- Joined
- Apr 6, 2025
So what effect does phalloplasty have on voting for the pooners?great segue to get this thread back on track. so cutting of the dicks and making trannies is good for voting. understood.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what effect does phalloplasty have on voting for the pooners?great segue to get this thread back on track. so cutting of the dicks and making trannies is good for voting. understood.
Well it's not actually a dick so...So what effect does phalloplasty have on voting for the pooners?
Causes them to stay at home crying on election day. Oh wait, that’s what they do every day.So what effect does phalloplasty have on voting for the pooners?
This was in the tranny Ls thread, but I thought it made more sense to reply here.This is why when MTF troons try and minimize or remove features rather than adding them they just start to look sexless and weird, but critically, they do not start to look like women.
Genital transplants, instead of bottom surgery, would have to magically somehow actually be possible. Right now, for MTFs, bottom surgery is just giving yourself an axe wound in your crotch that smells like shit, and for FTMs, it's just attaching a flesh cylinder to your crotch that could rot off. I don't foresee genital transplants as ever actually happening, but if we're just talking hypotheticals, that's one of the things that would need to happen for me to support them. Because it's horrific seeing/hearing about sex change surgeries, and troons are far more likely to kill themselves after a sex change surgery. It never looks good. When it's "successful", that just means they got one of the less bad outcomes, but it's still bad.View attachment 7901851
From the JKR thread. It got me thinking, what evidence would you need to see to change your views on trans people? For example, if brain scans showed trans identified people were more similar to the sex they wished to be, would it change your mind? In that example, it still doesn’t match material reality. I would need to see evidence that trans is real, I’ve yet to see a convincing argument for it, and have never seen a trans person with as much conviction as a schizophrenic person believing they’re actually Jesus.
Nothing. I disagree that this would make me a fundamentalist. I have far too much experience with trannies and I have dealt with them enough that I am convinced that nothing good can come with interacting with them. My stance is borne from experience, not unwavering belief. Trannies are, at best, something to be treated with great caution and a rapid exit to be made when possible because they will turn violent. Not necessarily physically violent, but they will find some way to impose their will on others and it is incredibly unpleasant.View attachment 7901851
From the JKR thread. It got me thinking, what evidence would you need to see to change your views on trans people? For example, if brain scans showed trans identified people were more similar to the sex they wished to be, would it change your mind? In that example, it still doesn’t match material reality. I would need to see evidence that trans is real, I’ve yet to see a convincing argument for it, and have never seen a trans person with as much conviction as a schizophrenic person believing they’re actually Jesus.
For me to accept trannies, they would need to prove that a sane man would cut his penis off because he wants to be a woman. Good luck with that.View attachment 7901851
From the JKR thread. It got me thinking, what evidence would you need to see to change your views on trans people? For example, if brain scans showed trans identified people were more similar to the sex they wished to be, would it change your mind? In that example, it still doesn’t match material reality. I would need to see evidence that trans is real, I’ve yet to see a convincing argument for it, and have never seen a trans person with as much conviction as a schizophrenic person believing they’re actually Jesus.
If people can actually change their sex then I would probably (key word there) change my mind. However, even if there was overwhelming evidence that showed trans was real and their brains really matched the genders they identified with, the truth of the matter is that sex changes are impossible. (and if they argue that they don't get sex changes but "Gender reassignment surgery" it still would be pointless because an axe wound is not a vagina and vice versa with flesh cylinders) the fact that so many trans people try hard to convince people that it is one only proves how delusional these people are. If they really had lady brains then theirs would be dysphoric over the surgery because it would know that's not a vagina or a penis.From the JKR thread. It got me thinking, what evidence would you need to see to change your views on trans people? For example, if brain scans showed trans identified people were more similar to the sex they wished to be, would it change your mind? In that example, it still doesn’t match material reality. I would need to see evidence that trans is real, I’ve yet to see a convincing argument for it, and have never seen a trans person with as much conviction as a schizophrenic person believing they’re actually Jesus.
Yeah but their excuse is that society refuses to accept them when they got the "right genitals". Honestly, I can't for the life of me understand why handmaidens try really hard to convince people that the surgeries these people get is exactly like the real thing. The fact that these people think axe wounds are exactly like real vaginas or that the flesh cylinders TIFs get are like a real penis speaks volume over how bad the American education got. Even I know that there's more to the vagina than a gapping hole, but TRAs have really convinced themselves that doctors have really found a way to swap genitals. If this was true, why are TIMs who detransition unable to have biological children then?Because it's horrific seeing/hearing about sex change surgeries, and troons are far more likely to kill themselves after a sex change surgery. It never looks good. When it's "successful", that just means they got one of the less bad outcomes, but it's still bad.
It depends on what you mean by 'change my views', honestly.View attachment 7901851
From the JKR thread. It got me thinking, what evidence would you need to see to change your views on trans people? For example, if brain scans showed trans identified people were more similar to the sex they wished to be, would it change your mind? In that example, it still doesn’t match material reality. I would need to see evidence that trans is real, I’ve yet to see a convincing argument for it, and have never seen a trans person with as much conviction as a schizophrenic person believing they’re actually Jesus.
I wouldn't fret over it. There doesn't have to actually be contrary evidence. The idea is that if there were contrary evidence, you'd be able to change your mind. We know there isn't, and it's pretty hard to imagine there would ever be. However, we certainly wouldn't refuse to change our mind on principle rather than reason.View attachment 7901851
From the JKR thread. It got me thinking, what evidence would you need to see to change your views on trans people? For example, if brain scans showed trans identified people were more similar to the sex they wished to be, would it change your mind? In that example, it still doesn’t match material reality. I would need to see evidence that trans is real, I’ve yet to see a convincing argument for it, and have never seen a trans person with as much conviction as a schizophrenic person believing they’re actually Jesus.
I know I'm kinda late and gay, but I still wanted to respond to this. Not necessarily an opposing view, mostly adding on.there are different types of women (shocker) and different reasons women become pooners, dont compare it to troons where like 90% of it is for gooning reasons. for women who feel weak and disadvantaged by society, there is actually benefit to wanting to disguise as a man to be taken more seriously, or as a direct opposite to troons, to make themselves unfuckable and not a target for sexual violence.
for men, there's not really much tangible benefit to dressing up as a woman, except just to fulfill fantasies that make their dick hard, or escape from the pressures to be a strong manly man.
There is nothing that can change my opinions on troons, because every single reason for trooning out is retarded and often degenerate. Letting these thoughts manifest into physical alterations also brings social consequences that the rest of us have to deal with.From the JKR thread. It got me thinking, what evidence would you need to see to change your views on trans people? For example, if brain scans showed trans identified people were more similar to the sex they wished to be, would it change your mind? In that example, it still doesn’t match material reality. I would need to see evidence that trans is real, I’ve yet to see a convincing argument for it, and have never seen a trans person with as much conviction as a schizophrenic person believing they’re actually Jesus.
They pretty much already consider any push back against trans ideology as genocide. If such a pill existed, they would call it conversion therapy, try to draw parallels to anti-gay movements of the past, and still insist on transitioning as the somehow more "natural" or "moral" option (even though it is clearly a medical nightmare).Different hypothetical I've personally wondered about:
If a pill was invented that completely got rid of gender dysphoria without any need to transition on any level, how do you think progressives would take it?
From observing debate in like the deaf community where some deaf people label treatment as cultural genocide I'm inclined to think a lot of trans people would react like that.
The gender dysphoria argument was a gambit for acceptance.If some guy wants to date men, or wear dresses and make-up, or be referred to as a woman, then that's their right!
The progs are fixated on pushing the moral boundary (it's literally in their name) and recent success has gone to their heads. I can only imagine this will lead to some breaking point where they find most of their work undone, just because they don't know when to stop.Oh, you've got a severe disorder that renders you extremely distressed with your sex? Well, I suppose I could accommodate you in that case.
most straight romance is aimed at the male gaze
This is patently false. You're either a woman purposefully lying to make women as a whole look better or a man who doesn't know what female goon material is like.women don't want to be reminded of rape in their erotica
It's still kind of taboo for women to directly want sex and so the erotica they put out tends to be extra freaky in response - it's full of rape fantasies because it's a vehicle for getting the female lead into sexual situations without her seeking it out.A shit load of romantic and straight up porn for women also has a lot of rape in it. Either of the "starts to like it" variety or the hero saving the damsel from being forced upon. Which is also a huge thing...a lot of main characters in romance for women lack agency and the entirety of the romantic arc is decided by the male lead's actions. Even if on the surface it may seem to have the trappings of her being a stronk independent womxn! when you pay attention to how it's actually written she just basically emotionally reacts to other character's and various plot devices. When you get into the yaoi schlock you're looking at even more rapey bull.
I think a pill would only be developed if it was marketable, and although some trans people insist that no one would choose their lifestyle, it’s unlikely many are pushing for a cure for gender dysphoria. I think I saw in the tranny Ls thread that one of them had stopped transitioning after taking Ozempic, like the desire had just completely gone, so I do wonder if that will be looked into more. It’s as another poster above me said, they will call it conversion therapy and not allow anyone to take it, even if they want to, which is ironic.Different hypothetical I've personally wondered about:
If a pill was invented that completely got rid of gender dysphoria without any need to transition on any level, how do you think progressives would take it?
From observing debate in like the deaf community where some deaf people label treatment as cultural genocide I'm inclined to think a lot of trans people would react like that.