US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[Potion_Time]

Nigger the victims from little saint james directly said Trump never did anything.

He is still on the list and he is directly withholding it for that very reason.

Again, answer. How the fuck is he going to claim defamation in a court of law? It would be dismissed at first filing.

 

[No-Eyed Square Guy]

I'm fairly certain those activities are a deal breaker for a sizeable portion of the voting public, self included.

That portion is white men. They're already Republicans.

Women who aren't ideologically right-wing or "sex bad" type feminists are obsessive Hunter fans. His media image is a guy who's allowed to commit crimes because he's from a royal family. He's photographed committing sex crimes against women, on the taxpayer dime. Only him personally murdering their own children could endear him more to female Democrats. If a woman doesn't vote for him, it's probably because she slipped in her own pussy juice at the ballot box and died.

I don't think the Democrats are smart enough to run him, though they're "rehabilitating" him for some purpose. The plan is to stick with women until finally, finally It's Her Turn. AOC is their best chance because Vance is so easily undermined. (Lest we forget, he was a liberal celebrity golem just like her until about a year ago.)

 

[holyhandgrenade]

This is funny.

View attachment 7740978

go back to reddit

He is a pedophile. There are multiple sources that say Trump is on the Epstein list. No sources that say he isn't. So what would Trump use in court to claim defamation?

muh sources say

 

[Nihil Jung]

https://jewishonliner.org/p/federal-judge-rules-attacks-on-the

Obvious question here is why this logic works. She wasn't attacked for her wearing a Star of David, she was attacked for wearing an Israeli flag. If someone attacks someone for wearing a Saudi flag with the Shahada on it, is that islamophobic?

This is the have it all ways, always thing we've been talking about. I gather you are saying it is wrong to view it as a hate crime as the star is on the flag of a nation, but its precisely why I was objecting to calling the decision for that "secular" nation's flag to have it on it in the first place. Of course a situation like this arises, and of course untold liters of ink will pilpul the logic and reasons both for and against and of course the community will rally, evoke the shoah and absolutely railroad the dumb, violent, anti-war femoid. The scholars get to scholar, the diaspora gets to feel collectively victimized and the perp gets triple fucked over.

More over, your hypothetical is entirely the next part of the slippery slope, of course the Saudi flag will have the same protections when a lawyer argues the coherent logic to the courts. If only the confederates put crosses on the flag like some had conceptualized...

I suppose if a protester is waving the Missouri Battle Flag around and gets attacked they will never be afforded the same consideration and protections.

And this is all from the initial slippery slope of hate crimes laws. Intent is already considered in Mens Rea.

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

Fyi I fucking called it. I said the reason they're giving Maxwell temporary immunity over her testimony is more than likely because criminal investigations are opening up, and thats also a reason why they are not releasing the Epstein files because that would toss out the evidence in any criminal trial. Lo and behold the house oversight committee has subpoenaed several people on BOTH SIDES of the political spectrum to talk about Epstein
•William Barr – August 18
•Jeff Sessions – August 28
•Robert Mueller – September 2
•Loretta Lynch – September 9
•Eric Holder – September 30
•Merrick Garland – October 2
•James Comey – October 7
•Hillary Clinton – October 9
•Bill Clinton – October 14
These are all the people who have been subpoenaed over Epstein.

No Matt Goering? This shit is rigged.

 

[Potion_Time]

muh sources say

Yes. muh sources say.

Therefore it would be literally impossible for Trump to prove defamation in court.

So what the fuck could he possibly sue them for?

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

Again, answer. How the fuck is he going to claim defamation in a court of law? It would be dismissed at first filing.

Oh I never claimed that retarded shit lmao, they can make fun of whoever they want.

South Parks only sin in mocking Trump directly is that it fucks over the running gag of Gerson being their universe's Trump and is significantly less funny.

 

[not william stenchever]

The starship troopers movie affect in which a piece of satire tries to make fun of its targets but the targets instead embrace it therefore making the satire fail.

Helldivers 2 asked me if I have the strength and courage to be free and my response was "FOR SUPER EARTH"

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

Windmills - Cucked
Clients - Subpoenaed
Trannies - Acked

Today might just be a good one.

 

[Wax]

He is a pedophile. There are multiple sources that say Trump is on the Epstein list. No sources that say he isn't. So what would Trump use in court to claim defamation?

Again, it's both hilarious and sad that you think it's illegal to make fun of the pedophile you worship.

What sources say he is on the list that went to pedo island and fucked kids?

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

Helldivers 2 asked me if I have the strength and courage to be free and my response was "FOR SUPER EARTH"

Honestly, HD2 is a much more clear-cut and well-executed example of satire given the government of Super Earth, unlike the Terran Federation, actually is a hyper-authoritarian brainwashing mill that executes dissidents about as much as they do enemy combatants, along with directly controlling all industry and every aspect of all citizens personal lives. They literally have a Ministry of Truth named "the Ministry of Truth".

The Terran Federation doesn't even have a draft. It's seen as antithetical to their philosophy.

Helldivers is what pseudointellectuals claim Starship Troopers is.

 

[Sensitive Young Man]

President Trump HATES “youths”.

Edit: Image of White victim he is referring to.

Spoiler: Blood

 

[quaawaa]

President Trump HATES “youths”.
View attachment 7741090

Forgot the picture of one of the victims of the "youths":

Source (Archive)

 

[Potion_Time]

Oh I never claimed that retarded shit lmao

@Sammich did.

 

[Left Ass Cheek]

https://x.com/IcebergActual/status/1952808149573914991

View attachment 7740796

View attachment 7740799

"Media literacy" is one of those buzz phrases that didn't need to be turned into a soy pack howl. People really should be more discerning when it comes to media messaging, especially parents. It's a shame smug retards from Twitter and Reddit ran these two words into the fucking ground and inadvertently made ignoring authorial intent based.

 

[Potion_Time]

What sources say he is on the list that went to pedo island and fucked kids?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyq921zqqzo

BBC. Again, you can create genetic fallacies all day long. You don't have to believe it. But Trump would have no standing to sue for defamation because somebody called him a pedophile. It would be an opinion protected by the first amendment.

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

"Media literacy" is one of those buzz phrases that didn't need to be turned into a soy pack howl. People really should be more discerning when it comes to media messaging, especially parents. It's a shame smug retards from Twitter and Reddit ran these two words into the fucking ground and inadvertently made ignoring authorial intent based.

Well maybe if people stopped making the bad guys looks so fucking cool all the time

 

[IAmNotAlpharius]

The starship troopers movie affect in which a piece of satire tries to make fun of its targets but the targets instead embrace it therefore making the satire fail.

It’s also bad satire because it doesn’t understand the source material or the author of the source material.

 

[gaysexenjoyer]

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyq921zqqzo

BBC. Again, you can create genetic fallacies all day long. You don't have to believe it. But Trump would have no standing to sue for defamation because somebody called him a pedophile. It would be an opinion protected by the first amendment.

Read the articles you post my man.

 

[Wax]

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyq921zqqzo

BBC. Again, you can create genetic fallacies all day long. You don't have to believe it. But Trump would have no standing to sue for defamation because somebody called him a pedophile. It would be an opinion protected by the first amendment.

Your source is the report where Trump's name is mentioned several times helping investigators? That's your definitive proof that Trump is a pedophile? That's what's caused you to be completely mindbroken over Trump and Epstein? Really?