Sum Dirtbag
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2025
He's not entitled to that, you sexist bigot incel!!!!!
Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.
- Thread starter Billy Bob Dick
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2021
Only the top gangbangers, average nigga is a loser who can't get a message back and lives on welfare/minimum wage with his mother.
But yes, I do agree that vaginaniggers accidentally tell on themselves and their ideal lifestyle by saying shit like that. Ideal lifestyle according to foids is joining the top 10% men's harems and playing retarded catfight/drama mind games with the other side hoes to become the Chad's main bitch.
Chunky Salsa
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
That's how it works out in practice, but it's not the fantasy ideal. Reading a couple female goonerfic novels was a real eye-opener. The fantasy man is either so sexy that no legs can stay closed for him, and so go-getting that he takes what he wants, or incredibly sexy, yet so dedicated to saving baby penguins or some shit that he just hasn't even noticed women, not even the hot bombshell blond with 34E boobs (who actually is a terrible horrible fake bitch). In the first ideal fantasy, the heroine's magical pussy and enchanting existence make him give it all up, cast away those other hos, and live only for her. In other words, the ideal is that as soon as she joins a top 10%er's harem, he takes one look at her, one look at all those other bitches, and tells them to leave, never to think of them again. They are always blindsided by being just another ho to him. It never crosses their minds that all those other harem bitches thought they had the magic pussy, too, and has never seriously reflected on why she should have a fate any different than theirs.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
Responding to /threads/do-men-even-like-women.183466/page-54 but I don't want to necro the thread.
In my experience, women don't like men. They like things about men or what a man can get her in the short term. Women will represent that they like men or are pro men's rights, or agree with a man's opinion or what they think a man's position like is to manipulate that man and try to get on their good side so they, the woman, can extract favours and other benefits from the relationship. It is all entirely transactional and superficial. I reject your premise. Women do not like men, they see men as tools, and as far as they are a good tool they like that tool. So no, women do not like men.
Another problem is that conflate derogatory language with genuine opinions. There is a psychological concept call Splitting. Mostly when derogatory language is used by an individual they are doing splitting, where they associate one sub group of a larger group as holes, foids, non member entities of the group and will continue to insist that they are prefect representatives of the group who are not whole and foids, of course this is not the cantor on the Kiwifarms. It's like a variation of the No True Scotsman fallacy, where instead of the identity being questioned and denigrated, there is a pure clean version that is the real thing, and only a criticised sub group is the denigrated version. Like Protestant Scotts are not real Scotts, but clearly having been Catholic be the Norman Kings connection, such people are the true Scotts. I can't believe I have to explain this. It's like how women try to be cute and find some quality with something a man says and then interpret it only to come back around to how they are failing to recognise a very simple part of life or common knowledge all to the benefit of trying to make the man look dumb, but at the same time derail the conversation or present topic by obsessing about interrelate details. Whether it's a put-on or not does not matter, the effect is it's a derailment tactic.
Women are defective. They are bad at all the things they are supposed to be good at like being mothers and home makers. When women try to do traditionally male activities they usually do it poorly or are not as dedicated to the endeavours as men in the same position are and become discouraged with their progress where they are only putting in 20 hours and comparatively their male counter part is putting in 60 hours, because the man does not have creating human life as a backup gig, he is naturally more motivated and focused on creating a legacy for himself though his work. Women seem universally to fail to appreciate this concept. Generally women are not very interested in history, so they will instead try to criticise the thing that doesn't automatically validate and satiate their egos by saying, "why it's it HERstory" and similar. Never is it just accepted that the default in language is to use the male pronoun when the sex is unknown and when people are speaking in the abstract; again there is a craven need to derail. This is usually to denigrate areas of life that they do not full control or have no control of at all to attempt to dominate those few bastion of life that are not yielded to women for nothing more than they simply showing up.
Men like women a lot, but it's the illusion of women created by media culture that lives in the minds. Real life does not live up to the fantasy that lives in the mind. Trying to point this out is generally unappreciated because men and women both like to live in their fantasies of kind ego comforting lies instead of in unpleasant reality. So if the women that you are taken with is just a product of your imagination and fancy, then do you really like the objective creature in the flesh. Men are more visually acute than women. So there is something to be said in appreciating the physical beauty of women, but that too is superficial and fleeting. Real life never lives up to what people imagine, lead about by the media and romanticism.
In my experience, women don't like men. They like things about men or what a man can get her in the short term. Women will represent that they like men or are pro men's rights, or agree with a man's opinion or what they think a man's position like is to manipulate that man and try to get on their good side so they, the woman, can extract favours and other benefits from the relationship. It is all entirely transactional and superficial. I reject your premise. Women do not like men, they see men as tools, and as far as they are a good tool they like that tool. So no, women do not like men.
Another problem is that conflate derogatory language with genuine opinions. There is a psychological concept call Splitting. Mostly when derogatory language is used by an individual they are doing splitting, where they associate one sub group of a larger group as holes, foids, non member entities of the group and will continue to insist that they are prefect representatives of the group who are not whole and foids, of course this is not the cantor on the Kiwifarms. It's like a variation of the No True Scotsman fallacy, where instead of the identity being questioned and denigrated, there is a pure clean version that is the real thing, and only a criticised sub group is the denigrated version. Like Protestant Scotts are not real Scotts, but clearly having been Catholic be the Norman Kings connection, such people are the true Scotts. I can't believe I have to explain this. It's like how women try to be cute and find some quality with something a man says and then interpret it only to come back around to how they are failing to recognise a very simple part of life or common knowledge all to the benefit of trying to make the man look dumb, but at the same time derail the conversation or present topic by obsessing about interrelate details. Whether it's a put-on or not does not matter, the effect is it's a derailment tactic.
Women are defective. They are bad at all the things they are supposed to be good at like being mothers and home makers. When women try to do traditionally male activities they usually do it poorly or are not as dedicated to the endeavours as men in the same position are and become discouraged with their progress where they are only putting in 20 hours and comparatively their male counter part is putting in 60 hours, because the man does not have creating human life as a backup gig, he is naturally more motivated and focused on creating a legacy for himself though his work. Women seem universally to fail to appreciate this concept. Generally women are not very interested in history, so they will instead try to criticise the thing that doesn't automatically validate and satiate their egos by saying, "why it's it HERstory" and similar. Never is it just accepted that the default in language is to use the male pronoun when the sex is unknown and when people are speaking in the abstract; again there is a craven need to derail. This is usually to denigrate areas of life that they do not full control or have no control of at all to attempt to dominate those few bastion of life that are not yielded to women for nothing more than they simply showing up.
Men like women a lot, but it's the illusion of women created by media culture that lives in the minds. Real life does not live up to the fantasy that lives in the mind. Trying to point this out is generally unappreciated because men and women both like to live in their fantasies of kind ego comforting lies instead of in unpleasant reality. So if the women that you are taken with is just a product of your imagination and fancy, then do you really like the objective creature in the flesh. Men are more visually acute than women. So there is something to be said in appreciating the physical beauty of women, but that too is superficial and fleeting. Real life never lives up to what people imagine, lead about by the media and romanticism.
Last edited:
sono chi no sadame
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2024
I assume any woman who writes this much is probably frothing at the mouth and projecting what she believes to be what men are, but doesn't have any idea of what a good man is, doesn't understand men at all, and thinks the worst of all men in existence. tl;dr Fat and incorrigible women aren't worth paying attention to ergo I won't read it. 
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
As with my "If you like the ladies, you like Peter Cetera/Astrology," thought line, reading a romance novel or two can be very useful for men in general. For the autists in the cheap seats, I'm not saying you have to actual like it or make a hobby of it, get enough under your belt to have fun with it instead of just autistically dismissing it like a boring asshole. Just enough to tell her that you thought she was a Scorpio or that she's definitely not a Virgo, with your best shit eating grin. Make it a fucking game, have fun. Women are like retarded teenagers, but they can be fun.
Also the right wing e-thot catfight is hilarious, since it pulled Nuke in, since he may or may not have fucked Pearl, and he's probably the best guy in the manosphere at making the ladies mad.
Autism King 03
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 22, 2024
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
Woman sinks canoe with two other men on board. Analogy with modern civilization is in place:
Sneed's Feed n Seed
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2024
How do people let themselves go until they become awkward blobs who can't even get into a boat.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
Being thin is a symptom of patriarchal opression
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
Tiktok is the most blackpilling technological development in human history. I don't use Tiktok, and yet I can't escape it; even logging off doesn't work because women reference it irl constantly.
Tiktok is essentially a consensus generating network for women. It's where they go to bitch about Chad/their bf/their "partner", it's where they go for their fear porn, it's where they go to get their political opinions, and its where they go to express their general disdain for men.
The dating app data is one thing, but when women start openly espousing that 90% of men don't even register to them it basically torpedoes whatever hope you might have had left.
Obsession sounds like a horrible starting point for any relationship, but I guess if your metric is fantasy then anything less than complete domination of the others attention seems like a lost cause from the jump.
Tiktok is essentially a consensus generating network for women. It's where they go to bitch about Chad/their bf/their "partner", it's where they go for their fear porn, it's where they go to get their political opinions, and its where they go to express their general disdain for men.
The dating app data is one thing, but when women start openly espousing that 90% of men don't even register to them it basically torpedoes whatever hope you might have had left.
There's this weird idea women keep posting online that "the only way a relationship can workout is if the guy is more obsessed with the girl than she is with him".
Obsession sounds like a horrible starting point for any relationship, but I guess if your metric is fantasy then anything less than complete domination of the others attention seems like a lost cause from the jump.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
Treat it more like an "emotional moneypit" for women. It is crack cocaine tho for them. Time she spends tikhoing around is not spent annoying you.
Just ignore what they want and do your own thing.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
She gets in the boat all the way, then steps to one side and holds on to the dock, the rest is just buoyancy as the canoe is no longer balanced. Basically women are dumb, don't understand simple physics, and like to pretend to me more mild and indecisive when there are men around so they can get help and handouts from the men. If I had a quarter...
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
The Chinese are very smart and they have a deep and developed understanding of social media, they know just how to compromise society by injecting themselves right into the minds of what the simps are trying to follow blindly. Take out the women and you get the simps and the rest of society in one action. Very good Art of War.
It's the same trope about women saying there are no good men, but actually they are attracted to thugs and not nice guys.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2020
Maybe the women experts here can explain this to me.
You are in a group. It's kind of queer and stuff. Everything is chill. Some weirdo shows up, saying shit like his kink is humiliating and breaking women. He's very open about this and makes no effort in hiding it. Oh and he also casually confessed to assaulting his partner "but it was just one time years ago".
Now if it was just this, he'd be just a creep. But he adds that he's into bdsm so that makes it legit or something.
Some other girl there is also into bdsm. Says she likes to be insulted and dominated. Creepy guy clocks her and she's like "omg k feel so understood, like is like a language only us bdsm ppl understand".
Naively, you point out creep is creepy and that bdsm girl needs to be careful. She's tells you that what creep likes exists in the bedroom in a vaccuum and totally does not bleed to his daily interactions with others.
Subby girl gets mad at you for pointing out this is nonsense and telling her nicely she needs to be more careful about this stuff. She cries, spirals, implies you are calling her a whore and now everyone hates you and says you were too rough on her and creepy creep. Most ppl there don't even know you or the argument but side subby girl because she was nice to them and u made her cry.
The feminists are probably just going to say she's traumatized or whatever, as if that excuses her being a cunt, but so are plenty of men, they're into bdsm and they are not this deluded. Men in bdsm don't allow even one ounce of the brutality to be inflicted on them that women do.
I'm really, genuinely, trying to understand this. I've been trying for years and simply can't.
And why are submissive girls always such insufferable borderline cunts? They are all meek and quiet until they find a man to hide behind.
You are in a group. It's kind of queer and stuff. Everything is chill. Some weirdo shows up, saying shit like his kink is humiliating and breaking women. He's very open about this and makes no effort in hiding it. Oh and he also casually confessed to assaulting his partner "but it was just one time years ago".
Now if it was just this, he'd be just a creep. But he adds that he's into bdsm so that makes it legit or something.
Some other girl there is also into bdsm. Says she likes to be insulted and dominated. Creepy guy clocks her and she's like "omg k feel so understood, like is like a language only us bdsm ppl understand".
Naively, you point out creep is creepy and that bdsm girl needs to be careful. She's tells you that what creep likes exists in the bedroom in a vaccuum and totally does not bleed to his daily interactions with others.
Subby girl gets mad at you for pointing out this is nonsense and telling her nicely she needs to be more careful about this stuff. She cries, spirals, implies you are calling her a whore and now everyone hates you and says you were too rough on her and creepy creep. Most ppl there don't even know you or the argument but side subby girl because she was nice to them and u made her cry.
The feminists are probably just going to say she's traumatized or whatever, as if that excuses her being a cunt, but so are plenty of men, they're into bdsm and they are not this deluded. Men in bdsm don't allow even one ounce of the brutality to be inflicted on them that women do.
I'm really, genuinely, trying to understand this. I've been trying for years and simply can't.
And why are submissive girls always such insufferable borderline cunts? They are all meek and quiet until they find a man to hide behind.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2019
Well here's problem number one.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2020
Even if it wasn't queer I have no doubt I'd run into the exact same types of characters hiding under different labels.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
If a woman got Hepatitis it means she was fucking niggers, who contracted it in prison.