US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How tf do people manage to shoot up military installations without MPs and Infantry Units immediately turning them into swiss cheese?
Bases are essentially small towns, they're massive and have tens of thousands of people on them. Many of these are civilians, and many of the enlisted aren't warfighters, they do shit like uniform sewing, washing machine repair, etc. (whenever you meet a fat black bitch who's a veteran this is what she did btw).

Even warfighters don't carry firearms 24/7, this is also how the october 7th attack was so successful.

That said, there are examples of people trying this and getting turned to swiss cheese or just apprehended. You just don't hear about them as much. The majority of the people who try this are base personnel who snap so they know where to hit and where not to.

If every human was an interchangeable economic unit of production and no country cared where their goods were produced, then tariffs are just an inefficient form of an already inefficient tax. But given that neither of those things are true, it doesn't really matter.
Nut bustingly well said.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
I want to be clear that I'm not a socialist
If you have to say that, that means you are.
I think it was explained on this very site that the Japanese federal age of consent is higher than most of the prefectures and that they defer to federal law because "Fuck you, nukes"
They switched it to 16 nationwide because that clusterfuck was a national embarrassment.
They have weather control satellites with lasers, sweetie.
Jewish space lasers, of course
 
Yep. We mock redditors. But quite a few of them did the stem thing. And got jack shit.

Reddit is now like 80% pajeets begging for sex, stroking their egos and occasionally running scams. Look at this latest scam that made the frontpage today. He's trying to get $100,000 USD in donations. Fuck pajeets. Hope they all die.

Reddit Pajeets.webp
 
There's truth to this, but there's a lot of other factors at play, as well. I would like to point out that the EU has better outcomes for its citizens, has a more robust manufacturing sector, higher manufacturing wages, an industrial trade surplus, and still manages to provide healthcare, child care, maternity leave, and all the other stuff you mentioned. So how do they do it? How does the EU get to have their cake and eat it to? Corporate profiteering, a mix of over and under regulation, corruption, immigration, and hordes of useless idiots on both sides which are too busy arguing against their own interests to realize they're fucked either way.

I don't think it's a coincidence that, when you ask most conservative Americans what the most prosperous time was, they will say the post war boom, the 50s and 60s. I would also like to point out this was at the peak of union membership and tripartite agreements (labor-management-government). The US absolutely dominated manufacturing, provided pensions to its workers, had affordable housing, healthcare, and childcare, and had high wages and better citizen outcomes. What changed? Why are all of these things impossible now? Why are labor unions virtually non-existent? Why do companies provide no pensions or bullshit pittance 401(k) plans? Why is healthcare impossible for large sections of the working class? Why have US wages grown 0.7% in the last half century versus executive compensation which has grown by an order of magnitude? Why, despite decades of record breaking corporate profits, companies in the US continue to shear the sheep closer and closer to the skin? Why does half the US believe that, again, despite year after year after year of record breaking profits, companies will suddenly implode if they are required to provide the same standard of living which the rest of the developed world offers?

Anyway, I don't have all the answers, and I won't pretend I do, but I think there's something there. I want to be clear that I'm not a socialist, but I do believe in ethical capitalism. I find it interesting that small and medium sized businesses tend to provide better benefits and wages than large corporations, despite slimmer profit margins. I think patriotism or the lack thereof has a lot to do with it. If I was an executive, I would want to provide high wages and excellent benefits to my workers just because I want to see them succeed. I want Americans to be productive, happy, healthy, and confident. There's probably a reason I'm not in the C-suite at a major corporation, I suppose.

I'll leave you with this: you know which group of Americans is most opposed to minimum wage increases? Those who stand to gain. The people who make just above minimum wage right now and would see their wages go up of the minimum wage was increased are most opposed, because they are more concerned with being labeled a "minimum wage worker" than seeing a wage increase.
The rest of the world is no longer recovering from a world war, welfare capitalists don't really exist like they used to and American organized labor in recent years is at the lowest point of union membership ever since that metric has been recorded. The economic conditions of the 1950s, a period of history quite a few people revere in the United States, may potentially never come to pass again.

Unions image-wise have been associated with socialism and communism from time to time. Their leadership is at times inept or corrupt with ties to organized crime. Many manufacturing jobs have been lost to offshoring. Some of the larger unions today in the country are in the public sector. Pattern bargaining as a whole has been devastated. In the political world the Democrats are from time to time called out for dismissing working-class Whites who happen to be members of unions and the Republicans have rarely if ever have cared for unions as they often prefer to side with business interests and employers. It doesn't help that as of this time you have unions conflicted over being pro-American labor or pro-illegal immigrant labor and also public unions (some of the largest unions in the country today are of a public nature) like the National Education Association are liberally "progressive" and does stupid things all the time.

Raising minimum wage in my eyes is a short-term solution. It doesn't address the root causes that are the reason for the increase in the first place.
 
Last edited:
I would like to point out that the EU has better outcomes for its citizens, has a more robust manufacturing sector
Lol no. Europeans are broke, have less disposable income and smaller homes than Americans, have much higher taxes and living costs and their manufacturing sector is dying due to Net Zero and no more Russian gas.

That's before we start talking about all the people in prison for tweets.
I am happy that Apple appears to be serious about onshoring (cue the optimistic reacts)
It's time we dealt with faggots who put rainbow stickers on anything positive.
robocop-431x300.webp
 
Do people honestly believe that the United States has simply been sitting on its 40 year old arsenal of weapons and technology and not advancing those things? Are there people out there that think we've just sat around waiting for people to catch up?
Shhhhhhhhhhhh.... it's better if they believe this.
 
And the latter ones: Production engineers are the ones you need to run factories.
Do you mean Manufacturing Engineering? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_engineering

More automation has meant less Manufacturing Engineers, at least in terms of the ratio for designing, building and maintaining a factory. It's shifted more towards various IT engineering groups for the software systems (HMI, SCADA,MES, etc.), Controls for the PLC platform automation systems, and Maintenance (seen them try to automate away maintenance and it never ends well lol).

I agree that school is useful, but people can learn on the job, and will probably learn faster and better there how the real world operates. Schools are also extremely outdated on modern manufacturing.

I think the other thing people don't realize is that if you force this, companies will setup training programs, they will add more internships, they will start to figure out ways to get more of any type of engineer that they need. They'll increase pay and lower standards (temporarily) if needed.

It's not like China started out with the ability to do all the engineering they're doing today, they didn't even start with teachers who could teach engineering at the level we teach at today. So they made due, built up knowledge over time and did some unavoidable trial and error.

The only thing I can agree on is that Republicans may be trying to do it too fast. A more incremental approach could be better, but at the same time if you do it incrementally then people won't take it seriously, they'll think they can wait it out and see if a change in administration reverses course. So, I'm personally fine with it, even if it does raise prices for a bit. If those higher prices translate to higher wages and a more secure nation, then so be it.
 
Anyone else larfing about this redistricting nonsense? Democrats always cry about it when they know they're losing seats, and to be fair both parties gerrymander, but the Democrats are particularly spooked about it this cycle.
Don't forget they have zero military costs. The US has protected Western Europe for almost a century. I think you've outlined a very good series of points, but don't forget that Europe hasn't had to worry about a major war on their continent in a very long time. Even the Balkans Wars were heavily subsidized by the US while the EU took in minimal Balkans refugees, dumped thousands on toxic waste sites (and left some in places where there are still active mines!), and gave themselves a Nobel Peace Prize for doing fuck all.
 
They switched it to 16 nationwide because that clusterfuck was a national embarrassment.
It was more like it was already effectively illegal but in true Asian fashion, why bother changing it if it doesn't matter? There were and still are worse places in Asia, like China. Amusingly, Hong Kong is far stricter than China in general, also it's illegal to pound a chick in the ass there, unless she's 21 or older.
 
It was more like it was already effectively illegal but in true Asian fashion, why bother changing it if it doesn't matter? There were and still are worse places in Asia, like China. Amusingly, Hong Kong is far stricter than China in general, also it's illegal to pound a chick in the ass there, unless she's 21 or older.
They changed it because it varied and still looked fucking awful. They have a massive prostitution problem that does include children. It needed to fucking happen.
 
Lol no. Europeans are broke, have less disposable income and smaller homes than Americans, have much higher taxes and living costs and their manufacturing sector is dying due to Net Zero and no more Russian gas.

That's before we start talking about all the people in prison for tweets.

It's time we dealt with faggots who put rainbow stickers on anything positive.
View attachment 7746544
1st and 2nd amendments are glorious
 
major war on their continent in a very long time
they haven't for about 35 years. They pissed away their armies at light speed after the USSR collapsed. sure, The US was going to be pulling most of the weight but the Germans, British and French had massive armies (and reserves) during the Cold war - because they had to hold their ground until the US could surge units to Europe Via REFORGER and similar operations.

Then they threw all that away to spend that money on . . .something? they certainly haven't had any tangible gains from it. its not like military expenditures were weighing their budgets down. the UK's entire military budget in 1989 was only 4% of GDP.
 
Back