US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honestly.

I've been a fan of Hunter for a while and while I wouldn't vote for him over Vance, I think he has a real chance if he just owns all the stuff out there that we know about him already, which he seems to mostly be doing. You can't embarrass this guy any more than he has been already (its his fault).

No I don't support him taking creepshots of his nieces and or fucking them
Being the Prince Andrew of the Biden family apparently hasn't hurt his prospects.
 
You’re a talmudic tarbaby and tardbaby if you think that somehow lessens the awfulness of what she said. It is unacceptable for one of America’s most powerful politicians to pledge fealty like this to any foreign country. You’re a kike from Israel so as far as you’re concerned, this is a natural state of affairs and how things should be. You genuinely can’t understand why I have an issue with it.

That’s more telling than anything.
I can tell why you're upset about it but you're either too stupid or dishonest to pretend that your framing of it wasn't implying that the US would support Israel over its own destruction. I personally think it's the stupid side as you uncritically posted a meme that you saw without fact checking.

Honestly.

I've been a fan of Hunter for a while and while I wouldn't vote for him over Vance, I think he has a real chance if he just owns all the stuff out there that we know about him already, which he seems to mostly be doing. You can't embarrass this guy any more than he has been already (its his fault).

No I don't support him taking creepshots of his nieces and or fucking them
Why are you a fan of Hunter? He's a drug addicted sex addict. The only people that I've known that are fans of him are leftist women.

That being said it was extremely funny when maga was begging for more hunter Biden dick pics
 
I'm fairly certain those activities are a deal breaker for a sizeable portion of the voting public, self included. Plus you know. His art is shit.
The majority has no idea and probably won't.
Being the Prince Andrew of the Biden family apparently hasn't hurt his prospects.
The shitty thing is no matter who you vote for they probably had sex with a teenager at some point.
 
The starship troopers movie affect in which a piece of satire tries to make fun of its targets but the targets instead embrace it therefore making the satire fail.
Helps when your "satire" barely understands what it's satirizing nor the source material it's adapting.

If your entire conception of fascism boils down to blond hair, square jawed attractive people in hugo boss uniforms living in a military-centric society and nothing else then your satirical attempts aren't going to be very biting. Ffs Ricos parents were not only civilians, but actively and openly anti-military service and they were allowed to become millionaires with their own private business with nary a whiff of government repudiation. That's not exactly a staple of a fascist society.

The bugs fucking massacred millions of innocent people, unprovoked, because a bunch of mormons wandered into their territory against the Federations warnings, AND never even attempted negotiations or communication with the Humans despite being intelligent enough for interstellar travel, to the point Humans genuinely thought they were mindless violent animals. Fuck the bugs, they deserve whatever comes to them.
 
Why are you a fan of Hunter? He's a drug addicted sex addict. The only people that I've known that are fans of him are leftist women.
I don't want to powerlevel too much but I'm a drug addict also so I look at what hes doing and im like "nice...". I respect him as a member of the industry.

There's something endearing about a guy who is just so shameless with his degeneracy.
 
Helps when your "satire" barely understands what it's satirizing nor the source material it's adapting.

If your entire conception of fascism boils down to blond hair, square jawed attractive people in hugo boss uniforms living in a military-centric society and nothing else then your satirical attempts aren't going to be very biting.

The bugs fucking massacred millions of innocent people, unprovoked, because a bunch of mormons wandered into their territory against the Federations warnings, AND never even attempted negotiations or communication with the Humans despite being intelligent enough for interstellar travel, to the point Humans genuinely thought they were mindless violent animals. Fuck the bugs, they deserve whatever comes to them.
Fun fact Robert heinland did not believe in forced military conscription. Notices how the federation never forces its people to fight, how even civilians despite not being able to vote can still own houses, and businesses.
 
yeah, calling a dude a pedophile is just "making fun of" you waterheaded gimp.
He is a pedophile. There are multiple sources that say Trump is on the Epstein list. No sources that say he isn't. So what would Trump use in court to claim defamation?

Again, it's both hilarious and sad that you think it's illegal to make fun of the pedophile you worship.
 
yeah, calling a dude a pedophile is just "making fun of" you waterheaded gimp.

He is a pedophile. There are multiple sources that say Trump is on the Epstein list. No sources that say he isn't. So what would Trump use in court to claim defamation?

Again, it's both hilarious and sad that you think it's illegal to make fun of the pedophile you worship.

This is funny.

1754423740772.webp
 
The Secretary of the Interior issued an order that no federal land can be used for renewables unless they produce the same energy-per-acre as a gas/coal/nuclear plant:

Secretary Burgum Announces Order to Rein In Environmentally Damaging Wind and Solar Projects​

08/01/2025
Last edited 08/01/2025

WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum signed a Secretary’s Order to more efficiently manage our nation’s energy resources by permitting projects that optimize energy generation while minimizing their environmental impact. Massive, unreliable energy projects, such as wind and solar, are inefficient uses of federal lands when compared to other energy sources with much smaller footprints, like nuclear, gas and coal.

In accordance with existing law and President Donald J. Trump’s energy executive orders, the Department will now consider proposed energy project’s capacity density when assessing the project’s potential energy benefits to the nation and impacts to the environment and wildlife. This order directs the Department to permit only energy projects that are the most appropriate use of the federal land and resources.

“Gargantuan, unreliable, intermittent energy projects hold America back from achieving U.S. Energy Dominance while weighing heavily on the American taxpayer and environment,” said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum. “By considering energy generation optimization, the Department will be able to better manage our federal lands, minimize environmental impact, and maximize energy development to further President Donald Trump’s energy goals. This commonsense order ensures our nation is stronger, our land use is optimized, and the American people are properly informed.”

Under the law, the Department must consider reasonable alternatives to proposed projects and make land use decisions—both onshore and offshore—that are judicious. These laws ultimately raise the question of whether the use of federal lands for wind and solar projects is permissible, given these projects’ encroachment on other land uses and their disproportionate land requirements, especially when reasonable project alternatives with higher capacity densities are technically and economically feasible.

Based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, one advanced nuclear plant (2 x AP1000) produces 33.17 megawatts (MW) per acre, while one offshore wind farm produces approximately 0.006 MW/acre, which is approximately 5,500 times less efficient than one nuclear plant. Thus, when there are reasonable project alternatives that can generate the same amount of or more energy on far less federal lands, wind and solar projects may unnecessarily and unduly degrade federal lands.

The Department will identify and make the necessary revisions, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to any regulations, guidance, policies, or practices, necessary to implement this Secretary's Order.
Source (Archive)

The order:
so-managing-federal-energy-resources-and-protecting-the-environment-2025.08.01-final-signed_5...webpso-managing-federal-energy-resources-and-protecting-the-environment-2025.08.01-final-signed_5...webpso-managing-federal-energy-resources-and-protecting-the-environment-2025.08.01-final-signed_5...webpso-managing-federal-energy-resources-and-protecting-the-environment-2025.08.01-final-signed_5...webp

Highlight:
Based on common sense, arithmetic, and physics, wind and solar projects are highly inefficient uses of Federal lands. On a technology-neutral basis, wind and solar projects use disproportionate Federal lands relative to their energy generation when compared to other energy sources, like nuclear, gas, and coal. For instance, based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, one advanced nuclear plant (2 x AP1000) produces 33.17 megawatts (MW) per acre, while one offshore wind farm produces approximately 0.006 MW/acre, which is approximately 5,500 times less efficient than one nuclear plant. See Appendix. Thus, when there are reasonable alternatives that can generate the same amount of or more energy on far less Federal land, wind and solar projects may unnecessarily and unduly degrade Federal lands.
 

Attachments

Fyi I fucking called it. I said the reason they're giving Maxwell temporary immunity over her testimony is more than likely because criminal investigations are opening up, and thats also a reason why they are not releasing the Epstein files because that would toss out the evidence in any criminal trial. Lo and behold the house oversight committee has subpoenaed several people on BOTH SIDES of the political spectrum to talk about Epstein
•William Barr – August 18
•Jeff Sessions – August 28
•Robert Mueller – September 2
•Loretta Lynch – September 9
•Eric Holder – September 30
•Merrick Garland – October 2
•James Comey – October 7
•Hillary Clinton – October 9
•Bill Clinton – October 14
These are all the people who have been subpoenaed over Epstein.
This comes directly from the chair of the house oversight committe James Comer
I would also like to point out that because of immunity some of these people have to testify
 
Last edited:
Back