The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

indian immigrants are economically beneficial i think you guys are just racist and don't like them because of there skin or religion
how do you niggas not see ragebait when it's butt naked flashing its bare oily ass cheeks at you while twerking like this 🥀

On a another note, could it be so imaginative to mandate the brown biomasses enter reeducation camps before coming to our countries? This would not only make the (((magnates))) above us happy as they can happily keep their slave cattle, but it would keep our most vulnerable members of society safe. You might say "well what stops the subhuman masses from cheating?" and who said we'd give them written examinations? We have the omniscient power of god bestowed upon us by Palantir for us to spy on every American citizen, breathing mass, or leaf in the wind with a perfect copy of their exact genome and details of their previous three lives. What stops us from bombing every brown biomass into the same strawberry pulp the rest of us are made of when it misbehaves?
 
people shouldn't be judged on appearances alone?
People should almost entirely be judged on their appearances alone browns should be wood chippered you are not human if you are brown you register below bugs to me I could hit you spit on you light your entire dirt road village on fire and it wouldn't be wrong of me to do since you are legitimate subhumans all trespasses against nonwhites is justified. Indians are a sickly people their eyes jaundice and yellow like the negro their arms are skinny and small while their bellies are fat and potted, I wouldn't be surprised if the head bobbing they do is the cause of parasites that give Indians their neurological issues from all the feces they consume and exist around like how cat owners have bugs in their brains. Sure there may have been some smart indians to exist its not impossible when you have such a huge population pool to pull from that they all won't be taken purely by the indians baser nature to consume shit they still consume shit with their higher iq its just less pronounced but on the vast majority are all a slave cast they should have been culled centuries ago when the arabs first conquered.
 
I don't think this is just in-group preference at play, it's an entire cultural mentality.
Like I said. From Iran all the way to Burma, all these people have low to non-existent honesty virtue. Their cultures just do not bring it into the picture at all through childhood and adolescence. They don't value this virtue. It's not in the bedrock of society. Without it, you can never get to high-trust.
I've had a bit of a schizo theory brewing that a lot of this sort of behaviour ties into Hinduism and its derivatives.

Semitic religions in general had a skew towards seeing Gods as being like Kings. The Ancient Semitic religion was polytheistic (many Gods) and later monoaltrous (many Gods, but we have a covenant to only worship this one), which you see hangovers from in the Bible (your God is a jealous God, the Most High divided his inheritance to the nations... the Lord's portion is His people, Jacob his allotted inheritance). Then because of the Babylonian exile they concentrated it down into monotheism with the idea of having to believe in God being the only God becoming important - i.e. orthodoxy; even more so with the emergence of Christianity and then also the destruction of the Second Temple. And from there it becomes a lot more about your belief, what's in your heart; acts of penance are largely to help demonstrate your contrition towards God to seek his forgiveness, or ultimately, as with Protestantism, irrelevant as long as you are truly sorry for your sins. God moves in mysterious ways, and your ultimate reward is in the afterlife. What is good is God's will. Our cultures built into their structures that doing bad things is a sin, and you must seek forgiveness and be truly sorry.

Proto-Indo-European religions tended to just be pure polytheism. They did have local cults (e.g. Athenians particularly venerated Athena) but there's more of a defined notion of function associated to Godhood. The Gods themselves were of creation and did not control the cosmic order, which is why they could go against it (e.g. Orestes has to avenge his father's death because of orders from Apollo, but then is tormented by the Furies for killing his mother). There are other beings that are not Gods but are not necessarily evil, and may need to be appeased or can even grant blessings (e.g. elves, fairies, nymphs, naga). You should also venerate your ancestors as they don't go on to an afterlife and should be appeased (this persists in some branches of Hinduism as Shraddha), but mostly what the Gods deal with is if they're going to give you famines and pestilence, or bounty and fertility in life. The Gods grant curses or boons based on whether you go against the natural order (kin slaying) or if you personally piss them off (oath breaking, because you invoked them to make the oath). They are appeased through sacrifice and ritual. The rituals must be performed in the correct manner - if they are done incorrectly they are ineffectual or even actively harmful (because you've pissed off someone important and they will punish you). This places the main emphasis on orthopraxy (correct practice), rather than orthodoxy (correct belief). It's why you get things like entirely Hindu villages playing recordings of Muslim prayers in old mosques;
Maadhi is another such village in Nalanda district where recorded Namaz is recited five times a day and Azan is played from a 200-year-old mosque by the people from the Hindu community. Rajiv Swami, a native of Maadhi village, said: "Being Hindu, we do not know how to offer Azan or Namaz. So we have recorded them and play them at the scheduled time every day. "We do not know who built this mosque. As there was no Muslim family staying in this village, the villagers decided to repair the structure and deputed a three-member team for its maintenance," Swami said. This mosque is now a religious place for the people from the Hindu community. Every time a marriage takes place in the village, the bride and the groom visit the mosque to seek blessings. Even after the birth of a child, the parents go to the mosque seeking long life of their kid," Swami added.
because there's an understanding that Muslim saints can bestow blessings if the ritual of worship is performed correctly, even without anyone present believing in it.

So there's already a difference there. Hinduism has more of a flexible approach - you can't be "forgiven", it's that doing bad things has bad consequences unless you do rituals to rebalance the bad consequences. Later developments in Brahmanism do begin integrating ideas of the Purusharthas, and moving away from that sort of approach, a bit like the Stoics -
By reflection, reasoning and instructions of teachers, the truth is known, Not by ablutions, not by making donations, nor by performing hundreds of breath control exercises. - Vivekachudamani
but this is again the pursuit of the scholarly class. It's argued that most Proto-Indo-European cultures had a "trifunctional" model of priestly scholars, warrior kings and agriculturalists but the Indo-Aryans bolted another one on and made them more rigid; Brahmins (priests), Kshatriya (warriors), Vaishya (agriculturalists) and Shudra (the non Indo-Aryan peasants). And the Brahmins didn't have their eyes in every temple, so it syncretised with the local Dravidian religions which were basically a form of totemism/animism (we have a local God we make offerings to who looks after the village in return for our worship, morality outside of filial duty doesn't matter so much). There are absolutely versions of Hinduism that place great emphasis on personal ethics, but there's a lot of practice that basically links outcomes to shame and duty rather than guilt and personal responsibility.

In fact, most Indian languages don't exactly have a word for "sorry". It's more "please forgive me", which sounds like a nuance without meaning - but it's not an expression of remorse, it's a request for mercy and clemency from a figure of authority (क्षमा कीजिए - kṣama kījiye - is asking the person to express kshama). As a result most apologies can feel "too formal" and even unnecessary -
Another point that sheds light is the Indian belief in service. This may be a predominantly Hindu thing, but it feels all pervasive, this philosophy of existing to serve, to fulfill our duty. Dharma. We are born to carry out a certain role, and we go through life trying to do it to the best of our abilities. Hence, if the intent is pure, why would one need to apologize for any shortcoming? It is accidental, without malice. The thinking goes, I have not set out with the intent to injure, or disappoint, or let you down. So, no apology required.
and therefore if you insist on apologising, it can even suggest you did something on purpose or that the issue is considerably more significant than it first appears
Culturally, saying sorry does not come easy to Indians and more so to Indian business and political leaders. This hesitation can perhaps be linked to the fact that in India a public apology is seen as an admission of guilt (Maddux et al, 2012) [...] Since the practice of offering a public apology is relatively new for Indian businesses, it is to be understood that an apology not delivered effectively rather than mitigating the damage, can escalate the damage done.
Educated Indians tend to calque the word "sorry" to fill the gap, but it potentially doesn't carry the same weight because it doesn't have the same cultural grounding. It might not be so much a way to say "I didn't intend for this to happen, but it has happened, and I am remorseful for it", it's just "don't be angry with me and show me mercy". After all, if you've broken from dharma, you just need to make ritual offerings to the Gods to rebalance it - and if this isn't someone in your kin-group, what does it even matter? If it's a dalit then they did something in a past life to end up being in a low caste, and being too contrite to them is imbalancing your dharma which could in turn bring ruin upon your family.

Sikhs aren't Hindus, obviously, but it's descended from the same family (they get classed separately like Buddhists and Jains because they disregard the Vedas). So it might well explain this knee jerk reaction of "he didn't intend to kill that family, show him mercy".
 
On a another note, could it be so imaginative to mandate the brown biomasses enter reeducation camps before coming to our countries?
The whole point of importing these people is that it's cheap, there's alot of them, and they're stupid. With a "Reeducation Camp" it becomes expensive to import them. You'd need "teachers", you'd need housing, you're basically housing them for free hoping they become useful (they wont). The left would see it and compare it to the Holocaust/Japanese Interment Camps, the right would throw a fit over the spending. The solution is just not bringing them here in the first place.
 
As such, they're getting what they fucking deserve. Silver lining as well, the WEF tech dystopia/15-minute cities will be Jeet run. And as such will be made of fail. Even CWCville will seem competent in comparison.
The problem is they can pay their way out of any of the shit they bring down on the country. Cities going to shit because of migrants? Get a mansion away from the city. Maybe have a pied-a-terre for those times you need to be near the company office. You replaced 30% of the population with streetshitters that can only drain resources? Just hop to a new company, or simply move places.
Money is made global so the elites can leech from whatever country is the most exploitable. But a side-effect is that they can also uproot their life the second they shat up one country. They're like pajeets in a way. Just like a pajeet runs Canada in the ground as he exploits it for remittances, a billionaire runs a country into the ground as he exploits it with cheap labor. And once the country is a shithole, they run and leave the rest with the mess.
Okay, new rule. Spoiler your public defecation pics or they're getting replaced with Johns and you're getting threadbanned for a week.
Reduce the punish! Ancient brahim tradition SAAR.
 
how do you niggas not see ragebait when it's butt naked flashing its bare oily ass cheeks at you while twerking like this 🥀
It's easy to assume that people are actually that stupid, because a large chunk of people are. That's not even getting into that fact that jeets use the exact same excuses and cope.

The eternal problem with trolling people by pretending to be retarded is that you've now convinced everybody you're retarded, and no amount of "lol i twoll yuo" is going to convince people that you aren't a drooling sped that shits himself.
 
Someone needs to start an NGO that offers free 1 way tickets to Tel Aviv to Indian nationals.

20250902_043508.webp
 
If india is so fucking awesome, why the fuck is it a trash filled, over populated, polluted shithole? Why the fuck is the national pastime getting the fuck out of india? Why do jeets need another functioning society created by white people to succeed? Indians have literally done nothing but claim that they're "necessary" while being scamming parasites. What has come out of india other than a wave of retarded shit-people? Jeets were given a functioning society by the brits and they let it go to waste - they couldn't even maintain and grow what they were given.

We don't need hundreds of millions 60IQ streetshitting skaven breeding retards in every white country.

I did "know" an indian. He was born in america and had a cushy white collar job. The last thing he said to me was that he had to have a doctor clean his ears out because he couldn't hear. LIKE BRO. YOU COULDN'T MAINTAIN EAR HYGIENE? I probably couldn't contain my face ICK spasm and he walked away. We never talked again.

Even "americanized" you people are filthy.

I guess it has a lot to do with their caste system.

It has nothing to do with castes, Jeets of all castes think they are smart for being lazy and fooling someone else into doing the work for them. When they ALL start doing that at once you hit a massive brown catch-22 where nobody wants to do the work and it never gets done. While there's no way to determine exactly when or where the singularity was passed ie a critical mass of jeets started doing this, here's a few major factors:

1. When Britain gave India their independence in 1947 (again for free just because they stink lol), India fundamentally tried to become a white country and be a democracy and have a constitution and legal system (good), but they are too brown and low iq to actually figure it out so they fucked everything up (bad).
2. In based states in America you can set up an LLC online in 3 hours and with 20 bux. In India, to actually go legit, you have to endure the massive bureaucratic nightmare that is their business registry. It takes 10 fucking years just to get a "No" response back. So jeets just set up their shop and don't care.
3. Because you are operating illegally no matter what you do, Jeets realize quick that they can either just scam everyone from whatever they were selling, or more realistically, get into a higher scam tier like running a tech scam call center or gift card scams etc. If you are gonna get in the same amount of trouble from running an actually honest supermarket versus a lucrative tech scam call center, fuck it why not do the latter?
4. No address and everyone is named the same - You can't arrest anyone and get to the bottom of things when there's 40 of them living in one bedroom and every single one of their names is the same. There's no documentation and since jeets don't have any possessions (since they have 39 roommates and all their shit gets stolen), fuck it just run away and rent a room down the shit-street until the heat is off even if they DO bother to come try to find you.
5. Courts, justice system, constitution, all are a joke in India, they take bribes, the constitution is 800 pages long and set up that way on purpose so you can get out of shit by paying someone a few bucks.
6. Punishments for crimes are a joke. They had a literal nuclear power plant meltdown (you didn't hear about it because air quality in India already so shit) and the jeets responsible got like 3 years in jail. Running tech scams against other white countries not even considered a crime.

Put all this together and you have the perfect brown storm where everyone is trying to scam each other, they realize how shit things are and all they want to do is come to white countries. They take this attitude towards everything. They know how fucked India is because they are jeets themselves so they know how everyone in the country thinks like them too. Every jeet is able to guess the insane amount of work it would take to fix this and how even if they did it'd take another 50, 100, 200 years for their shitty culture to change. When that number rose above the average life expectancy in India (which is also low because of the air cancer), that's when you know the singularity was passed and they all started to say, it'd be much easier to just run to a white country. That's why you have to keep them out, they will just re-create India there and there will be nowhere to run to.
 
Haiti/Jeet poo war, I am so ready.
1756757194742.webp
>Oh you haitians think poo is your ally saar?
>You merely adopted the poo
>I was born in poo. Molded by poo
>I didn't see the porcelain until I was already a very stinky man
>by then it was nothing to me but BLINDING SAAAAAAAAAAR
 
I don't think this is just in-group preference at play, it's an entire cultural mentality
You are correct.

The bugmen also play these games of ignoring customs/biosecurity laws, but their standard response to being caught is to simply retreat into non-comprehension of English.
 
On a another note, could it be so imaginative to mandate the brown biomasses enter reeducation camps before coming to our countries? This would not only make the (((magnates))) above us happy as they can happily keep their slave cattle, but it would keep our most vulnerable members of society safe
I have an even more radical suggestion: how about we don't allow any of them into our countries, and either exile the magnates to their literal dunghill countries, or hang them from the nearest lampost.
 
Back
Top Bottom