, so thank you. Obv its easy to get lost in the propaganda from every side but it's good to remember our alliances have, at times, served us well.

Just wanna remind all the niggers who were in here a couple days ago saying AOC was attractive.
View attachment 7738436
This shit ain't attractive homies. This the fat bitch y'all simpin for.

Tulsi sisters on top :smug:

Would you cucks legit stop with your constant BLACKPILLING?

AOC is like 40. Yeah, she's gained a couple pounds and she's not a skinny 20yo model. So what? That's not the appeal. She's not a fatty tho by any means.

She's an attractive abuela with a nice rack, respectable ass, acceptable face, etc. She was a 7 in her prime and probably a 6 now but if she hit the gym, she'd be good.

Here's her a couple years ago...

Tulsi isn't that attractive, imho. She has a brood, haggard face. Her tits are a little small. She has close to a manjaw. Meaning, u gay.
 
If this was about oil or breaking up OPEC then we'd bring the entire might of the US armed forces to bear on the Gulf states and topple them within a month.

1754397157932.webp

But as far as I remember the Gulf states play along.

It always makes me feel so old when someone is too young to remember 9/11.


I think if the political value/capital of supporting Israel wasn't so high thanks to the likes of AIPAC, then the reasons for supporting what is probably, at best, a politically divisive issue, would be next to nil.

We don't tend to react well when third-world barbarians threaten US business interests. We might not be quite so tolerant of their treatment of Christians in the region and stop doing the whole thing where our politicians have to honor their stupid wall, but between the Intel plant and the medical research industry there, we also wouldn't just stand by and let the Shiite death cult a few states over realize its vision to bring about the 12th Imam or whatever it is has them so obsessed with Israel.
 
Last edited:

This afternoon the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a preliminary injunction protecting our client Kimmara Sumrall, a prominent Zionist activist assaulted for wearing an Israeli flag by a member of the antisemitic hate group CODEPINK. Describing this “extraordinary remedy granted sparingly,” the court found that Ms. Sumrall was likely to succeed on the merits of her lawsuit, noting that: “The Star of David—emblazoned upon the Israeli flag—symbolizes the Jewish race…targeting the Star of David is as racially motivated as [using] the highly offensive racial slur, [the n-word].”

Ms. Sumrall’s lawsuit utilizes a virtually forgotten provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, passed just after the Civil War to eliminate all incidents of racial violence. The provision reads: “All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right to…the full and equal benefit of all laws…for the security of persons and property.” The Complaint pleads that the assaillant deprived Ms. Sumrall of her rights under several relevant D.C. laws. The Supreme Court has long held Jews are considered a race for purposes of civil rights law.

As far as we know, this is the first instance in the post October 7 landscape in which a Jewish person has used this provision to sue someone on the basis of antisemitic violence. The relevant provision has been hiding in plain sight all along, and we expect the floodgates to now open for others alleging antisemitic violence, which as clarified by today’s ruling encompasses attacks on Jews for supporting Israel.

Obvious question here is why this logic works. She wasn't attacked for her wearing a Star of David, she was attacked for wearing an Israeli flag. If someone attacks someone for wearing a Saudi flag with the Shahada on it, is that islamophobic?
 

Attachments

Fox News has a breakdown of Pam Bondi directing a prosecutor to deliver evidence to a grand jury about the Russia Collusion stuff.

View attachment 7739329
The question is where is the grand jury? If it's in DC there's no point. No indictments will come and then they can all say they were "exonerated".

Don't get your hopes up for anything meaningful just more theater.
 
Bull-fucking-shit. More people need to hear this sentiment, not fewer. Hearing normal, everyday people saying these things at congressional hearings (even just at the state level) reminds them that no, that nagging voice in their heads that this tranny shit isn't right isn't just in their head, but everyone else's too.
You can say that this tranny shit isn’t right without saying “We could use them as suicide bombers in Iraq.” It legitimizes their victim narrative. That’s the weapon they fight with and considering how far they got with it, it’s a more effective weapon than you give it credit for.

If you want more people saying that, we’ll go right back to square one real quick. I’ve seen enough of the past 10 years to know that for a fact. Real life is not fuckin’ Kiwi Farms.
 
Back