- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Again, you're failing to understand the situation Curt was in, and the social context. Curt was a vendor at a comic show. In that situation, his primary goal is to make money. As any smart businessman would know, trying to obtain sex from the exact same people you're trying to get money from tends to be a bad move. Now, it is forgivable that you don't understand this, since you probably have never had to do business in a scenario like that. That is why I'm explaining to you that your reasoning is flawed: claiming this was "sexual oneupsmanship" is a clear sign that you're the kind of person who cannot separate business from personal pleasure-- and exactly the kind of person who wouldn't understand why a girl having fun at your comic table isn't "success with the opposite sex".It's not flawed. That was sexual oneupmanship. Stop lying.
To be clear, this isn't an attack. I'm just stating categorically that you do. not. understand.
Furthermore, you're repeating the same points over and over, suggesting that you no longer have a way of illustrating your point. As I said both yesterday and today, you're not especially adept at defending your perspective, and it might be a good exercise for you to ask about things you don't understand.