Containment Chris in the Media - Mentions of Chris in different medias

So Jack purchased the 25,000 dollar T-shirt, I take it.

if you value your Twitter account.

Good thing I don't have one

Seriously, this forum needs to be taken underground.
I think it's disgusting, these people can't even add to their articles why they believe Chris has some sort of redeemable characteristics or qualities. In fact, I think I've heard myself, Marin, and Karen say nicer things about Chris than this article.
 
Last edited:
The funniest part is that chris doesn't read ween comments or tweets
Twitter's corporate policy of white knighting self-righteous assholes is always obnoxious but it gets woslrse when they extend it to people like Chris. Aside from the he objectively doesn't deserve asspatters from the social justice community even by their standards, there's also the fact he's just outright better at ignoring weens and A-Logs than any of the usual suspects.

When someone shitposts Wu's feed, she goes crazy. They do it to Chris? He does nothing.
 
It's sad that the end of Chris might be like the end of the movie "A Clockwork Orange".

That implies he ever got better at some point to be remarkably different as a person than he was before, such that he couldn't easily revert back.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
This media exposure may have a total backfire effect for Chris. Million of mundanes are going to wonder whom this "Christine Weston Chandler" is, they do a Google search, and they find all of the past articles and videos of him doing things like threatening the President, pepperspraying a Gamestop employee, storing spooge in his freezers, etc. Talk about a "Barbera Steisand Effect".
 
This is exciting, I finally may get to be a witness of a significant event in christory.

Thought of this just now!
SchuComic10P94.jpg
 
OPL should really plug his ebegging page. I reckon he could get at least a few suckers who just heard about him via the Kotaku article to donate to his Skylanders fund.
 
Guys I think you overreact on the exposure thing.

This thread is kind of a mess but it seems the reaction is only for the kotaku article? In it, Chris is just made a mention in the middle of it.
Do you guys REALLY think that people reading this are going to focus on this? Chris isn't the subject of the article, he's just an anecdote, people don't randomly google about every person mentionned briefly in the middle of articles. So why are you all acting like its a big deal?
 
Back