Plagued Ruben Sim Derangement Syndrome - Because it's definitely a good look to attack a guy who takes down pedophiles.

[liam dees]

What is real life to them? They're showing pornography to real children, and that's worrying. Their logic falls apart again because now it's not just "mere pixels" who are harmed in this situation.

Obviously the "8 million boobs in real life" comment refers more so to the fact that women have breasts in real life without it inherently being sexualizing to children. I expect this to be the actual logic behind the comment on their part. But it's insanely easy to take the devil's advocate look toward the implications of that statement. This whole interaction would not exist if people weren't making porn items on Roblox. The Roblox cube avatar DOES NOT NEED BOOBS. IT'S A CHILDREN'S GAME. REAL LIFE IS SEPARATE FROM A CURATED ENVIRONMENT MEANT TO ACCOMODATE CHILDREN. That's why the boobs shaders should not be in Roblox, and saying "but muh boobs irl" is pretty much going off-topic.

Publishing porn items on Roblox has a direct harm on the children's platform as well as the child users of said platform. Nuff said. The argument is a non-starter.

 

[Trusty Terrorist]

"But parents just need to watch their kids" no they won't. Every single responsibility is being abdicated.

 

[Inco G. Nito]

The Roblox cube avatar DOES NOT NEED BOOBS.

Maybe the Danish were the real gooners all along.

 

[Hakase Shinonome]

"Can you give me proof for why he's a nazi?"

>Shows self-made Hitler edit of him
See!

 

[Hakase Shinonome]

Obviously the "8 million boobs in real life" comment refers more so to the fact that women have breasts in real life without it inherently being sexualizing to children.

I know I would be arguing against people with actual, literal brain damage, but there's a clear difference and distinction between having tits and showing off tits. A woman can have massive-ass tits, nothing she can really do about it, she's born with it. But if she goes around wearing exclusively tank tops, bikini's, croptops, she's a fucking whore. If she wears sweaters, hoodies, generally things that covers them up, she does an effort to not be a public nuisance. Her tits are something she can't do anything about but clothes are something you put on with a thought in mind.

And yet this has nothing to fucking do with Roblox because all content on there is made with intent and you make fucking naked tits in a children's game, kill yourself.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

Roblox porn (As in porn of a Roblox character) can be made in SFM, which has no affiliation with Roblox, and can be drawn.

You'd already have to be a sad creature in order to engage in cybersex on Roblox.

Your brain also has to be kind of broken in order to make/consume Roblox porn OUTSIDE of Roblox.

 

[Lingering butter taste]

You'd already have to be a sad creature in order to engage in cybersex on Roblox.

Imagine how broken your brain has to be in order to make/consume Roblox porn OUTSIDE of Roblox.

I mean, no, I’d definitely say the one that endangers minors is worse. Not sure why you framed that as if the route where the gooner keeps the NSFW private and only amongst adults is somehow sadder than grooming minors.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

I mean, no, I’d definitely say the one that endangers minors is worse. Not sure why you framed that as if the route where the gooner keeps the NSFW private and only amongst adults is somehow sadder than grooming minors.

Yes, doing it on Roblox proper actually is worse as it does far more damage to minors, fapping to blocks in any context is still pretty sad. Sexually explicit Lego or Roblox shit seems more like a bad shitpost otherwise.

It's becoming increasingly rare for gooners to keep their shit private though, and I find it difficult to believe that anyone who unironically makes/watches Roblox porn actually is keeping it private and not doing it on Roblox proper too.

 

[Lingering butter taste]

It's becoming increasingly rare for gooners to keep their shit private though, and I find it difficult to believe that anyone who unironically makes/watches Roblox porn actually is keeping it private and not doing it on Roblox proper too.

In my honest opinion, I think it’s like. Really easy not to. I can see the thought process but I don’t think it works out.

Spoiler: Sperg

If someone has a leather fetish, they usually can wear a leather jacket without issue. Just like how if someone finds a Roblox character attractive, they can generally play Roblox without issue. Especially since the attraction rarely if ever comes from the blocky artstyle, but rather the character itself (Ergo, they wouldn’t mind if they were drawn as a normal human too). I’m explaining this not to defend them and say “It’s fine, stop worrying”, but because in my experience, any argument based on consequentialism or “They can’t control themselves” always, mark this, always gives pedos an edge. It’s a tempting argument, but pedos always spin it in their favor because consequentialism by most people is considered bogus since it’s been very publicly wrong several times. I don’t believe it’s an argument that’s always wrong, but it’s one no one will listen to. And by the time people listen, it’s way too late. Not to mention, people such as radqueers always use it to groom people (“You can’t CONTROL how you feel, so embrace it!”). I think a more objective argument is very simple; this person showed porn to minors. Thats really it, no sane person can get mad at that.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Ruben pointed out that these grooming gangs aren't just perverts who get together, they're full-blown criminal enterprises that make money.

The only way any of this could make sense is if Discord and Roblox were in on this criminal enterprise.

I'm not one to take to conspiracy theories, but I could believe that senior employees of both companies are colluding together to target minors, not necessarily to groom, but for profit. The grooming and pedophilia is a byproduct of their shit moderation. Ruben exposes these things and is hit with lawsuits, bans, and harassment for doing their job for them. Any company who is above board would thank someone for bringing these glaring issues to their attention. Sure Ruben is a shitposter and a troll but he cares about protecting kids, something you'd think companies who's main demographic of customers are minors (at least their parents anyways) would try to protect them. But no, they'd much rather protect the adult pedophiles than the minors. It would be fun to look into the devs, execs, and other staff of both roblox and discord.

 

[Shut up alex]

I'm not one to take to conspiracy theories, but I could believe that senior employees of both companies are colluding together to target minors, not necessarily to groom, but for profit. The grooming and pedophilia is a byproduct of their shit moderation. Ruben exposes these things and is hit with lawsuits, bans, and harassment for doing their job for them. Any company who is above board would thank someone for bringing these glaring issues to their attention. Sure Ruben is a shitposter and a troll but he cares about protecting kids, something you'd think companies who's main demographic of customers are minors (at least their parents anyways) would try to protect them. But no, they'd much rather protect the adult pedophiles than the minors. It would be fun to look into the devs, execs, and other staff of both roblox and discord.

the fact other roblox youtubers are being told not to collab with schlep further backs this theory

 

[dick brain]

I often find myself wanting to use the Ruben Sim situation as an anecdote to communicate to parents why they shouldn't let their kids on the internet, but I'm not all that knowledgeable about it. Can anybody confirm if I have this correct:

- Ruben Sim, a youtuber, makes videos blowing the whistle on pedophile rings in Roblox, a children's game, sexually roleplaying with and/or showing porn to children, including Roblox admin/staff members and game devs
- rather than banning the pedophiles, Roblox staff bans him, covers it all up, and sues him for cyberterrorism
- Ruben Sim develops a bot/blocklist that can be voluntarily implemented on Discord servers to automatically kick known Roblox pedophiles
- Discord bans his bot, bans him, and threatens to sue him

Is that correct?

 

[Metallic Blood]

I often find myself wanting to use the Ruben Sim situation as an anecdote to communicate to parents why they shouldn't let their kids on the internet, but I'm not all that knowledgeable about it. Can anybody confirm if I have this correct:

- Ruben Sim, a youtuber, makes videos blowing the whistle on pedophile rings in Roblox, a children's game, sexually roleplaying with and/or showing porn to children, including Roblox admin/staff members and game devs
- rather than banning the pedophiles, Roblox staff bans him, covers it all up, and sues him for cyberterrorism
- Ruben Sim develops a bot/blocklist that can be voluntarily implemented on Discord servers to automatically kick known Roblox pedophiles
- Discord bans his bot, bans him, and threatens to sue him

Is that correct?

Correct. But if I were to talk to a parent about ROBLOX. I honestly would start with the basics and say that the platform has a well known pedophilia problem, where anyone can make content for the game like Instagram, and it does a very poor (and almost malicious) job moderating it.

Mentioning Ruben Sim is like feeding meat to a newborn rather than milk, 95% of parents don't understand how the platform works. If you talked about minors being groomed in it, they think what happens are kids getting messages from known sex offenders to meet them in a certain place after school, which while awful, it rarely happens compared to EPI or Discord servers.

If you wanna fearmonger, talking about Spawnism would also be really effective imo.

 

[Hakase Shinonome]

I'm not one to take to conspiracy theories, but I could believe that senior employees of both companies are colluding together to target minors, not necessarily to groom, but for profit.

Kids don't have money, groomers do.
Groomers are massive whales that buy grandiose amount of garbage for not only themselves but the kids they groom too, they substitute for the kids' lack of any purchase power.
Sexual ads on YouTube aren't being moderated because, not only do the advertisers pay to be on it, disgusted porn-addicted people are more likely to click on it, kids are more likely to click on it, people in general are more likely to click on it just out of curiosity, than any other form regular of advertisement. Annoying ads don't get clicks, boring ads don't get clicks, even some above-average ads don't get clicks. Sexualised ads get clicks.
Banning groomers off Discord, YouTube, Roblox, etc, will only hurt their profit margin. Imitating that you care, by having "TOS/rules" to abide by; "We do not allow sexually explicit content on your platform", but not actually following said rules will give you both the sexual-content-money-making-machine and people who care about (their) kids' wellbeing's consent, a win-win.
But oh, those meddling RubenSim-and-alike trying to out them, they deserve court, not for showing that platforms cause real harm to children, but that people who are against it cause real harm to our profit.

 

[Vibe_Guy]

Don't want to bump the other thread so if somebody can screenshot this to NTTS (no text to speech) I'd be greatful
Apologizing for calling you a faggot. You did look like a faggot in that dress. We're not friends and probably never will be but know I harbor no feelings of hate towards you.

Also tell the teacher who got phonebooked to reach out to law enforcement if anybody contacts her, or reach out to me if anybody claims they did so with encouragement from this website. Additional apologies for wanting to watch you burn (figuratively), I was very angry. Not at you specifically, but at the media miss info and gayops surrounding the situation.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Sexual ads on YouTube aren't being moderated

Well you know what they say, "Sex sells."

But I think there's enough evidence for a real conspiracy. I'm not a great info collector but it would be interesting to look into the staff of both discord and roblox.

Edit: Also I don't think it would be too difficult to make a roblox for kids and one for adults. Or simply segregate the adults and minors.

 

[Hakase Shinonome]

I think there's enough evidence for a real conspiracy. I'm not a great info collector but it would be interesting to look into the staff of both discord and roblox.

There was less evidence for conspiracy theories that proved to be real. I'm majorly doing some noticing here.

 

[Shut up alex]

Well you know what they say, "Sex sells."

But I think there's enough evidence for a real conspiracy. I'm not a great info collector but it would be interesting to look into the staff of both discord and roblox.

Edit: Also I don't think it would be too difficult to make a roblox for kids and one for adults. Or simply segregate the adults and minors.

I've talked about this for a while, but David Baszucki was a member of the paley media council (other members include former CIA Director Robert M. Gates, Former FBI directors Robert Mueller and Christopher Wray, Condoleezza Rice, US Secretary of State/Treasury James A. Baker, and multiple people in Epstein's black book, like Henry Kissinger, Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch, and Michael Bloomberg, another former member of the council was P. Diddy) The Founder of the Paley Media council (William S. Paley) was CEO of CBS when the CIA was working with it during operation mockingbird.... just some things

 

[Shut up alex]

I've talked about this for a while, but David Baszucki was a member of the paley media council (other members include former CIA Director Robert M. Gates, Former FBI directors Robert Mueller and Christopher Wray, Condoleezza Rice, US Secretary of State/Treasury James A. Baker, and multiple people in Epstein's black book, like Henry Kissinger, Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch, and Michael Bloomberg, another former member of the council was P. Diddy) The Founder of the Paley Media council (William S. Paley) was CEO of CBS when the CIA was working with it during operation mockingbird.... just some things

7 out of 10 of the people i listed have nothing to do with media companies, but a ton to do with Governments and 3 letter terrorist organizations

 

[Butwhythough2]

There was less evidence for conspiracy theories that proved to be real. I'm majorly doing some noticing here.

I skim the thread when it comes up, so I miss out on a lot of info but just from the light amount I've read on the thread (comparatively), I've done quite the noticing myself but I often read the loli/shota thread and notice the same types of people defend that will defend grooming on discord and roblox. Looking at these people's Xitter profiles and who they follow have a lot of crossover.