- Joined
- Feb 25, 2024
Is it going in 30 sec intervals? I restarted recently with the extra long option. Not sure if it's me you're picking up or someone else.Decoding successfully on 7096 USB
View attachment 7913504
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it going in 30 sec intervals? I restarted recently with the extra long option. Not sure if it's me you're picking up or someone else.Decoding successfully on 7096 USB
View attachment 7913504
Well you're got one good DX with Flux, my equipment isn't exactly the fanciest nor the most noise free environment so it's not a big surprise I can't hear it. Thanks for giving it a go!Well I double checked and I'm well within the digi-mode & CW only part of the band so he can shove off to another frequency. I'll be done in 65 minutes or my radio explodes whichever happens first.
Also my radio is set to transmit on U-Digi, USB Digital Mode (it limits my power output and supposedly helps with the CAT control.)
No problem, won't be able to make it through even like a fourth of it before my battery gives out sadly (didn't expect the bulletin to be so long) but its the shitpost that counts. Right now I'm on 7097.5 I believe, running the 30 second mode. If any of you got me, let me know. I'll see if I can get a better antenna by the time we do this again (if we do)THE IONOSPHERE WANTS MY SHITPOST TO PROPIGATE
truly the world is healing.
Also, thank you, Channel Cat , for re-transmitting on your end.


This was fun! As expected, my battery sadly couldn't take it, but looking at @888Flux's images shows that he got me, yeah. I suggest if the newslines are gonna be long to have a summary/abbreviated version at the beginning like this:KiwiNet AAR
- Technical problems nearly delayed the transmission, all 15 minutes of testing time needed to get new computer online.
- Transmission began at 2101, estimated time to complete was 103 minutes, 45 seconds. Brevity is needed in the future.
- Primary frequency was clear at the beginning, but a Mexican phone station (that' s just voice, talking into the microphone) did begin to interfere somewhere around the 20 minute mark, reported by @Jotch
- Transmission ended at 35 minutes when my radio halted transmission to avoid overheating. I decided to end the test. the resulted in over half of the planned transmission not being sent, but a text copy has been attached ITT
- @Channel Catfish assisted and transmitted as well when it became clear we could not receive each other.
- @888Flux was able to receive and decode the partial transmission at -10db The last part of the message i sent was encouraging people to watch Erika Kirk's speech she gave yesterday.
Overall, we should consider this a success. Transmission was received and decoded by at least one forum user!
Future transmissions will need to follow the FCC guideline of 15 on, 2 off, to protect my rig from overheating. Until I can afford an amplifier, propagation should not be expected to improve. Cooperative re-transmitting and simul-transmitting will be necessary to maximize propagation if that's the goal. I had fun though, and so long as next week is a slow news week I might be able to avoid caveman-esque summaries. I can see why S2 picked this method for his news transmissions that he does.
Interesting. You run an EFHW, right? Have you checked the SWR while you were transmitting? It's possible some power may have been lost if the SWR wasn't that great - wouldn't be too much of a problem at say 20 watts, but with only 5, every bit counts. Keep in mind that there is also more noise on 40 meters than there is on 20 meters and so on. 20 meters is very much open at night, meaning it may be worth thinking about going there or at least one operator going there too at the risk of greater amount of non-Farmer eyes on a no-callsign operation.Just reviewed my FT8 propagation and not a single station picked me up. I think i have an antenna issue, because i can hit 1050 miles on 20m FT8, but not a single beacon on 40m picked me up.
Truthfully: Go for it, do it in the ISM band or something and nobody will really give that much of a fuck if you're just pinging the moon.Hey this is probably the wrong place to ask but I might as well anyways as a science experiment I've always wanted to build a radar to bounce a signal off the moon and use that to estimate the range what sort of licenses would I need or could I just do it in the middle of the night?
I was thinking about building my own set using a microwave magnetron as my RF source doing my own wave guides etc.Truthfully: Go for it, do it in the ISM band or something and nobody will really give that much of a fuck if you're just pinging the moon.
But this is actually a whole thing. If you get a ham license and radio you can actually talk to people with moonbounce.
As for the gear, I could say but someone will know the modern meta better than I.
Technician license allows you 1500W on basically all the bands above 50mhz.Hey this is probably the wrong place to ask but I might as well anyways as a science experiment I've always wanted to build a radar to bounce a signal off the moon and use that to estimate the range what sort of licenses would I need or could I just do it in the middle of the night?
What do you plan to use as a receiver? SDR dongle? A microwave oven magnetron is not going to put out a very clean signal.I was thinking about building my own set using a microwave magnetron as my RF source doing my own wave guides etc.